chaircover: scrap all that sisi . . . . .Further investigations reveal that it is a user who has the letter "R" in his user name . . . and No its not coogar
coogar: benitez figured torres out - torres contributed to the game. his assist was as good as mata's goal. without his brilliant run in the channel, mata wouldn't have scored. if that was hazard or oscar, they would go for the goal instead of finding an exquisite pass.....
Now the problem is Hazard whom you are Nateevs told us woud make Torres score bucketloads and Oscar who played 20mins or thereabout
coogar: you are a spastic donkey..... if chelsea scored 5 goals in the first half and defended the way they did in the second half, the score would have ended 6-5 to west ham! you cannot silence your opponent if you leave the back door open!
ussr went 4-0 against nigeria in saudi 89 - nigeria equalised and won on a shoot out. brazil went 3-1 in atlanta 96, nigeria equalised and won 4-3. jose mourinho became a legend out of scoring first and flattening the match! chelsea were 1-0 up at half time.....if they had defended like european champions, they woulda won the game!
You are a lobotomized ape. Why cant Torres score his own do his part and leave the rest.
So because the Benitez improved defence is leaking was the reason Torres refused to score? or thats why he was missing easy chances
Now that Benitez too can't figure out Torres, Isnt it about time we try Onigbinde or Tunde Disu
nateevs: You are trying to be a smart ass by arguing on 2 sides.
Are you saying that Benitez may be a failure is vindication for the fact that RDM did nothing wrong? Or are you arguing that "my cohorts and I" hired Benitez?
Define your argument.
Firing Di Matteo was a very wrong decision and Benitez wont make any difference, or rather make it worse.
Benitez league wins percentage 0%
Di Matteo did wrong by putting his attacking faith in Torres. Thats all DI Matteo did wrong
coogar: nigerian football fans are generally idiotic when it comes to football punditry! no offence to your wedding guests but i don't think many of them have a clue!
the chances were far and between for torres today......he had 4 shots on target and jussi made good saves to keep them out! the last chance was a diving header @ the far post - it was a half chance as the cross wasn't precise!
An unchallenged header is a half chance? So whats a full chance? An already scored goal?
nateevs: So in essence, you are saying we conceded 3 goals because Torres did not score a chance.
Everyone who watches football knows when you put your opponent away early they lose the drive to fight. Keeping it 1-0 for longer spells gives WestHam the confidence
What happened to
nateevs: It's been a long long time I saw Chelsea defend like we are doing now. Players willing to dive into danger if it has to be done.
StarBoard: And it is you who should be a sky pundit. What happened to the tactical goof you and your cohorts were blaming Di Matteo for in Turin, for which Benitez was hired?
Not playing Torres made Chelsea lose in Turin, What now made them lose in WestHam? Not playing Torres on a Sunday
nateevs: Torres is to blame for everything. We conceded 3 goals. Is Torres to blame for that? The introduction of Diame totally swung things West Ham's way because they completely dominated the midfield. Is Torres to blame for that? Infact, Sky have named Diame the MOTM. Oh Torres should have marked him and curbed his influence and as such he is to blame.
I tire for beer parlour analysis.
What was Torres contribution to the game today., last week even from August? If Torres had buried his chances the wind would have been out of WestHam and could have been a routine win.
You all asked us when Torres doesnt perform, the others should. This season the others have done their part its now left for Torres to do his. BTW he has started all league games this season
coogar: you have to be a fool to type the above.... the torres chance you are yapping about is the same as the mata's double chance that he wasted. actually, mata's chance was worse. the ball fell kindly to mata's path a second time and he still managed to get his shot blocked by a defender.....
Mata blasted the ball and the keeper saved it Torres played a tame shot that was easily blocked
Meanwhile somewhere in Ojuelegba-Costain
Chelsea shey e de Pampers ni abi e wo nappy ni? (Shey una wear pampers abi una tie Nappy)
nateevs: So what Carlton Cole plucked chances out of thin hair? How difficult is it to see that Carlton, Nolan et al are player bought and playing to the Alardyce style?
Carlton Cole waited for them to lay it on a plate for him and he didnt have to wrestle Ivanovic for the goal
Where this A40 boy? Na when I need instrument e go dissapear
Ibime: At one-nil, Torres had great chance to kill the game. That's the cancer within Chelsea that shekpe fans won't admit to. The difference between Champions and crisis-team
No Its MAZACARs fault they dont understand him. they dont lay it on a plate for him Mata a midfielder with lesser minutes has scored more than the number 9 top striker who has started all league games
coogar: you saw the pass from moses to torres that led to the goal? it was the same kinda run torres made that dayokanu condemned in the screenshots you loaded last week. mata brings a whole lot of dimension to the way chelsea play - resting him on wednesday as yielded dividends - he's the main difference between the 2 sides!
The same Mata you told us is the problem is now the difference? Remember to update the number of goals scored in the league by Mata vs Torres despite the former playing lesser minutes