₦airaland Forum

senatordave1:
You fall back to the copies of the agents and police.by the way,no one is alleging manipulation at collation point.

It was for both LP and PDP

senatordave1:
Oga,inec guidelines are just rules not laws and cannot be used to nullify polls.what matters is the constitution and electoral act.in the eyes of the supreme court by virtue of adeleke vs oyetola form ec8a is primary...
Additionally,that clause comes into play when there are contradictory figures.sincevthe figure on irev isn't legible or clear,you simply use the physical form

There is no how you can disregard any rules electoral process same EA gave INEC power to itemized the process guidelines

senatordave1:
Oga,inec guidelines are just rules not laws and cannot be used to nullify polls.what matters is the constitution and electoral act.in the eyes of the supreme court by virtue of adeleke vs oyetola form ec8a is primary

And where EC8A manipulated at collation centre what now happens

Geopex:
Dey play, form EC8A for a party without agent in numerous polling units in SW,NE, NW on election. If they are rigged out in those locations. So pe otilo. Irev is rubbish, and u should forget on transmission or no transmission, too, forget Abt double nominations or not, also forget Abt drug case or no drug. All have been attended to in various court. The rulling will based their fact on existing court order and rullings..obi should focus on river and some states where they are clearly rigged out and where their agents have the copy of the real polling units result. Then lest see if the total will help them win and satisfy the needed requirements

Are you following the case at all or the hearsay you're been fed with

Geopex:
Dey play, form EC8A for a party without agent in numerous polling units in SW,NE, NW on election. If they are rigged out in those locations. So pe otilo. Irev is rubbish, and u should forget on transmission or no transmission, too, forget Abt double nominations or not, also forget Abt drug case or no drug. All have been attended to in various court. The rulling will based their fact on existing court order and rullings..obi should focus on river and some states where they are clearly rigged out and where their agents have the copy of the real polling units result. Then lest see if the total will help them win and satisfy the needed requirements

It is good you are not the PEPT nor the judge

It is also known fact that you are neither LP, PDP, inec or APC counsel or witness so keep your calm and allow the court carry out their duties

senatordave1:
Inec can interpret it to mean anything they like

INEC need to follow the result collation as stipulated in the electoral act.

Several complaint on what is declared been different from what is declared at Collation center which INEC REFUSES to check from IREV as stipulated in thr EA 2022 because there was nothing on IREV

senatordave1:
All these are clear jargons.the prof said irev is a collation system and later said it is not.sorry,the judges have taken note

You keep going up and down making the same up and down

In both statements he is very correct based on what is asked and they both mean the same thing.

It's left to you to understand.

Collation system is different from collation center so he's very correct.

Stop making this up and down accept your goofy

senatordave1:
He said he's not a statistician which is a problem.
He agreed that 18000 blurred copies on irev doesn't mean others are blurred which is crucial.
They will likely discountenanced his facts

And 18,000 Blurred result result cannot affect the outcome of the result right?

senatordave1:
Another fumbling.how will you analyze unit results without analysing ward and lga results to see if it adds up?

What you failed to relaized is that He is working on Form EC8A

1. Form EC8A from PU agents available


And

2. Comparison to what is on IREV

Which he did, you can pushed on him what is not part of the task he is expected to carry out

senatordave1:
By saying irev is a collation system?

Your problem is non understanding of what is called a SYSTEM

tinsel:
They have got what they wanted. About IREV cannot be used to tabulate results and tabulations are done at the collection center with hard copies.

However by INEC regulations IREV data must correlates with Collation Data

senatordave1:
At first,he said it is a collation system

Do you know the meaning of SYSTEM at all.

Maybe u need some crash course on the meaning of system

senatordave1:
Saintbillion

SYSTEM

fergie001:
Did you not factor that there will be rigging in the 2023 election?
Every politician in the Country, Obi inclusive, knew there was going to be some % of rigging, so it isn't strange to me at all.

Rigging will continue to reduce hopefully, but it will remain there. Atiku & Tinubu can also argue their votes were suppressed elsewhere. See for the umpteenth time, if CPC, ANPP, nPDP, APGA-faction, AC had not come together, the PDP will remain in power today.

If PDP & LP go into 2027 separately, they will meet a definite outcome, DEFEAT. It is the obvious truth.

The truth and nothing but the reality

Divided opposition can not win in the current Nigeria

fergie001:
Most important thing is.... Akume has been extremely loyal to him since 2011.

Femi's own case is just that he has the experience and will help him stabilise the NASS.

The NASS matter is where femi comes in


Faleke is tool lousy

fergie001:
Ayu don't appeal, just go!

Lol Ayu that ma will not resign.

But its better he resign

garfield1:
Another massive blow to pdp their end is near

Why don't they win back their seat back

That is to tell you something

yarimo:
since he was not join why filing any stay of execution

Every judgement is judgement and in law You don't joke withany judgement but rather seek for ways to vacate such.

fergie001:
SOURCE

PREVIOUS THREAD::
https://www.nairaland.com/7699006/breaking-court-hear-perjury-suit#123302288

Na all frivolous court case Petitioners go shop breakfast las las

Omowale2023:
Bros.....are you now telling me, A husband murdered his wife, and only the wife people can take the husband to court?. Therefore I don't have jurisdiction to take the husband to court even if I have overwhelmingly evidence that the husband committed the murder? You must be joking. If it was a pre election matter, why didn't obi take Tinubu to court before the elections?
He knew they would throw the matter out the window because for pre elections matter is an internal party affair. But after the primaries and the main elections has started, things have now become an external party affair. Did the Judge say Shittema was free from the double Nomination? No. What the supreme court said is they don't have the jurisdiction to handle the case.

Murder case is entirely different from Election matter

yarimo:
But Why will ALEX OTTI file stay of execution after claiming the high court judgments in Kano those not include him ? confused and liars full labour party

Carefully read it now


He took the right step

He was not joined and now that the Appeal court is taking over stay tuned

fergie001:
SOURCE


PREVIOUS THREADS:
https://www.nairaland.com/7694993/court-sacks-alex-otti-assembly

https://www.nairaland.com/7695681/sack-lp-candidates-abia-should

Right step in the right direction

Penguin2:
They did then because there was a president Buhari who is still in power. But by May 26th, Buhari would be merely 48hrs away from power.

Again, I’m sure they feared Tinubu might win the election fair and square with no troubles around his election.

But seeing that Buhari is on his way out (48 hours is not enough to witch-hunt judges), and seeing that INEC fraudulently declared Tinubu, the judges might want to judicial activists and save Nigeria from a Tinubu disaster.

The next most likely persons to benefit from that judgment would be either Atiku or Obi.

Now, why would they fear harassment from Obi or Atiku?

Hmmmmmm


May 26th

What a day filled with Uncertainty by Nigeria Politicians

fergie001:
The Court will strike it out.

You will discover that Shettima is not one of the respondents for the PDP and he is a necessary party.

APC will kill it with preliminary objections.

They've started doing that already

I'm of the opinion that they just introduced that as ground 4,

There main appeal is in ground 1 to 3 which I'm still looking at how it will play out,

However will itnot be better to consolidate this case now that it like 3 horse case with similar ground

fergie001:
The Court will strike it out.

You will discover that Shettima is not one of the respondents for the PDP and he is a necessary party.

APC will kill it with preliminary objections.

Yes i noticed that also

However we watch as it played out.

Tinubu inauguration is sacrosanct May 29

fergie001:
It wasn't....
It is estoppel per rem judicatum for the PDP because the same suit, parties and subject matter were already litigated up to the Appeal Court level. PDP cannot do so again....

It is LP who is challenging on that front.

However it was introduced in their ground 4 and also in their responses to the respondents response

Barims:
What if that person fail that course again in 200l first semester? What next?

Are you planting to carry it over again.


I hope you know thaf it will keep affecting your CGPA

Jones4190:
put emotions aside and answer simple, is there any different between abia federal high court and Kano federal high court?

Same federal high court however they have their various jurisdiction

garfield1:
I don't need to be a judge to know the directions of some cases.pdp will lose sir

You said more than this for Osun

You said more than this for zamfara

You said more than this for Edo

garfield1:
Where did I say they didnt have ec8a? They must tender the ec8a and demonstrate it one by one it open court as it is the primary evidence

Why are your changing your voices


From He did not have agent in all PU now to this.

Well to wherever the Tribunal eventually ruled on whether for APC, PDP or LP one facf remain this is 2023 and not what you assumed to be for 2019

garfield1:
Nothing has changed with respect to claims of victory.if you sat you won,you will present ec8a first in physical form one by one and compare it with inec and police copies

You are not the Judges so no need to argue with you further on this.

Time will tell

However i will remind you

garfield1:
The electoral act does not back irev.the major difference is the bvas and Bvas data was wiped out before pdp and lp could inspect it

Go back and read the judgement

Let me tell you something today which you may not know.

Nothing was deleted from the BVAS Inec only needs that judgments back should in case.

For your information

1. BVAS was backed up whatever inspections to be caarried out is the bvas backup.

So for your information i will repeat again You have a mindset which I'm not here to argue with you on but the fact remains that what you seem to be aware of is minute to what you need to understand