₦airaland Forum

Lukmann:
It still doesnt change d fact dat they didnt do it..remember the prophet said"follow my sunnah and dat of the rightly guided caliphs"..any oda thing oda than dat is based on desires..i rest my case..salam alayka

In my community, we used to celebrate the birth day of Mohammed (PBUH). In the past 30 or so years a lot of people start saying this is haram. Many people stopped doing it for many reasons but mainly not because they said it is haram but because the people who prohibit it are really bothering the people who do it. Like calling us "Mushrikin" or "Bid'ah".

I can see why they prohibit it, because some people do something considered odd by most Muslims, Like dancing or singing.. But the Celebrations I am talking about are simple, No dancing or any stuff like that. We gather, we read Quran, say some stories about Mohammed (PBUH) and remind each other about his ethics (Akhlaq). One more thing to mention, this kind of Mawlids are celebrated in many random days in a year not only in the real birthday of the prophet. But the name is Mawlid still. I think we do it this way to avoid making that day so special. Many times we call it 'Jalsat Zekr' جلسة ذكر and not Mawlid.

Lukmann:
My brother there is a big deal in it..if the companions who drank directly from d fountain of knowledge of the prophet didnt celebrate maulid who are we to.hence ,my refusal to accept d food

Lukmann:
yea it doesn't but as for me based on my on convictions which doesn't support maulid i wont accept d food.

Lukmann:
Oh! on the aspect of the food there is no daleel on it but i guess they did qiyaas

Lukmann:
My dear brother i neva said they aren't muslim moreover u said it urself that the evidences for or against maulid are debatable therefore m not wrong if i follow a certain a specific scholar's line of thought so far it is based on authentic daleel.where i myt be wrong is forcing my opinion on this thread when there is ikhtilaf on the matter..May Allah(swa) forgive us on our shortcomings

Lukmann:
u dont get my point..eating food prepared purposely for maulid means u recognise the festival it becums even more dangerous if u know dat d maulid is a bida'a and u are u supported it by eatin the food and anyone who supports an innovation is an innovator and on the matter of xmas it is a matter of aqeedah n it shldnt be taken lightly eatin an xmas food is haram.maulid is a case of innovation while xmas is a case of belief so d comparism u gave doesnt allign..now let me ask u a qstn. [b]Can u eat a food prepared expressly for ogun festival? if NO then whats d difference btwn ogun festival and xmas?[b]

Lukmann:
Salam alaykee..it will be better not to eat or accept their food to show that you are displeased or not in support of their festival..maulid nabiy is a bida'atul mufassiqah(innovation of transgression) and accepting their food knowin d evil in maulid can indirectly make you a mubtadi(innovator)

karim77:
OK thanks a lot sir .

karim77:
yes sir n even learning both spiritually ....

Sir if I don't ave money to buy any animal,,,can I recite d yasin like 4 times or more in the night after prayers,,,,,hope its OK because I don't want to run mad

karim77:
y d stop?

Truthpallbearer:
kennyos.ein
Empi.ree speaks like Imran Hossein and other soofees

DeathStroke007:
it's not salawa... it's only a music... music compilation or content is not part of Islam...

DeathStroke007:
because Saudi does it doesn't make it right

Lukmann:
Salam alayka o broda..since its a nafilah there is no sin on u if u leave it but its beta if u do it what makes it a bida'ah is when u do d nafilah at d wrong time without any daleel qata'i(decisive evidence) from d qur'an n sunnah..wah makes it a sin is when u abandon it completely based on ur desires or when u hate to do it..

kennyosein:
The Zionists only make use of the shia in causing corruption among the Muslims, right from the onset of Islam.

These Rafid a (Shia) actually descend from Abu Lu'luah Majoosi (a Persian fire worshipper) and Abdullaah ibn Saba' (a Jew). However they are more dangerous from the Christians and Jews themselves. Christians and Jews fight Islam face to face (if they did) while Rafida stab Islam from its back.

Salafis are peaceful Muslims,

Salafis do not disobey with the ruler in all that agrees with the sacred texts of Islam, and disobeyed in all that does not.

Salafis denounce public demonstrations

Salafis do not even block the path of a begger much more a COAS.

I agree shias are seriously misguided, but not zaidi shias who are ahlesunnah, quran warned us not to seek alliance with the jews/christians(zionists), the first time the muslims did this, they destroyed the khilafa by raising arab nationalism against the turkish ottomans, do u think after stealing oil from arab countries and pricing it that they helped us? The arab oil should have benefitted the seller not those that are pricing it, yet our economies and currencies are undermined by the imf, so we will never get global prominence, use your brain, Allah even helped the saabieens to take over the unjust believers, why not shia? I know their aqeeda is messed up, but shia didnt bow to the dajjal, sunni countries have, and back when the khilafa was destroyed arabs were fools to believe britain and lawrence of arabia was helping them.

dragnet:
rubbish.

malvisguy212:
I have questions to ask.

Surah 33:4
Allah hath not assigned unto any man two hearts within his body, nor hath
He made your wives whom ye declare (to be your mothers) your mothers, NOR HATH HE MADE THOES WHOM YE CLAIM (TO BE YOUR SONS ) YOUR SONS. This is but a saying of your mouths. But Allah saith the truth and He showeth the way.

Why does islam ban adoption ?