CoolUsername's Posts
Nairaland Forum › CoolUsername's Profile › CoolUsername's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 (of 189 pages)
Wilgrea7:I think you're wrong about the definition macroevolution, there. It is simply microevolution over a long period of time. |
If man evolved from ape, why do we still have apes . Checkmate atheists. /s |
At least, theists get GODzilla. Atheism is a non-prophet organization. |
![]()
|
KingEbukasBlog:Nah, it's just a comic satirizing crappy creationist arguments. You know, like when they say that God didn't create the stars after light but just regulated in relation to earth and off-the-wall bullsh*t like that. You know the type, right? ![]() |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_as_fact_and_theory?_e_pi_=7%2CPAGE_ID10%2C2301186425 Let's not debate this. |
KingEbukasBlog:Once again you've murdered logic. I cannot even begin to argue. |
KingEbukasBlog:Finally, a chance to post this satire comic. Thank you! EDIT: Picture didn't show up as I'd 've liked it to. Posting the link instead: http://www.smbc-comics.com/?id=2703
|
Some Nigerian guys must be fashionistas considering how deep in the closet they are. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/14/gay-porn-pakistan_n_3437529.html |
gaelllic:Funny that you believe animals can split with such diversity from a common ancestor in a few thousand years but cannot accept evolution. |
kevoh:That's okay, just take some time off work/school. |
Religion is like a work of fiction. When I watch Star Wars, I'm not trying to look at the science behind intergalactic travel or lightsabres, I'm just trying to watch a good movie and be entertained. This is known as 'willing suspension of disbelief' (WARNING: That site Will Ruin Your Life). Religious conditioning encourages that sort of thinking. It's usually called 'faith'. With faith, people are just supposed to take things at face value and have a good time or risk spoiling the fun. |
hopefulLandlord:Just viewed the thread.
|
I think the major problem is that moderates would quickly speak out to clear Islam's name once things get violent while at the same time implicitly agree with the reasoning behind the violence. The fact is that there were no Christians, Jews, Buddhists, or atheists in that angry mob, or in ISIS for that matter, but don't let me digress. The point is this, these extremists are a bigger threat to what you claim type religion is about than any islamophobe. So don't ignore the problem or shift the blame. |
Ranchhoddas:How much of a choice do you really get? Indoctrination, like I said can cause a person to hold deep beliefs in matters. This, coupled with the fact that most religious tenets are not to be questioned or changed, isn't exactly going to produce an open mind in that area. Isn't that what faith is all about? That's exactly why we see people trying to twist the words of their holy books in a bid to for them into reality. I'm not going to answer your accusation, it's baseless and unfounded. |
Ranchhoddas:Of course atheistic indoctrination is a thing. There are a lot of atheists who practise that, but atheists are by no means monolithic. I, for one, would raise my child without religion; he/she can later make that choice once mature enough. The problem is that indoctrination is intrinsic to EVERY. SINGLE. RELIGION that I know. True or false? |
felixomor:And the picture he posted is false in both cases, right? Where is the fraud here? |
felixomor:You say his diagram is fraudulent. Yet you bring one that only shows one foetal stage. The test ate early stages of embryonic development. Christian al- taqiyya? |
Ranchhoddas:That's not what this is about. We know what childhood indoctrination can do to a person (see ISIS, Boko Haram, etc.) All OP is saying is that it creates bias in the child's mind and hinders said child's ability to make informed decisions in the future. The worst aspect of this is that you can make a child believe anything whatsoever through indoctrination. Have you been taking blue pill lately? |
The fact that childhood indoctrination is such an important part of most religious shows the poverty of said religions. The total absence of fact proof is the reason why it is best peddled to the vulnerable; whether they are young children, bereaved, indigent, life the like. That seems to be the best time to sell your religion. This type of thought conditioning borders on emotional abuse, especially when practised in children. But that's the world we live in... |
KingEbukasBlog:Till then, I guess. |
KingEbukasBlog:Man, just stop. If you define macro-evolution honestly, then there's plenty of evidence. http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/section5.html#speciations We know it's possible. So you should provide evidence as to how people had such technology in the B.C. period but nothing like that shows up in recorded history. I can clearly see that your problem with evolution isn't rational, in your own thread, you told Christians not to accept it because Jesus can't be an evolved ape. You tried to appeal to my pride by questioning how I can believe I share common ancestry with the ape. Our beliefs have no effect on reality. I'm waiting for your evidence. |
KingEbukasBlog:Is this what you eschew modern scientific fact for? Your personal theological headcanon? Your stories are not validated by reality. They aren't even validated by the Bible. Where is the evidence of prehistoric technology? You reject solid proof of evolution when you can't even give solid proof of the epic fantasy series you've come to with. Sickening! |
KingEbukasBlog:Why don't look up the meaning of the word 'tower'? Guys who hadn't even invented toilet paper yet wanted to build an interdimensional portal? It's funny that people want to make laws based on beliefs that border on fan fiction. No matter how you slice it, the things you are saying have no basis in reality. |
KingEbukasBlog:And I'm supposed to take that seriously, right? Your pathetic attempt to twist the words in your Bible only goes to show the amount of mental gymnastics you go through to maintain your belief. |
Because I own up to my shortcomings and try to improve on myself. |
Gerrard59:Finally, someone who understands. |
What is this? What the hell is this?! GMOs are safe to eat, and this debate has been laid to rest a long time ago (among credible scientists, at least). Their safety has been affirmed by every major worldwide health organization. Research shows us that GMOs make up at least 70% of the feed for hundreds of billions of farm animals, year after year for 29 years with no negative effects. Source: http://www.forbes.com/sites/jonentine/2014/09/17/the-debate-about-gmo-safety-is-over-thanks-to-a-new-trillion-meal-study/#2395e842ca93 Here are 1,783 different scientific studies affirming the safety of GMOs: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/07388551.2013.823595 Now don't get me wrong, genetic modification is neither inherently safe nor harmful but rather, a tool that can be utilized for good or for evil. Regulation and scrutiny for each individual case is necessary but fear-mongering is not. They would prove to be an important tool in feeding the ever-growing world population. |
4kings:I came to learn. I don't really know the nitty-gritty of pantheism. |
Surprisingly good thread.
|
CAPSLOCKED:Moderates vs extremists.
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 (of 189 pages)
. 





lol, any contribution?