Dulcet7's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Dulcet7's Profile › Dulcet7's Posts
He was on a visit to Jerusalem and he struck up a conversation with an elderly man in the Muslim Quarter. This shopkeeper seemed keen to sell him jewelry. Moreso, since the shopkeeper was a Sufi mystic, he seemed even keener to engage him in matters of the spirit. He told him that religions are human inventions, so we must avoid the temptation of, for instance, worshipping Islam rather than Allah. He said what matters is opening yourself up to the mystery that goes by the word God, and that can be done in any religion. As he tempted him with more turquoise and silver, he asked what the man was doing in Jerusalem. When he said he was researching in order to write on the world’s religions, the shopkeeper put down the jewelry, looked at him intently, and, placing a finger on his chest for emphasis, said, "Do not write false things about the religions." Mystics often claim that the great religions differ only in the inessentials. They may be different paths but they are ascending the same mountain and they converge at the peak. Examples abound, and I will name three: [list] [li]the Daoist sage Laozi, who wrote his classic the Daodejing just before disappearing forever into the mountains;[/li] [li]the Sufi poet Rumi, who instructs us to "gamble everything for love";[/li] [li]and the Christian mystic Julian of Norwich, who revels in the so-called feminine aspects of God.[/li] [/list] But the focus on this thread will not be on these so-called spiritual superstars. It is on ordinary religious folk like us — the stories we tell, the doctrines we affirm, and the rituals we practice. And these stories, doctrines, and rituals are so entirely different. Christians do not go on the hajj to Mecca; Jews do not affirm the doctrine of the Trinity; and neither Buddhists nor Hindus trouble themselves about sin or salvation. So here is the question: What do you think about the Mystics' (and Shopkeeper's) assertion? Is religion truly various surfaces of the same object? |
Joagbaje:Ok |
imhotep:+1 |
My heart is deeply moved for Nigeria, if we have educated people thinking like some of the posters on this thread. Kobojunkie, Deep Sight and Sagamite thanks for all your posts. They have positively and properly tipped the scales of sanity on this thread. ![]() |
The replies from those defending the prosperity gospel give me very much cause for concern because love is somewhat missing in their equation. |
Beautiful! I have never been to East Africa. . . |
Joagbaje:Thanks. That means you were talking to yourself here (Feb 28): ![]() AKHOZEM:Ooooookaaaay. . . ![]() |
I once said my intuition hardly ever fails me. Joagbaje you said you took over AKHOZEM's ID in January. Was it before or after this event recorded below (also in January)? https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-584241.0.html JeSoul: Dulcet7:JeSoul link=topic=584241.msg7523845#msg7523845 date=1294933245:+1 AKHOZEM: Dulcet7: AKHOZEM: Dulcet7: |
Thanks for shedding light, Congoshine. I was going to say this looks more like a satirical movement against popular religions, and not a religion itself. |
Thanks for shedding light, Krayola. You are correct the debates & conflicts started earlier, middle to late 1st century. I thought you were speaking of organized "right thinkings" of a global rather than local import. By the time churches started gaining access to other churches' beliefs via their own epistles and gospels, global crises must have escalated and in 2nd century ending concerned people defined their own take. E.g. Marcion came up with his own canon, first ever canon, drawn from only Paul's epistles and a gospel like John but stripped down to remove the virgin birth and stuff. John versus Thomas? I dont know for sure but I think it wasnt refuting only Thomas but maybe other gnostic texts too. To drive the point home and offer an alternative, John is then written in a gnostic style. |
Hi thehomer Thanks for your submission. For me I believe "Son of God" relates to "A chip off the block". It means if God ever wore a physical body, this will be as close as it gets. Hi Krayola. I like your last post but let me offer some additions/corrections that I think are in order. 1. Orthodoxy and heresy began to be defined late 2nd century. Prior, religion was personal and defined by intuitive practice. 2. The gospel of John is almost definitely not historical, but rather a calculated refuttal of the gospel of Thomas. To cap it, Thomas was also ridiculed in John. |
Krayola:Hello Krayola. I agree with this. |
Thanks for replying me, thehomer but it is not yet clear. In what [b]sense [/b]do you refer to [b]son [/b]when you say "[some] Christians believe there is some supreme creator (God) who has a [b]son [/b]Jesus"? |
Joagbaje:Hello Joagbaje. I don't believe this. Rather, they all got born again when they believed in the God that can single-handedly make people born-again. |
thehomer: One doesn't have to be a fundamentalist or a literalist, but such a person must believe some basic tenets. Can a person be considered a Christian who does not believe that Jesus is the Son of God?Hello thehomer I found out you are an atheist, but what exactly do you understand/did you mean by the term "son of God" when you said the above? Thanks in advance. |
mazaje:Hello mazaje. I said I think, and not [/i]that I know. Think [i]carefully about the following sayings of Jesus. If you still have questions, please let me know. Gospel of Thomas verse 97: Jesus said: The kingdom of the [Father] is like a woman; carrying a jar full of meal and walking a long way. The handle (of) the jar broke; the meal poured out behind her on the road. She was unaware, she knew not her loss. When she came into her house, she put down the jar (and) found it empty. John 6:63 The Spirit gives life; the flesh counts for nothing. The words I have spoken to you are spirit and they are life. John 3:8 The wind blows wherever it pleases. You hear its sound, but you cannot tell where it comes from or where it is going. So it is with everyone born of the Spirit. |
Giving is a symbolic action. Many things people do in religion represent something much deeper but often it gets so commonplace over time that the true spiritual essence is entirely lost. In some cases it becomes corrupted or ba$tardized: I do not believe anyone should ever be asked to give to God, except if at the time of telling, they did not know what giving to God symbolizes. For someone who is not new in any faith, they should never be told to give. If they love their God, it will be natural to show it by caring for their fellow man. When you give, it shows your heart's passion towards the cause. In the case of giving to God, it shows you have more passion or love towards him, enough to put him on a high level on your scale of preferences: your money being an outward representation your influence or values. Remember the widow's mite. She gave her whole being in that tiny monetary piece. |
Krayola:I think the bolded is true for most of the Bible. |
Deep Sight:You are quite close, Deep Sight ![]() |
Moderators have cleaned up the mess. You guys are just too much |
Thank you Karyola. My best parts of the post are The path to salvation thus becomes more like an awakening, an understanding, and an experience of what is already here but we cannot see. The spiritual path (prayer, meditation, fasting, worship, etc.) becomes a mechanism to peal back the onion layers of who we are and what we think the world around us is, so that we can examine the power of God within ourselves, within others, and within existence itself. Salvation is an opening of our eyes and hearts, a new way of seeing the universe.All those lines read the lips of my very own heart ![]() |
Reading this I am so happy for you, my friend! My heart is very glad for you indeed, Ileke-Idi! God really loves you ![]() |
Get Blender http://www.blender.org/ It is free, open-source and it is of industrial standard. Learning materials abound on the internet. Here is a popular resource: http://www.blendercourse.com/English.aspx |
Sigh. ![]() Right now, the religion board is an eyesore. |
Buddha says real repentance is remembering it, going into the details fully aware of what happened; going backwards, reliving the experience. Reliving the experience is like unwinding; it erases. And not only that -- it makes you capable of more awareness, because awareness is practised when you are remembering it, when you are becoming again aware about the past incident. You are getting a discipline in awareness, in mindfulness. Next time you will become aware a little earlier. |
This is a statement of my own views of repentance: Jenwitemi's post is also very close to my own views. Repentance means retrospective awareness, repentance means looking backwards. You have done something. If you were aware then no wrong can happen, but you were not aware at the time you did it. Somebody insulted -- you became angry, you hit him on the head. You were not aware what you were doing. Now things have cooled down, the situation has gone, you are no more in anger; you can look backwards more easily. You missed awareness at that time. The best thing was to have awareness at that time, but you missed it, and now there is no point in crying and weeping over the spilt milk. But you can look, you can bring awareness to that which has already happened. |
Thanks, Deep Sight. ![]() |
TGIF, Deep Sight ![]() Deep Sight: Sometimes i wonder if you are a prankster. Hitler was adored by his people? Perhaps u are unaware of the numerous attempts to assasinate him. U seem not to know the level of intimidation that hitler deployed. Go to Germany today and see if he is adored or an icon of national shame, the object of a national guilt that is yet to heal.Hitler's people were the Nazis [/i]and not the Germans. Many WWII German soldiers were non-Nazi in fact. Nazis adored Hitler, and wherever they still exist in pockets, they are believed to still adore their belated Fuhrer. Deep Sight: You say you respect him by dint of his story and struggle. By the same token you must respect despots such as Idi Amin, Pol Pot, Stalin, Mobutu, Mussolini and the like.Well, for me I distinguish [/b]between respect and admiration. You might accuse me of splitting hairs very often ~ and you won't be far from the truth ~ because I don't see the world in black and white. I respect [b]the riveted application [/b]of a man, [i]any man, to his vision [b]even though I might not approve, condone or excuse or even admire what he did or why he did it. This is because it shows that if this man's heart had known [/b]better, the same application would have made a [b]significantly positive impact [/b]in this world. I believe our experiences in life ~ when they interact with evil ~ are like an act of recycling - there is so much junk and poison but we can always salvage something even from the waste and evil. [b]There is always something to take away, to learn, to respect. Even from a life like Adolf Hitler's. Or the life of Pol Pot, Idi Amin, Stalin, Mobutu, Mussolini or Sani Abacha. Deep Sight: I dont understand u. Each time i read your posts and i am on the cusp of respect u come up with some post that is either a ridiculous prank or what else i just dont know.I am a little glad to read the submission above ![]() It is in line with the topic discussed here: all humans ~ all of us ~ are frail. Please look beyond whatever I say because I will never be 100% right. I will err a lot, but I will always try to be sincere. I only ask that whenever I say that which is useful to you, no matter how infrequent that happens, please accept and pass it on to others if you are urged in your heart to do so. I wish you a great weekend, Deep Sight. |
Interesting interview (although it seemed a little violent at some points ).Let me add some points about the "person" of Christ ~ which I believe is most pertinent. I quote a certain teacher Christ is totally different from Christianity so whenever you want to understand Christ, go directly and immediately -- not via Rome; then you will never understand Christ. Christ or Krishna or Buddha cannot be organized: they are so vast that no organization can do justice to them. Only small things can be organized. Politics can be organized, not religion, Nazism can be organized, communism can be organized -- not Christ, not Krishna. The sheer vastness is such that the moment you try to force them into a pattern they are already dead. |
Thanks for your response, noetic16. In essence, I can say your view is "repentance is an understanding of your current spiritual status and (it's difference/distance from) your spiritual goals"? Please keep them coming! |
Deep Sight:Thanks! Let me see. |
@Deep Sight: Scandalous? I apologize if you are offended. No, it's no impertinent [/i]joke. To his own people, the Fuhrer Adolf Hitler was a great man indeed - so I was only taking a global view. And as for what there is to respect about Hitler? I do not [b]condone [/b]or [b]appreciate [/b]what he did, but I [b]respect [/b]it all the same ~ [i]considering his background (I read his biography). Regards. @noetic16: I'm cool, sir ![]() |


I am Dulcet 
