₦airaland Forum

fergie001:
BVAS report is a secondary evidence and subject to human and network challenges like the Card Reader reports. It is of no fruition when faced with the primary evidence. What is this Primary evidence? (Will be explained later)..

These reports are been inputted by humans and the Supreme Court analysed wrt Card Reader Reports in Shinkafi V Yari, Otti V Ikpeazu & Okereke V Umahi that it is the maker of that document that will give probative value to same otherwise it is .of no moment.

The SC insisted that Card Reader is expected to aid the Voter's Register (in accreditation) and not to supplant Register... Section 49(2) of the EA 2010.

Back to BVAS and Osun
Now, the expert witness for the Petitioner (Oyetola & APC), Isiaka Olanrewaju admitted he analysed the BVAS report of 749 PUs and allegedly found over-voting took place. He also told the tribunal that he is aware that the BVAS reports is subject to network and human challenges.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2022/11/22/election-results-bvas-report-established-over-voting-for-adeleke-witness-tells-tribunal/amp/

Like INEC argued, the Commission said it didn't finish updating when Oyetola requested for the CTC, a day after the election and it was handed over to him 2 weeks after the election. In 2015 in Akwa Ibom State, it took over 7 weeks for this to be updated. Now, INEC said it has fully updated and the BVAS machine will be tendered in evidence as well.

EA 2022. S62
(2)The Commission shall compile, maintain and update, on a continuous basis, a register of election results......

Don't also forget BVAS report is a post-election procedure. It is a process that takes place after elections has been completely concluded not during. (EA 2022. S62(1-3))

---

For Osun and 2023: The legal framework is based on three pillars: The Constitution, Electoral Act 2022 and INEC Regulations & Guidelines 2022.

1. You have a smart card reader or BVAS machine which authenticates your PVC. S47 EA 2022

2. After that your details must be checked, confirmed and ticked on the Voter's Register. (19e of INEC Regulations)

3. After the results are collated and announced at PU stage, results are entered into forms EC8A (signed, dated and stamped by PO).

4. No of persons accredited, failed ballots, results, etc are electronically transmitted to the collation centre and the IREV portal using the BVAS machine (they are stored therein as well

##. After which the BVAS machine and the original copy of Form EC8A are placed in tamperevident envelopes, and in company of the Security agents submitted to the RA and upwards it goes. (Section 38 of INEC Regulations).

1&2 happens during accreditation
3&4 happens during collation of results

To prove over-voting and/or accreditation issues, the BVAS reports will fail when faced with 1-4 above.

aiel123 engineerboat

Exactly on point.

The issue is that Oyetola Star witness is blanked out of what he is doing about the report

garfield1:
Which APC must have done to arrive at that over voting...

On another note,accredited votes are disseminated quicker than result uploads.to accredit,you dont need network and it uploads or send data to inec long before results are uploaded.before election results are announced fully,accreditation figures are ready.this jargon of synchronization or completing upload after 7 weeks is a lie except inec are colluding to falsify or match results.

Oyetola counsel are not ready for the BVAS analyses with the believe that something might have happened.

Again the ball is on them to prove that anything happened.

So Oyetola Star expert have more work to do

garfield1:
Theres no need for any report.all the 749 bvas machines in issue will be analysed

The question is Does Oyetola Star analysist did, the answer is beholding us in the face, all what they depend on is that incomplete synchronized server report,

He has not analyzed the BVAS report.

So there Tribunal case is based on an incomplete Secondary evidence

fergie001:
BVAS report is a secondary evidence and subject to human and network challenges like the Card Reader reports. It is of no fruition when faced with the primary evidence. What is this Primary evidence? (Will be explained later)..

These reports are been inputted by humans and the Supreme Court analysed wrt Card Reader Reports in Shinkafi V Yari, Otti V Ikpeazu & Okereke V Umahi that it is the maker of that document that will give probative value to same otherwise it is .of no moment.

The SC insisted that Card Reader is expected to aid the Voter's Register (in accreditation) and not to supplant Register... Section 49(2) of the EA 2010.

Back to BVAS and Osun
Now, the expert witness for the Petitioner (Oyetola & APC), Isiaka Olanrewaju admitted he analysed the BVAS report of 749 PUs and allegedly found over-voting took place. He also told the tribunal that he is aware that the BVAS reports is subject to network and human challenges.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2022/11/22/election-results-bvas-report-established-over-voting-for-adeleke-witness-tells-tribunal/amp/

Like INEC argued, the Commission said it didn't finish updating when Oyetola requested for the CTC, a day after the election and it was handed over to him 2 weeks after the election. In 2015 in Akwa Ibom State, it took over 7 weeks for this to be updated. Now, INEC said it has fully updated and the BVAS machine will be tendered in evidence as well.

EA 2022. S62
(2)The Commission shall compile, maintain and update, on a continuous basis, a register of election results......

Don't also forget BVAS report is a post-election procedure. It is a process that takes place after elections has been completely concluded not during. (EA 2022. S62(1-3))

---

For Osun and 2023: The legal framework is based on three pillars: The Constitution, Electoral Act 2022 and INEC Regulations & Guidelines 2022.

1. You have a smart card reader or BVAS machine which authenticates your PVC. S47 EA 2022

2. After that your details must be checked, confirmed and ticked on the Voter's Register. (19e of INEC Regulations)

3. After the results are collated and announced at PU stage, results are entered into forms EC8A (signed, dated and stamped by PO).

4. No of persons accredited, failed ballots, results, etc are electronically transmitted to the collation centre and the IREV portal using the BVAS machine (they are stored therein as well

##. After which the BVAS machine and the original copy of Form EC8A are placed in tamperevident envelopes, and in company of the Security agents submitted to the RA and upwards it goes. (Section 38 of INEC Regulations).

1&2 happens during accreditation
3&4 happens during collation of results

To prove over-voting and/or accreditation issues, the BVAS reports will fail when faced with 1-4 above.

aiel123 engineerboat

Oyetola Expert bungle that case right from the word go.

They were not patient enough honestly

garfield1:
Where is the complete one

INEC Already submitted it in their defence

garfield1:
Where is the complete one

We awaits the INEC Presentation time,

Remember APC acclaimed Star witness could not established the said over-voting during his cross-examination

garfield1:
Apc says bvas records shows less figures than results declalredll

They only have Server incomplete Synchronised bvas Report

fergie001:
Yes, WAEC has testified on his behalf before in 2018 and the Court of Appeal upheld it.

WAEC will simply present the original like they did and say they can't see the blurred one. Adeleke will provide his own original that tallies with WAEC's. Case dismissed.

APC will then have to prove that what Adeleke submitted is fake. Which is not possible

We watch as it unfolds

garfield1:
Things will unfold as it goes on...
I am more interested in the over voting part

The overvoting aspect is more easy from my view.

BVAS is the primary source of result uploaded which is synchronised with the server.

The question then is is the BVAS result same and what is declared.

fergie001:
Case wey go end like Obaseki own.

@garfield1
@aiel123
@kyase

Court strikes out Aondoakaa's suit against Alia.

It's a settled case anyway


Petitioner time is been wasted.

They have the certificate with them already which is the CTC from INEC.

Can't they do ahead with the witnesses.

Moreso a 2018 election disturbing 2022 election

ejimatic:
. I don't understand what they want to achieve in the certificate saga. It is like they are claiming all his papers are forged.

It's what they are achieving already.

Keep the noise in the media about subpoena which was wrong address and to the wrong person.

How quick to run to the media

ejimatic:
After Oyetola won in the SC in 2018 ,APC was prevailed by some people to withdraw the forgery and impersonation cases against Adeleke At that time the Principal if the where the incident took place and six others were in remand in Abuja with Adeleke as the defendant. The cases were settled out of court by the parties involved. It is the case that APC is reopening now any other related cases!

From what is going on

APC are only delaying issue for their case.

They swear under oath that they are with the CTC of The certificate from INEC

What then is the noise about.

They applied For CTC from INEC HQ abuja, why don't tbey subpoena INEC HQ if they need another copy

savenigeria1:
Even the unknown gunmen will vote that day. No one is stopping us from voting. We are voting massively that day. My only fear is. We a day be enough to vote that day. My polling unit has more than 6000 registered voters. How can we finish the voting in one day.

I hope so

No citizen should be prevent or scared from voting for candidate of his choice.

As to the PU size. INEC is making effort to decongest and improve the voting time

Bendeco02:
Oga don't give yourself mumu hope, Anambrarians will come out and vote massively for Obi.

Howmany people came out to vote in Osun last election compared to registered voters?

Am asking you this ques because probably you're tinubu supporter from S.W

How do you people reason is a surprise to me.


Does your disposition answer the questìon.

Abeg face front

Ugolistikp:
But Borno that has been ravaged by insurgency can come out and vote..

Bro u must be a comedian

As usual leave the issue and attack the messenger you cannot change or learn anything.


simple question

[quote author= post=115285535]Borno they were making noise isn't upto 3 million registered voters, Anambra is even higher than Borno[/quote]The question is do people go out Nd vote in Anambra.

Remeber monday and Thursday's issue and NO election crisis.

How are Anamabra or south east going to curb the situation

fergie001:
It's a dead end. Even the Supreme Court will throw it away!
He has no locus to even institute the case having not participated in the Primary.

olril17, adexxi!



SOURCE

Previous Thread:
https://www.nairaland.com/7132881/osun-2022-court-rules-favour#112944587

The man like wasting money.

This one self is against the high court case which throw away his own case


Good evening.

Nairaland spambot keep me out for some days from Saturday midnight

19. OBOKUN LGA

Register voter 67651
Acredited voters 29696

APC 14527
PDP 13380

Valid vote 28988
Rejected vote 692
Total vote cast 29680

APC WIN

PDP (13 LGA)
APC (6 LGA)

18. ORIADE LGA

Register voter 69651
Acredited voters 31798

APC 14189
PDP 15947

Valid vote 30941
Rejected vote 806
Total vote cast 31747

PDP WIN

PDP (13 LGA)
APC (5 LGA)

Moh247:
Well let's hope number of cancelled votes or accredited PVC from the polling unit due to violence doesn't equal to the margin of 5000 votes PDP leads with

If not the electoral laws are clear

Difference is more than the number you're quoting

Moh247:
Lol

I guess you haven't gotten a Television to watch channels TV

5000 vote isnt losing woefully such gap can cause inconclusive Election like last election

No inconclusion

No rerun


INEC already have complete result

This are just normality

17. IREPOODUN LGA

Register voter 57712
Acredited voters 29913

APC 12122
PDP 14369

Valid vote 29032
Rejected vote 544
Total vote cast 29576

PDP WIN

PDP (12 LGA)
APC (5 LGA)

16. IFE CENTRAL LGA

Register voter
Acredited voters

APC 17880
PDP 13523

Valid vote
Rejected vote
Total vote cast

APC WIN

PDP (11 LGA)
APC (5 LGA)

15 LGA to go


Stay tuned

15. IFEDAYO LGA

Register voter 19598
Acredited voters 10300

APC 5016
PDP 4730

Valid vote 9912
Rejected vote 124
Total vote cast 10036

APC WIN

PDP (11 LGA)
APC (4 LGA)

14 IFE NORTH LGA

Register voter 58672
Acredited voters 21774

APC 9964
PDP 10359

Valid vote 21050
Rejected vote 650
Total vote cast 21700

PDP WIN

PDP (11 LGA)
APC (3 LGA)

13 OLORUNDA LGA

Register voter 104700
Acredited voters 42009

APC 18709
PDP 21350

Valid vote 41187
Rejected vote 737
Total vote cast 41924

PDP WIN

PDP (10 LGA)
APC (3 LGA)

12. OROLU LGA

Register voter 39653
Acredited voters 21182

APC 9928
PDP 10282

Valid vote
Rejected vote 413
Total vote cast 21178

PDP WIN

PDP (9 LGA)
APC (3 LGA)

11. OBOKUN LGA

Register voter 53267
Acredited voters 24447

APC 9727
PDP 13575

Valid vote 23813
Rejected vote 586
Total vote cast 24399

PDP WIN

PDP (9 LGA)
APC (3 LGA)

Collins4u1:
I thought they were doing digital... Why doing manual collation at State level.

Gradually that is the goal

10. BORIPE LGA

Register voter 69538
Acredited voters 30563

APC 21205
PDP 7595

Valid vote 29510
Rejected vote 598
Total vote cast 30108

APC WIN

PDP (7 LGA)
APC (3 LGA)