₦airaland Forum

gnss:
...I want to differ on this sir ...What is Enforceable about Sex Mate Living together for Several Years , How do we define an Agreement under this Context ...No formal or Informal Marriage Contract ,No documents U mean if I should go to a Nite Club now and I see a Lady ,Invite her to my house to sleep with her ,We have an Agreement of an amount and I settle her and later she discovered I am with no woman ,then she started coming often and we continued the sexual Relationship ,I give an agreed amount anytime he comes ,Later he moved into my House ,Takes care of her needs ....This goes on for some Years ,No Child .Along the line we had a differences and she left my home ,after some few weeks ,She sued me to Court .On what Ground will that be ,What would be her Claim.,That I kept her at my home without her Consent ,that I owned her money or what .I don't understand.

Respectfully, your scenario does not fall within the meaning of an Agreement. And what you described is the typical African Man/Woman Relationship, in which case, the man bears all the burdens of the relationship and he consents to the burden while the woman's contribution is received on the face of it.

Where you see this issue play out is in Value Relationships as seen in foreign Jurisdiction because, living conditions are quite arduous there.

Therefore, things like rent, cars, fuel, food, companionship, sex, travels, hotels, restaurant bills etc are very very important to them and are valuable to them in any relationship.

Therefore, any one who seeks to be a part of their lives must take up some parts of these obligations.

And the where a partner assists in the other partners liability, that other partner now owes reimbursements to the Assisting partner and failure to reimburse brings liability.

All these is known and Agreed by the intending couple, in that jurisdiction.

This idea of relationship is unknown and uncommon in African Jurisdictions.

Saintmary:
Well, the person of interest is your Cousin's Mom. She is the one who forced and still forces everyone else in your family to come in contact with the man. If she had separated from him (since she obviously refused to divorce him even at the cost of her well being) you guys could have related with him from a distance, making things easier for all involved. Very selfish, lazy and foolish woman.

Meen, you are wicked oh, No Compassion at all!

bukatyne:
An interesting angle.

What if the children decide to relate with the parents from a distance?

Seeing the father continually treat the mother like trash and her constant acceptance is enough to finger any child's brain.

Before the son does something that makes the father curse him.

This is the Law -"The Curse, causeless, shall Not Come".

"They that forsake the law praise the wicked: but such as keep the law contend with them" Proverbs 28:4

MrBrownJay1:
fight someone for doing something they've done for +20yrs? lol... stop wasting your time, as such action can send you 6 feet under. tell your mother to leave this abusive demon and basta... but raising your hand on your father aint gonna end well for you!

do you actually think that any father would accept that the ungrateful child they fed/raised/schooled for +20yrs suddenly think he/she can beat you and tell you what to do?!

That is why it is Very Bad to Do A Wicked Thing, for when you Do Wrong, even your New Born Baby, is Right To Reject You, because you are Evil!

For it is The Law - "All Workers of Wickedness Must Be Cut Off" and "A wise King Scattereth All Evil"

sonmvayina:
The people who created hell also created purgatory....so you can go to purgatory if you die in veniel sin..

But to the creator death is just sleep...

Man has already been judged.

"From dust you where made, to dust you shall return"..

Any other thing is for social engineering (population control )

The Deceits of Catholic church is so well entrenched in your soul that you are accustomed to blindness, if not you would have seen that Judgment Only Comes After a Trial, Which Only Comes After A Charge or Accusation of the Commission of an Offence is Made.

Therefore, that "From dust .." Judgement belongs to Someone who has been Found Guilty of an Offence, at his Trial.

It is The Law of God that "No Man Can Be Convicted for an Offence, which he has not yet Committed". Not to talk of him being Accused of that which he has not yet done!

LordReed:
Executing an 80 year plan while family members are dying and you have the power to intervene now? I can BS. No man who has love for his family and has the power to prevent harm from coming to them will standby and wait for devastation to be visited on his family for 80 years before he intervenes in the name of a plan. Such a person who can execute such a plan is clearly not good.

Remember, I am not man and weak and Stupid. I have Great Powers, and there is Nothing I can not do for and on behalf of My Family.

My Family Knows this and they know that I Always have a better Plan than they can ever conceive, therefore, they Trust my 80 year old plan, Knowing that all that they have gone through for My Sakes, will Most Surely Be Returned and Compensated to them in the Unending Life of Goodness, in the Permanent Cure of All the things, that previously harmed them.

So, surely, 80 years of mixed goodness and evil can not be compared to Eternal Living in Goodnesses Alone.

For this is the kind of investment that wise people are always searching for, in that they suffer a loss of 80 years hardship to Acquire An Eternal Life of Rest-filled Enjoyment.

Which is actually not a novel thing Only by far better as it is seen, people suffer the pain of 65 years of working only to get at best 15 years of Pension of Rest.

So, this Plan is no different only by far far much more profitable and much more better.

LordReed:
It was the point of the question. You have power to intervene and prevent the suffering of your family but you are just gonna standby for 80years? What kind of good is that?

Another angle in Answer is that My Family Knows My Plan and the Reason for my Plan and therefore, they know that if I am not intervening, It is in Execution of A Plan, which they are even aware of and Understand the Wisdom of It, therefore, they Also Agree with the Plan!

LordReed:
It was the point of the question. You have power to intervene and prevent the suffering of your family but you are just gonna standby for 80years? What kind of good is that?

Okay!

My first intervention was that I Wiped Out All the Evil and Corrupt People and Purified The Whole Earth Anew.

Then by the Knowledge and Law that, It is A Clean Towel, that is Reasonably used to properly wipe Away A Dirty Surface, Not A Dirty Towel, which will make it Worse.

Thus, i Put down A Clean and Good man (Noah) and his family, in the New Purified and Washed World, under the Law that yam must give birth to yam; A Clean Good family must give rise to other Clean Good Families.

Yet, after a while, men, again, still elected to Hurt Me and Seek my hurting. I chose to ignore it, and find Another Solution, since the Noah Plan has been Corrupted.

I therefore, looked for the Worsest (permit my use of word) House in All the World and Took over it, Knowing that if the Worsest has changed and can change, all the other less worse families will have No Excuse.

Therefore, I Launched the Abrahamic Plan, that through him All the earth will be Whole and Good Again or I can conclusively come to the Judgment that these people love Wickedness and evil and they hate me and they Surely do not care, if I shall destroy them because they Wilfully Choose to Hurt Me Deeply and Continously, Neither do they wish to live.

So, Executed the Abrahamic Plan and behold their is Division in their Numbers, Those, who love me on one side and those who choose to hate me on the other.

And behold I looked once more, and I said, to myself, "Let Me Go Down To These People who hate Me and Directly Tell them to their Faces, What and How I shall Hotly Deal with them for their Wickedness, Maybe, they may alter their evil ways.

Therefore, I intervened once more, by coming down, speaking and teaching them, even given them in advance My Judgments, Yet, they Proved me Right that they Hate Me and that they would kill Me, if they Could.

And they eventually fulfilled their desires of their evil killing, Me, their God thereby Proving Beyond All Reasonable Doubt, that they hate Me and whilst they Love being evil, therefore, Sealing Their Fate!

After All these, I have Still Tarried in Giving My Judgments, though, Now For A short time, And yet Do they do even greater evil and much Wickedness.

This is the Great Goodness of The Lord, in that He is Given Too Much Rope to Evil People, especially these days unlike the beginning, (but I understand and I Love Him For It) for No, there is None as good as The Lord, who after his son has defied him, insulted and ridiculed him, who still stole his father's property, sold them and fled with them, yet the father did not pursue him.

Which man on earth did not disown, in the least a child who did all these, and should that child run into that father by mistake, is it not death that is waiting for that child, as we say?

The Lord has intervened severally, but wicked people love their Wickedness and choose destruction rather than change their ways, as Proven even in here in this thread.

And Truthfully I, am baffled however it is quite intriguing to see how far they are willing to go with their love and doings of Wickedness!

LordReed:
And all the people suffering in the mean time are inconsequential? And you think that is good? Wow just wow.

You have shifted your post for the question you asked was "Why The Lord is Tarrying in Giving Judgments And Not about "people suffering".

Separate issue, Separate thread Required!

petra1:
You need the smartness. He'll is a temporal abode for the wicked. For just like the prison for pridoners Awaiting Trial

It's Called a Holding Cell, then if found guilty, they shall be moved to the Main Prison!

VillagePeople11:
I can't make any sense out of your reply...you sound like confusion.... Is hellfire a proportionate punishment for varying level of sin committed by different people? That is the question.... What is it with killing somebody that looks at your wife.... Laws of different lands have different level of punishment for different crimes ranging from community service to death sentence. What hellfire does is throw all of them into a burning fire for eternity.... My question is does that make any sense to you?

Lake of Fire is The Fore-Warned and Pre-Warned Designated Punishment for Offences Commited over a duration of time.

Such that, if not that such a soul was Cut off and Put in Prison of (death), such soul will continue to Sin, even Previously Unimaginable Sins shall be implemented.

All Done From the beginning, without restraint and redress!

Community service, fines, short imprisonment are for what you call small small sins in law it is called Misdemeanors and Simple Offences.

But for felonies/ Capital Offences, as you have seen some offemders have been given Double Lifetime Punishment and more which only covers A Range and Series of Particular Offences, as it is Impossible for man to CHARGE and PROVE the Truth of All the Offences Commited by a man.

But this is Not So With The Lord, For Camera and Super Microphone plenty and Lifetime Gig Plenty. And Inexhaustible Storage Dey and Nobody fit break in nor hack am

LordReed:
if you had great power why would it take 80years for you to do something about it?

That is what it means to be Fully-Power-Full and Good!

Because I can Hurt , Beyond Imagination, And I Do Not Like Hurting, Neither Do I Want To Hurt.

So, I Remove Myself From Seeing your Hurting of Me, Yet, They Reach Me. I Turn to the side, yet they tap my shoulders. I move away and put Another to Deal with you, Yet, He too, Cryeth Out to Me, that He is Overwhelmed, and that He Too Requires Judgement.

Whilst I did all these, 80 years went by in your world and alas, he who has sinned, is put in prison for My Trial and Examination of him, because Many Cry Against him, for Judgement.

VillagePeople11:
I can't make any sense out of your reply...you sound like confusion.... Is hellfire a proportionate punishment for varying level of sin committed by different people? That is the question.... What is it with killing somebody that looks at your wife.... Laws of different lands have different level of punishment for different crimes ranging from community service to death sentence. What hellfire does is throw all of them into a burning fire for eternity.... My question is does that make any sense to you?

I was attempting to bring to your notice how the Judgment of Lake of Fire is appropriate, but you do not understand, so let me attempt it this way.

The appropriateness of the Rightness of Lake of Fire is based on
1) The Gravity and Weight of Each and Every Offence and Offences committed. (And it settled that we commit diverse Offences in One Day, so hold this in mind because this part is not yet exhausted)

2) The Regularity of Those Offences committed that is, the one on earth (visible and physical sins) maybe every 3 hours of A Day in addition to the one committed in heaven, which is spirit, and those who have not learnt to control their spirit commit many many Offences in the spirit at least hourly eg (murder of their neighbour because he has bought a better looking car, smooshing your neighbours wife, servant, daughter without permission, therefore you have Raped, using your spirit to cause your neighbours wife to sleep with you on earth as you have done in heaven etc I see this everyday,).

So, count, using the Law of Discerning that which is an Offence, the number of Offences perpetrated in one week and the regularity thereof, if you can?

3) It Also takes Account of Each and Every Person Who has been affected by that offence and shall be affected by that offence eg Till the world ends, People would still be blaming Satan and Adam and Eve for the Miserability of the lives.

Every Soul who is affected by an Offence and cries out because of the pain of the Offence, Such Soul brings a Charge Against that Sinner and The Lord will hear it, and if that Charge Sticks, He shall be Punished Anew. Why? Because it is The Law, "Where There is A Wrong, There Must Be A Remedy"

So, check out Satan and AdamEve's Charge of Offences and how many millions of souls who have gone through this world who have blamed them and the millions of souls who now blame them and the millions that shall come to blame them, till the end of the world? How long is that charge going to be?

4). Failures To Heed Repeated Warnings.
In Spite of Repeated Warnings and Counsels and Admonishings and Even The Threat of Sanction.

Under here are, all the several souls past and present, who had severally Chastised and Counseled you that you should not do that which is not good, yet you did not listen to them. Now, you have Offended them for they thought you would respect them and listen to them but, you did not, So Now, They also Accuse You of Offence of insubordination in the case of Elders, Disrespect in the case of your peers, Disregard, Nonchalance, Recklessness, Negligence, etc

5) Failure To Desist from Committing Offences after Several Warnings. (I don tire to dey type, so short cut)

6) Failure to Remedy your Offences.

7) Failure to Utilise Provision, Provided and Made by God to Wipe Away your Offences

8. ) Refusal to Utilise Provision, Provided and Made by God to Wipe Away your Offences.

There are still many more that justify the Punishment through the use of the Lake of Fire, but I can not bring all of them, for the list is very long.

Let me stop here, my finger dey pain me and d phone done dey hot!

gnss:
. Could a man Agreed with a woman that she would be His Bed sex mate ,Live together ,No Kids ,No court Marriage ....The man feeds the Lady ,Pays for the rental ,Buys her clothes in a nutshell takes full responsibility of the lady while the lady inturn gives only the man her Private part for a long period of Years .Can that be a relationship based on a Predetermined sets of right and shared Liabilities ? Would a woman agreed to such alone without been interested in other things

This is The Law - Consensus ad idem and "Consent Makes The Law".

No matter how imbalance and unusual an agreement is, once it is shown that the parties Willfully agreed to it, it is enforceable.

VillagePeople11:
A gruesome death maybe...but figure this same person burning for 10 million years together with petty theives, drunkards, gigolos, stubborn children etc for the same amount of time.... Don't pick any extreme case to justify a general punishment that does not regard the severity of the crime/Sin committed

Oh, no you are not been real! A gruesome death is for just looking at the wife. We have all experienced that when a certain husband thinks his wife is melting for you.

So, your judgement is still for charge 1, hour 1, at 10 minutes past a certain o'clock.

Add charge 2 which came at 55 minutes past that certain hour of hour 1, before it aggravated in the hours 2 and 3!

Imagine, what the Judgment will be by the time 12 hours have gone by on Only That 1 Charge, Excluding All the other charges you shall rack up along the way, by their own hourly Account.

virginboy1:
The HELL I know is the one Nigeria citizens are passing through in the hand of it's government.


Any other Hell fire is just a fictional phenomenon to keep religious people in check.

Thank God that you have acknowledged the hell that comes to Nigeria, his Senior Brother is the one a person shall meet when he dies and goes to him.

VillagePeople11:
There are different punishment for crimes committed, for instance fine, probation, 6months, 1 year, 10 years in jail etc.

Humans with their treacherous heart understands this and frown at any punishment that is too much for the crime committed i.e you shouldn't behead a person as punishment for slapping another person(assault). You don't kill your wife or child for disrespecting you.

Now take a second look at the hellfire punishment, the human lifespan is 80 years, and you have people dying at 15, 30, 50 45 etc. Let take a collection of 20 of these humans and call them sinners meant for hellfire.

Now you throw them into fire, i mean burning flames, and you do not even show them the mercy of dying, you continuously burn them for 1 hour, 10 hours, 24 hours, 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 1 year, 10years, the number of years equivalent to how long they lived, still burning, 100 years still burning, 200 years, 500 years, 2 million years, 10 million year.... Let me stop there.

Regardless of everything you have been thought, does the punishment of hellfire make any sense?

cc: lalastilala

What is your True Judgement going to be, on camera with sound microphones, your friend sleeps with your wife, your child complains about it and your friend kills him, your friend goes ahead to use your house as if he owns it, he also rapes your daughter, withdraws your monies in the bank, you inform him that you have the video and records of all his atrocities, yet he Insults you and calls you "a week stupid man, you can't do nothing". Then he goes ahead to begin to sell your properties and squander it on prostitutes while he has turned your wife and children to slaves, whipping and killing them at pleasure, let me stop here.

All these going on for say 80 years, if you had great power, what punishment do you think is just to be meted on this man who has done these things to you personally?

gnss:
. Which System works ,Which Unfair ,Injustice and Un- Balanced Justice is that .Does it means because it's happened in Canada makes it a Justice Authority and Compelling on others in other Countries. There are things you are not Telling us ,U mean a man and woman live together as Sex Mate only nothing else for 10 Years ?

You know they have what we we in Nigeria would call a weird relationship type which is a relationship based on a Predetermined sets of Rights and Shared Liabilities.

Thus if any party fails to keep their own side of the agreement, they could be sued for it.

Sarita01:
Lol,that guy is actually right,a few months back a Canadian woman sued her lover of 10yrs for refusing to settle her after their breakup. Mind you they never got married,they never had any children together although the man has children with a previous partner,the funny thing is she won the lawsuit and the guy paid her a very huge amount of money for being his fvck buddy and will continue to pay monthly upkeep. so in a system that works,she have a very strong case

In follow up to Truespeak is;

The Tenets of The Law is To Live Honestly, To Harm No One and To Give To Each His Due!

coolsegun2002:
I told u to go read the OPs original statement...if u read it well u will see that he raised three different points to nullify the woman's claim even though he already knew and told us this woman had children for their late son...below are the points

1.That the woman isn’t legally married to the man.
2. that she left for some time....

3. to now paint her bad... he added that man was sick in her absence till he died....and she ddnt take care of him...

Why bring up number these points...when he already knew the woman had children for the late man, making her entitled to come back and ask for what is due for her children ...?? It was to make their family’s case of denying the woman and her children strong....

U’ll see that many people were commenting in the first page that there’s no official union, so there’s nothing between them to dissolve...that’s becos people were addressing one of the points he raised( that the union is unimportant because it’s devoid of paper).

That’s why I came in and Addressed his number one point by saying “ ....paper or no paper living with someone for a significant number of years with or without children technically counts as civil union everywhere in the world...”they can’t make the union nonexistent just becos of paper....( that’s not the reason why are claim is valid anyways, but I’ll tell u why I mentioned it below)

I followed up with another statement...that fact that she has a child makes her case even stronger....

U see why I mentioned the first point ....families like that of the OP are wicked....if the woman never had a child, and never left.... they would have still brought up one of the 3 points above to prevent her of having any inheritance
...I.e the marriage is paperless....

Thanks for the clarification, for the most peaceful way of resolving a conflict is through the use of healthy debate, and this statement above, without doubt is very clear. (and as an obiter this is provided by Natural Law )

And you are right, it is Wrong for the family of the man to prevent the children of couple from taking from their father.

coolsegun2002:
Seriously....I am tired....by the way...stop trying to pull ur holy than thou attitude on me...no one is perfect here....if u are not Jesus ..keep u perfection speech to urself...

In Truth, the more I learn Natural Law, the more I see that as a person we are "Under-Righting" that is, we do not do the whole Right.

And as a Christian, Natural Law Clearly Shows that we Fall Short on Rights and we do not do the Sufficient Right or Rightness or Righteousness in any matter, therefore, we are Unrighteous.

And if we are Unrighteous, we can never qualify to be considered for the Kingdom of God.

And I do want to qualify for it, and the criteria is "Do No Wrong".

And Like Equity has said "He Who Comes to The Law (I put here, The Lord), Must Come With Clean Hands!" As gleaned from the Statement in

Psalms 24:3-4

3 Who shall ascend into the hill of the Lord? or who shall stand in his holy place?

4 He that hath clean hands, and a pure heart; who hath not lifted up his soul unto vanity, nor sworn deceitfully.

coolsegun2002:
marrige is one of the most complicated situation in the world.....

And here, is the reason why you all are confused, running up and down, in an Attempt to resolve simple problems.

Marriage is Easy, if and only if, the couples Do Good Only to each other.

But this is Not So, for it appears one party is attempting to defraud the other or prevent another from taking a benefit. Or in the case of Liability, Fleeing, from it, while the other pursues so that they may have joint liability.

All these evasions and schemings are Definitely Settled in Natural Law, in their respective places.

coolsegun2002:
...besides there’s a present condition that qualifies her to come back, which is her kids...that superceeds any other reason why she left....

Her children are hers' and Wherever they are, She has a Right of Access to her children, No Dispute here for the Op did not raise any issue about the children.

And Neither did the Op say that they have prevented her Access to the children, So leave this children matter. If you are interested in the analysis of the Rights of A Unmarried Mother separated from the father of her children, Raise A thread to that purpose.

coolsegun2002:
I have seen this case plenty times....becos the she left with her kids, the family of the man Wants to cut her nd her kids off.....
why?
because giving her kids any inheritance automatically means she has gotten something especially when the kids are still young....

Aha, Lawyer, even your courts have settled this one na, "That Nothing shall prevent the children of the deceased from entering into the deceased's estate'

The wahala is that most times the family no go gree until court chook mouth.

coolsegun2002:
.u are the one that’s not getting the OP and the man’s family stand...go and read the the ops first comment in the first page and ask the OP if the kids are grown up enough to claim and manage their father’s inheritance without their mother......

If they are adults..their mum won’t be there in the first place .....

This one is settled na, we have already said she can claim for "their' (No be only her get the children, hence instead of her I elected to say "their children" children, whether little or grown.

But it appeared that you were attempting to stretch the fact that she could even claim for herself, that one is a very Big NO, NOT POSSIBLE, IN THIS CASE, UPON THE SAME FACTS!

coolsegun2002:
U saying that the woman doesn’t have right by herself is just a desperate attempt to modify the condition on ground....the woman in question cannot be viewed separately becos she has kids... why do u keep bringing up another scenario where she can’t lay claims??

This is your statement causing contention hereunder!

coolsegun2002:
She can still lay some claims legally.. but only in a customary court if she decides to sue the family of the man for trying to cut off...

because a man and a woman ddnt marry legally by state law does not nullify the union completely as “never happened”....living with someone for a significant number of years with or without children technically counts as civil union everywhere in the world...the fact that she has a child makes her case even stronger....

She might not have a say with ordinary mouth. but her claims are valid if she drags the family of the husband to a customary court ...

As stated earlier, it is settled that with children, the woman can make a claim but the objection is on the fact that without Children, it is impossible, coming on the ground that you have said "with or without children her claims are valid"

We state that with children it is valid and without children, it is impossible for her to make any claim. Imagine, play-play girlfriend wey don terminate since 2008 go come get right to come dey drag property of old boyfriend when e die, Nna men, Lauretta Onochie go be president before e happen.

orisa37:
COVETOUSNESS IS THE THEORY.(INSTRUCTION).

HOPE IS THE PRACTICAL.(BLESSING).

Covetousness is Stealing and Stealing is an Act or Action.

Which means Covetousness is An Act, which is Practically and Realistically Done!

author=Acehart

"In the multitude of words, a liar will lie there. I thank you for being a liar. Go about your ego-tripping.

Let me bust your bubble: The Criminal Code, S. 30.35, provides: "A person under the age of twelve years is not criminally responsible for any act or omission unless it is proved that at the time of doing the act or making the omission he had the capacity to know that he ought not to do the act or make the omission."


If you want to make you defense in Sharia Law because you are a Muslim, say it. Section 39 of the BauchiState Shari'ah Penal Code Law, 2001. The age of maturity is not defined. Some other states' Shari'a penal codes contain a slightly different wording. For example, the Shari'a penal code of ZamfaraState specifies that the consent of a "a person who is under eighteen years of age or has not attained puberty" is not considered as consent.

If I hate you, it’s because you are a liar. "
_------------------++. -----------------++++++
Dtruthspeaker.
You should know when you Lose it Not wise to keep, keeping on, for you will subject yourself to Further Ridicule!

However, it is seen that Fools Keep on Digging in an Attempt to get out of a pit!

NOW YOU ARE ATTEMPTING TO SHIFTING YOUR POST AND STEER IT AWAY FROM THE LAW OF CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY COMMENCING AT THE AGE OF 7 YEARS TO LIABILITY OF A PERSON OF 12 YEARS, WHICH IS NOT WHAT I EVER RAISED!

NOW IT IS NOT BEYOND YOU TO DECEIVE, AS SATAN DID EVE, Yet ye shall claim to be Holy and Good and Righteous, Worthy and Deserving of the Kingdom of the Holy and Good Lord!

Shame be on you!"

So, seeing that you would not stop shaming yourself, I leave you be!

Acehart:
I remember someone saying this about you ( hope I am not mistaken): He just finally discovered what's wrong with your brain: on the left side there is nothing right and on the right side, there is nothing left. I now know you aren't saved since 2 Timothy 2:15 has no hold on you, hence, you spew lies instead of the truth.

If I lie, there are many here who will not waste a milli second to call me a Liar!

And Now you Falsely Accuse Me, And Condemn Me without A Fair Trial! Yet, you think yourself holy and Righteous and Just, Fit for the kingdom of God.

Seeing how you Extremely Hate Me without course, I thank God, for I have heard the Truth in your soul, for I did not know you Hate Me So, but Now I do.

Acehart:
I may be a LordReedian but you are a Muslim; In the northern states, the Penal Code 1960 specifies that seven is the minimum age of criminal responsibility and categorizes juvenile offenders as those under 17. According to the Sharia laws, children are eligible for hadd (for which the prescribed punishment is mandatory) and qisas (punished by retaliation) punishments from the age of puberty. [Constitution of Nigeria, Article 175(1).]

The minimum age of criminal responsibility varies among Nigerian states. The federal Children’s Rights Act 2003 does not specify a minimum age of criminal responsibility.

THANK YOU FOR PROVING THE TRUTH OF MY CASE FOR ME!

For the Penal Code is part of Your Laws in Jurisdiction called Nigeria. And Not Only the Penal Code but Also the Criminal Code Act, Most Applicable in Southern Nigerian where those Who Believe in the Principles of the Bible predominantly reside.

By Section 30 of The Criminal Code, it is Clearly and Expressly Stated that "A person under the age of 7 years is not criminally responsible for any act or omission."

You now can see that You Do Not Know Much!

coolsegun2002:
#.did I say it speaks for natural justice and fairness...?

No quarrel intended here.

Your laws could not escape Expressly Declaring and Stating that you Must Do "Natural Justice, Equity and Good Conscience".

coolsegun2002:
#. see.... it’s not my place to analyze the circumstances surrounding the marriage, marriage is complicated, why she left is not really my business.. in fact the OP ddnt say...he just said she left for a while and came back after death....if she ddnt have kids for the man.. she can’t come back naaa.

This is a bad statement because Doing Justice compells you to discover and ascertain that, which is True and Solid from that which is a Lie or Falls, sieving that which is Good from that which is Bad.

And this can only be achieved through Proper Analysis!

Any Lawyer who is not willing to do this really has no business in Law, for he condemns himself.

coolsegun2002:
#What’s the essence of this imagination u asking me to do....that’s not condition the OP gave us.. it’s about someone that came back to lay claims cos she has kids...I don’t get u ooooo ......

And we are all saying that the Woman herself, has No Right To Claim for herself or her benefit. If she was even the wife, she would not even have to make a claim.

But it is settled that the children do not even have to make a claim to take up their father's property, it is theirs already by Nature and Natural Law!

And the op has not made an issue about the children but About the woman, which is the reason why all comments are directed towards the Rightness or Righteousness of the woman's conduct and her purported case.

gnss:
Hmmm! Speechless

Yeah! That's how much your fellow man deprives you of your God given Rights and desires for you to NOT KNOW THEM.

It is even rather they want you to beg for even a little piece of them, as if he is the giver of it, meanwhile, it is yours already!

Acehart:
I don't know who would have read your comment on the age of accountability being seven years old and wouldn't think you are the 32 years old lunatic.

CC: LordReed

Wow! You have now become a LortReedian?
God's Word is Sure!

That aside, are you not a lawyer again that you do not know that it is your law, contained in your law books that a Child below 7years is not Criminally Responsible?

Shame be on you!

Bacteriologist:
Think of as me giving you a little heads up to pay more attention to discussions before responding. It helps avoid making a complete fool of yourself.

Know that I do have the Right to attack any part of a post, anywhere and I can not be circumscribed or compelled to respond to any post, simply because, you desire it.

Acehart:
Does a child with cerebral palsy or autism or Down syndrome know what is good at the age of 7?

You had to ask a stupid question? Really

You could have gone the whole mile and as well asked if a 32 year old lunatic is also accounted for in my statement? Shame on you!

Bacteriologist:
Another bullshït response born from a straw man grabbing, unthinking, bible bashing christian.

How very thoughtful of you to know what I was feeling when god showed up "at first."

So the best records of those who accepted an intelligent god and talked with him are not books filled with thought experiments, empirical facts or epistemological theories but stories of mythological events in stone age settings, dragons, unicorns, slavery and how to take virgins as spoils of war.

What an intelligent god you serve! No wonder you sound so intelligent just like him!

Gotcha! And you could proceed no more!

Bacteriologist:
You get insulted when you fail to pay attention and use common sense.

If you were following correctly, I asked for evidence of Ehisscotch's claims when he said


When you can't even follow a single page thread properly it's no surprise how your type miss the inconsistencies and numerous lies in the Bible and your entire religion. It's a pity.

You have just added this!

it's obvious that you are attempting to insult me and annoy me to leave this thread!

Interesting!

author=Bacteriologist


You get insulted when you fail to pay attention and use common sense.

If you were following correctly, I asked for evidence of Ehisscotch's claims when he said "

More Insults!

Like everyone here, I have a right to appraise any post or part of your post, here, free and independent from whatever issue you would have desired I specifically address.