₦airaland Forum

Very good, Lagos is not for everyone, if you can not live by its rules, try the other 35 states. We will never allow these barbarians overrun Lagos, take your okada to your states. Criminals use okada for fast access, the new initiative to carry passengers to the last mile will suit Lagos megacity posture.

Training and retraining, it's more about how you use what you got. Maintenance is key as well. We need more national defense asset.

One nation bound in freedom. We are a circular nation...no freedom no Nigeria. We are not an Islamic nation. We have our traditional institutions long before the Europeans and Arabs came. Every man has a right to do what he likes as long as he is not infringing on the rights of others.

South must unite!

Just a night with Grande, is good enough, sweet babe

NgeneUkwenu:
These people are afonjas from South West, they want to separate us from our Ijaw brothers, so they can steal our oil wells....

We have drawn the map of Biafra to include all the states of South South(Delta, Bayelsa, Akwa Ibom, Rivers, Edo,Cross River)...There is nothing they can do about it...

Our Supreme Leader Nnamdi Kanu leads, we follow...

Chukwu Okuko Abiaoma Bless Our New Rich Utopian Country...

Uthopian you say

I have always sounded this too. The Ogodomigodo, the ancient Benin Kingdom has existed for thousands of years, and all lands, zones and clans of the South of the Niger, emanated from it. It is only the deluded biafra pawns that talk nonsense on this topic. Even Onitsha emanated from the Benin empire. Am sure even their Igwes know.

Armaggedon:
let's hope the hunter doesn't turn to bushmeat.

Am indifferent about that...may the best man win.

Armaggedon:
...and the army starts blowing off their explosives?

Always expect a reaction for every action, it might be disproportionate.

This is what happens when you start killing security operatives, and breaking prisons.

Blood for blood.

stancydg:
Oponu ayeraiye leleyi. Your case is so pathetic, simply because you don't know that you don't know and dumbly acknowledge it. I challenge you to quote the version of the Bible that mentioned "Rameses" or his regent son Merneptah. If you can't, then shame on you olodo rabata, descendant of a viper. Now, its clear to millions of nairalanders why your olodo questions will forever remain unanswered.

All you did was google it...i.e, if you Google who the name of Egyptian first pharoah is, google will tell you. You are still using leads from the bible, which is the only source of information you have ever got on the subject. You have not proved to me that Isrealites were mass slaves of Egyptians. You have not proved your argument, just going round in circles.

This is how Wikipedia puts it...The Exodus (Hebrew: יציאת מצרים, Yeẓi’at Miẓrayim: lit. 'Departure from Egypt') is the founding myth of the Israelites.[1][a] It tells a story of Israelite enslavement and departure from Egypt, revelations at biblical Mount Sinai, and wanderings in the wilderness up to the borders of Canaan.[2] Its message is that the Israelites were delivered from slavery by Yahweh their god, and therefore belong to him by covenant.[1]


Departure of the Israelites (David Roberts, 1829)
The consensus of modern scholars is that the Bible does not give an accurate account of the origins of the Israelites, who appear instead to have formed as an entity in the central highlands of Canaan in the late second millennium BCE from the indigenous Canaanite culture.

Mad animals.

stancydg:
You're bringing this dumb reasoning again even after seeing historical facts not gleaned from the bible or did you ever read any version of the bible that stated things the way I put it up there. If telling you about the Pharaoh that lived when Joseph was in Egypt and the one that ruled during Moses isn't enough to establish that the Bible was correct about Israelites living and serving in Egypt, then no further education will. You obviously don't know how to make an inference.

You are still using biblical characters, olodo, say something apart from what your pastors have filled your brain with. Prove to me that the Isreal slave story is real. Archeological evidence, historical footnotes etc...zombie

All you did was mention names of old Egyptian rulers, as named and stated in the bible. Prove to me, in front of millions of nairalanders.

Because of a stinking Lebanese?

Lebanon is a war torn, militia terrorists filled country...poor country.

Don't start a war, when you can't control it. Hamas is killing Palestinians.

UncleKoboko:
You christain pig slave.
Take to my advise or you die miserably.

Go and advice your terrorists brethren, am good.

stancydg:
Let me help you again with some history.

Joseph dealt with the great Rameses II when he was a young man. This pharaoh had a remarkably long reign, and was still alive when Moses was born. But by this time the old man was senile, so his son Merneptah was serving as regent. It was this Merneptah who persecuted the Israelites.

When Moses returned from his exile, the pharaoh he dealt with was Rameses III, the grandson of Rameses II.

Egyptians recognise the Pharaohs mentioned above.

When you choose not to ask dumb questions, you will get some good answers.

Egyptian history is older than the new edition bible, common sense will tell you that they will use real names of past Egyptian rulers in the story...like I said again, give me empirical fact that the Isrealis were slaves of Egyptians, you still have not done that. People that edited these books are smarter than you.

This is Wikipedia...There are two main positions on the historicity of the Exodus in modern scholarship.[3] The majority position is that the biblical Exodus narrative has some historical basis, although there is little of historical worth in the biblical narrative.[8][25][1] The other position, often associated with the school of Biblical minimalism,[26][27] is that the biblical exodus traditions are the invention of the exilic and post-exilic Jewish community, with little to no historical basis.[28] The biblical Exodus narrative is best understood as a founding myth of the Jewish people, providing an ideological foundation for their culture and institutions, not an accurate depiction of the history of the Israelites.[29][1] The view that the biblical narrative is essentially correct unless it can explicitly be proven wrong ("Biblical maximalism) is today held by "few, if any [...] in mainstream scholarship, only on the more fundamentalist fringes."[3]

Mainstream scholarship no longer accepts the biblical Exodus account as history for a number of reasons. Most scholars agree that the Exodus stories were written centuries after the apparent setting of the stories.[5] The Book of Exodus itself attempts to ground the event firmly in history, dating the exodus to the 2666th year after creation (Exodus 12:40-41), the construction of the tabernacle to year 2667 (Exodus 40:1-2, 17), stating that the Israelites dwelled in Egypt for 430 years (Exodus 12:40-41), and including place names such as Goshen (Gen. 46:28), Pithom and Ramesses (Exod. 1:11), as well as stating that 600,000 Israelite men were involved (Exodus 12:37).[30] However, the numbers involved are fanciful, as the Sinai Desert could never have supported the 603,550 Israelite males and their families mentioned in Numbers 1:46, which modern estimates put at 2.5-3 million total Israelites.[31] The geography is vague with regions such as Goshen unidentified, and there are internal problems with dating in the Pentateuch.[16] No modern attempt to identify a historical Egyptian prototype for Moses has found wide acceptance, and no period in Egyptian history matches the biblical accounts of the Exodus.[32] Some elements of the story are miraculous and defy rational explanation, such as the Plagues of Egypt and the Crossing of the Red Sea.[33] The Bible also fails to mention the names of any of the Pharaohs involved in the Exodus narrative.[34]

While ancient Egyptian texts from the New Kingdom mention "Asiatics" living in Egypt as slaves and workers, these people cannot be securely connected to the Israelites, and no contemporary Egyptian text mentions a large-scale exodus of slaves like that described in the Bible.[35] The earliest surviving historical mention of the Israelites, the Egyptian Merneptah Stele (c. 1207 BCE), appears to place them in or around Canaan and gives no indication of any exodus.[36] Archaeologists Israel Finkelstein and Neil Asher Silberman say that archaeology has not found any evidence for even a small band of wandering Israelites living in the Sinai: "The conclusion – that Exodus did not happen at the time and in the manner described in the Bible – seems irrefutable [...] repeated excavations and surveys throughout the entire area have not provided even the slightest evidence."[37] Instead, modern archaeology suggests continuity between Canaanite and Israelite settlement, indicating a primarily Canaanite origin for Israel, with no suggestion that a group of foreigners from Egypt comprised early Israel.[38][39] Scholars such as Jørgen Knudtzon identified the Hebrews with the Habiru, however in recent years this is been suggested to be a false cognate.[40][41]

Despite the absence of any archaeological evidence, a majority of scholars agree that the Exodus probably has some historical basis,[25][8] in that a small group of people of Egyptian origin may have joined the early Israelites, and then contributed their own Egyptian Exodus story to all of Israel.[d] William Dever

stancydg:
You laid down rubbish that shows you don't even know the meaning of common English words. I have given you empirical geographical facts that are undeniable in history. Yet, you are choosing to hang your low life on uncertain theories analysing established history. You're indeed an ojojo high school material.

Which empirical facts...you said nothing...which empirical facts...am waiting

stancydg:
The noise of your ignorance is getting so loud. Look at your own words...modern, archealogists, postulating, not exclusively... Doesn't that tell you something at least? If there wasn't something in history, will they be postulating and considering if something was exclusively or not Jews? I see why your search has yielded no result. Its been dumb all the way.

I laid down facts, stop speaking religion, that is where dull people with low IQ hide, when they have nothing in their empty brain. You are just a pawn. Give me facts, not cursing out of frustration

The postulation is about the nature of the artisans/workers, the findings discovered that the workers/artisans that build the pyramids, were paid workers not slaves. So the whole Isreal slave story is a myth.

Am writing it for millions of other nairalanders, and to show your fallacy and expose your foolishness. You are a zombie, a lost cause...pawn.

stancydg:
You must have been searching wrongly and dumbly too. The Egyptian mummies alone are a physical testament to the veracity of that history. Not to mention the Red Sea, Mount Sinai and other existing geographical elements dotting that history. Like the poster mentioned, if it were not true, Egyptians would have denied. They never denied having pharaohs, did they? Don't be foolish.

Egyptian mummies have nothing to do with the Isreal supposed slaves. Modern archeologist now say, due to the technicality of the job carried out on the building of the pyramids and other wonders of Egyptian architecture and monument, they are postulating that most of the builders are paid workers, not slaves...of course they have slaves for domestic work and farming, but no evidence that these were exclusively jews
You are the foolish one, believing everything you read and hear. Like I said earlier to be Religious means removing common sense/reason. It is religion, Egyptian state does not have to give an official statement, no one is asking them for reparations, or compensation or apologies, like Germany was forced to pay billions in reparations after the second world war.

UncleKoboko:
Go fùck your mama or papa or some children.
That's what your gay bishops and pedophilè reverend fathers do.

zombie, we are not the same, I know where am from. You are an Arab slave, you will die as one, and the paradise they promise you is fiction.

UncleKoboko:
Christains are hypocrites and worst of mankind.
You are a christain slave fool! That is what you are. That is what your people are.
You are following the the path of people who came to your land;
to steal, destroy, rape your mothers and sisters and kidnapp your kinsmen for slavery, while they hand you their STORY-BOOK (bible) to brainwash you. Such a demented fool.

Go Bleep a cow, that is what your fulani brothers do. Slave

UncleKoboko:
You demented foolish pig animal cant deceive everyone. Your are a moronic christain. slave to the white pigs. Being Jews sympathizer wont help your current miserable situation. Jews dont give a fvck about christains.
They dont believe in your MAN-god jesus.
You are only wasting your life
Just get a life!

Muslims are terrorists. I follow the native tradition of my ancestors, you are an Arab slave, Arab see blacks as less than animals, and you pig take their culture as religion. Islam is a religion of terrorists.

NobleRace:
Bible stories are not mere stories. They're histories. That Egyptian story is the history of Israel's origin.

Research and find out the truth for yourself. You have the responsibility to learn. No one will be responsible for your ignorance.

Send me link pls. I have asked historians and searched everywhere, no footprints of it ever, only saw it in the bible.
You are a religious pawn, religion takes over common sense.

UncleKoboko:
I pity your parents...
They've just wasted their time and energy raising a waster.
woe betide you and everything around you.
You christain slave. Slave to your so-called whites (oppressors)

You pig can not understand that most of us overstand, you are just pawns. Religion is politics, am non religious. Islam is a terrorist religion, 100% of worlds terrorists are muslims. Boko Haram, ISIS, Iswap, Alqadia, Taliban, Hezbollah, Iran, etc. It is a cult group.

NobleRace:
It is. Egyptians have never denied it

What do you mean they have never denied it...it is bible stories, it is nowhere in history. Nonsense. Show me any historical link that confirms it.

hhmmcj:
Don't waste time and energy on people whose ignorance runs deeper than the Atlantic Ocean. They keep reading their fake bible stories while the real history resides in books that they will never read and educate themselves.

The Zionist state of Israel is a "Rasicts" country that will be extinguished in time. The Palestinians will get their land back in this our lifetime of the next; but one day.

DOWN; WITH THE ILLEGAL OCCUPATION OF THE ZIONIST STATE OF ISRAEL.

I & GOOD PEOPLE AROUND THE WORLD STAND IN SOLIDARITY WITH THE PEOPLE OF PALESTINE

No one support terrorists only muslims, cos they are one.

UncleKoboko:
of course, Adolf hitler was a muslim, and the crusaders that killed hundreds of thousands of muslims were also muslims. Many fools can pretend to forget all the atrocities christains have caused to this world but, NOT EVERYONE IS FOOLISH.

Idiot hypocrites, I said terrorists today. You should be ashamed to bring up your children under such a blood sucking religion. World war 3 will destroy you all. Evil blood suckers. Your block bigoted head can not understand that not everyone in Nigeria is either christian or Muslim... bloody slave to the smelly Arabs.

UncleKoboko:
keep fooling yourself, slave to so-called white pigs calling themselves servant of the a carpenter's son.
Human worshipper

You deal with empirical evidence? The one your father established abi
?

Not everyone is religious, religious people are zombies. I rather be an atheist than to belong to a terrorist religion. 100% of terrorists today are muslims. It is more like a blood sucking cult group. Only zombies can belong to such. You all can be sure of one thing, no paradise for blood sucking demons
Religion of terrorists.

UncleKoboko:
I guess your bible must be lying then....

jew sympathizer

Non religious, I deal with empirical evidence. Bloody Arab slave. Conquered and turned to a follower, zombies.

Second class citizen slave