₦airaland Forum

.

nnamdi640:
Why won't they match, assuming it wasn't money he was spraying, matching won't come in

Leonardo4:
Didn't you see the caption on her pics?
"I was like who is this person that's spending money "
Be forming one olo.do there

You lot just have money in the brain. Here's what she wrote verbatim:
“He was there with his girlfriend too. We started vibing and he was spraying me money. I thanked him later because I didn’t expect it, and from there, we started vibing,” she recounted.

Gabrielshow24:
Also, this topic has two fronts which also encapsulates human conditioning! In all my response I give replies to accommodate both! You only want to see "No free will". Peter chose to deny Jesus! Judas chose to betray Jesus! If then what you imply is true then there should be no consequences for Judas 🤨 after all he is following divine scripts. Jesus also pointed out something similar Matthew18:17,Luke17:1!

None of these negates the action of free will!
He chose to deny God and God almighty had already known that his present state wasn't enough to overcome!

Free will is a complex matter and your simplification is far-fetched!

Funny guy, you're the one simplifying freewill to mean whatever a person does and trying to force it into predestination.
I'm the one saying it's so complex the whole thing doesn't add up from our human perspective. A hypnotized person will think he has free will. But does he have freewill? Nope, he's under mind control! And though we can't go into his head, from his actions we know!

We can't go into Peter's head or anybody's head. But, as in the case of a hypnotized person, It's from their actions we can tell!

Gabrielshow24:
This is not what I am saying. This is also a straw man! My discourse with you has two different fronts; the first front, an Intelligent mind configuring circumstances to fulfill his will/word while the second is the supposed inherent self-choice of the actor that fulfills the will!

The fact you shied away from providing a response to the simple question I queried some posts ago, shows you have made a conclusion! For the sake of educational research, what answer would you have provided using your "scientific theories on free will"? Did Peter have free will?

My good Christian brother everything is not strawman! Infact you've invoked it so much I'm thinking you may not be aware of other logical fallacies.
See some listed below (Texas sharpshooter and no true Scotsman fallacies are not listed )
I thought I already answered that ridiculous question. Of course PETER HAD NO FREEWILL for crysake!! Someone told you in a few hours you'd do something you'd never normally do exactly 3 times, and you did exactly as they said, and you're still asking if it was freewill. What do you think free will is sef? I'm sure to you a hypnotized person has freewill too because he's choosing what to do!


MaxInDHouse, Janosky, LordReed, DeepSight,
tctrills, Dtruthspeaker, Everyday247, Ruke1990, sonmvayina, MeetDx
/////////////
jimRohn, Kobojunkie, FxMasterz, maynman, DrJones109, Jesusjnr2022, Jaephoenix, JessicaRabbit, Knownunknown, BBIA HellVictorinho6, SIXFEETUNDER, OkpaNsukkaisBae, Bacteriologist, FRANCISTOWN, SIRTee15, Aemmyjah, TheSourcerer, Busybrain2233, 1Sharon, TakeNigeriaBack,
Botragelad, isan, Fourthpredator,
seun, hopefullandlord, bobestman, Lorrayne, HardMirror, Hahn, SlawG, albreezy4eva, Muslim, Dominique, Mrbroke, EnemyofGod2, kkins25, Wilgrea7, A001, Maynthemayn

Dtruthspeaker:
I agree 💯% with you. But from the argument I see that he does not understand free will at all and how, when and where it works because of his conflicted mind

Exactly. To him everything is freewill except automatic things like sweating and such

Bellotelli:
Since she emphasized the spraying of money, we can now conclude that she was enticed by money.

It led to them starting to talk and then found out they're a match - not that she decided to marry him because of money!

The circled below is scientific proof that freewill is an illusion - your mind is made up before you are aware your mind is made up. Which perfectly explains addictions!


MaxInDHouse, Janosky, LordReed, DeepSight,
tctrills, Dtruthspeaker, Everyday247, Ruke1990, sonmvayina, MeetDx
/////////////
jimRohn, Kobojunkie, FxMasterz, maynman, DrJones109, Jesusjnr2022, Jaephoenix, JessicaRabbit, Knownunknown, BBIA HellVictorinho6, SIXFEETUNDER, OkpaNsukkaisBae, Bacteriologist, FRANCISTOWN, SIRTee15, Aemmyjah, TheSourcerer, Busybrain2233, 1Sharon, TakeNigeriaBack,
Botragelad, isan, Fourthpredator,
seun, hopefullandlord, bobestman, Lorrayne, HardMirror, Hahn, SlawG, albreezy4eva, Muslim, Dominique, Mrbroke, EnemyofGod2, kkins25, Wilgrea7, A001, Maynthemayn

1Alex:
In 2014 before before Buhari came in, it was $568.5 billion after rebasing: Nigeria became Africa’s largest economy.

This dollar not naira

Today it is about $165b in 2014 dollars.
So we have gone from $568b to $165b

Sagefromtheeast:
We don't like telling ourselves the truth

Plus $ itself is losing value. $250b today is $162b 15 years ago. See it below.
So we have gone from over $500b to less than $162b

Originalsly:
Did she tell you it was not about money or car? How did you know it wasn't?

I'm not the one who started with cars and money

oz4real83:
They are afraid to convert it to dollars, Nigeria once had a gdp of $500b before Buhari and his gang came in . Everything quoted above is less than $250b

You are right. It is $244b
See it below 244,000.000.000

This is a most ridiculous post. Who be this one? What made him an expert on such things??
Top SANs have already said Monday should withdraw the threat and tender unreserved apology

Originalsly:
What will happen if another man spray her with more money? ... or gift her a better car? The husband should know what goes around comes around .... that she can be bought by another man .... his friends wives and her friends will know ... she has no problem snatching men from their women. Hope we can get an update on the wedding in six months.

Did she tell you it was because he sprayed her more money or had better car?
They simply matched. Not because of money or car

BeardedMeat:
Op, did you continue seeing her and doing her after her confession?

Obviously a bullshit story. No Girl in uni will EVER admit to having random sex talkless of admitting she has HIV!

Double0h7:
Thank you ☺️. May God protect us all ☹️

Very easy - just don't have sex
What can be easier?

See the answer below.
Anything outside these ought shock u

Double0h7:
What’s the difference?

I thought this word count thing was over 😭

Pre is for prevention. You take it as prescribed to avoid infection
Post is after infection. You start taking it within 72hrs after you have had high risk sex to avoid infection.

See below

Now compare South and North Korea of Kim jong
Un. N

There's always a reason behind such abandonments

Firebox123:
money without connection

Just lol 😂

Kkkkkklkkk

Connection had a way of magically appearing when there is money

He needs POST-exosure prophylaxis (PEP) NOT PRE-exposure (PrEP)

Constantly remind yourself of her bad qualities and above all else bear in mind she can't love you without achievement.
So focus on achieving and brushing up on your grammar - your grammar really sucks

Do you have money?
If you do, you sure can. Just pay off the right people

It's not easy. I bet through all that people were expecting he send them money!

Boomark:
There is no context that will change the fact that the Father is the only true God. There no context that will change the fact that Christ is the holy servant of God. There is no context that will change the fact that our God is his God. He said all these by himself.

The work of your context is to twist what he said.


Let those who think they are capable answer the question. They will just see how they oppose the words of Jesus Christ. They don't belong to him all those who reject his sayings.


John 12:47-50 NIV
[47] “If anyone hears my words but does not keep them, I do not judge that person. For I did not come to judge the world, but to save the world. [48] There is a judge for the one who rejects me and does not accept my words; the very words I have spoken will condemn them at the last day. [49] For I did not speak on my own, but the Father who sent me commanded me to say all that I have spoken. [50] I know that his command leads to eternal life. So whatever I say is just what the Father has told me to say.”

Continue looking for context to reject his words. Satan and the antichrist are happy.

The context that changes it is that Jesus is the ONLY begotten Son of God, which is impossible because there is no mother. So "Son" here basically means "offshoot" of God, which of course is also God - which was also the decision unanimosly reached by some 300 bishops debating in Nicea for a month!

Read the OP for other reasons why he has to be God.

Here are some other reasons:

John 1:1,: "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God."

AND
John 14:9 “Don’t you know me, Philip, even after I have been among you such a long time? Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, ‘Show us the Father’?

AND
Mathew 16
16 Simon Peter answered, “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.” 17 And Jesus said to him, “Blessed are you, Simon Barjona, because flesh and blood did not reveal this to you, but My Father who is in heaven.

AND
John 20:28
28 Thomas said to him, “My Lord and my God!”

AND
John 8
58 “Very truly I tell you,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!” 59 At this, they picked up stones to stone him... (for obviously claiming to be God)

AND
John 10:33,: "We are not stoning you for any good work," they replied, "but for blasphemy, because you, a mere man, claim to be God,"

AND
Mark 14,: Again the high priest asked him, “Are you the Messiah, the Son of the Blessed One?”
62 “I am,” said Jesus...
63 The high priest tore his clothes. “Why do we need any more witnesses?”
(Here again Jesus uses the divine "I am"}

If you honestly study the whole Bible with an open heart, it will gradually dawn on you as it dawned on those 300 bishops and on the apostles themselves: This is God!

Dtruthspeaker:
If you are in a trap you can't move. And then you can say that the person had no freewill.

But not when your opponent was given the same opportunity of making every move on the board as the Victor, yet the opponent was beaten. That person cannot claim he has no freewill.

And it is still the same as when Kasparov says "I will beat you in 6 moves". As seen none of his opponents claimed they did not have freewill.

You don't understand what he's saying. He's basically saying that anything anybody does is freewill as long as it is not automatic. But that is not the generally accepted definition of freewill. See my screen shot above - an action predetermined by constraints is, by definition, NOT by freewill.

Gabrielshow24:
Any sane person can see you are still drawing straws. I didn't say Jesus used calculations. I said an intelligent mind configured circumstances that warranted his optimal choice!

To cut this back and forth, Did Peter have free will or not? Maybe this will help you think!
Nowhere did I say the prophets prophesied based on calculations! My argument is not hinged on the prophets but rather on the actor's free will to fulfill such prophecies! Along with the prerogative of the intelligent mind to make the actor fulfill His words!

I gave examples such as Saul, Jesus, Peter among others to sell my point but still you didn't get it! Did Saul have free will? Did Jesus have free will? Did Peter have free will? Let us know wise one!

Having one choice is also not the same as not having free will! Let that sink in!

My good brother I can now see where the problem lies - it lies in definitions. By your definition anything a person does is free will as long as it is not something automatic. But that is NOT the generally accepted definition of freewill.
As you can see from the below, an action predetermined by constraints is, by definition, NOT by freewill.
I think that about clears that up.

Gabrielshow24:
As regards Peter, My concern is not on God not knowing but on Peter having free will that fulfilled God's words, they are two different things completely and you keep drawing straws to prove some non-existent mangekyo-esque theory of no free will!

I can know, the same way people know what window to have sex in—Provided, all things else are equal. Likewise the key thing you failed to accomodate is that Peter's actions were configured the same way, I can make someone be born by configuring actions that will result in such. I can for instance use aphrodisiac on them both, I can tip the presumed Father of the unborn child's drink with Viagra, I can lock them both up in the same room, I can do more to ensure that they have relations within the woman's window! With my end goal being the creation of a child, I am not even Interested in whatsoever the unborn child is later named, I am just interested in actualizing my end goal of bringing such a person to this world!

Now you tell me, if an higher being cannot do all these and more that will result in them fulfilling his will or words!

You are wrong, human conditioning doesn't negate free will!

You know, I can't believe someone is actually arguing this. PROBABILITY IS NOT CERTAINTY!!!
The prophets didn't prophesy the coming of God the Son and his being from Bethlehem and born in a manger based on some calculations and algorithms. They see something happening and they tell you what they see. They're not mathematicians calculating probability!

I don't know what your definition of freewill is, which is why I keep referencing the clip. Does the guy have freewill?? Nooo, because the oracle already knows with certainty what he'd do - not because of any calculations but because he had already made the choice and the oracle somehow knows what he chose! If the oracle knew it because he was constrained to only make one choice - that's still tantamount to having no freewill!!!

As for Peter, I don't know why you keep talking about straws. Jesus told Peter with all certainty he'd deny him exactly 3 times and in your opinion Peter denied him exactly three times because Jesus made calculations that Peter must use his will to obey! That sounds really smart, doesn't it?Na wa for you o

Gabrielshow24:
This has really become redundant! In the variations of chess, even before men play it—there are variations that lead exactly to this! So what exactly is your point?

Even before the game is played, theoretically there are variations that lead to one's knight being trapped but it's the free will of the chess players to actually realize it over the board! What aspect of this is also hard for you?

Let me use syzygy tables as an example for you! Syzygy tables contain solved analysis of 1-7 chess pieces(endgame) irrespective of the position on board! Does it mean if one of this position occurs over the board that it negates the free will of the players that realized such? No!

Once more, brother. The fact you refused to comment on Peter's case shows you have made a dogmatic conclusion on the matter and whatever I say won't change that! Such opinions are debilitating to younger christians, not properly seasoned in the word!

My dear brother you are talking gibrish!😅
And you keep talking of this Peter's case and I haven't really focused on it. Are you saying God didn't know Peter would deny Jesus or what? Please elaborate.
Anyway, know this - there is NO WAY you can know if a particular person will even be born (his father could use his fee will to decide not sex that day) or if he would be into playing chess at all, talkless of what particular move he'd make on a particular chess board years before his birth!😂

Anybody knows why MaxInDHouse deleted all his 43 topics and all his posts?
Maybe he quit JW or got disfellowshiped or something.
I pray he's ok.



MaxInDHouse, Janosky, LordReed, DeepSight,
tctrills, Dtruthspeaker, Everyday247, Ruke1990, sonmvayina, MeetDx
/////////////
jimRohn, Kobojunkie, FxMasterz, maynman, DrJones109, Jesusjnr2022, Jaephoenix, JessicaRabbit, Knownunknown, BBIA HellVictorinho6, SIXFEETUNDER, OkpaNsukkaisBae, Bacteriologist, FRANCISTOWN, SIRTee15, Aemmyjah, TheSourcerer, Busybrain2233, 1Sharon, TakeNigeriaBack,
Botragelad, isan, Fourthpredator,
seun, hopefullandlord, bobestman, Lorrayne, HardMirror, Hahn, SlawG, albreezy4eva, Muslim, Dominique, Mrbroke, EnemyofGod2, kkins25, Wilgrea7, A001, Maynthemayn

Bahamas95:
Don't mind them jor!

You see all forms of pretenders on the internet. They think admitting witchcraft is real makes them look primitive.

But why don't people like you ever ask simple cogent questions? This same place has countless unsolved robberies running into billions, how come it only works on two chickens and a goat?!