AbdulSleeky: I hope you know that this also includes the number of mosques in Nigeria?
We are too religious here.
I was actually expecting your comment. You are atheist but why did you pick on mosques?. The reason author mentioned churches is for obvious reason no one can deny. Watch this. It is talking about the same thing. He mentioned churches the most. I believe you are yoruba man. So help yourself
You sound like a typical Black way of reasoning. Obviously you are a reflection of your leaders. No wonder so many Black nations are backward. I am giving you free education but you chose to be a clown.
Let me tell you what you don't know about China loans. It is called Chinese Money Trap. Jamaica, Sri Lanka and Zambia are already trapped.
Your incapacity to think and reason is your problem. Sit down there and wait for Nigeria to pay off debt.
Paying debt for railway is one of the easiest things to do.
where are you from?. Are we talking about railway here?. Is railroad the only debt the country owes?. First of all, you don't even have manner of approach.
Second, do you realize how much Nigeria owes foreign govt?.
Third, don't you see what's happening to Jamaica, Sri Lanka and Zambia?. These countries are physically controlled by Chinese police. So if Nigeria can not pay her debts just wait and see Chinese police control your streets. If you don't believe me ask Jamaicans.
No, you don't have problems yet. Problems are just about to start. What you are witnessing is rehearsals. Real second wave of slavery is looming. Watch
RenaissanceGuy: Nollywood movies are an embarrassment. 97% of their movies lack originality or a touch of realness. Ordinary window, smartphone or plasma TV othey can't even break in their movies.
You will pay for the damages?. And why must you compare?.
Alhajiemeritus: Bros There is nothing like Hafs version of the Qur'an or Warsh version of the Qur'an. They are just different recitation models. This is something you'll know if you have a sound knowledge of Tajweed.
he doesn't even know Arabic alphabet needless to say tajweed.
He knows what he's doing by emphasizing versions. That is his goal so that he would say Qur'an has different versions. But he hasn't been able to provide different versions of Qur'an
Restructure this country. These hausa/ fulani people are dragging us backwards
how are they dragging you backward?. By spending federal grant?. Did other region not get their allocation and what did they do with it?. We just had one fainted over misappropriation.
No, I don't agree with his position 100%, that we should stay clear but I do support the idea on the basis of ignorant, lazy and unlettered people who delve into it without knowledge of figh and are subsequently misguided. This is very common. On the contrary, encounter with this knowledge is natural for some.
yasolan: What an Expository lecture. But it's worthy to note that the Alfa supported the view of some scholars that this type of knowledge is "Uloomi sharri" and we should stay away from it. But what if one exploits numerology using the Qur'an basing on the principle that the Qur'an is "Shifaa'un wa Rahmah". I have many more questions abound. Now I understand why ikupakuti mentioned that he has been given the key to exploiting and exploring numerology
I suppose you brought ALL your knowledge and intelligence from heaven. You never needed to learn from anyone. But we see you do copy and paste from others here. And here you are saying that I cannot think for myself. Maybe next time you copy and paste from another source I will remind you of this.
CP's post, if relevant to the thread, is a welcome one here. Is that difficult for you to grasp?
CP, Empir.ee's nightmare!!
Okay, this is my last reply to you. You don't make sense. It is you and I but you brought CP here. You are unable to present proper argument and them retorted to CP. Are you well at all?. If you can not present your argument here correctly am out. I have watched CP and he blocked muslims he can't handle.
sagenaija: Sheikh Yasir Quadhi DELETES "Holes in the Narrative" Interview! By: Acts 17Apologetics
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2V73m8RPIIg After Sheikh Yasir Quadhi admitted that there are "holes in the narrative" during his interview with Mohammed Hijab, critics of the Quran have been having a field day, and Muslims have been complaining about the damage Qadhi has done. Not surprisingly, Dr. Quadhi has finally removed the video from his YouTube page. Unfortunately for him, we already downloaded it. David Wood discusses the issue. Empiree
Whats my business with Yasir Qadhi?. His mistake has nothing to do with Quran authenticity. His mistake is his not islam.
it means you can not think for yourself. CP does the thinking for you correct?. CP blocks people when he realizes he is at crossroad. So this thread isn't about CP but you that brought this argument.
Are you cp?. No. What's my business with CP. That's my point. You keep repeating same thing. I will ignore you soon.
sagenaija: [size=6pt][/size] I have never seen or met you. But should that make me assume that you are a ghost? The answer is: No!
Social media has changed things. Many meetings and interactions took place VIRTUALLY in the midst of covid 19 lockdown.
Insisting on SEEING a person's face before you can admit that his arguments are cogent only shows that you are running away from the truth with that lame excuse.
Fortunately others are reading this thread. Some will want to find out why their hero Empi.ree is running away from Christian Prince. They will go and watch him.
I have made my points. You have been unable to take them on one by one. There are different versions of Arabic Koran. Not English translation. There are verses of the same chapter that differ between copies of those Koran versions. I have shown one (There are many more others) between the Hafs version and the Warsh version. Here in koran 43:19 one version used the word 'slave' and the other used 'with'. That made the meaning different in the two versions.
You have not been able to show that the Arabic words are not different. I DO NOT NEED TO FIRST GO TO ARABIC SCHOOL TO SEE IF THE ARABIC LETTERS AND WORDS YOU WRITE ARE THE SAME OR DIFFERENT.
It shouldn't take more than a few sentences in ENGLISH to explain how, in your argument, they are the same.
I asked you to show explanations through the strokes and markings in the Arabic how they are the same. You HAVE BEEN UNABLE to do that.
But, if I know you, instead of doing what I have done here - i.e. clearly explain your position - what you will do is either to still claim that you have 'REFUTED' me or still ask me to go to Arabic school. So, where does that leave you?
Again, fortunately, others are reading this thread. Emp.iree, others are reading this thread.
Escape route. I have no business with CP. Am not gonna be arguing with ghost CP. You either make your argument clear here and face me one on one or admit you know nothing about islam
sagenaija: [size=6pt][/size] Those your questions should actually go to you.
Are you saying that the Hafs and Warsh Arabic versions of the Koran are transliteration?
I told you that transliteration you posted was incorrect. Two others also spotted the same yet you are still arguing.
You know what, please for God's sake, go and enroll in Arabic school because it will help you a lot. You are just screaming Hafs and Warsh up and down but you actually don't know them.
Again, please enroll in Arabic language course. It will make things easier for you.
Guy, do you have comprehension problem?. You posted transliteration not Arabic text. Transliteration you posted is different from original Arabic text. I showed you clearly but you proved stubborn and adamant to correction . What's wrong with you man?. You have been posted original Arabic text to debunk me.
Oh I see, you don't know the meaning of transliteration.
sagenaija: There is Hafs version of the Koran. There is Warsh version of the Koran. There are over 30 other versions of the Koran. ALL in Arabic. Not English translations.
Differences between them have been found.
I pointed out one such. You've been going round in a circle and keep talking about my not understanding Arabic.
How come you've not been able to simply explain to readers?
Just simply dismissing you opponent DOES NOT mean you've put up a good argument. Don't you see that?