Fenrir's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Fenrir's Profile › Fenrir's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 (of 92 pages)
DeepSight:Grow up. |
DeepSight:See, I come from NORWAY and I have been very clear. You petty man-child. |
DeepSight:And dont get me wrong fella it comes to THE MAJORITY of Nigerian men including you, if you say..... 1) we are traditional 2) any part of your traditions or cultures are mandatory 3) you must do it 4) we are humble and respectful Then you are lying. But then only 22% of Nigerians are literate on the law. |
DeepSight:Fella "you lot" is not offensive. You forget 1 thing look how i talk? Im Scandinavian that grew up in the uk but was surrounded by Africans more than Europeans and learned English from Australians and Americans so I tend to mix British/American/Australian. Grow up and on here the amount of liars there are its "you lot against us" |
DeepSight:You lot had religion forced on you at school, that's my equivalent. |
DeepSight:Different definition of posh aka toff talk. |
DeepSight:Ill take that as a compliment good sir, you lot have pidgin but I have posh. |
TenQ:Pray, sequester your current volume of vacuous and cacophonous disputation, lest you find your consciousness utterly petrified by my most impenetrable scholarly lexicon. And I assure you, I am not blowing big grammar; I am initiating a comprehensive atmospheric purification of this digital environment’s linguistic integrity. |
TenQ:See, cherry-picking out of context the typical trick of Nigerian men Proof you lost, I answered everything in 1 go, you cherry-pick and twist it. Now I must implore you to neutralise your current penchant for this galling and grandiloquent banter lest I am provoked to disintegrate your logic with a relentless salvo of esoteric philosophical fragments and pray do not misinterpret my discourse as blowing big grammar i am simply facilitating a rigorous anatomical dissection of your current rhetorical fallacies |
TenQ:I never said differently but I get to define the atheist I am And I went to war SO PEOPLE HAD THE RIGHT TO BELIEVE WHATEVER THEY WANT show me 1 Nigerian man that will fight for my beliefs? Because I gave blood for yours and you dont even practice Christianity since you scream your traditions are mandatory in a lie, both the Bible and Quran directly tell you not to do that and it makes you a selective hypocrite. |
TenQ:And i did not claim to be an atheist I DIRECTLY outright told you im atheist. See the narcissistic attitude of the men in this country. |
TenQ:I answered ALL of your questions, stop being lazy and a hypocrite. Go read it and quote it. Get over your narcissistic arrogance. |
TenQ:The “Rectum as Blowhole” Hypothesis A Design Flaw or Divine Troll? Consider this. If humans are semi-aquatic animals (and let’s be honest, we kind of are. We’re 60% water, we pee in pools, and we love a good beach until the sunburn hits), then Yahweh absolutely half assed the engineering. Here’s the breakdown. The Case for Rectal Respiration Dolphins / Whales Blowholes = evolutionary perfection. One hole. Two functions. Breathing… and occasionally spraying water to confuse tourists. Humans Two holes (mouth + anus), but neither doubles as a snorkel. Wasted. Potential. The Fix If Yahweh had just rotated the plumbing, we could’ve had: Blowhole Mode “Oh shit, I’m drowning” (clenches) Now I’m breathing through my ass like a pro. Bonus: solves the “don’t trust a fart” problem. Gas exchange instead of social embarrassment. Theological Justification “And God said, ‘Let there be multipurpose orifices,’ and it was lit.” (Genesis 1:21, Åberg Revision) Why It Didn’t Happen Yahweh was distracted (probably arguing with Lucifer about free will again) Divine humour Imagine the first human doggy-paddling while inhaling through their butt. “And on the 8th day, God laughed.” The Fall’s hidden curse Adam and Eve ate the apple and boom… no more aquatic dominance. Now we’re stuck with gills that don’t work and a fear of sharks. Semi Aquatic Human Evidence: We Were Meant to Be Better We should be WAY better in water than we are. Exhibit A: Babies can swim instinctively (until society scares it out of them with “What if you drown?”) We love floating Pools. Bathtubs. The Dead Sea. Anywhere we can pretend gravity isn’t real (because gravity is a scam) We pee in water No shame. Zero shame. If dolphins can do it, so can we. We invented boats Because walking is boring and flying is cheating. Conclusion We’re failed mermaids. Yahweh gave us the desire for water but forgot the upgrades. The Nigerian Angle: Why This Theory WILL Especially Piss Them Off If I dropped this take in a Lagos bar… The Religious: “Blasphemy! God’s design is perfect!” My comeback: “Then why do we drown in a mammal’s natural habitat? Checkmate, theologians.” The ‘Science’ Guys: “Evolution, bro! We evolved from land mammals!” My comeback: “So you’re telling me millions of years of evolution and the best we got is webbed toes that don’t even work? That’s lazier than a Nigerian civil servant.” The Traditionalists: “Our ancestors respected water! They didn’t question it!” My comeback: “Your ancestors also sold people into slavery, so let’s not put them on a pedestal, yeah?” Nigerian Hypocrisy Bonus They’ll pray about it: “God, why did you curse us with weak swimming?” But won’t learn to swim: “The pool is cold!” Me: “So you’d rather drown than be uncomfortable for 20 minutes? That tracks.” The Real Question: Divine Malice or Just Bad Coding? Let’s weigh the options. Divine Malice Yahweh wanted us to suffer “Let them struggle in water, it’s character-building” Explains why we love beaches but can’t live there Evidence: the Bible is full of drowning stories (Noah’s Ark = generational trauma) Bad Coding Yahweh forgot to patch us “Oops, the gills module didn’t compile” Explains why cramps exist Evidence, we sweat in water. Who designed that? Verdict It’s both. Yahweh is a chaotic-neutral programmer. Brilliant ideas. Zero QA testing. The Åberg Solution: DIY Evolution Since Yahweh won’t fix it, here’s how we hack the system, Start a cult “The Church of Rectal Respiration” Slogan: Breathe Deep. Let It Out. Train your body Daily enema practice (for “blowhole readiness”) Pitch it to Nigerians “Bro, no more drowning. Just clench and breathe.” Them: “Is it halal?” Me: “Does drowning sound halal to you?” Profit Sell “Holy Butt Plugs” (patent pending) as spiritual snorkels. The Deeper Truth I’m Actually Digging At This isn’t about blowholes. It’s about, The arbitrary rules of existence Why are we THIS close to being aquatic gods but stuck with paper thin skin and fear of jellyfish? The hypocrisy of “intelligent design” If we’re so special, why did Yahweh give ducks waterproof feathers but give us goosebumps? The Nigerian habit of ignoring the obvious They’ll pray for a miracle but won’t learn to swim Just like they’ll demand tradition but ignore its flaws. I’m pissed because the tools for freedom (or at least not drowning) are right there. And people still choose the cage. Whether it’s wedding traditions, religious dogma, or just refusing to learn how not to sink. Final Thought Yes. Yahweh absolutely intended us to be semi-aquatic demigods. But He forgot to push the update. The rectum could have been the blowhole if not for the Fall, lazy evolution, or divine trolling. Your move. Social media test announcement Test the theory (report back with results) Pitch it as the ultimate japa hack Because if you can’t swim to Europe, breathing through your ass is the next best thing.
|
Truthseeker10:You have severe case of diarrhoea for gray matter... No. I do not claim my morality is the “ultimate standard for all mankind” handed down by me as an authority. That framing is your invention, not my position. Now the actual answer. Global governments do not agree on gods. They do not agree on theology. They do not agree on which scripture is “ultimate.” there are tens of thousands of Christian denominations alone, all claiming divine authority and all disagreeing with each other. If God were the source of a clear moral standard, that fragmentation would not exist. But here’s the part YOU can’t escape. Despite massive disagreement on religion, culture, and politics, most of the world converges on human rights law. Not perfectly. Not everywhere. But clearly. Why? Because human rights are based on harm, dignity, consent, and protection of the vulnerable, not revelation. That’s why documents like: the Universal Declaration of Human Rights conventions against torture conventions against rape, slavery, child abuse exist across countries with completely different gods or no god at all. Those laws don’t ask: “What does your god say?” They ask: “Does this action cause measurable harm to a human being?” That’s inter-subjective morality in action. Now the killer point, stated plainly. If divine morality were the ultimate standard, countries that claim the strongest belief should have the strongest protection of women, children, and the poor. They don’t. Instead, the countries that most closely follow secular rule of law and human rights tend to have safer streets lower violence less child abuse less corruption While the countries that blur law with religion constantly excuse abuse as: “culture” “tradition” “discipline” “God’s will” So no, governments don’t agree with my morality. They increasingly agree with outcomes-based morality: reduce suffering protect consent punish abuse limit power And when Nigeria ignores its own laws while shouting about God, that’s not a failure of atheism or relativism. That’s a failure of accountability. |
Truthseeker10:You keep asking if my morality is "subjective" because you want to believe that without your book, everything is permitted. You are hiding behind a question to avoid looking at the blood and dust of the real world. You think that if morality isn't handed down by a "First Cause," it isn't real. You are wrong. Morality is inter-subjective and biological. We don't need a "Sky Daddy" to tell us that rape and murder are wrong; we have empathy, mirror neurons, and the visible evidence of trauma. If you believe rape is only wrong because a book says so, you are a dangerous man. If you know it is wrong because of the agony of the victim, then you’ve admitted you don't need the book. You ask who has the "ultimate right" to determine good. I don’t look for "rights"; I look at results. My "subjective" morality led me to spend 12 years in war zones including your own country against Boko Haram putting my life on the line for strangers. I didn't do it for a reward in heaven. I did it because suffering is real and it must be stopped. Your "ultimate" morality allows you to quote scripture while your neighbors starve and your daughters are silenced. You claim I haven't answered, but the truth is you don't like the answer. If your "Objective Standard" was superior, Nigeria would be the safest, most honest place on earth. Instead, your "ultimate standard" is used as a shield for corruption and the abuse of the vulnerable. When you say "rape is subjective" in an attempt to win a debate, you are insulting every victim in your own country. You are choosing a philosophical "win" over the lived reality of human pain. I don't need a book to be a man of conscience. I am the evidence that humans can choose light over darkness without being threatened by a whip. If you can't see that, it’s not because I’m being "dishonest" it’s because you’re terrified of a world where you are the one responsible for your own actions. Sort your house out. Until your "ultimate standard" stops the rape and the killing in your own streets, your arguments are just noise. |
Truthseeker10:Ive answered your question enough its not my fault your parents failed to teach you right from wrong and only whooped your ass when you questioned the evil they did. Ive posted the answer 4 times now, and you obviously cannot read If you argue that raped is subjective, you are arguing that killing is subjective. You are the problem with country. |
Truthseeker10:Sort your country out. Stop the rape Stop the molestation Stop the killing over culture Stop the killing over religion Stop fathers forcing daughters to suffer in silence Put yourself infront of your child as a shield then we will talk about good and evil. Until then you are spitting hypocrisy and nothing more. |
Truthseeker10:Your system is broken. You preach God, compassion, and love, yet you sit comfortably while someone at the end of your street starves and rots to death. You smile, pray, and quote scripture while doing nothing. You talk about family values, yet daughters are sexually abused and silenced to protect reputation. When she needs her father most, he hushes her. Not for her healing, but for his image. Then later, when she finds love or tries to escape, you suddenly remember morality. You demand payment, submission, and apology, while forgetting that men like you knew what was happening and did nothing. That is not righteousness. That is not compassion. That is organized neglect dressed up as virtue. If this is what your God produces in practice, then the problem isn’t disbelief. The problem is the system you’re defending. |
Truthseeker10:You asked who has the right to decide what is good and evil. My answer is me, because I accept responsibility for my choices. I don’t outsource morality to a book while doing the opposite. I don’t need fear of punishment to stop me harming others. When innocent women and children are in danger, I don’t pray, curse enemies, or wait for miracles. I act. I put my body between them and harm so they have time to escape and live. And i made that choice in wars zones all over the world for 12 years. Have you ever risked your life for people you never met in lands that are not yours simply because you couldn't bare the thought of innocent women and children suffering? "Boko haram" so no, you haven't. That choice costs blood, pain, and risk. I accept that cost. That’s what morality is to me. Not obedience. Not promises of heaven. But choosing to reduce suffering, even when it costs me. If your system calls that “pride,” then your system has confused submission with goodness. |
Truthseeker10:Me |
Truthseeker10:If you need a book to tell you how to be good while you do the exact opposite of what that book says are you good at all? There is no scientific proof that “good” and “evil” exist as cosmic forces. Science doesn’t deal in moral absolutes. What it does prove is harm, suffering, wellbeing, cooperation, trauma, survival, social trust. Those are measurable. Morality emerges from biology, psychology, and social systems, not from metaphysical edicts. If goodness only exists because a command was issued, then morality isn’t moral, it’s compliance. And compliance under threat is not virtue. It’s fear management. If good and evil only exist because God says so, then God could declare torture good tomorrow and it would be “moral.” If they say “God wouldn’t do that” they’ve just admitted morality exists independently of God. There are parasitoid wasps whose entire reproductive cycle depends on maiming living hosts, sometimes children, animals, or creatures that must remain alive long enough for the larvae to eat them. This isn’t a “fall of man” issue. This predates humans by millions of years. Why would create that? What possible reason is there? Thats the act of a psychopath and is infact evil. |
TenQ:You talk about "Software," "Dimensions," and "Prophets," but you are ignoring the data of the physical world we actually live in. If your "Software" (the Spirit) were functioning as intended in Nigeria, the results would look like the values found in the very Bible you quote. Instead, we see the complete opposite. Forced Conformity vs. Free Will. You demand "respect" and "obedience," but the Bible emphasizes a voluntary heart change (Joshua 24:15). Forcing religion through social pressure and tradition isn't "saving" anyone; it’s just indoctrination. Tradition over Truth: You prioritize man-made cultural customs (like the bride price/traditional rites) over actual spiritual or legal standing. Jesus specifically rebuked this in Mark 7:8, accusing people of "setting aside the commands of God to observe human traditions." "Big Man" Culture vs. Servant Leadership: In Nigeria, leadership is often about being served, carried, and feared. Yet, Jesus said in Matthew 20:26 that whoever wants to be great must be a servant. Your "Prophets" live like kings while the streets are full of suffering. Prayer as a Weapon vs. Love Your "Back to Sender" and "Holy Ghost Fire" prayers for enemies directly contradict Matthew 5:44, which commands you to love and pray for those who persecute you. The Fruit of the System: You claim Norway is "godless," yet it is a society of high trust, safety for women, and care for the poor. You claim Nigeria is "Godly," yet it struggles with systemic corruption, child abuse, and human rights violations. If your God is real and your "software" is superior, why are the most "religious" societies often the most broken, and the "unbelieving" ones the most compassionate and functional? You are starving in a land you claim is blessed, while you criticize the people who actually built the "safe streets" you say God wants. |
TenQ:You asked for one scientific error. Here is the biggest one, Your claim that "Intelligent life requires an Intelligent Designer" is a circular argument, not a scientific law. If complexity requires a creator, then your God the most complex entity of all would require a "Super God" to create Him. If you say "God doesn't need a creator" you’ve just admitted that complex things can exist without a builder. You broke your own rule. But let’s look at the "Subjective Experience" you mentioned. You say you "tune into your conscience." My "conscience" tells me that a God who demands "respect" while his followers oversee suffering, plastic choked streets, and the abuse of women and children is a human invention used to justify power. You call it "Software" I call it "Indoctrination." In Norway, we don't need the fear of a "Sky Daddy" to be good people, we just care about each other. If your God is real, why are the people who ignore Him doing a better job of looking after His "creation" than you are? |
TenQ:Norwegian..... we are not indoctrinated at birth Notice a pattern in the world? Richest countries = no religion in school, low std rates. Women can walk the streets safely. Parents dont beat their kids screaming "OBEY ME" Poorest countries = religion forced in school, hiv and aids everywhere, HIGH levels of rape and child molestation. Human rights violations screaming to the world "RESPECT US, RESPECT OUR CULTURE, OBEY OUR RULES" streets full of plastic and suffering everywhere. Law is optional and corruption is everywhere. If your god was real and loved you the unbelievers would be making each suffer wondering why BUT no, countries like Nigeria where the men rule with abuse calling it righteous and humility are suffering the most. Consider this fella..... your food for thought is leaving you starving. |
TenQ:You didn't defeat anything just fell for your parents scam |
TenQ:Do you hear yourself? "God's righteous man" Thats not a compliment, thats a cage It needs suffering It needs evil It means he to needs to accept authority that cant be proven Its also a real estate scam And the funny thing 🤣 for all religions when you are born, the default setting is atheist until parents choose how to raise you, there is no belief at all Its a cosmic joke They strip away curiosity and replace it with fear of damnation and yes its a dammed nation The kingdom of heaven that no one can prove exists |
Boomark:The real test for delusion....... The more you actually think about Christianity, the more ridiculous it becomes. God “loves” you, but if you don’t love him back in the exact correct way, he burns you in hell forever. Out of love, obviously. He creates you with sin already built in, even though he hates sin. So he puts the thing he hates inside you, then blames you for having it. But remember, he loves you. He just hates what he deliberately put in you. Then comes the solution. He creates a son who is also himself, with a pre planned mission to be killed, by rules he made, to forgive humans for breaking rules he knew they would break. He sacrifices himself to himself. Then undoes the sacrifice three days later. Which somehow still counts as the ultimate sacrifice. Except it wasn’t even three days. Friday evening to Sunday morning isn’t three days, but don’t question it. Smile, nod, amen. Sin still exists. Suffering still exists. But you’re told this fixed everything. And after all of that, if you still don’t understand it properly, don’t accept it correctly, or don’t love him the right way eternal fire. But don’t forget he always loves you. The real message is simple don’t think for yourself. And the irony the Serpent didn’t force anything. Didn’t threaten. Didn’t promise. Didn’t lie. He asked one question. “Do you want to know?” That was the real crime. |
TenQ:Funny how you accuse people of not reading something then they take apart the entire religious argument "false scientific claims" and you go quiet, i smell hypocrisy aka bullshit. |
McDoe:Really? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vz6mMHaM7v0?si=9tmB10w9tjYVMsby |
