₦airaland Forum

Kingozymandias:
It's not the turn of the Southsouth, it's the turn of the southeast.
The silence of the Southeast should worry everyone .. rightfully it's our turn to elad this great nation.. we are not more bedeviled with problems than any other tribe yet we are being denied our rightful shot at the fixing this nation .
Some people have asked me have we fixed the southeast ? I laugh because other regions have ruled yet they are still battling myriad problems so why are my people being denied our turn?

Salty suddenly zoning that has been used by every region to secure the slot has been jettisoned now it's the turn of my people and it Futher makes us feel disenfranchised and and marginalized.

Then tomorrow you turn around and wonder why sesssionists had such a willing ear in the people to listen?

You can't deny a people their rights and make them feel less and expect them to willingly want to stay in Nigeria .. that is wrong and tantamount to bullying.

Who in his or her right conscience can say it's not the turn of the Igbos ? Please who can in good honest faith say this ?

Why push a people so hard to the point just telling yourself they can do nothing ? Really ? A nation can never be built by brute force but by inter Corporations and unity. Let me tell you my fellow NIGERIANS , IPOB didn't have up to 10% of the Igbo people support forget those iliterate touts and their social media propaganda. But to deny my people our right this time around for whatever reason is telling the remaining 90% of us who rejected ipob that maybe just maybe those touts have a point.

Yes power isn't given ,yes I agree but as ever other region had it zoned to them and a consensus picked so should it be done for the Southeast. To deny us our right is to do what Chinese is doing to Taiwan, to do what Israel doing to Palestine, to do what ImUAE is doing to shites..

Forget whatever we tell ourselves, each and every one of you my fellow country men and women know it's the turn of my people. I would have taught the great Asiwaju a defender of justice would have picked an Igbo man as his chosen candidate, that would have sent the message that he recodnizes that's it's rightfully our turn and that he stands for justice.

Anyways it's his right to run for office but like I said, to deny us is going to send a very strong message to every single Igbo man, woman ,boy and girl child that we are not recodnized and wanted in this country and I am afraid that would have a very dire repercussions in inter ethnic relations . I don't think buhari is in support of it not being an Igbo person infact I am shocked to admit from his a tions one can deduce he feels rightly it should be an Igbo person..

Alas time will tell

To be honest, social media has turned me to an Igbo hater and I have never wanted to see them in Aso Rock but this post moved me. This is why one should never allow the wrong side to be too loud.

Honestly speaking, The hate-filled Nnamdi Kanu followers have successfully made a lot of enemies for your tribe. Before 2017, it was highly unlikely to hear anyone in my state (Kaduna) insulting the Igbos but nowadays, few people say good things about the tribe and IPOB is solely responsible.

They used insecurity (which ironically, has killed more Northern muslims than Igbos) to call northerners animals, to call the north's second largest ethnic group, Fulanis all sorts of names just because a few criminals among them were killing people.

There are a lot of Igbo men that would be perfect for Nigeria but I'm afraid, it's highly unlikely for them to succeed because the amount of anti-Igbo sentiment in the north these days is alarming.

AsampeteNwaanyi:
this is why I keep laughing at those people that do hype countries like China and North Korea.

I keep telling people, battle for battle war to war. US fit smoke and crumble any country in this world under 2 weeks.
this one no be hype but fact.
country wey their defense budget alone is even bigger than many country's annual budget.
you think say na only riffles dem dey use am buy or do you think they loot money meant for defence.

These guys knows this, countries like China knows this that's why they dare not go into war with US either combat or economic war.

This is how some people hyped Japan during world War 2
we knew the outcome later.
fact is that there are many hidden weapons the US have that you're yet to know.

Shut up there. If they could destroy Russia in two weeks, then why did they spend TRILLIONS of dollars in Afghanistan and Iraq?

Most of USA's huge budget has to do with maintaining aircraft carriers (which are only useful against weak countries. A swarm of hypersonic missiles would take out any aircraft carrier and its team), maintaining their 800 military bases, being screwed by their military industrial complex, etc.

And to top it all, a nuclear war doesn't care about how much you spend on your military. You just need good air defense systems, nuclear warheads, and the missiles, bombers, and submarines required to deliver them.

HigherEd:
Yea Israel has some of the brutally realistic and practical foreign policies on earth. They are surrounded by enemies and don't want to complicate their matter by making more powerful enemies. They do not live under the impression that the US would come and rescue them when the consequences begin. This is why they abandoned Armenia too when it was being pummeled by Azerbaijan.

Israel may need to advance a land attack against Iran some day and the only realistic way that happens is though Azerbaijan border with Iran. And to keep that remote possibility alive Israel refused to help Armenia.

Forget Iran's military capabilities. Given its terrain alone, even USA would find it nearly impossible to conduct a successful land invasion against Iran talk more of a tiny nation with a defense budget less than $20 billion. The land size, the mountains, and Iran's militia groups would make Vietnam look like a joke.

Israel can never so much as try that. The highest they can do is to bomb Iran (which will also be hard, given that most of their fighter jets and missiles can't reach there).

Skyfornia:
The way Russian economy will crumble in the nearest future will put them at the top of the poorest countries. Except the sanctions are revoked.

Winning the war is not all about killings and bombings...

If Qatar and Germany are able to pull it off (considering the distance between them), have you asked yourself how much the price would skyrocket for Germany?

Lightorder:
if you can define what true success is, tell me one successful country without the WEST ?

Can you tell us how the West acquired and still maintains its power?

Hint: it's not their technology alone.

Kelvin3476:
AND U ARE A FOOLISHBOY ALREADY

Still, no points made.

pansophist:
Also with Lithuania vs China, now the tiny baltic country has been abandoned.

Their eyes will be clear soon. And you still see them calling Belarus a puppet state when the entire EU has become USA's area boys.

Invitationn:
They also hijacked Macron's $90B submarine deal with Australia

Lol

sweetjohn:
Oga, Hilter intentionally refused to face USA alone. Do you even study the war? He has planned to attach USA last using his large acquired army to. He dealt severely with USSR. It was the USA that came to their rescue. The USA dealt massively toHiltler and his large German solders to the extent Hitler committed suicide

You are asking me if I study war and at the same time, you are making ridiculous claims. The main reason Hitler never made it to USA was because he couldn't get the Soviets, and he wanted to get the Soviets so that he could acquir enough oil to keep the war running.

Had Hitler achieved his aim in the USSR, the entire western world would have been fvcked

sweetjohn:
even as you are typing this nonsense, you know you are typing trash. And you know in your heart of hearts that China and Russia combine just as Japan and Germany combo during ww2, can not stand USA. Japan and Germany combo was the badest and the greatest joint fight in the world against USA and at the end the USA not just defeated them but give them brutality. Respect your father Mr man

I have just 4% in my battery but I couldn't resist addressing your ignorance.

Germany singlehandedly defeated France, and Britain. Had the Soviet Union not fought them the way they did, even your US couldn't have faced them. Do you know how many people died in Leningrad alone?

Germany basically fought USR, France, Soviet Union and Britain alone. Japan and Italy were useless compared to the Nazis. Just take a second and imagine Germany only having to deal with USA alone or any other allied power for that matter.

USA has been Fucking up the EU for a long time. They did something similar to Australia recently. They led them to an economic stare down with China and abandoned them

You'll never see this on western media. In fact, it won't even make front page.

angelfallz:
SA is a monarchy. Xi is not a dictator and he can't unilaterally make decisions. There is the CPC (Chinese Communist party) of which Xi is the general secretary. He is beholden to them.
You need to get knowledgeable about China and stop listening to all that the Western media tells you.

You can use this space in Quora to learn more about how China's political system works:
https://chinasfuture.quora.com/

You talk about Xi unilaterally breaking an agreement, hasn't Biden (US) unilaterally sanctioned countries they don't like? Hasn't the US unilaterally invaded countries they don't like? Hasn't the US unilaterally toppled democratically elected government (Egypt's Muslim brotherhood president Mohammed Morsi) and (Ukrainian govt in 2014) because they didn't like them?
You are talking as if the US holds itself accountable to rules and regulations when the evidence is there that it does not.

I'm an atheist but I'll still say it.

God bless you

Kastonkastroll:
At the bolded. I'm also bewildered with that level of brainwashing. You begin to wonder how a Blackman with brains in his head will be praising westerners while he malign the people standing up to the oppressors.

Exactly. The irony is that they don't care about their support for them. You'll see some Africans, especially Nigerians trying to defend NATO while the white guys make degrading comments on them.

gambojimeta:
They can always move it to other countries Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, The Philippines, Bangladesh, Thailand, and even India e.t.c these countries already help with manufacturing to an extent. They just need to increase their capacity.

Yes you are right. But the amount of Market China has already garnered will still take a long time to be destroyed.

seunny4lif:
https://mobile.twitter.com/RALee85
The person is not a pro Russia but I have been following the account since Syria war

https://mobile.twitter.com/200_zoka
That’s pro Syria and Russia account from Syria war

If you on telegram
I followed Russia defence ministry.

Thanks man. I will check them out

Kelvin3476:
U were making sense until ur drugs expired halfway

Intelligent people argue with points.

Comradewhy:
A Nuclear Iran will be dangerous to the world.
If Iran acquires nuclear weapons , Saudis will also try to acquire it with the help of Pakistan.

With nuclear weapons in it's kitty, Iran along with Syria will change the political balance of Middle East.
There is always a danger of these nuclear weapons falling in the hands of terrorists which can be dangerous for all nations.

Iran does not have a “normal” attitude that other nations have. Iran is literally a religious theocracy. Iran poses a strategic risk to its neighbors, most notably Israel. Iran have openly called for the total destruction of Israel.
Just like allowing Adolf Hitler get a nuclear weapon.
Which sensible person will allow that?

Sounding like a well-groomed zombie.

So let me get things straight, tell me what is "normal attitude. "

Is it USA that is involved in every conflict on the planet that is normal? Or is it Israel that is still illegally bombing Syrian troops, civilians in Gaza and assasimating Iranians?

You western buttlickers don't even know that many of the terrorists we have in the world today were indirectly creates by USA. Do me a favor and go read how Taliban and ISIS came into existence.


You want Russia to sit back ans let itself get surrounded by century-long enemies on the grounds of "sovereignty," but you don't want Iran, a sovereign nation, to get nuclear weapons because it would put your allies at risk. This is as shameless as it is stupid.

B2Bmen:
u are indeed a baby know wonder all u putting lunatics think alike. Even Germany that once conquer almost the whole Europe. Were was your Russia then with their big land max?

You people are just plain idiots. As at 1940, China was still under Japanese occupation but what about today? A lot of things have changed over the years. Germany doesn't have a single nuclear weapon today.

OhBritannia:
There are always going to be casualties of war and unfortunately it is going to be innocent people.
I am not justifying the bombings of NATO over the years in various countries, however we should not forget that the human right we are now enjoying as humans and the freedom of speech, freedom to criticize, freedom to ask for justice are made possible by members of NATO especially USA and countries in Europe.

The Chinese are going to come out to bash USA and Nato about their war operations over the years, just to control the public narrative.
Why don't the Chinese hypocrites talk about how they maltreat their own people in China.
How many Chinese journalist have gone missing over the years because they went against the government?
How many Chinese protesters have been arrested and jailed because they protested?
In China, once you go against the government, that will be your end.

During the COVID-19 outbreak In China, the various Chinese researchers, scientist and journalist that wanted to come out to expose the Chinese government, were all killed.
Most of them were never found, they just disappeared out of the face of the earth.
How about china talk about that?

NATO countries might have their faults but they are the reason why we enjoy peace today, they are the reason for development, the reason why there are freedom of speech, the reason why Obama a black man can become president. It doesn't matter what you say about the great USA and nato members, they still remain the Best.

GOD bless the united states of America and God bless all members of NATO, irrespective of all your shortcomings, we love you all and May GOD Continue to protect you all and strengthen you all.

Amen!!!

I have made a new year resolution to reduce the insults I throw online so I will reserve them.


Kindly explain to me how the people that killed over 1 million Vietnamese civilians just because they didn't like their economic system are responsible for our peace today.

Explain to me how the same people that ended real democracy in Iran through a coup that they couldn't even deny their involvement in are responsible for our peace.

Explain to me how the same people that invaded Iraq and killed over 500,000 civilians even after UN had confirmed that there were no WMDs there are responsible for our peace today.

Explain to me how the same people thag have weaponized their economic advantages (which had indirectly been obtained through years of slave trade, land grabbing, and colonialism) to impoverish innocent civilians in Iran and Venezuela are responsible for our peace.

Explain to me how the countries that turned Libya from being the most prosperous African nation to sh!thole where devils like Boko Haram can buy weapons to come to Nigeria here and kill you and your families are responsible for world peace.

Explain to me how the same people that sell and even donate sophisticated weapons to Saudi Arabia and Israel to kill defenseless civilians while refusing to sell weapons to your country because of "human rights" are responsible for world peace.

Explain how the same people that glorify war criminals like George Bush, Obama, and Tony Blair are responsible for world peace.

Explain to me how countries that sponsor terrorists disguised as rebels in Syria and Libya are responsible for world peace today.

Explain to me how a country that has no regard for sovereignty. A country that killed the general of a sovereign country on a diplomatic mission in Iraq are responsible for world peace today.

Explain to me how people that praise dictators in one part of the world (e.g Muhammad Bin Salman, Musevini, French West African dictators, Suherto, etc) with respect and then preach democracy when it's convenient like in Syria, Russia, North Korea, Myanmar, etc are responsible for world peace. In fact, they even treat democracies with disdain if they aren't favored as we have seen in Venezuela, Ukraine pre-2014, and Iran in the 80s.


You'll find them in every single war on the planet supporting one side against the other and not as mediators or peace makers. Iran vs Saudi, North Korea vs South Korea, Nigeria vs Biafra, Iraq vs Iran (where they supported the aggressor, SADDAM HUSSEIN), China vs India, India vs Pakistan, Yemen vs Saudi, Israel vs Palestine, Ukraine vs Russia, Ethiopia vs Tigray, Afghanistan vs USSR, etc. These disputes are hundreds of kilometers away from them but they still go there, pick a side (based on what they stand to gain and not who is right or wrong), arm them and enjoy the show as brothers kill each other. How can any same person believe these people are protecting world peace. How?

USA that many of you worship was built on slave labor and genocide of an entire race.

UK, France, and others all treated you as less than animals. In fact, they are still treating you like that through subtle means. If you don't understand, look at how they treat your countries. Look at how they treat you in their embassies.

Since you talked about free speech, please tell me the offense of Snowden and Julian Assange

It's funny when people whose recent actions and entire history is full of cruelty, wars, and so on can still fool people into thinking they are angels. I respect their ability to achieve this, honestly.

valentineuwakwe:
Nonsense talk without any meaning. ......the west will continue to dominate world affairs except China come to the rescue. You dissolve the USSR and expect Russia to be great again with all it skirmish n invasions?
So long the west still control almost what the citizens of the world uses n needs, its dominance will never end!


I dedicate this FTC to all the citizens of Ukraine, fighting and defending there fatherland. ....the world will not be safe if tyrants in power still exists!

Welcome to the 21st century. China is the manufacturing powerhouse of the world. In fact even Western countries now outsource their productions to China

Rgade:
Wow Putin’s actual warlords are apparently as dumb as his internet ones .... and I was here thinking it had something to do with typing from the comfort of your cushion
The MP was right about one thing though, the American psychology ... a little threat of civilian casualties is a major concern for America and most western democracies in fact, unlike Russia and her allies that don’t give a fvck about her own people which is why this dumb MP could open his mouth and spew this garbage as if his people are insulated from nuclear weapons.
This is why any country in the world that is not a democracy is a threat to world peace, especially if that country is powerful.
Now you know why US is desperate to democratize the whole planet.

Desperate to democratize the planet by bombing every UNFRIENDLY country you mean. What a dunce

seunny4lif:
He came to Ukraine
The threat was before he came.
I followed both pro and anti Russia accounts

Bro give me some pro-Russian accounts to fllow

Comradewhy:
And what is Russia business with Ukraine wanting to Join NATO and have a base at it's house?

What's USA's business with Iran wanting to build a nuclear weapon at its house?

CoronaVirusPro:
Russia still struggling with Ukraine.

It's true. Ukraine's warship have all been abandoned and are now under Russian controk.. The Navy is no longer existent.

Toktee:
oga na lie....you know nothing about military operations...if russia is struggling with ill equiped ukrain army what made you think it can stand the alliance if 29 ntions exluding the US?
They cant even try what they are doing now to poland by now moscow would have be welcoming missiles.

Do not comment out of hate this is not chelsea vs man u.

How many of those 29 countries have a single ICBM to match Russia's fury? It's like you don't understand how effective nuclear weapons are. A nuclear war would mostly be fought with missiles and not troops and tanks and without USA, Russia has more warheads than all of them combined.

Hellonearth007:
Then tell Putin to strike any NATO country nah
Let's verify what you just vomited

NATO has always been the trigger-happy one. They went to Siberia, Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Vietnam, Korea, Libya, and other places to fight wars that don't concern them so what are they waiting for now?

Toktee:
It is you that lack basic knowledge of how things work on international stage especially Nato...the alliance dont work as a components but as a single unified force eg there is balistic misiles in poland,romania and other eastern europeans nations that shared border with the bully nation.....when russia laubch missiles in one member nation the whole lots of same missiles will rain down on moscow.

Economical,militarily russia is not a match to Nato.

That is just what you think. Nuclear weapons are not distributed to allies except maybe in secret and there is no confirmation on that. North Korea spent years begging the Soviet Union to just teach them how to build nuclear weapons but they refused. We are talking about two communist states here.

The last time USA and USSR took ballistic missiles to Turkey and Cuba, what happened?

Hanks0000:
You know how big Canada is?
Joke's on you.

Canada is big, but how many ICBMS do they have to retaliate in case Russia strikes?

godliman:
if Germany alone during WW2 drove Russians to the out sketch of Moscow, with an armored train waiting to evacuate Stalin. The onset of winter saved the Russians. So don't praise a larger than life paper lion. If Ukraine can make Russia sweat like this what about Britain, France etc

How many nuclear weapons did it take to defeat Japan? Britain and France don't even have up to 1000 nuclear bombs but Russia has over 5,000. It's not even fair

pquaver:
Oga why u dey talk like dis.. U dey underrated the royal army ooo.. Without nuclear war I tell u UK will match Russia.. Imagine Ukraine dem still dey struggle.. Chai UK don suffer for ur hand. USA should sit back it won't last 3weeks 29 Nato states will capture Putin. Without nuclear weapons.. U think say France UK Germany Poland na chaise..

You are right but the problem is that should NATO and Russia ever go to war, nuclear weapons would definitely be used.

Toktee:
oga na lie....you know nothing about military operations...if russia is struggling with ill equiped ukrain army what made you think it can stand the alliance if 29 ntions exluding the US?
They cant even try what they are doing now to poland by now moscow would have be welcoming missiles.

Do not comment out of hate this is not chelsea vs man u.

You lack knowledge on how militaries operate. In thw case of Ukraine, there is a plan to limit civilian casualties. That's why you see people having the courage to PROTEST in front of Russian soldiers but assuming Russia had declared war in Ukraine, their Iskanders, Thermobarimissiles, Warships, Hypersonic missiles, and ballistic missiles are what would be flying into Ukraine daily. Millions and millions of civilians would die and Ukraine will fall within hours especially if nuclear bombs are involved.

Let me ask you, how many Atomic bombs did it take for Japan to Surrender?

Among all those 30 countries you mentioned in NATO, how many of them have Intercontinental Ballistic missiles to retaliate against Russia? They'd be defenseless sitting targets. Only UK, France, Turkey, and maybe Israel would be able to do something to Russia. Don't forget that Russia has enough landmass to survive considerable number of nuclear bombs unlike those tiny-tiny countries.