DrLazDevitan's Posts
Nairaland Forum › DrLazDevitan's Profile › DrLazDevitan's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 (of 31 pages)
mcshol: no nid calculating.d guy dn already get d course na. Unless something unique happensThat's great,you did basic before? Goodmorn! |
A friend of mine got the following result for basic 1st semester... Chem=43 Phys=36 FSB=41 ENG=29 MATHS=34 and the second semester... Chem=31 FSB=39 PHYS=40 ENG=27 MATHS=32 Please sombody shud help calculate the percentage and tell or predict my chances for Admission list into MED/SURG. |
[quote author=papindinho]One should be very careful in showing emotion or any form of attachment to a material thing. For once you are never unwilling to relinquish your possession, your possession tends to possess you.[/quote]Does money have hands to possess you?.....Does foods have hands to grab over ur weight? Material things can't possess you,it is wat you use them for that actually coses the possession.Pleasures from the material form is actually the possession not the material itself.MONEY on it own does not provoke possession,using money to buy drinks,buy house,the thought of it....is actually the possession......So i disagree with u! |
[quote author=promisechild]Lawyers and philosophers are enemies The lawyers formerly known to be the sophist originated from the ancient greeks which socrate the father of philosophy was bitterly against their doctrine and deeds the sophist also known as lawyers teach to gain money and they cram all what they teach. The sophist/lawyers teach the following doctrine 1.How to make friends and control them 2. How to start a business without hardwork 3.How to fall in a poo without been stain Socrate was against this odd teachings because he hates and detest evil Do u really think philosophers and lawyers are truly enemies just because of this socrate's belief?[/quote]PHILOSOPHERS and LAWYERS are never enemy.PHILOSOPHY leads in the path of law making within the terrains of philosophical judgement.The SOPHIST are ployest of all PHILOSOPHERS,it often the normalty to make gain with what the environment can offer.In today's world,u may doubt the SOPHIST SOPHISTISING...but then,it all relates beyond some immaterial relativism! |
Fynestboi: pick up my pen and book to learn at the feet of my seniorsHmm....oga,we wanna learn from yah! |
[quote author=JustCare]who is man [/quote]Who is MAN?! Is yet to be dealt with.Is yet to be known.Is yet to be understand.Man is herself the most complex entirety of nature to dispose its definition.Man to me has no prefferred definition,man is content of what we know about ourself.As confusing as it is,it may seem evenworse to every one of us that the animal suitable to manage other lower animals dont know much about itself. In wanting to know who a MAN is to expension to time as much as u cud.MAN is a definitive of what he is.....whom he is........what he wants.....what he does not want.....Man is endless in a form of permissive definition. In my thought i oversee that, A MAN IS SOCIAL BEING IN WHOM DWELLS ALL METAPHYSICAL ENTIRETY THAT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR HIS UNIVERSAL COURSES WITHIN THE CURTAINS OF HIS JUDGMENT.......... But yet to be reconcile with is the metaphysics that orient with Man's existense.......This inscrustable fairring as distable human and the connection of the intellect to knowing the versatility of human is a core need to know this metaphysics...... I humbly....i do request the blatant philosophising to knw more about this METAPHYSICAL-MAN and his ENVIRONMENT! |
[quote author=Buzzonix]In other to keep the thread Organized, i suggest let's all discuss One topic after the order. Someone e.g the Op, can bring out a topic and everyone can debate/learn/research/argue/contribute towards the topic. If we're done with that topic, another one is brought out.[/quote]Done that! |
In respect to what my next PHILOSOPHER suggested,it dawn on me to raised a profound issue so we can rationalize and equal make an inferrence out of it.Before i move i really want to appreciate every PHILOSOPHER dat have so much see the need that we exist alone because we are unmixed and yet preciously to sister courses......Inshort PHILOSOPHY is the mother to all field of life. I want every great philosopher to join up in this forum to discuss a tangible topic on METAPHYSICS This the topic: METAPHYSICS: THE HUMAN EXISTENSE AND HER PHILOSOPHY OF UNIVERSAL DEVELOPMENT! |
[quote author=JustCare]love love love!!! It really makes our world go round. The only factor that could keep our world going[/quote]Just as you cannot cook a food with only SALT...... So,LOVE on its isolation is NOTHING! Humans make love of its effect......humanity makes the world goes round...... Not LOVE! |
[quote author=benbuks]you need to understand the power of love bruv... love rules over all...that‘s the key formular the world is void of... though it‘s obvious and naturally imutable that a boy will later turn man or water being colourless it is strongly believed of me that all things. have proofs..however ,some things are impossible to prove by some beings..thats does not make the ‘claim‘ untrue. which is where , the bone of contention exist between some ‘ free thinkers‘ and ‘ religious‘ folks.. e.g . we believe that God exist, though logically speaking ,we cant substantially prove that. (does it make it untrue?) also we believe , every human being have conscience , we cant also substantially prove that as well. the fact that i. cant convincely prove somthing does not make it untrue...(could be supernatural) actually , if we dont. believe supreme beings exist beyond our universe ,then everything we do as terrestial beings will only appear as fringe and our quest for a better world will only run amok. .am heading somewhere but let me stop here .[/quote]Sir,i put it upon myself that FORMS and IDEA rules our ultimate universe combined with the universal forces of this solicited world.Love is only but an ABSTRACT-a non-substance and also a victim and a victor to other abstract.If LOVE rules,then HATRED,hostility and cruelty are emphatically ruling in their pointless form too. Love seems to be....it does not be.It seems to appear....it does not appear! Abstract may be hard to prove,not by the metaphysical guff that stand between the form and the ideal.It so easy to knw that the search for wanting morals have made some ABSTRACT to felt most ordinarily everyday. You feel FEAR,...You are caught away by a woman's beauty......Do these thoughts rules over you? Forms rule...but the guidance of INTUITION and THOUGHT is supernaturally overhaul by ABSTRACTIONS. ABSTRACTIONS(LOVE) does not welcome proof in any form,inshort abtraction produces abstraction,don't expect love to produce a tin of milk,a newborn baby,a beautiful house........So,the physical which is suppose to offer the magic for proof is sub-zero.So LOVE is and abstraction of a common root that lacks proof to its existence.We feel it...by experience,intuition and thought almost from primary knowledge of wat we av about it. So,it seems to GOD....Some sed,GOD IS LOVE.....ABSTRACT is alwys equal to ABSTRACT.....everything equal to evil....love...hatred....is also equal to GOD. So we can say LOVE IS GOD....LOVE IS HATRED.....GOD IS HATRED.....HAPPINESS IS DEATH..... Because every ABSTRACTION welcome an another one with an agenda behind it or afore-most unwelcome dat should be welcome or not welcome! |
benbuks: I've always believe in numbers,in equations andIf i disagree with PYTHAGORAS dat form and reality is govern by ARITHMETICS.,then i diisagree with you!...... My view is.....since LOVE is ABSTRACT....it cant be numbered! Regarding FACT and PROOF Do you really need proofs to back the fact that a boy definitely will grow into a man? Do you really need a proof that water is colourless? |
JustCare: hope metaphysics is allowed?All forms of human metaphysical grandeur is essential! |
DEVA1: Oya startI have come to the realisation that nothing actually in the objective sense is permanent and the temporal and mundane vision of fickleness is attributed to the permanent knowledge of form and idealism.......what do you feel about my thought? |
[quote author=3@nairaland.com]A component of philosophy called axiology talk about value theory;thus how do you value what you love.In its general sence the theory educate us to value what we love[/quote]You value what you love if that thing has a value.....To me value produces value.Immaterial things should therefore be within the essence of knowledge than a purposive constancy of love.As a material form losses it focus so the love that goes with it...... Any more philosophizing? |
This thread is open for the PHILOSOPHERS,were free-thinking is lauded and human right is blatantly discuss. Please,rationalism is the hallmark of this forum.....ASPIRANTS of this REASONING course is without borad invited to see things for themselves how NAIRALANDERS reasons things out! |
[quote author=vincent561]I beg to disagree wit u on num 2 sir. Rennin which is secreted by d gastric glands in an inactive form prorennin,which is activated by HCl converts caseinogen 'milk protein' into insoluble casein in d presence of calcium ions. @ Op,caseinogen is d soluble form of milk protein while casein is d insoluble form. Hope dis helps.[/quote]Pls get this......RENNIN helps to make the INSOLUBLE CASEIN....the RENNIN does not make it soluble The solubility of the CASEIN is open to the ZYMOGEN CELLS...which helps in the production of PEPSINOGEN...n finally PEPSIN dat finally make it SOLUBLE! |
Notwithstanding THEIST and NON-SATANIST are also invited to board this thread to a trajectory point of their inflammation too. Incase,you don't knw how to BACKMASK......Let me tell the non-satanist how to go about this..so they move with every one of us For example...let me backmask this expression: DOG IS AN ANIMAL! To backmask this expression.....You mirror the word in the LATERAL INVERSION...but then,dis form of INVERSION may be hard to do...... It all involve starting and turing opposite the ending of statement to the beginning...so this how it goes LAMINA NA IS GOD This BASKMASK VERSION....... To read this BACKMASK VERSION,you should read it from the left side to the right side... |
Influence01: I think no1 should be SkinYes the skin generally is man's largest organ..... I thought the LIVER......due to usage of ''IN''......as in INSIDE the body!....dat was used by him! |
This forum promote our expressible usage of LANGUAGE as we sort it just by BACKMASKING it. When we BACKMASK our language...the commoners we never get to know much of us...as we express our self in the most holiest form of worship! Every SATANIST........ Should know how to BACKMASK ........a word! |
It has come to my notice that in almost all nook and crannies of NL that SATANIST and free-thinkers have bin smoulder with all wrongs.......Well for me,i believe it is a matter of choice to serve the purpose of your belief! Much as this happens to keep me within the rims of informal and formal thought of intuitive and phisolosophical rationalism-I in most time duff out in the course of playing with early childhood knowledge and never to terminate issues when the buds ar yet not ripe enough... So i sort a ground for common friend of radical but sportive and spurtive utopy of uncommon religio-philosophical background To hide our content of speech..derogatory.....loyalty...pledges I duely pray all SATANIST/ATHEIST To write and discuss with a BACKMASK LANGUAGE! |
Prince adebayo: (1).The largest organ in man is ?Answers 1. LIVER(mostly visceral organs of the ABDOMINAL CAVITY) 2)Pepsin makes soluble the curds of CASEIN! 3)Man=32.....Dog=42.....Rabbit=28 4)Sebum 5)what is supporting the testis in the scrotal sac are mainly connective/soft tissues.....It is not necessarily a term ''HOLD'' to be use! |
To economic student...answer this What philosophy of thought was behind the essence of Adam smith definition of ECONOMICS? Please try to rationalise! |
vincent561: ISLET: a small group of cells that is structurally distinct 4rm d surronding cells.Oh!...yes....that's with ANATOMY......most time when i see most of your questions......i got many things to say...and several issues immediately comes into my reins!... |
Swagalord18: [color=grey]NO, THERE'Z NOTHING WRONG WITH THE QUESTION,As much as i know,plane mirrors don't have magnification........this is becos the object and the image appear same as possible as i inferred earlier!....... |
Influence01: I love ur composure sirPls call me Devitan....thanks! |
vincent561: What re islets?It is not just ''ISLETS''....it is exhaustively referred to as ISLET OF LANGHERHANS. There are 3 main cells comprising the ISLET OF LANGHERHANS,they 1)ALPHA-CELL(responsible for GLUCAGON) 2)BETA-CELL(responsible for INSULIN) 3)DELTA-CELL(responsible for the production of SOMATOTROPHINE HORMONE for growth of the body) |
For those of u mailing me.....please get to know that nairaland does not send those emails,so i did not c any of them! |
[quote author=labodinho]Let's have breakfast when we wake A circuit has an area of 0.4m^2 and consist of 50 loops of wire.If the loops are twisted and allowed to rotate at a constant angular velocity of 10rad/s in a uniform magnetic field of 0.4T,the amplitude in the induce voltage?[/quote]Use E=wBAN......as a formular...u shall arrive at ur answer! |
labodinho: 4)If 24.4g of Lead(ii)trioxonitrate(v) were dissolved in 42g ofRecall that the density of water is 1g/cm^3,so 42g of water obviously is also 42cm^3 of water! 42cm^3 of water contains 24.4g of Pb 1000cm^3 will contain (1000 * 24.4)/42 So, SOLUBILITY=581g/dm^3 |
vincent561: Hw many bones make up d stenebrae nd d manubrium nd where re they located?Manubrium........the upper section of the pectoral(CHEST) region.....major bones of concern der are CLAVICLE COSTAL(RIBS) CARTILAGE....and the STERNAL bodies in the extra! |
Influence01: meaning u re still an aspirantAm not open to such question....am sorry ..sir! |
[/quote]Who is MAN?! Is yet to be dealt with.Is yet to be known.Is yet to be