Elampiro's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Elampiro's Profile › Elampiro's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 (of 561 pages)
Pedro Amada: Admin misquoted him even misunderstood him....Responding to the three questions posed by the Italian journalist and writer, the Pope says the key issue for non-believers is that of “obeying their consciences” when faced with choices of good or evil. God’s mercy, he stresses, “has no limits” for those who seek him with a sincere and contrite heart.Do you realize that this is a reported speech. Go back, read the original speech which quoted the Pope verbatim (word for word), then you will realize the difference. Pope Francis is so controversial that the Vatican always come to help correct his speech after the damage had been done. |
Ubenedictus: what is new there, christ became sin for us that we may have the righteousness of christ. Please note that isn't me or the pope, it is paul in the bible. Christ has become sin for me, that is why he was on the cross, each time i confess my sins i'm just acting on what the bible say Christ has become sin for me, confession is handing over sins to he who is sin for me and i simply take up the righteoussness of christ.You are so wrong. You are already falling for errors. Paul never thought this kind of error. Encouraging people to sin again without guilt. Imagine the Pope saying God doesn't even need to forgive us because it was not our sin in the first play. Wow! ''it isn’t that we say our sin and God forgives us. No, not that! We look for Jesus Christ and say: 'This is your sin, and I will sin again''. - Pope Francis. |
Goodnight all. |
Is this not what has been prophesied since? See below: ............................................................................................................... The time is near for the persecution of My Beloved Vicar, Pope Benedict XVI to reach its pinnacle. Monday, July 16th, 2012 My dearly beloved daughter it is time to prepare all of God’s priests, bishops and all those who run My Holy Catholic and apostolic Church on earth. For the time is near for the persecution of My Beloved Vicar, Pope Benedict XVI to reach its pinnacle. Very soon he will be forced to flee the Vatican. Then the time will come when My Church will divide, one side against the other. I call on all of My sacred servants to remember your most holy vows. Never forsake your mission. Never forsake Me. Never accept lies in lieu of the Truth. You must ask Me to help you in the difficult times ahead. You must rise, unite and follow Me. Pray for the strength you will need through this special Crusade Prayer. Crusade Prayer (66) For clergy: Help me to remain true to Your Most Holy Word Oh Dear Jesus help me to remain true to Your most Holy Word at all times Give me the strength to uphold the Truth of your Church in the face of adversity Fill me with the grace to administer the Holy Sacraments in the way in which You taught us Help me to feed Your Church with the Bread of Life and remain loyal to You even when I am prohibited from doing so Free me from the chain of deceit I may face in order to proclaim the true Word of God. Cover all Your sacred servant with your Precious Blood at this time so that we will remain Courageous, loyal and steadfast in our allegiance to You, Our Beloved Saviour, Jesus Christ. Amen. Do not be disheartened My beloved sacred servants for the discord has been prophesised and must come about in the final battle for souls. I love you and I will be with you now as you walk with Me the thorny road to Calvary so that Salvation can be achieved once more for all souls. Your Beloved Jesus http://www.thewarningsecondcoming.com/the-time-is-near-for-the-persecution-of-my-beloved-vicar-pope-benedict-xvi-to-reach-its-pinnacle/ The facebook link for online discussion of this group: https://www.facebook.com/JesusToMankind?fref=ts |
italo: Wrong! Every pope's statements have always been controversial to the world.You are wrong. Past Popes had their statements rejected by the circular world because it was the truth. But Pope Francis is getting a heavy applaud from the circular world because he is twisting the truth. Go and see how the gay people are praising him in yahoo and other western sites. |
coogar: so we weren't disgraced between 2000 and 2005 when keane was in his active years? perhaps you were too young to see what madrid's redondo did to keane & the likes at old trafford. fact remains it was under keane united did not smell the league title for 2.5 seasons. under carrick, the longest we have gone without a league title was 1 season.1. All these are stories. Hargeaves played one season and won the double. So whether United won 7 straight league or not is immaterial. In the league he got 100%, in the UCL he also scored 100%. United has played 4 UCL finals. In two of them we had ball winners (Kean/Hargreaves) and we won the matches. In other two we had shadow markers (Scholes and Carrick) and lost in scores, and also lost woefully in possession because no one to take away the ball from the opponents. I wont allow you drag me to that era when Fabian Batez conceded cheap goals to 'big Ronaldo', and that wasn't even a final match sef. 2. In Madird Jones was in the middle, yes. But if you watch the match you will see him stopped Ronaldo several times particularly in the second half, and he did some stopping by racing backwards. I guess you didn't watch the match. 3. You mentioned Rafael, Valencia, RVP, Rooney etc. You should try and know the reason for argument. The argument has to do with midfielders ability to win balls from opponents. Hargreaves, Kean, Fellaini are on same group. You can add Sneider, but not Kagawa. But this argument is not about Kagawa because I don't want to say bad things about him anymore until he gets his chance this season. |
My advise to Catholic at this time is that they should listen to Catholic end time visionaries. They have long prophesied these things and they are still talking. The time is short before the Tribulation begins. Get ready and prepared. I have the link of some catholic visionaries websites. |
blessed4ever: The Lord's Chosen Charismatic Revival Movement presents a two-day power-packed international Youth and Campus program, titled,'THAT WE MIGHT BE BLESSED',in Lagos,Nigeria, at the Lord's Chosen International HQ, Ijesha (stop at Ijesha Bus stop) this week Friday and Saturday, 13th & 14th September, 2013. Time: 8.00 am daily. All youths in high schools, School Leavers, Jambites, Campus students, Youth Corp Members,Academic and Non-academic staffs are all invited.I beg go and open another thread for this fake miracle worker and prosperity preacher. Don't derail this thread. We are not here for kindergarten Christianity and churches. |
coogar: that is the beginning of joblessness...,kean and Hargreaves won Champions League. They also won the league. So you have no point. The point is when we were without them, we were disgraced in the UCL final in terms of possession. Sneijder is not like Kagawa. Kagawa is indomie, he is not forceful and cant even win simple 50-50 balls. Sneider is a lion. We had Scholes Carrick , Fletcher and Park yet we went for Hargreaves and Anderson to seek power. Hargreaves left, immediately we became powerless in that department and everyone had been shouting since. Why did SAF put Jones on Ronaldo in Madrid and on Fellaini against Everton? Did we not have Cleverly and Anderson. Power! Power!! Power!!! |
Two goalkeepers are head and shoulder above the rest in the world- Cech and Neuer. They will bench anyone any where they go. |
vivichocs: @op, the topic u chose for this is so destructive cos the pope never said to atheists tht u dont need to believe in God to make heaven, tht wasnt the way he put it...but cos u wantd to criticize and ridicule d pope, u chose tht topic and I know many nairalanders ll make their judgement from tht without reading the whole write up. .for those who didn't read , see below..I posted it just the way the paper published it to the whole world. Come to think of it, is Pope Francis inexperience as to give room for him to be misquoted always in his controversial statements? Do you know Pope John Paul II reigned for 25 years and never for once did catholic had to defend any controversial statements? Pope Francis is just few months into his reign and this is the 4th time people are coming to his defence. What do you have to say to his statement when he said when people go to confession they should tell 'Jesus this is your sin and I will sin again'? He said Jesus is a sinner for us, and so when we sin it is not that we are confessing our sins, but only handing over Jesus sins back to Him. He is too controversial and seems to have a hidden agenda. The prophecy has told us there will be a Antipope. |
peppy luv: We don't need to defend him cuz he said the truth!he is obviously talking about believin in the christian God.Don't be carried away by the donation of Bill Gates and co because they sponsor abortion and use of contraceptives. Abortion records for dozens of million deaths of babies every year far worse than all the killings of WWII. |
coogar: if i earned a kobo for each time you have told me you are making a last reply, i would be richer than bill gates.1. I changed my mind after a last reply whenever I see a provocative post, particularly from you. 2. Hargreaves was preferred in big games, not disputable. Only when there was a special assignment or he injured. How many big games did he miss? 3. 'Sit out' means the person was not involved, not necessarily that he was on the bench. But again I stated three big games Scholes watched from the bench when Hargreaves played. Then we had like 5 or 6 of such while Carrick was on the bench. 4. United played 4-3-3 in Moscow. If you think it was 4-4-2 that is your headache. Some papers had 4-2-1-3 while many could not state the formation because it was odd. Hargreaves role was confusing. 5. Ask yourself why Hargreaves played instead of Oshea who had always played in place of Brown? 6. United played two finals without Hargreaves and we were disgraced in possession because no one to take the ball from barca. No one to engage in direct confrontation. But in 2008, Hargreaves clipped Messi. Did you not watch it. What is the lie there? 7. Messi did not operate in the right. You did not watch the match. Messi started from the Hargreaves wing and later ran away to Evra's side. Finally, if Scholes and Carrick were so special why did we cry for Sneijder ever since? Even SAF admitted that Hargreaves was the long time replacement for Kean just few weeks he arrived. |
SailorXY:It is sometimes good to also look for trouble. ![]() |
montelik: ^^ when did 4 become top?First 4 out of thousands is top. Top of a tree. ![]() |
Most assists in the Premier league history!! Ryan Giggs - 131 Frank Lampard - 94 Steven Gerrard - 85 WAYNE ROONEY - 81 Thierry Henry - 80 Rooney is always on top of every good thing/record. |
coogar: you have been exposed as a fraud....[b]Perhaps only one last time I want to reply to you so as not to derail the current argument going on. 1. What do you mean I was exposed as a fraud? Everything I said was corrct except you decided to look at it from a narrow point. You keep shouting lies, lies. Can you point to any lie? Or were you referring to when I said Carrick and Scholes sat out while Hargreves played? 2. You also said Hargreaves only played two games in central midfield in the knockout stage. Except you didn't understand my statement, I said Hargreaves was selected ahead whenever he was fit and there was not need for a special assignment in another position. I wasn't speaking Dutch at all. He played 9 matches in the UCL with 2 in the group stage. He was deployed to kill Messi and Iniester against Barca in the right back. Even Messi had to run to Evra side to operate when Hargreaves clipped him. Also in the final, SAF gave him another special assignment which he alone could do based on his versatility, speed, energy and ball winning skills. All the other arguments I had already provided answers, so no need to go round circles with you. Finally, you seem not to know the basis of the argument in the first place. The argument has gone from its primary into detractive subsidiaries which add no value. The argument was all about what ball winning midfield guy like Fellaini brings along, then the first twist came when dademola asked me to mention any match in which Hargreaves played a two man midfield. Then I gave him three big matches without looking far. My earlier assertion that SAF usually added a third midfielder to Scholes and Carrick to help them in ball winning while playing against tough oppositions also came to the fore. I just want to stop here so that I don't belabour this. [/b] |
tsmith: Yes, I support him.God is the same yesterday, today and forever. God's laws or teachings or His religion do not require to be updated to meet human ways. If humans go too wayward from God's ways, God will destroy them as He did in Noah's time and Sodom and Gomorah. Don't ever try to rationalize God's teachings to fit modernism. |
obayaya: come and see the beauty of God, if you don't, you will perish and Go to hell?I don't understand you. Hell exist. So it is also a tipic that can't be avoided. If you love your neighbor, you will save him from hell by telling him the truth. |
obayaya: so the best way to win them for Christ is to threaten them with hell? because they were born into a family a country a region that isn't christian?Who said something about threat? The best way is to tell them to come and see he beauty of God. Not encouraging them to remain in their unbelief. |
tsmith: So you haven't answered the question raised if all ancestors would go to hell, even though they never had the opportunity to hear about God. Its a clear case if by chance you believe they might make heaven due to lack of God's knowledge, then you are thinking alongside the Pope.The Pope is saying atheist should be comfortable being atheist and you support him? |
BERNIMOORE: Matthew 24:15You are very correct. |
hbpeze: That is why i tell pple catholic is not a church*even d anglicans*was it not jesus dat said "NO ONE CAN GO THROUGH THE FATHER EXCEPT THROUGH HIM"so whats ds pope sayin*This is not the opinion of the Catholic church, it's the opinion of Pope Francis. He alone knows what he is aiming at. Pope Benedict never said such things. |
Vatican Radio) Christian life is not a spa therapy "to be at peace until Heaven," but it calls us to go out into the world to proclaim that Jesus "became the sinner" to reconcile men with the Father. These were Pope Francis’ words during his homily at Mass Saturday at the Casa Santa Martha. The Christian life is not staying in a corner to carve a road which takes you into heaven, but it's a dynamic that encourages one to stay "on the road" to proclaim that Christ has reconciled us to God, by becoming sin for us. In his usual profound and direct way, Pope Francis focuses on a passage from the Letter to the Corinthians, from today's liturgy, in which St. Paul very insistent, almost "in a hurry", uses the term "reconciliation"five times. True reconciliation means that God in Christ took on our sins and He became the sinner for us. When we go to confession, for example, it isn’t that we say our sin and God forgives us. No, not that! We look for Jesus Christ and say: 'This is your sin, and I will sin again'. And Jesus likes that, because it was his mission: to become the sinner for us, to liberate us. " -Pope Francis in the link above. .................... More news: It looks to me this man will be the one to change the Mass and the sacraments. His new deputy just appointed is already getting set to welcome talk on cancellation of celibacy of the prieshood. New Vaican Secretary Of State Says Celibacy Open For Discussion. http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/09/11/20433950-pope-francis-no-2-clerical-celibacy-is-open-to-discussion?lite |
damerry: Gbam! Critics please answer the bolded. God bless the pope joor.There is a difference between the ancestors and now. The ancestors never had the opportunity to hear about God yet history has it they still looked up to heaves (sky) when they called upon a Supreme Being. They are different from atheist who rejected the good news. Even if atheist might be saved, the head of Christians should call them to beauty of God rather than encourage them to remain in their unbelief. |
damerry: Gbam! Critics please answer the bolded. God bless the pope joor.There is a difference beween the ancestors and now. The ancestors never had the opportunity to hear about God yet history has it they still looked up to heaves (sky) when they called upon a Supreme Being. They are different from atheist who rejected the good news. Even if atheist might be saved, the head of Christians should call them to beauty of God rather than encourage them to remain in their unbelief. |
Pope Francis said our sins are not committed by us but they are Jesus' sins : "When we go to confession, for example, it isn’t that we say our sin and God forgives us. No, not that! We look for Jesus Christ and say: 'This is your sin, and I will sin again'. And Jesus likes that, because it was his mission: to become the sinner for us, to liberate us. "* June 15 at his daily mass homily PF1. *source http://www.news.va/en/news/pope-the-christian-life-proclaims-the-road-to-reco ....................... The above was one of the controversial statements the Pope had earlier made. He said Jesus has died for our sins , that when we commit sins they are not ours but Jesus' sins. Then he went further to say how we should go to confession. This one generated heat too and many Church officials came to his defense that he was speaking theologically? Why did we not have some many confusion with JP II and Benedict? Now I am beginning to worry. Catholic prophecies have it that here will be an Antipope who will be one of the two beasts with the Antichrist as described in Revelation 13. They explained that the Antichrist will be head of the one world govt while the Antipope will be head of a new age church basing their teachings on humanism and atheism. The Catholic church will be hijacked to form this new one world new age religion. They said the Antipope will take the seat of Peter, he wil rule and be loved by many due to his new all inclusive religion. |
Pope Francis assures atheists: You don’t have to believe in God to go to heaven In comments likely to enhance his progressive reputation, Pope Francis has written a long, open letter to the founder of La Repubblica newspaper, Eugenio Scalfari, stating that non-believers would be forgiven by God if they followed their consciences. Responding to a list of questions published in the paper by Mr Scalfari, who is not a Roman Catholic, Francis wrote: “You ask me if the God of the Christians forgives those who don’t believe and who don’t seek the faith. I start by saying – and this is the fundamental thing – that God’s mercy has no limits if you go to him with a sincere and contrite heart. The issue for those who do not believe in God is to obey their conscience. “Sin, even for those who have no faith, exists when people disobey their conscience.” Robert Mickens, the Vatican correspondent for the Catholic journal The Tablet, said the pontiff’s comments were further evidence of his attempts to shake off the Catholic Church’s fusty image, reinforced by his extremely conservative predecessor Benedict XVI. “Francis is a still a conservative,” said Mr Mickens. “But what this is all about is him seeking to have a more meaningful dialogue with the world.” In a welcoming response to the letter, Mr Scalfari said the Pope’s comments were “further evidence of his ability and desire to overcome barriers in dialogue with all”. In July, Francis signalled a more progressive attitude on sexuality, asking: “If someone is gay and is looking for the Lord, who am I to judge him?” http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/pope-francis-assures-atheists-you-dont-have-to-believe-in-god-to-go-to-heaven-8810062.html Why does the Pope like making controversial statements? This is about the fourth time. So now, there is no need to preach to anyone to convert to Catholic church/Christianity? |
UN rights council says Syria gas attack videos, photos fake: Russia Russia says the United Nations Human Rights Council (HRC) has confirmed that the videos and photos purporting to show the victims of a chemical attack near the Syrian capital, Damascus, were fabricated. The Russian Foreign Ministry said in a Tuesday statement that international experts as well as Syrian public and religious leaders presented their evidence to the 24th session of the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva on September 9. It also said evidence provided by numerous witnesses confirms that militants fighting against the Syrian government used chemical weapons in the Damascus suburb of western Ghouta last month. The participants in the UN Human Rights Council session warned of the consequences of a military strike against Syria, noting that such an attack would constitute a crude violation of international law. The US administration has been using the footage and the photos in question to lobby for a military strike on Syria. The recent war rhetoric against Syria first gained momentum on August 21, when the militants operating inside the Middle Eastern country and the country’s foreign-backed opposition claimed that over a thousand people had been killed in a government chemical attack on the outskirts of Damascus. The Syrian government categorically rejected the accusation. Nevertheless, a number of Western countries, with the US being at the forefront, quickly started campaigning for war. On August 31, US President Barack Obama said he would seek Congress authorization before the possible strikes on Syria. However, reports indicate a majority of Congress members are either against the planned strikes on Syria or are yet undecided. The Senate has meanwhile postponed a vote on the US administration-proposed resolution to attack Syria. Syria has been gripped by deadly unrest since 2011. The United Nations has reported that more than 100,000 people have been killed and millions displaced due to the violence. See video in the link: http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/09/10/323066/un-says-syria-attack-videos-fake-russia/ |
Hargreaves – the energetic, skillfull ball winner There can’t be many players who United have paid 17 million pound for, who have played so few games but who made such a big impact. Owen Hargreaves signed on the 1st July 2007 and ended up playing a prominent part in United winning the Premier League and Champions League in the 2007-08 season. He made 16 starts in the league that season with seven as a substitute and only 23 in total with 11 as substitute. However, it was the quality and not the quantity of his appearances that were important. He was a player who had a history of injuries when we secured him from Bayern Munich but Sir Alex Ferguson clearly identified him as a player, who would take a title-winning side onto the next level in Europe. I believe Sir Alex was spot on in his assessment and was perfectly right to pursue and finally land the player, irrespective of the risks involved. Hargreaves suffered a broken leg in 2006 and only came back for Bayern at the back-end of the 2007 season. As a player who suffered from patellar tendonitis, I think the enforced rest from playing during his rehabilitation with the broken leg, helped the tendonitis ease and enable him to pass his United medical. This is just my presumption because as soon as he started his United career, the problems clearly arose again. Fergie and the medical staff had to handle his game time with kid gloves. Many questioned the United Medical team in the following seasons but I think the problem was so great, they did a brilliant job in getting him on the pitch, as much as they did in the 2007-08 season. Thank God they did because he was instrumental in United winning the double that season. He missed the first three games of the season and made his debut in the derby at the Eastland’s Stadium, United going down to a 1-0 defeat. He did play the week after in our first win of the season, at home to Tottenham and again the week after in a win against Sunderland at home. That game was on the 1st September and he didn’t feature again until the end of October. United had put their early season stutter behind them by then and apart from that defeat at City and getting knocked out of Carling Cup by Coventry, they had remained unbeaten. Sir Alex seemed to be picking Hargreaves games and he was entrusted with the big one’s against our main rivals. Once again he didn’t feature for a full month after the 2-2 away draw with Arsenal. A home win over Fulham, then another fortnight off until the away win at Anfield in mid December. After that, he never spent any significant time out of the squad but never started three in a row. Instead, he seemed to play one, next week on the bench, with the occasional rest thrown in. I think, by now his worth to the team was invaluable. He was also adaptable, playing mostly central midfield but could move out to the right and was giving Ronaldo licence to move inside a lot more. It was that licence and protection from Hargreaves that enabled him to score 42 goals that season. He also played a couple of games at right back for the Reds, adapting as if he was a natural. Hargreaves first goal for United came in the away win at Fulham on the 1st March, a beautiful and highly technical free kick from just outside the area, that was in all the way from the moment it left his right foot. He was then entrusted with two starts in four days, firstly in the Champions League quarter-final against Roma where he was man of the match and set up Tevez for the crucial only goal of the game. Then the all important home clash with Arsenal, which resulted in another crucial 2-1 win in the title race. Hargreaves scored his second goal for United in this game, with a similar class free kick as his previous one. Those two home wins gave United the impetus and belief they could win the title and the Champions League. United were well and truly in the zone now, Hargreaves didn’t feature in the away draw at Blackburn and was saved to play full back in the midweek goal less draw at the Nou Camp, in the semi final first leg. Back on the bench for the controversial defeat away at Chelsea on the following Saturday and then back on full back duty for the home semi final leg against Barca. In both the Barca games, Sir Alex opted to play Hargreaves full back and bring Park into the midfield. His industry up and down the right enabled United to interchange the strikers and Ronaldo didn’t play as a conventional wide man. We all remember that game was won and our Moscow final date booked with a screamer from the Ginger Prince Paul Scholes. Once again he was risked in the starting line up in the crucial home win 4 days later against West Ham. This left United needing a win at Wigan the following week to clinch the league title, with the Champions league final another 10 days after that. I think Sir Alex had picked his Cup Final team before the Wigan game and Hargreaves was crucial to the way his team would set up against Chelsea in Moscow. I think that’s why he was left on the bench for the Wigan game, which United duly won and clinched another title. Hargreaves inclusion in the final team, allowed Sir Alex to play the extra man in central midfield to combat Chelsea who always played three in there. I may be biased but a midfield three of Carrick, Scholes and Hargreaves was one of the most balanced and with a telepathic understanding of each others jobs and positioning I have ever seen playing for United. Such was the trust that the rest of the team had in them, it allowed the back four to stay solid as a unit and the front three, the licence and liability to roam anywhere and pick up space in between the Chelsea lines. Hargreaves was instrumental in this midfield, his energy, ball winning skills, ability to sniff out danger and class to use and keep the ball, went a long way to securing our victory. The front three of Ronaldo, Rooney and Tevez were equally effective. None of them had defined positions that night, each taking it turns to drop in wide left or right and get up and support the furthest forward at the time. We all know it went to penalties but United should have put the game to bed in the first half but we know the nature of our club is not to do anything easy. Hargreaves played the full 120 minutes that night and despatched his penalty with consummate ease, what else would you expect from a man who used to ply his trade in Germany. So United bagged a historic Premier League and Champions League double and Hargreaves was certainly a one season wonder. Such a shame that his injuries prevented him from really featuring for us again, apart from the odd comeback attempt. With David Moyes striving to secure the services of class midfielders, I have always maintained we have never replaced Hargreaves. When you have a natural box to box player like that who can play any role in that midfield, its such an asset to the squad. Lets hope we can sign a player of similar qualities to Hargreaves and curly hair doesn’t have to be a pre-requisite of that player. http://mufclatest.com/hargreaves-the-energetic-skillfull-ball-winner/ The above clearly showed how SAF managed Hargreaves games. |
[b]I am done with my response this morning, I will come back much later in the day to continue. I am so tight now. Some of you are mixing up the reason for this argument in the first instance. This argument is not about who had more games or which player is better between Scholes and Hargreaves. No. It was also not about 2008 UCL final formation. This argument started from an article from a legend praising Fellaini's strength in tackles and ball winning both on the ground and aerial contest. I said I supported such and we have been lacking such a strong midfielder. I said if only Fellaini had speed in addition to his qualities. This brought to mind the fact that Scholes and Carrick were weak in that department, and that allowed opponents to toss then left and right and out run them easily. If you consider the above, you will notice that everyone has been crying for the midfield to be address since 2009- same year Hargreaves finally bowed to injury. Why did we all call for Sneijder despite having Scholes and Carrick ever since? See you guys much later. [/b] |
dopeJemi: 2008 champions League final, hau United's Line up Looked LikeThis doesn't tell the details of what happened on the field that night. This is for the kids to see on the pages of the newspapers. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 (of 561 pages)
see how easy it is to expose the fraud that you are.......