₦airaland Forum

Maynman:
Dtruthspeaker

Say something!

I do not read long shitty presentations. For first, my own research shows that Socrates met Paul. Acts 17: 16-31

And by Socrates' admission, Paul convinced him of God, for he believed in God and in life after death as proven by the fact that rather than submit to the will of the politicians of his time, he towed the paths of Jesus and Stephen by refusing to save himself, choosing to drink the portion of death.

"The difficulty, my friends, is not to avoid death, but to avoid unrighteousness; for that runs faster than death"!

Extracts from "Socrates Final Speech, Death before Dishonor"!

So this is just a complete perversion with an intention of Insulting The Lord (as prophecied) as you can see, Satanreed applauded it. (Make I quote am before he modifies his post, He is as evil as that)

LordReed:
Brilliant!

PastorMIsBack:
You asked what I thought, not what she thought. And I think, 'bad idea'. Ask her what she thinks. Good day.

He wants you to ask a 15 or 16 year old what they think? He obviously does not have children.

Also, a colleague just pointed me to another fact which proves that it is not Law that we were being trained to study.

This is seen in the fact that supposed lawyers mostly call themselves "Legal Practitioners" instead of "Law Practitioners"

"Law" texts mostly read eg "Nigerian Institute of Advanced LEGAL Studies" (not law studies)

Legal Education, NOT LAW EDUCATION.

Legal ethics, NOT LAW ETHICS etc.

Yet they say they are "Lawyers" instead of "Legallers"!

My People check it, is it kwarect? Help me see, if you can find someone out there who can validy clear out these discrepancies and misrepresentations.

Now, it is very noticeable that immediately after that trick of "Legal.. something" which is not "The Law" Method or something which we all came to learn, the law texts then divert and somersaulted to "What is Law/Meaning of Law"!!!

How can they do this?

Is the course not "Legal Method" again? (and they have clearly explained to us that "legal" is not the same as Law"? For "legal" IS ONLY AN ATTACHMENT, like a virus to a file and the File is Law, which we came to study but they are making us study the virus)

Therefore, should the next topic not be "What is Legal/Meaning of Legal?" and not "What is Law/Meaning of Law".

Why did they switch over to Law when they did not start with Law?

And the focus was not on Law but on the Attachment called "legal"!

Am I the only one sees and who smells a fraud and deceit here?

As part of my CLE, I decided to review all the law texts and subjects we were taught in school and consider this.

By Jamb, our course of study is "Law" right?

Then we entered school and we saw "Legal Method" (of course, by our secondary school mind legal and law mean the same thing, right?)

Hence "legal method" will by our secondary school mind mean "Law method", right?

But look at all the explanation/definition of "Legal Method" now that one is a lawyer, it is not "Law Method".

It is about "SOMETHING CONNECTED OR A RELATION (PAPA, MAMA, ENEMY, FRIEND, PIKIN, NEIGHBOUR ETC) OF LAW.

BUT NOT THE LAW ITSELF.

Eg Google LawLane, you would see it saying

"The phrase ‘’legal method’’ contains two words – ‘’Legal’’ and ’’method’’. The word ‘’legal’’ means something relating to law.

A.O Sanni of Unilag also said

"The phrase 'legal method' is made up of two words -'legal' and 'method.' The word "method," in ordinary parlance, means a way of doing something or the quality of being well planned and organized. The word "legal," which is an adjective, connotes something connected with the law.

Same is seen in various law texts "Something Connected" or "Something Related".

So I humbly ask, did they teach "Law Method"?

For clearly, it can be seen that by the definitions/explanations, "Legal" is not "Law!

Or am I wrong?

So lawyers, help me do justice to it. Sophritebenitez, and others whose names I do not remember at the moment, what do you think.

Even you, the ordinary reasonable man on the street, you are welcome to comment.

orisa37:
Satanic Spirits work better in the Universities, as they do in Churches, Mosques, Shrines and Cults.

The world is their toy.

haddeylium:
There are religious organization without belief in god or deity

A school is one of those institutions that it's religious beliefs should be the disposition of Pure, True and Good knowledge, as they represented aka (Good education, not a bad or evil one).

Not the Lies and Misrepresentations and Conjectures.

Take for instance, we entered the university to study Law! The University represented that they would teach us Law.

Now, thank God, I remembered and maintained the several questions which I wanted to ask then, but could not at the time. And it is seen that acquisition of knowledge can I deed answer previous questions a person intended to ask, however, for me, more knowledge only raised up more questions.

So, now I do confidently say, that "INTENDING LAWYERS ARE NOT TAUGHT THE LAW. THEY ARE TAUGHT THE LIE AND FABRICATION CALLED "LEGAL".

https://www.nairaland.com/6989896/lawyers-not-deceit

https://www.nairaland.com/7004609/re-lawyers-not-deceit-there

It is a deceit and a complete betrayal of public trust and a wickedness and an evil, perpetrated on the public.

Exactly as a farmer teaching his willing-to-be farmers, bad and even destructive farming practices.

The world is destroyed by it.

And as you can see, the world is truly destroyed.

Workch:
You are wrong, pastafarians are the only people with God's law.
Christianity is fake

Nairaland's comedian has just released another skit for his upcoming show.

IMAliyu:
Classic Dtruthspeaker. Crying foul already.

I am very very alert to you people's invalid arguments for 90% of you people's argument is based on unspotted invalidities.

IMAliyu:
My answer was No, if you had a hard understanding What I see are the fantasies and parables of dead men laid to paper, proclaiming itself to be revelations from God."

I take it that your "No" is for the question "Has God not revealed His Mind?".

First of all, even I can see that you have not spoken Truly and Fairly, rather you are reporting what you tell yourself everyday, to reject the Bible and its contents.

Yout opinion is not borne out of a reasonable and fair analysis of the Bible but out of a personal hatred for it, which makes your comments untrue for it is a child of Bias.

And Statements of Truth are without Bias and Imbalance, for every reasonable person after all valid considerations comes to the irresistible conclusion and Truth that the Bible indeed and in Truth Contains The Word of God!

But, as I once told you, you are never reasonable and fair when it comes to God and the Bible.

Good Reason and Fairness just completely disappears when you speak. You just either rely on your right to adopt a position, whether right or not, or you dart here and there, creating one issue or the other as you depart from the issue in focus.

And those activities of yours just render your comments invalid for being Biased and Imbalanced and Fanatical.

winningwinner:
I... The question I have for sincere Christians here is, are there implications for sitting on a married man's bed innocently as I did without having anything in mind?

His house, his rules just like God's World, therefore God's, Rules!

ENGINEERG:
I have been seeing some people posting these images againt Catholic faith.
A Muslim I know posted it and we talked about it..He was just making jest of it, and I told him what is the different between stoning of Satan in Saudi Arabia and these Catholic images... And he remained silent.
So everyone, must accept others religion, [b]cos religion itself can never be logica[/b]l but it must be accepted by the followers.

Wrong!

Is it not logical to condemn any thing which is bad or unreasonable?

It is.

Do we not regularly do so even on a daily basis?

We do.

Therefore, it also religious, to be logical.

PamelaAgboma:
You can wear TROUZERS..

You can wear MAKE UP..

You can wear JEWERIES..

You can wear WIGS..

AND STILL LOVE GOD!...

And the Proof of Loving God is in Your Doings.

THEREFORE, HOLINESS, IS IN YOUR DOINGS!

Kobojunkie:
... one of them being that He was not a witness to the sin in question,

Stockbroker pretending to be a lawyer, else you would have known "A Judge is never a Witness in the case in which He Judges,"
As seen in the First Case of cases God vs. Adam/Serpent.

God did not see, yet had jurisdiction to judge.

So stop speaking things ye know little of as though, ye are an expert.

Kobojunkie:
and the other being that the same law also decreed that God desires mercy over sacrifice.

And if ye were a lawyer ye would have known that "Mercy Only Comes Before Judgement" as this John 8 clearly shows.

PastorMIsBack:
Lol and I bet you knew what I was going to say

didn't expect "O ti oh, not my daughter" that definitely knocked my cap off.

AntiChristian:
Dtruthspeaker,

How do we reconcile the above with that below:

“Don’t misunderstand why I have come. I did not come to abolish the law of Moses or the writings of the prophets. No, I came to accomplish their purpose. Matthew 5:17 NLT

Law of Moses on Adultery
“If a man is discovered committing adultery, both he and the woman must die. In this way, you will purge Israel of such evil. “Suppose a man meets a young woman, a virgin who is engaged to be married, and he has sexual intercourse with her. If this happens within a town, you must take both of them to the gates of that town and stone them to death. The woman is guilty because she did not scream for help. The man must die because he violated another man’s wife. In this way, you will purge this evil from among you.
Deuteronomy 22:22-24

Simple: From the story in John 8, the people were on their way to "Execute The Law God gave Moses" and WE SEE THAT JESUS, DID NOT INTERFERE.

IT WAS RATHER, THEY DEVIATED AND CAME TO SET HIM UP FOR DISGRACE.

AND FOLLOWING THE TRAP SPRUNG, YOU SEE HE STAYED AWAY, BUT THE BASTARDS WILL NOT LET HIM BE.

IT WAS AFTER THAT HE COMMENTED ON THE MATTER.

AND WHAT DID HE DO?

HE RAISED WHAT WE CALL IN LAW, "A PRELIMINARY OBJECTION" ON THE LAW BACKED JURISDICTION OF THE LAW ENFORCERS, TO EXECUTE THE JUDGEMENT OF THE LAW, WHETHER THEY HAVE COMPLIED WITH IT!

AND THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF HIM IN ACTION, CLEARLY UPHOLDING THE LAW, HE SAID IN MATHEW 5:17 THAT HE WAS AFFIRMING.

TO THE EFFECT OF ASKING THEM "HAVE YOU COMPLPLIED WITH THE LAW? IF YOU HAVE, THEN YOU CAN DO WHAT YOU WILL, TO DO.

AntiChristian:
Secondly, how can we interpret the incidence to suite the reality of today as virtually everyone would have had one sin or the other hence nobody would eventually be punished?

Very Good Question! This and many more situations like this led me into Querying "the law" we were taught to practice, which is the man made concorction called "LEGAL". AND NOT TRUE LAW CALLED "LAW". (Presently, I have challenged supposed lawyers, who are actually "Legallers" AND NOT LAWYERS, to come and attack my presentation in my thread https://www.nairaland.com/6989896/lawyers-not-deceit

https://www.nairaland.com/6989896/lawyers-not-deceit.

Yet they flee)

which I now find out that it is a fraud and deceit meant to steal from people and perpetrate injustice to the benefit EXACTLY AS DANIEL SAID in Daniel 7:25 "think to change the times and LAWS".

Obviously, it has been sneakily implemented.

So, where is its Applicability Today? It is now reserved in our personal lives being confined to our families, business or work and neighbourhood.

And definitely, we still see it's action today, A Cheating wife, can never judge a cheating husband, A perverted Judge can never condemn a Stealing Politician, A bribe taking legal enforcement personnel eg police, NDLEA, EFCC, ICPC, can never arrest or prosecute a criminal.

WHICH IS WHY BASED ON THE LAW, JESUS CHRIST, IS ONCE AGAIN, THE ONLY PERSON WHO HAS THE JURISDICTION OF THE LAW, TO JUDGE EVERY PERSON, WHEN THE TIME FOR HIS COURT TO BE CONVENED, ARRIVES!

IMAliyu:
Are you God, himself?

Stop trying to Change Post, no where did I claim that me, Dtruthspeaker was God. So, this is no valid at all and does not stand.

IMAliyu:
Are you God, himself?

Since he is the Judge, why not leave such ultimate judgments to him.[/quote]And God has even beaten you before you knew to think this for He Said
"Now these are THE JUDGEMENTS, which thou shalt set before them Exodus 21:1

So, He has already, in advance, given us His Judgements, therefore, we can now begin to measure (Judge) ourselves.

So there is NOTHING valid and reasonable for you to say.

All your other comments are INVALID FOR BEING EITHER CHANGE OF POSTS or OFF POINT eg "What I see are the fantasies..."- No one asked you what you see, I clearly asked

"Has God not revealed His Mind?

And did He not give us a basis for judging?

IS THERE ANY BETTER GREATER THAN HIS OR EVEN CLOSE?"

And you have failed to answer, which of course we know that it is because you can only give an answer that will prove you wrong, that is why you are dodging Questions.

You have a right to adopt or maintain any Way of Living you please, but when you speak, LET YOUR STATEMENTS BE TRUE AND ON THE POINT!

LordReed:
Where did he say there is no god?

Satan must come.

AntiChristian:
I said:
[b]Was God with anyone in the first place?

Does this not have a meaning?

AntiChristian:
Job was tested severely and that doesn't mean God left him.

And does this not have a separate meaning different from the one up?

Abeg, leave me alone.

PastorMIsBack:
My daughter is 18 and going to Uni in September. I do not wish her to get married now. Finish Uni, get a good job/career, be settled, then get married. Not marry now then begin to rely 100% on her husband. O ti oh

I saw you down there when I was typing. .

AntiChristian:
Where is the double speak, probably in your head. Better check what you are on.

You obviously need a psychiatrist to not see that

AntiChristian:
Was God with anyone in the first place?

reasonably meaning God is with no one based on the thread you say "there is no God"!

Then immediately after implying that "there is no God" you thereafter say

AntiChristian:
.

Job was tested severely and that doesn't mean God left him.[/quote]Meaning, God was with Job and therefore implying that "There is God", thus, cancelling your former earlier statement implying that "there is no God". Which is called "Double Speak" aka "speaking from 2 sides of your mouth", in Law, it is the offence of "Approbating and Reprobating".

haekymbahd:
Alright, I understand now he can't judge human himself unless God tells him to but why?

Because, He came for something else.

"I came that ye may have The Way, Know The Truth and Acquire, Life,". John 14:6

haekymbahd:
So who will judge on judgement day will it be Jesus or his father...

Jesus, The Christ! "All power is given unto Me, in heaven and in earth" Mathew 28:18.

But all judgment is postponed to "In The Day When I Visit, I will visit their sin upon them" Exodus 32:34

....

PastorMIsBack:
Remain confused. You want Jesus to stone the woman to prove He is not a sinner? That's what we call Mercy.

Mercy always has a time limit!

To give opportunity for due compliance with The Law.

haekymbahd:
Why didn't Jesus/God condemn or stone the adulterer was he also a sinner?

Verse 15 and 16 Answers you "I judge no man". Translation "I did not come to judge man"

"And yet if I judge, my judgement is True". Translation "WHEN I COME TO JUDGE, MY JUDGEMENT SHALL STAND".

haekymbahd:
If Jesus didn't condemn the adulterer then who will condemn her or is adultery legal I'm confused.

All cases, since Eve, are filed for the "Day of Court and Judgment.

So, NO, HE DID NOT SIN. AS PROVEN BY THE FACT THAT EVERYONE PRESENT IN THAT CASE DID NOT ACCUSE HIM OF ANY WRONGDOING (SIN)

elated177:
El Elohe Yahshrael!

There is absolutely nothing wrong with a woman getting married in her late teen.

If you had known scripture, you would have known that this is the fulfillment of The Prophecy.

And as you can see, it is only men talking here. No womb man at all.

Aaronsrod:
13 to 14 na better age.

Well trained and obedient straight from their fathers compound to ours. No

Thus do we bend their will to our service . As the Bible teaches they must submit to their husbands in ALL THINGS. Ephesians 5:22-33, Colossians 3:18,

Only for them to enter "hoe period" in there 18-28. O I forgot, they are now married, so they do not need to stop whorering.

Kobojunkie:
Are you asking if God make different and contradicting laws for different religions?

No, he is not and you ought to have known that.

And as you can see, I answered him and he did nairaland suicide (deactivated).

IMAliyu:
Parts of the rhetoric that lead me down a road of indifference.

I find it arrogant that some Muslims and Christians assume to have perfect insight into the mind of God, enough to assume the role of a judge themselves and pass judgment onto others.

Has God not revealed His Mind?

And did He not give us a basis for judging?

IS THERE ANY BETTER GREATER THAN HIS OR EVEN CLOSE?

IMAliyu:
You think the religion you were conveniently born into and raised in...

This is even most irrelevant because till tomorrow you still pick up ways of living which are better than the ones you were born into, to use them to bring good to yourself. Eg even this thinking you have was not from the place where you were born but you picked it up from a foreign land, because you liked it and you thought it was better.

So this thinking does not stand at all.

IMAliyu:
Just lead a righteous life (regardless of your religion or lack thereof)

Now, when you say this, is there not obviously a basis for the measurement (judgement) of those who can be said to have "led a righteous life" vs. those who fell short of it? (Again, the Judgement issue and the "Insights into the Mind of God" issue)

Snakedoctor1:
Thanks for the encouragement.
BTW, dad died of some kind of snake venom while on the front line. Long story.
It's well. Now I know better.

Oh! Condolences.
You are an anti-snake Doctor, I understand.

iramure:
you are right!
I picked it up, went through few parts, saw no sense in it and eventually dumped. Common sense has been guiding me.

Fine! common sense is your god, I respect that but, just know that there are people like me who would be there to mock you when your common sense does not put you in a good place.

And surely, we would kick and cut when you call our God into the matter, for you are supposed to call your god, common sense and not ours.

iramure:
is farther than the way you view it. Think deeply!!

It is not. It is just A Book! No different from James Hardly Chase, John Grisham, Sidney Sheldon,

You either like what you see and you follow it to see if it is True, most especially as it Said It is True, different from the Chase, Grisham and co, or you can put it away and continue to plot your own life.

It's as simple as that!

xproducer:
“The fear of the LORD is clean, enduring for ever: the judgments of the LORD are true and righteous altogether. More to be desired are they than gold, yea, than much fine gold: sweeter also than honey and the honeycomb. Moreover by them is thy servant warned: and in keeping of them there is great reward. Who can understand his errors? cleanse thou me from secret faults” - Psalm 19:9-12

Peace and Blessings!

I think the Greatest Commandments for our days is "Hear what God Hath Said and Do it!.

It was for those days when people could claim that they did not Know Who Is God and all.

But now, every one knows, so it is a case of Listen and Obey or you can do as you usually like to do.