Curious345's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Curious345's Profile › Curious345's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 (of 348 pages)
ReligiousCritic:hahahah |
This drunkard Mr Peacemaker5128 needs to be forced and caged In a rehab asap |
Seun Love lust with Reno omokri is now visible like full blown AIDS |
georgeakins:here you're seen insulting a tribe .. georgeakins:here you're insulting pastor EA Adeboye georgeakins:. Here you're insulting DK olukoya of mfm. georgeakins:. Here you're seen insulting oyedepo of living Faith church ... |
Nice one ... at least Se is proactive regarding security .. Where are the Judas troops seen frolicking with Fulani terrorist in Katsina recently |
Just be careful with Akure girls.. let me not talk yet shaaa |
Austineva:Biafra with only 5 states ? Biafra is an ideological thing. Not real persay |
Tinubu is not holy afterall |
Lok |
Rubbish. Let them head toward Niger State where Allahu Akbar screaming fulanis shot down a $150m dollar attack helicopter 🚁🚁🚁 killing airmen in the melee |
That should be obi . Not Tinubu. .this rigging must be reversed |
Lagos is a gangster paradise |
The most useless place to live and raise children is in the SW.. your child may end up as a thug |
Lagos is a thug paradise ... A shanty town. Gangs of Lagos is real |
Violence against Ibos occurred in phases. Significant “group-targeted” violence began as early as 1945, but the major and sustained phases began in 1966. About 30,000 Ibos, mostly civilians, were killed in three waves of genocidal attacks between May 29 and September 29, 1966. The killings were indiscriminate except that victims were Ibos, and they were killed for being Ibos. The killings were not outcomes of mob actions or riots. Evidence from survivors, victims and observers of the genocides prove that the various acts of violence against the Igbos were deliberated and coordinated by highly placed northern politicians with the connivance of some officers of the federal government. The instigation for violence against Ibos in 1966 derived from various incitements by government functionaries who complained bitterly about Ibo dominance of commerce in the north. This complaint was extended to mean the existence of an Igbo conspiracy to become the new rulers of independent Nigeria. The pattern of violence during the pogroms (May 29, July 29 and September 29, 1966) was similar to the attack against the Ibos during the civil war that would last for more than 3 years, between July 1967 and January 1970. Although official hostilities were declared between the federal and Biafran side, the conduct of the war by the federal troops in some instances offended the laws of war and invoked images of the pre-war violence against the Ibo. Even when Biafran strongholds were overrun by the federal side and there were no effective resistances, the genocidal dimensions of the war continued to manifest. Several foreign and local journalists reported cruel attacks on Ibos who were neither belligerents or in the way of battle. There are many documented testimonies of victims and observers about the gross cruelty and barbarism of the Nigerian soldiers meted on Igbos civilians even after the surrender of Biafran rebel soldiers, acts that raised the question of a genocidal motivation. At least that was the conclusion of the Investigators of the International Commission of Jurists led by Dr. Mensah of Ghana. According to Dr. Mensah he received evidence from two witnesses about mass graves where dead, sick and wounded Biafrans were buried alive with some sucklings and “the cries and wailing of the sick, the wounded and the babies could be heard from a long distance away.” In this testimony, it was also mentioned that, when these mass graves had been covered, the Federal soldiers danced native war dances over them. Dr Mensa concluded that “I am of the opinion that in many of these cases cited to me hatred of the Biafrans (mainly Igbos) and a wish to exterminate them was a foremost motivational factor.”3 There is no doubt from the evidence of international and local observers of the pogroms of 1966 and the three year civil war that Biafran civilians, especially Ibos, were victims of gross cruelty reminiscent of the Jewish genocide. There is sufficient evidence that the masterminds of these attacks were motivated, as Dr. Mensah put it in the ICJ Report, by a “wish to exterminate” the Ibos. But how does this motivation square up with the policy and politics of the war? Is it really the fact that other ethnic groups, especially the Hausa-Fulani in northern Nigeria, wanted the Ibos completely wiped out or driven out of Nigeria? The difficulty in understanding the genocidal behavior derives mainly from the nature of the civil war: how to reconcile the genocidal intent with the determination to keep Biafrans in Nigeria? It will appear that rather than other Nigerian ethnic groups wanting the Igbo outside the federation, they wanted them inside. Given that genocide usually involves determination to drive the victimized ethnic or religious group out of the territorial space, how do we understand the sort of genocide that wants the victims inside rather than outside? However, based on official statements, we can give the benefit of doubt to Gowon and conclude that in spite of brutality and violence against civilians, acts that contravened the Geneva Conventions, the policy for taking arms against Biafra was to crush Ojukwu’s rebellion and maintain the federation. But this conclusion has to explain such egregious violence against ordinary Ibos and statements by Nigeria war commanders like Benjamin Adekunle, a.k.a. “Black Scorpion,” that “I want to see no Red Cross, no Caritas, no World Council of Churches, no Pope, no missionary and no UN delegation. I want to prevent even one Ibo from having even one piece to eat before their capitulation. We shoot at everything that moves and when our troops march into the center of Ibo territory, we shoot at everything even at things that do not move…”9 Is such statement part of the conduct of a dirty war or does it evince a “motivation” to genocide? At a minimum, we can argue that there was strong hatred and demonization of the Ibos, which made such cruelty and gory killing of civilians conceivable and tolerable, even in the context of a civil war.
|
Do more |
Dey play |
Terrorist and not gunmen naptu2: |
In this dispensation , Yoruba will pay protection charge to Sam Larry and MC oluomo while Fulani and Hausa will pay to Bello turji. Security will be worse off |
Those communities can sue the APC for not protecting them |
Tinubu is still sleeping on a bicycle |
seunmsg:are you seek? |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 (of 348 pages)