FromGuiriga's Posts
Nairaland Forum › FromGuiriga's Profile › FromGuiriga's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 11 pages)
OLAADEGBU: That's a good observation. It is true that day and night happens simultaneously depending on the location. It is the evidence of a revolving earth. In Luke 17:34-36 we see that the 2nd Coming of our Lord Jesus Christ will happen while some are asleep at night and others are busy working during the day.Brother, is this literal? That some are sleep at night and some will be working during the day? |
striktlymi: Hello Gui,I'm just trying to understand you know.... According to the writer of Genesis God call the light day and the darkness he called night. Alright, then: 14 Then God said, “Let there be lights in the firmament of the heavens to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs and seasons, and for days and years; 15 and let them be for lights in the firmament of the heavens to give light on the earth”; and it was so. Here we have God creating lights again to divide day and night. On the fourth Day! But did not take care of this in the first day that was evening and morning? Can anyone reconcile this for me. Thanks in advance. |
OLAADEGBU: What was the first thing God created and when was the sun created? According to Genesis it was the heavens and the earth. According to somewhere in the new testament it was Jesus. Can you please address my questions as well. Thanks. |
OLAADEGBU: That's a good observation. It is true that day and night happens simultaneously depending on the location. It is the evidence of a revolving earth. In Luke 17:34-36 we see that the 2nd Coming of our Lord Jesus Christ will happen while some are asleep at night and others are busy working during the day.Help me out here, "God called the light day" What is this light? The darkness he called night. Where or what is it? As what we call night is simply the blocking of the sun by the moon. At least that is what I was taught in school. I ask because it sound, at least to me as if God is creating these this things but they are simply an effect of his creation. Did God not know this? Thanks in advance. |
Emusan: You get it wrong your initial argument was that Bible is not the word of God.I have not taken back my position. My initial argument is still my main argument. I have told you they are books that were put together by man/scribes. The bible is a collection of books or writings. People chose which books to include and which books to leave out. Some authors are know and some are unknown. I mean, these and more are the facts. Why not accept them? |
[quote author=Pastor Olu T][/quote]Yeah, but come to think of if they had all the books then it will always be a continueous thing and the book written even the world itself would not contain? That is precisely my point Pastor. The is the main focus of my argument here. You have come to this opinion by pure observation and the applied reason. In my opinion, sound reasoning. This is not about other people's opinion but what the fact is. You are correct Pastor, the facts are on my side. I making the case for the facts. Folks here are making the case against the facts, leaning on mere belief or faith. I have no problem with that. As a matter of fact, if folks here come and tell me that is their faith. I stop. I don't contest any person faith. I don't do that. This is not the point, the point is the book inline with what was written formally, 'cos when you look at the present bible, all the books correlate each other. I agree. Then what do we do with things that are quoted in the scripture that reference other writings/books that are in circulation until this day! The Christians here will not read those books so they won't know whats in there or whether is in line or not? How can they then pass judgement on things they know nothing about? Give thanks Pastor. |
OLAADEGBU: The Meaning of "Day"Brother, this is interesting....What do you think about the day never ending. In terms of what we call daytime in one country is night time in another country. According to scholars or scientist or at least what they teach in schools is that we experience night when the earth is on the other side of the sun or the moon something along those lines. But if you take a closer look, there is really no night as the sun never stops shining. I have more questions but one thing at a time as I'm slow in learning. What is you take on this reasoning? Give thanks. |
Emusan: Yes! They believe He was not the king they were expecting but He proved it to them many times. They same Jews that rejected Him later some finally believe and repent.Bredren, you summed up my argument. It looks silly to say the word of God is contained in 66 books. I agree. |
Emusan: How did you know the word of God claim all these?I knew this when I saw the suffering and injustices in the world. So when a man comes and tells me about his God, I first find out if that man has love in him. If he does then we have the same God. I don't need a book for that. By observation if you treat others as you want to be treated then the world is a better place. This is only 1 sentence. The law and the prophets hang on this. The books are there to confirm what the father has put in the people heart. It tells about people experiences, wisdom and parables. A lot of it is also the people customs and rituals at the time. Some it could what people thought at the time. I do understand that you don't need more than 66 books. What you need and what is the word of God are two different things. Another man might only need two sentences of of those 66 books. And that is his word of God. Period. That is my contention here form the beginning. That is what I'm hammering at. My position is the bible is a collection of books good for instructions, rebuke, wisdom and so forth but it is not the word of God. I say this with the confident that if the bible is the word of God then many people will not be save because their salvation depends on that book and they never read it or heard about. Yes bredren, I do obey the word of the father. I falter here and there but I just give thanks still. |
Emusan: Like @Tolu has said your arguement is baseless. From Bible is not the word of God to inaccuracy of the Bible. I know your next question will be if Bible is the word of God, why is it not accurate? As one of your people did above. The problem is that to interpret the Bible you need the original word which is the 'inspiration of God' but most people fail to know this.I'm not arguing the inaccuracy of the bible here. I have not even mentioned anything about the bible being inaccurate in any of my posts. Anyway, you need the original word? There is none. NO ONE has the original letters/manuscripts of the new testament writers. As a matter of fact, according to scholars, they don't even know who wrote some of those letters. There is no point on going that route. Up to the point where Jesus saw the boy, was the boy or his parents for that matter sinners or not? |
Bidam: That's not the point bro..The point is the Gospel hangs on the truth of the creation account. Paul says that man’s sinfulness can be traced back to the sin of one man, Adam. He argues that it was the sin of one man that corrupted the human race, and that it is by the righteousness of one man — Jesus Christ — that many can be saved from their sins (Romans 5:12-21). Cast out the creation as a myth and you cast out the gospel, as I see it. Paul said all sinned. Jesus said neither a man nor his parent sinned. (John 9:2-3) Reconcile that for me please. Thanks. |
Pastor Olu T: Sincerely i don't get your argument, no one is saying the the word of God is limited to the 66 or whatever books for God can speak through anyone. Every inspired word by the Holy Ghost is the word of God, be it the one canon of scriptures or the Ethiopian bible (Though dont know about it but if it is inspired by the Holy Ghost it is the word of God), you can also give the word of God if it is inspired by the HOly Ghost brother.I think there is a bit of confusion. I admit. When someone says the bible is the word of God. I take it that they are referring to the 66 books. As this is the most common bible out there. Yet there are other bibles with many more books. That is my position. So if the bible is the word of God then include the Ethiopian books and the others that are out there so people can get more of the word of God. I'm not here to discourage of question ones personal belief. But trust me Pastor. There are people out there who go places with those 66 books and teach that that is the word of God as oppose to; to this is what is written about Yahweh and Jesus Christ and so forth. Then if that person wants to believe it is God talking to him then be it. But that person cannot tell someone the word of God is contain in those books alone. This is not true. And in so many words, that is what I'm pointing out. I tell you something Pastor: I was talking to a Christian about the book of Tobit. Which is in the Apocrypha. He told me he does not read it because it contains divination or something like that. Yet, when his bible tells him the sun stopped and a burning bush talked to someone, that he believes. This is what I call indoctrination. When a person does not want to see outside of what they are being taught. If you grew up with the Apocrypha in your bible you would think of it as inspired by God by mere fact that it would haven been part of your belief system. I honestly think you would not question its inspiration. You would just accept it. I called you a hypocrate before Pastor and I really don't like to get on a negative vibe. Don't remember if I apologized. But if I did not. I'm sorry. Give thanks for the reasoning still. |
Emusan: @guiriga Truth, Love and Righteousness. Life forever more. |
Emusan: Don't get me wrong I only telling you why they didn't insert those 14books in their scripture.No, the Jews rejected Jesus because he was not the king they were expecting. A power hungry messiah that would give them the land of Canaan and have them rule over their enemies and so forth. My friend, do you think that God need people to reject his son for anyone to accept to be partaker of the gospel? All you need are the 66 books because that is what you were introduced to. This is the main point I'm discussing and my main contention. If you had been a Jew then you'll be here saying you ONLY need the 47 books of their Tanak. But if you were an Ethiopian then you might need even more books. So, you see how the needle is moving now. What you believe is personal and I do agree with you that if you deem it that all you need is 1 book then that is all you need. But for anyone to believe that the word of God can be contain in 66 books is in my opinion that person is misinformed. When Jesus was on the scene there was not no new testament until years after his death. Can you believe that, after the son God came on the scene then the word of God was put together later. These are the type of thing these people who spread this propaganda don't reason. They don't want to. They are happy with their belief. That is OK with me. But they make a mistake when they come to me and tell me, here this is the word of God. Go read this. If I tell them then accept the Quran where it says this is the word of God and there are no error in it. They won't. Anyhow bredren, I went off on a rant here. Sorry. Give thanks for the reasoning and sound advice. |
Bidam: Some thirty-eight hundred times the Bible declares, “God said,” or “Thus says the Lord” (e.g. Ex. 14:1; 20:1; Lev. 4:1; Num. 4:1; Deut. 4:2; 32:48; Isa. 1:10, 24; Jer. 1:11; Ezek. 1:3; etc.). Paul also recognized that the things he was writing were the Lord’s commandments (1 Cor. 14:37), and they were acknowledged as such by the believers (1 Thess. 2:13). Peter proclaimed the certainty of the Scriptures and the necessity of heeding the unalterable and certain Word of God (2 Pet. 1:16-21). John too recognized that his teaching was from God; to reject his teaching was to reject God (1 John 4:6)My friend, you do realize that when this was written (1 John 4:6) the "bible" was the "old testament". There was no "new testament." In fact the writer was not teaching ANYTHING new. "...Those who know God hears us , he who is not of God does not hear us..." My point is that John, just added to the "word of God" because there had already been the word of God in the Hebrew or Jewish "bible". But let's not stop there....in the selection of "the new testament" cannon, writings were left out. So at best, the word of God is incomplete. Imagine that, the word of God missing from scriptures. Back to the "Old testament" God, said adulterers, homosexuals, disrespectful children and so on are deserving of death. Now follow the word of God and do these things. Of course you would not....It's the Old testament! By the way...the story about when Jesus told the men who wanted to stone the adulteress woman, that those without sin let them cast the first stone....according to scholar Bart Ehrman, the story is NOT in the oldest or best manuscripts. Think about the implication of this in the word of God. That story was not in the bible when the cannon was put together! But it is in the bible you read now. So tell the Christian to remove because is the word of a scribe and not of God. |
Bidam: Actually it is not him saying it but the bible which is the inerrant word of God.You could be right my friend. Can you please quote that for me from your bible. |
Emusan: They were never considered as part of the Hebrew Scriptures, and the Jews themselves clearly ruled them out by the confession that there was, throughout that period, no voice of the prophets in the land. I stated this in my previous post.Why are you so concerned with the what the Jews rule out because there was or there was not a prophet in the land at the time? You take that as authority from them? Are these not the same Jews that tell you Jesus is NOT the Messiah? Yet you believe that he is (I assume). Here is a clear cut example how you lean to your own understanding of the situation arriving at your own conclusion but when it comes to exploring beyond what the Hebrews or Jews say, you are shackled. Very obedient. That is my point, who are you or any so called Jew for that matter to say what is inspired or what is not? How do you explain that the "word of God" did not reach the Amazonian i Brazil until recently? These people have been living and dying without the "knowledge" that supposedly God sent his son to die for them, which is essential to God's supposedly salvation plan. Explain this, please. Back to Jude...Whether Jude was a prophet or not, he did quote from the book of Enoch which people say is in circulation until this day. In fact, is part of the Ethiopian bible! What you claim to "know" is what has been passed down to you by the so called Jews in their books or literature in their 66 books. You say you don't need to read all books to know the truth. I agree with you. Yet you confide yourself in books for your truth. I don't understand. Christians will continue to argue about God until they get their story straight about God. They don't even agree on who is God. |
Pastor Olu T: So what is your point my friend?My point is that what you call the word of God is what the Europeans tell you is the word of God. |
Emusan: Pls the Ethiopian bible you're talking about does it mean it was written by Ethiopians or just a name because the only thing I know about origin of the Bible is that "The Apocrypha and the SeptuagintYou make some good points. Yo do know that here are books that are referenced in the bible that are around until this day but are not part of the cannon. As person (yourself) who is as informed in this matter will surprise me if you did not know that. The question is why are they not part of the cannon? The reason why I point at the Ethiopian bible is because it has more book than that of the 66 book standard bible. So how can the word of God be short of books? OK, the Catholic bible uses the Apocrypha but the Ethiopian bible has more, 81 books. Jude quoted from the book of Enoch. You do know that right? Have you read this books? The book of Tobit for example? |
Pastor Olu T: Never heard of Ethiopia bible, and besides this is not propagating white man's acceptance or believes. Pastor Olu, if you have access to the internet then you can do a search of the Ethiopian bible. Its has many more books than that of the bible the westerners call the word of God. The irony of it is that one the oldest bible is in Ethiopia. This is a fact. Even quoted by HIM. Right in Africa. Yet we Africans let others come and tell us what to believe and what to read and what not to read and more confusion all the while. But the Europeans who go to Africa never tell you that in Ethiopia is one of the oldest bibles. Yet when they get their Doctors in Theology they are taught about these things. I believe in the creator. The Most High God. The Source of all. The Supreme. Those with a clean heart will see him/it. Any how Pastor, Give thanks. |
benalvino: now there are 3 beginning... if you are talking about rev 3:14... note rev 3:14 should be source of the creation of God... or ruler of the creation of God. check all the translation see that they vary. in genesis in the beginning God created the heaven and earth it didn't say he created Jesus... in john 1:1 Jesus was there in the Beginning and through him everything came into existence without him nothing came into existence... now link all this verse to Colossians 1:15... through him everything was created for him. now revisit rev 3:14 and tell me if you say jesus is the beginning of the creation of God the bible wont contradict itself?I'm done with these here brother. Give thanks. |
benalvino: you don't know the bible really... There is no 2 different beginning... the same beginning when God create everything is same event john was all about... if it is 2 different beginning it means there should be 2 earth and 2 everything. you don't really understand don't you?The bible tells you that Jesus is the beginning of God's creation. He had glory with his Father before the world began. I told you that according to Paul there is a third heaven. I tell you also that according to the writer of Hebrews the worlds were framed by God. You keep walking into it then you come back shocked every time. I'm not going to waste your time anymore brother. Give thanks for the reasoning still bredren. Thanks for the reasoning. |
Bidam: ok..we know that God created us in His image and likeness. we also know according to the bible that Jesus came o earth as a man. The question now is who is Jesus? A Man, an angel, a spirit, a god?? who actually is this Jesus to you people?Jesus is the begotten/unique/only one son of the Father. God is spirit. If Jesus is in the form of God, I take it he is also spirit. That is my understanding.I cannot speak for anyone else. |
Bidam: It's not about paul but about Jesus Christ who is the full expression of God's glory and manifestation on the Earth. The whole purpose of God is for His GLORY TO BLANKET THE EARTH AS THE WATERS COVER THE SEA. IT IS JUST A MATTER OF TIME. Whether you believe it or not is irrelevant cos it's gonna happen in these last days. I understand. Give thanks. |
benalvino: 2 beginnings hmmm... You confuse bro. Learn the bible Every time you run into something you don't understand or you have no answer to you say I am is confused. The Cherubim that God put to guard the tree of life....when was he/it created? |
Bidam: The revelation of Jesus is actually progressive. What do you understand when Paul said that the manifold, variegated, multi-faceted, many-sided, multi-dimensional wisdom of God, which has been hidden in Christ, is now being revealed by the church, to principalities and powers in heavenly places.I disagree. The word of the Father must be eternal. Good yesterday, today and forever. Other wise The Father must continue to change/add/modify his word to suit the times/people. Imagine that. Tell me this: Do you believe Paul "secretly" knew about the trinity but did not teach it? Do you believe Paul "secretly" knew/thought Jesus was the Father? Answer those two for me brother. Thanks in advance. |
true2god: I believe too well that u understand my intent of saying 'thank u' to the post i quoted frm and what ensued prior my response or u make reference to the earlier posts that gave rise to it. I don't understand. I'm sorry. Come again... |
Mr anony: Lololol, interesting how in order not to expressly admit that you read your own interpretation into the verse, you try to throw a bit of mud out there in the hope that I'll try to "protect" Jesus' reputation.I'm not a Christian so I cannot speak for them. As a African, Jesus said: "...For I have not spoken of myself; but the Father which sent me, he gave me a commandment, what I should say, and what I should speak..." John 12:49 |
benalvino: how is it not reasonable? so there are 2 beginnings? and 2 creation? 2 heaven and 2 earth? genesis and john are same eventI don't not know of 2 earths but according to Paul there is third heaven...That solves that. I already posted scripture where Jesus himself say he came forth from the Father. There is the beginning of God's creation and there is the beginning of the heavens and earth. There is no conflict with that. |
benalvino: both of them are same... genesis and john 1:1 are same eventNo. No, you cannot read those two and arrive at a conclusion that they are the same. I mean, you can but is not reasonable. |
true2god: Thank u. Bredren, was Abraham the beginning of God's creation? |
benalvino: One there is only one beginning... I don't know where ur logic is coming from... Which one is the beginning, Genesis or John? |

