₦airaland Forum

MindHacker9009:
Constantine and his generals were worshipers of the cult of Sol Invictus which had a strong influence on Roman religious life in the 3rd and early 4th centuries. December 25, the Dies Natalis Solis Invicti (the "Birthday of the Unconquered Sun", was a significant celebration for the followers of this cult, coinciding with the winter solstice and the rebirth of the sun. There are similarities between the Roman pagan worship of Sol Invictus (Unconquered Son) and Christianity, such as the Sunday mass and the divine celebrations around Christmas.

This was how Constantine's mum discovered that cross of Jesus christ about three hundred years later. According to Christian tradition, the site where Jesus was crucified, Golgotha, had been buried and lost under a pagan temple built by the Romans. This temple was erected under Emperor Hadrian to obscure the memory of Jesus' crucifixion.
Helena ordered the demolition of this pagan temple and began excavations at the site.
During the excavation, three crosses were found. According to the story, these were the crosses used for the crucifixion of Jesus and the two thieves who were crucified alongside him.
After the discovery, the True Cross became an object of great veneration. Portions of the cross were sent to various churches around the empire, while a significant portion was kept in Jerusalem. The event also led to the construction of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre by Constantine at the site of the discovery.
This story of the discovery of the True Cross is central to Christian tradition, some historians view the narrative with skepticism, suggesting it may have been influenced by religious enthusiasm or later embellishment. The story has had a significant impact on Christian practice and the spread of Christian relics throughout Europe and the rest of the world.

If you are not a scammer you'll accept these stories of Jesus christ was made up to please those that are not Jews but wanted a way to become part of the Jewish religion so a virgin birth of  man/god was the best invention that those that are naive would believe.

Our man has gone from kuku to totally bonkers. What has any of these to do with what you were asked:

But the important question (which you dodged because you know you're talking nonsense) is, why would Rome let a Christ they invented transcend their own gods? They no longer believed the sun was god, nor Zeus, nor the emperor. Not only that, the emperor was now a lowly sinner headed to hell.
Also, this sinless Christ they invented was not crucified by their enemies but by they themselves! Not only that, all Christ-related stories put their country and leaders in bad light - not a single positive image of Rome in a story they invented! Those Romans must have really suddenly gone bananas😅!

I see you are NOT debating that those closest to Constantine were already Christians BEFORE he said he saw a sign.
You've already been told that non-fundamental aspects of Christianity were modified to accommodate new converts. You don't make people to suddenly change from Sunday to Saturday when Saturday worship was not fundamental to Christianity, neither was the exact birth date of Christ nor even it's celebration at all!

MindHacker9009:
Your mind is so deluded that's why you have resulted into calling yourself first a child now kuku.

Constantine 1, also known as Constantine the Great, the first Roman emperor to become a Christian Constantine's conversion to Christianity is traditionally associated with the Battle of the Milvian Bridge in 312 AD. Before this crucial battle, Constantine reportedly had a vision or dream in which he saw a Christian symbol (the Chi-Rho or the cross) and heard the words, "In this sign, conquer" ("In hoc signo vinces" in Latin). Inspired by this vision, Constantine had his soldiers paint the symbol on their shields and won the battle. This experience is considered a pivotal moment in his conversion.
Researchers today have shown proof that he only used his vision of christ to get Christians into his army to help him fight and win the battle. There are similarities between the Roman pagan worship of Sol Invictus (Unconquered Son) and Christianity, such as the Sunday mass and the divine celebrations around Christmas. So it was the religion of  Sol Invictus that got converted to Christianity by linking it to the expected Messiah in Judaism.   
 St. Helena Constantine's mum, who converted earlier, oversaw the construction of churches on Holy Land sites. She would later be credited with discovering the cross upon which Jesus Christ is believed to have been crucified and this was three hundred years later after the crucifixion for your invented Jesus christ.
The OT we have today is not the original Torah, the first Original Torah from Abraham was taken away or destroyed when the first Temple was destroyed by the Bybelonians. The second Torah written after the return from Babylon was taken away to Rome and hidden away by the Roman empire before the destruction of the second Temple in seventy AD. It was from this second Torah that they wrote the OT to suit their own agender. 
Because of the influence of printing and a demand for Scriptures in the vernacular, William Tyndale began working on a New Testament translation directly from the Greek in 1523. After church authorities in England prevented him from translating the Bible there, he went to Germany in 1524, receiving financial support from wealthy London merchants. His New Testament translation was completed in July 1525 and printed at Cologne. Again under pressure, this time from the city authorities, Tyndale fled to Worms, where two more editions were published in 1525. The first copies were smuggled into England in 1526, where they were at once proscribed.

Tyndale continued to work on the Old Testament translation but was captured in Antwerp before it was completed. Condemned for heresy, he was executed by strangulation and then burned at the stake at Vilvoorde in 1536.
If your mind is not deluded you would ask why he was eliminated. This reason is because if people have a translation they can read by themselves they would know the stories do not add up.

Several scholars have questioned or disputed the historicity of Jesus Christ, particularly focusing on whether or not Jesus was a historical figure or how much of the Gospel accounts can be seen as historically reliable. While these scholars come from different academic backgrounds and often have nuanced views, here are some notable ones who have either questioned the historicity of Jesus or at least aspects of the traditional narratives surrounding him:

1. Bruno Bauer (1809–1882)
A 19th-century German philosopher and theologian, Bauer is one of the earliest scholars to systematically deny the historicity of Jesus. He argued that the New Testament accounts of Jesus were mythological and that Christianity emerged from a synthesis of Jewish and Hellenistic ideas.

2. Arthur Drews (1865–1935)
A German philosopher and writer, Drews was a prominent proponent of the Christ Myth Theory. His book The Christ Myth (1909) argued that Jesus was a mythological figure and that the stories in the Gospels were later fabrications.

3. G.A. Wells (1926–2017)
A British scholar, Wells was one of the leading proponents of the Christ Myth Theory in the 20th century. In works like Did Jesus Exist? (1975), he argued that there is little evidence to support the existence of Jesus as a historical figure, claiming that the New Testament accounts are largely mythical.

4. Robert M. Price (b. 1954)
An American theologian and New Testament scholar, Price is known for questioning the historicity of Jesus. In books such as The Christ-Myth Theory and Its Problems (2011), Price argues that Jesus likely did not exist as a historical figure and that the Gospel stories are influenced by mythological and literary motifs from the surrounding culture.

5. Earl Doherty (b. 1941)
A Canadian author and proponent of the mythicist position, Doherty argues in his book The Jesus Puzzle (1999) that the early Christian writings, including Paul’s letters, describe a spiritual, not a historical, Jesus. He suggests that the historical Jesus was a later invention.

6. Richard Carrier (b. 1969)
A modern American historian and philosopher, Carrier is one of the most prominent contemporary proponents of the Christ Myth Theory. In his book On the Historicity of Jesus (2014), Carrier uses Bayesian probability to argue that Jesus was likely a mythological figure.

7. Thomas L. Thompson (b. 1939)
A biblical scholar associated with the Copenhagen School of biblical criticism, Thompson has focused primarily on the Old Testament but has also raised questions about the historicity of Jesus. In his book The Messiah Myth: The Near Eastern Roots of Jesus and David (2005), he argues that much of the narrative surrounding Jesus (and David) is mythological.

8. John M. Allegro (1923–1988)
A British archaeologist and Dead Sea Scrolls scholar, Allegro gained controversy for his unconventional views. In his book The Sacred Mushroom and the Cross (1970), Allegro suggested that early Christian mythology was tied to fertility cults and hallucinogenic mushrooms. While not directly arguing for the non-historicity of Jesus, his work sparked significant controversy and skepticism about traditional narratives.

9. Alvar Ellegård (1919–2008)
A Swedish scholar, Ellegård proposed that Paul’s depiction of Jesus refers not to a historical figure but to a spiritual entity. In Jesus—One Hundred Years Before Christ (1999), he controversially suggested that Jesus might have been a figure from a century earlier than traditionally believed.

10. Timothy Freke and Peter Gandy
Authors of The Jesus Mysteries: Was the "Original Jesus" a Pagan God? (1999), Freke and Gandy argue that the story of Jesus was adapted from pre-existing pagan mythologies, particularly the dying-and-rising gods of the ancient world.

What's the next garbage in you deluded mind kuku?

See this one, trying to obscure fundamental nonsense with copious, voluminous, ramblings. Ain't gonna work. Here it is again:

Do you know that every important person around Constantine was already a Christian before that sign - including his own mother and top generals, that he ultimately really had no choice?
But the important question (which you dodged because you know you're talking nonsense) is, why would Rome let a Christ they invented transcend their own gods? They no longer believed the sun was god, nor Zeus, nor the emperor. Not only that, the emperor was now a lowly sinner headed to hell.
Also, this sinless Christ they invented was not crucified by their enemies but by they themselves! Not only that, all Christ-related stories put their country and leaders in bad light - not a single positive image of Rome in a story they invented! Those Romans must have really suddenly gone bananas😅!

As Christianity grew, of course concessions were made in non-fundamebtal things to accommodate the new converts. One of them was Sunday worship - since Christ said we should worship God everyday.

FxMasterz:
Very articulate analogy.

Articulate but flawed. That's what happens when you try to apply extremely limited human logic to things of God. Where did the someone (devil) come from? Who created him and why is he indestructible? Why weren't the robots made with the correction consciousness already installed? Or, once it was discovered they had gone bad, why not destroy the original two that started everything instead of going to all that trouble?Then the ultimate question, why suddenly start building robots at all with all the attendant headahes, when you were doing just fine without them?! WeirdAlien

MindHacker9009:
You have no where to start other than from your convoluted and deluded mind that is making you to display your madness. You are a scammer you know the story of Jesus christ is a made up story but you are happy to use it to scam others who are still naive and are believing such nonsense.

These are the images of the kind of stuff under the Christian temples in Rome which shows that they still had their gods in those temples and that Christianity was only used to unite all the different pagan religions in the Roman empire in order to unit the empire which was about to crumble at that time.
Constantine made Christianity the official religion of Rome after he claimed he saw a vision of the cross in the sky bearing the inscription "Hoc signo victor eris" ('by this sign, you will conquer') just before the Battle of the Milvian Bridge which he worn and became the emperor of Rome. He's believe was that it was Jesus christ that showed him the vision that made him to win the war.
But in 70 AD your invented Jesus christ did not help his own people in Jerusalem to defeat the pagan Roman empire but decided to help a Roman pagan emperor to win his war in Rome.

Christ was not mentioned in the OT, Joseph was not the biological father of your invented Jesus christ. And even the genealogy was invented as the two genealogies contradict each other.
The word in Hebrew in the OT is Almah meaning a young lady, also the baby would come from a man and a woman, but to invent your christ it was changed to a virgin and a half man half god from the Roman empire's pagan beliefs.
There are similarities between the Roman pagan worship of Sol Invictus (Unconquered Son) and Christianity, such as the Sunday mass and the divine celebrations around Christmas.

Kuku.. kuku.. kuku...
I'd stop calling you child because that's an insult to children. I'd simply call you Kuku!😆

Do you know that every important person around Constantine was already a Christian before that sign - including his own mother and top generals, that he ultimately really had no choice? But the important question (which you dodged because you know you're talking nonsense) is, why would Rome let a Christ they invented transcend their own gods? They no longer believed the sun was god, nor Zeus, nor the emperor. Not only that, the emperor was a lowly sinner headed to hell.
Also, this sinless Christ they invented was not o be crucified by their enemies but by they themselves! Not only that, all Christ-related stories put their country and leaders in bad light - not a single positive image of Rome in a story they invented! Those Romans must have really suddenly gone bananas😅!

At least we now know you're NOT saying the OT was also invented, nether were the apostles and their works. Only Christ! If you were not kukuish you'd have seen that the stories are intertwined, that they can't be separated. You should have claimed ALL the Bible was made up by Rome. That way there'd be no pretense about not lying.
See below, how many times various scholars (including atheists and Jews) said Christ's comming was prophesied in the OT.

MindHacker9009:
Listen kid, that shows it's a made up story as the Jews were expecting a Messiah like Moses, Joshua, King David or Samson to come and defeat the Romans occupying their land and there were extremists among the Jewish Zealots turned to terrorism and assassination like is going on in the Middle East today and they became known as Sicarii (Greek sikarioi, “dagger men”).
They frequented public places with hidden daggers to strike down persons friendly to the Roman empire occupying Israel 2000 years ago] https://www.britannica.com/topic/Zealot . 
So the Roman empire had to invent a peaceful turn the other cheek messiah they named Jesus christ as a psychological warfare to reprogram the minds of the Jewish Zealots that were wagging a gorilla against the Romans for in the first century and into the second century.  

So, kid, why don't you grab your feeding bottle with baby food, sit down quietly, and let the real adults here like myself and Sonmvayina, teach you some real history of the invention of your Jesus christ.

Wow! Just wow!! There are all sorts of convoluted conspiracy madness, but this one takes the cake!
Where do I even start. This would be the first and only time this happened in history. Which genius in Rome produced all those powerful words and what other similar works did he produce? Soo somebody in Rome came up with a messiah who taught that their emperor and all their gods were trash and their emperor was headed straight to hell. Why didn't they lynch such a person? And they invented him for the Jews! Do you know the jews never believed in Jesus and that Judea was sacked by Rome in 70 AD? Why didn't Rome end Christianity after that? Why did they then let Christianity consume Rome and they abandoned their own gods?!

Once again, have you ever read the Bible, child?
Did Rome also create all those verses in OT pointing to the comming of Christ? Did they also invent the apostles? How many? And the prophets and Mary, Joseph, genealogy of Christ? What great inventors those Romans were!

MindHacker9009:
That's because Jesus christ is a Roman empire invention to control the minds of people in the nations they have conquered.

Child, the Roman emperor was god. Why would he invent someone that said he was no god, infact that he was a sinful nobody that needed forgiveness like the lowliest servant? Infact that non of Rome's long-revered gods were gods? Someone who said that the emperor specifically was going to hell?! Why would Rome invent all those biblical stories that put Rome in such bad light??
You see it now, child?

Lucifyre:
wtf😅

Thought God wasn't an author of confusion. He must love the chaos with you guys arguing over whose interpretation is rught across 40,000+ denominations and more than 2 religions. Perfect.

Child, there are no inconsistencies in the Bible about the really important things. You won't see anywhere where it says Moses received 8 Commandments or that Elizabeth was the mother of Christ, or that the Lord said kill your neighbor, etc

BaddieFreak:
The possibility of Dangote becoming penniless is extremely not possible, we both know this.

Shows how much you know. All these billionaires are MASSIVELY in debt. If anything triggers Dangote's creditors to want their money NOW, you'd immediately be richer than Dangote!

MindHacker9009:
You are the adult here who still has the mind of a kid from the garbage that has been feed into your mind since when you were a kid.
All four Gospels contradict each other and yet you believe the invented stories you have been taught because you still have the mind of a kid.
Even his own disciples could not recognize him after the resurrection (Luke 24:16, Luke 24:40, Matthew 28:17, John 20:14) as he was playing hide and seek like kids do.

Matthew’s Gospel:
Says that early on Sunday morning, as the new day was dawning, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary went out to visit the tomb.
Suddenly there was a great earthquake! For an angel of the Lord came down from heaven, rolled aside the stone, and sat on it. His face shone like lightning, and his clothing was as white as snow. The guards shook with fear when they saw him, and they fell into a dead faint.
Then the angel spoke to the women. “Don’t be afraid!” he said. “I know you are looking for Jesus, who was crucified. He isn’t here! He is risen from the dead, just as he said would happen. Come, see where his body was lying. And now, go quickly and tell his disciples that he has risen from the dead, and he is going ahead of you to Galilee. You will see him there. Remember what I have told you.

Mark’s Gospel:
Says that Mary Magdalene and two other women went very early in the morning and found, to their surprise, that the stone had been moved aside. A young man told them that Jesus was risen and they fled in terror, telling no one. This was originally the end of Mark’s Gospel.

Luke’s Gospel:
Says that Mary Magdalene and several other women went very early in the morning and found the stone already moved aside. Two men inside the tomb, appearing like angels, told the women that Jesus was risen. The women told the disciples of this, but Peter returned to confirm their story.

John’s Gospel:
Says that Mary Magdalene went alone to the tomb while it was still dark, but turned back when she saw the stone had been moved aside, assuming the body to have been stolen. This time, Peter and another disciple returned to confirm her story. Although Mary’s assumption made sense, the two disciples immediately believed that Jesus had risen.

EXACTLY, child. The inconsistencies in the Bible are exactly what prove it's authenticity. If it were concocted by some guy (or by Rome as some idiotically claim) it would be perfect. Everything would agree perfectly. But because it was inspired by God but indeed written down by fallible humans, it has inconsistencies.
Any more questions little one?

UltimateCSH:
Goodness me, I love you already😊
Let's go down this rabbit hole together.

So somehow some way, Bill Gates predicted COVID-19 immediately after Ebola. The question is HOW? If COVID was from a lab in Wuhan and he predicted it almost 5 years before it happened 🤣🤣🤣🤣 and it came to pass. Ok, let's say it's from bats like some said it was, so somehow Bill Gate knew that bats that people have been eating for thousands of years suddenly were going to give us COVID and your white god just happened to know it🤣 after his ted talk in years past like in 2010 that bro was all about reducing world population, or in 2007 where he was pushing for family planning to reduce population, oh, it's not his first time that he and Dangote had come together to do something like this. But why is he after your government collecting more tax and why is he bringing MILLIONS of MMS DRUG to Nigeria?

About the race thing, YES I AM A RACIST, and ANTI ZIONIST. It's better than being tribalistic. Those defective creatures are the main problem to our planet that's why nature never gave them melanin 🤣🤣🤣 did you hear of the failed coup in Bolivia 🇧🇴. Did you hear what a Senate person said about Niger 🇳🇪, do you know why they are fighting Russia 🇷🇺 through Ukraine 🇺🇦? Do you know what happen in Libya 🇱🇾, do you know the bush and Iraq 🇮🇶 story do you know what happen in Afghanistan 🇦🇫, wait Palestine 🇵🇸 is still on going, Google for the places and communities where bandits and terrorist are killing people in the north and see what they have in common. Your today Unilever do you know how it came to be Unilever?

Maybe when we are done with your bill gate we can then talk about those sponsoring him. Cause you are thinking the idiot is dashing out his money

Oh, you are RACIST (as you typed it), but not racist enough to know that Russians are also WHITES! Your hated whites who happen to be responsible for the very internet you're using to spew hatred - and every single major app on it! Your hatred won't let you see that whites are responsible for control of malaria and every single tropical disease that was decimating Africa, etc.

On to Bill Gates, the world was due for a major virus (check your history - it happens roughly every 100 years), he was raising the alarm in 2015 that we should focus world resources on how to contain it WHEN (not if) it happens. But no one listened to him.

Bill Gates had been the richest man in the world for a loong time (almost entirely from his investment in his Microsoft invention) when he decided he wanted to focus on giving away almost all HIS money, focused mainly on the poorest. There are billion exotic ways he could have used his money (as other billionaires do). He was richer than many countries - there were a billion ways he could have directly funded EVIL if that were his intention. He didn't interfere in elections, start wars, sponsor assassinations, terrorists, money rituals, etc. Instead his focus has been eradication of malaria, preventing pandemics, and such.

He hasn't hidden his hand like evil rich typically do. He puts his face on everything he does. He goes personally when he makes donations, not wire the money lazily from some island.
You have to realize there are very powerful evil entities whose feet he steps on, also many businesses focused on fleecing the poor that he destroyed, also those he refused to give money. That's where most of the hyper-negative publicity about him come from. Publicity you swallow without thought!
His philanthropy comes entirely from his foundation, which is funded by him, Melinda, and Warren Buffet - that's it. So which investors are you talking about??

MindHacker9009:
You are the one not okay! Why should Africans not hear of it, that it was only after they were conquered that they heard of it.

Replicated the shroud, by who? You are the one not okay.

If he had left his resurrection shroud behind then it would have been mentioned in the New Testament that he left his resurrection shroud behind

I apologize. I thought I was talking with an adult. That's why I kept asking if u were ok. Now I know I'm talking with a child, let me switch to teaching:

1) if something happens somewhere else someone from outside has to bring the news. That's why Africans did not hear about it until it was brought to them.

2) Scientists cannot replicate the shroud. The shroud is IMPOSSIBLE to replicate. No mordern technology can replicate it

3) Of course he left the shroud. That's what the disciples saw that made them believe - the shroud was wrapped as if holding a body but there was no body (see below)
Sorry it won't let me put the screenshot but here's the link:

https://findingpurpose.net/what-about-the-grave-clothes/#:~:text=When.

Esteemed Jewish scholar Simon Greenleaf, founder of Harvard Law School, meant to use his “laws of evidence” to challenge the theory of the resurrection, and became a believer…

When the disciples saw the “linen clothes lying” –- uncut, undisturbed, lying just as they had been, yet they were empty –- it convinced them that the body had been miraculously, supernaturally removed. Had some human hand stolen the body, he would have been forced to slit open the bindings in order to remove the body. Likewise, Greenleaf concluded, had Jesus revived and exited the tomb he could not have left the wrapping undisturbed.
When John saw “the linen clothes lying,” he believed. The word “lying” does not merely refer to the fact that they were “remaining on the floor of the sepulcher,” but rather, the word used, means that they were “lying precisely as the body had lain in them.” The grave clothes were in exactly the position the body had occupied.
When the disciples saw the “linen clothes lying” –- uncut, undisturbed, lying just as they had been, yet they were empty –- it convinced them that the body had been miraculously, supernaturally removed. Had some human hand stolen the body, he would have been forced to slit open the bindings in order to remove the body. Likewise, Greenleaf concluded, had Jesus revived and exited the tomb he could not have left the wrapping undisturbed.

BaddieFreak:
Yes but remember marriage is a long term affair

Which is why you allow room for growth. Growth is what's natural. If you marry Dangote, he can also become penniless - or dead!

UltimateCSH:
So here's the problem, you believe dangote in involved in the Sheddy deal. But Bill isn't, maybe because you see white maggots as your superior and next to your white god.

So lately Bill has been in the TV in Nigeria for all the good reasons but that's not why he's here. You see on tv he's talking of how Nigerians are suffering and how he is here to save your economy and how he as sent over $2b dollar to Nigeria and blah blah blah 🤣

The information that's not on the news is his drugs of over 3m bottles for pregnant women. I know you haven't heard of that but that 3m bottles is to save 70k babies with what he called new vitamin which they added. No name for the vitamin. Check online for BILL GATES MMS DRUG, oh your white god also said that your guys are not paying enough tax 🤣🤣 then he's also bringing other vaccines too.

It might interest you to know that this guy is the second-largest source of funds for WHO only behind WorldBank. Gate Foundation is responsible for 10% of WHO funds meaning the guy through those funding him own WHO cause if you ask me his investors also run WorldBank and IMF. In other for his involvement in your Government not to raise question the guy went there with Dangote your own person. 🤣🤣🤣 what business does he have with attending the NEC meeting?

Are you aware that COVID-19 vaccines killed a lot of people and your Bill Door was predicting that over 70% of Africa will be wiped out?

I see you're stuck on race. Nigerians are NOT obsessed with race so you're likely not Nigeria-raised.
Evil entities much richer than Gates operate in the shadows, never showing their hands, and here you are maligning one man whose ONLY interest is giving away his money in the way he deems most beneficial, and puts his face on everything he does!

Bill Gates predicted covid 5 years before it happeand and laid out how it could be prevented (see below). If the world had only listened to him it would have been contained to Woohan.

** Oh, Gates never said any of those things. Do a fact check

MindHacker9009:
You are the one that has bought an invented garbage. How many black African nations heard of the virgin birth before they were conquered.

If that was Jesus resurrection shroud then which one did he wear during his ascension.

How can Africans hear of it? Are you okay?
Why is the shroud impossible to replicate?
What does resurrection shroud have to do with ascension? You sure u ok??

GreatAchiever1:
That alone should even be a valid reason why you shouldn't pay any attention to what he says regarding agriculture, medicine, public health etc.
He knows nothing but want to put in motion the evil plans he has conceived with his cohorts.

Another genius! Bill Gates predicted covid 5 years before and laid out how it could be prevented (see below). If the world had only listened to him it would have been contained to Woohan

MindHacker9009:
And by you extremely limited logic you believe many of his creation did not hear about him being born of Mary till their nations were conquered and this your limited logic was force on many to believe two thousand years later.

I assumed you were somewhat informed, not knowing I'm talking to someone who has bought the most ridiculous conspiracy garbages.
Oh, you believe biblical stories started 2000 AD??

You are reasoning it with human logic which is extremely limited.
If it were by human logic no one would come up with such. IT JUST HAPPENS TO BE WHAT REALLY HAPPENED!!!

Using our extremely limited reasoning you can also ask who created the creator and why did he suddenly start creating?

Everyday247:
Yeah right 😏
That's what they all say at first until 5 years later when they are still in that same room, then sh1t gets real.

But the question is if you will marry someone who CURRENTLY ives in such, nothing about 2 or 5 years

BaddieFreak:
Hmm 🤔

CgRay:
I don't see anything wrong here. We aren't going to be in the single room forever.

Exactly. As long as it's not forever, absolutely nothing wrong with it for a married couple

Why not?? Couples live in a hotel room for months

ZTsambad:
ok let's us see how it ends since the end justifies the means he might be doing right after all

There was this guy who said he went to a native doctor for money ritual. He was told to do all sorts of evil things. He did them, expecting his business would improve. Instead what happened was, 5m (now 10m) was mysteriously deposited into his bank account. That's the kind of things evil rich entities (some are not human) do with their money. They work in the shadows, promoting evil, manipulating people. They fund terrorism, start wars and suppy arms to both sides, etc. They don't show up around things like malaria and such, and they hate people like Bill Gates and spread evil about him

EvilMerodack:
As soon as i saw "Complained of headache", I knew it could be brain complications. Death keeps repeating same script
RIP to her.

Meaning what?? People have headache everyday

chim14:
Forex trading is a skill and business of experience. Patience, absence of greed and timing is key.

If you want to know how, jump in and I will show you.

Well, experienced like you, said once Dangote oil comes on board it'll fall. I'm still waiting for that to happen. Instead it has shot up since Dangote announced

chim14:
Believe me, you can. There is the right time and right moment to trade. Why people lose money in the forex volatile market, is lack of patience, greed, and most especially trading at the wrong time & hour!

Example, how does "patience, lack of greed, and trading at the right time & hour" let you know if Naira (vs dollar) will drop or rise by tomorrow?

But how do you make "DAILY profits and WEEKLY payouts" from something as volatile and unpredictable as forex??

obonujoker:
Trump is winning still.

A woman cannot rule America, the world best country

Well, these just-released polls say otherwise

CandidSeeker:
Ignorance is bliss.

Burying one's head in YouTube is even more blissful

Originalsly:
Blacks are responsible for a lot of stuff but there inventions and contributions are downplayed or been patented by Whites. Do you know the light bulb ... the traffic lights ... GPS ... came about because of Blacks? ... Don't you see Thermo King written on the cooling unit on refrigerated trucks? .. that's the patent of a Black man who was allowed to have a patent and he had more. Do you think immunization is the White man's idea? ... they got that from an African...a slave ..a practice that was well known in Africa. Drainage and irrigation systems... African. These are some that we benefit from in these times.

Ok, who's stealing inventions from Africa - the black man's continent? Answer: nobody. What major invention has come from Africa?? (except Nairaland )

UltimateCSH:
Bill is just a cover boy for the big dawgs... Who are his investors? What do his investors want. 😁 that's the questions you should be asking

Another stupidity. You'd probably get 1000 likes for this.
Bill Gates wealth is from his investment in Microsoft which he no longer participates in. His only job now is philanthropy - giving away HIS money through his foundation (which other people run)!

UltimateCSH:
Dangote got his from cement and other of his product too🤣🤣🤣

It's always clean on the surface until you dig deeper

Dangote received massive fraudulent help from the government. The US government was after Bill Gates for all sorts of things - monopoly, taxes, no help at all

Up Nigeria!