₦airaland Forum

BoldBrainz:
I just mailed my complaint as well. That reporter is mad to be exhibiting that level of idiocy. They think say we dey follow them play this time?

Last night I participated in an online poll on twitter for the unmasking of either Reno Omokri, Festus Keyamo and one other messed up twitter propaganda machineries whose name I can't remember.

The result of the poll had Omokri topping the percentile. His sins will soon be in the open. Since he's making it a duty to attack entire tribes in his desperate bid to get recognition from the drug lord.

You can't win tinubu

Stricker321:
The CSU never endorsed any third party vendors to print their certificates. They even described them as online forgery sites that some folks patronise. Go and verify.

The CSU clearly stated their process for replacements and confirmed that Tinubu has never picked up any certificate from them or applied for any replacement.

Even if third party vendors print certificates, they can only do so after authorisation from the school and the school stated under oath that they did not get any such requests for Tinubu.

A vendor cannot just open shop and begin to print certificates for anyone that comes knocking Do you know what that means?

Maybe I will ask them to print Havard First Class certificate for me too. cheesy

Keyamo is lying and deceiving people. The transcript is there for anyone that cares to read. The CSU even stated that they ASSUMED that the Bola A Tinubu on their records is the same as the illegitimate man in Aso Rock.

Meanwhile, can you us how Tinubu graduated in 1970 from a secondary school that was established in 1974? Even the CSU degree was obtained on fraud, forgery and falsehood because Tinubu must have presented fake GCE results to the CSU and deceived the school into granting him admission.

The CSU also stated that they have never issued any certificate to Tinubu so which certificate was Tinubu replacing?

My dear,CSU said they do not have record of those that requests for replacement diploma so they cannot know whether tinubu ordered for it or not.they said the original certificate is no longer in tinubu file which means it was collected by tinubu.atiku has no tangible evidence

fergie001:
It was sent by a Good Samaritan, e dey house for hard copy.

A bit busy, I will read when I am lesser busy.

It wasn't a link.

It was printed, I just took the first page.

It's 138 pages.....

Can't you scan it and upload

Usmanovic95:
How is it better to keep silent, this is not the time for politicking and forming political correctness,Nigeria is on the spotlight with global audience paying close attention to this case. The man is the custodian of the image of the country, the earlier he nips this in the bud,the better for us all.

Whether he talks or not,you guys will believe what you want

Usmanovic95:
At this point Tinubu should name the off-site vendor that redesign the certificate for him, that will put CSU in a position that they will either admit or deny having dealings with such third party vendor.

It is better he keeps silent

BoldBrainz:
😂😂.

I rest my case.

Please do wofi

KanwuliaExtra:
Which case?
He should be LIFE PRESIDENT.
Only till 2027?

He should DIE in Agbado-Aso Rovk fa!
We will keep reminding y’all of ya sins.

Shikena!

Then rest

BoldBrainz:
Garfield my friend...😂!

You still have an unanswered question o.

There's no need to answer.atiku failed to establish forgery

BoldBrainz:
So Bola Tinubu got a replacement diploma from CSU in 1997, and forgot that he had ordered a replacement in 1979? Even CSU forgot to remind Tinubu that his first replacement request was still in the school and still went ahead to issue him the one in 1997 through an offline vendor?

😂..

Yes,very possible

BoldBrainz:
My question exactly. So you're insinuating that this registrar can refuse to recognise a certificate belonging to an alumni and signed by a previous president, because he wasn't in CSU then to witness it?

And you still didn't answer my previous question. Which replacement diploma did the registrar claim tinubu did not collect if you're claiming the same school issues him the current diploma with Inec through an offline vendor?!

The one of 1979.he forgot to collect it and reordered another in 1997

KanwuliaExtra:
I hope you are also planning to attend this 'CSU' of a GBAJUE SCHOOL?



. . . . .AND NO CERTIFICATE WAS ISSUED SIR!

No, CSU COULD NOT TELL FOR A FACT IF THE JAGABAT was the same BOLA A. TINUBU that attended the school.
The admitted a FEMALE, and claimed a MALE graduated without ENGLISH AND MATH?

You CANNOT graduate in ANY UNIVERSITY in the USA WITHOUT PASSING ENGLISH AND MATH.
Simple.

Tinubu has won this case and will be there till 2027

BoldBrainz:
- You didn't answer the first question.

- Going by your logic, if the Registrar refused to autuenticate Tinubu's diploma because it was processed by a former staff of CSU (Jamal Orr) and he wasn't a witness to it, can the same registrar refuse to recognise the signatures of past CSU Presidents on certificates that were issued to past students simply because he didn't witness those ones too?

It depends.when Mr Henderson questioned him,he agreed that he cannot competently speak on what happened before he came to CSU since it will be mere speculations.

KanwuliaExtra:
Lies!
OF COURSE!
You need to graduate to have a 'ceremonial certificate'.
No ceremony, no graduation.

CSU is only trying to fool people like you with words.
What is a ceremony?

The registrar clearly said he graduated ma.whether they are lying or not is not relevant,the court will take what they said not what you believe.tinubu has won

BoldBrainz:
If the CSU offered Tinubu his diploma through an offline vendor, why did the registrar claim Tinubu never collected the replacement he ordered? And why did he further refuse to authenticate the one Tinubu submitted to Inec, claiming to have no knowledge of it?

Isn't that like me telling you to get my product through my subsidiary and later refusing to authenticate that same product for you?

The diploma tinubu submitted was authenticated by Jamal Orr a former staff of CSU.the registrar refused to authenticate because it wasn't before him.he can only authenticate what he witnessed

KanwuliaExtra:
THAT NO CERTIFICATE was ever issued TO or picked up by TIEFNUBU

Now, we know why. THE GCFR never graduated!

But they said he graduated and that certs in USA are merely ceremonial

Omowale2023:
Well.....you are 101% correct, however the damage has been done. It doesn't matter what the apex court says. They can use Technicalities to dismiss the case, but they can never dismiss the "Damage" it's as caused. They can't dismiss the opinions it has created.
The truth will always prevail, I just hope you witness it one day.

The truth is what the laws say.we are used to damage,tinubu is used to it so it is a non issue

KanwuliaExtra:
Stop spreading LIES.

From CSU. . . TIEFNUBU HAS FAKE TRANSCRIPT TOOOOO;

NO ENGLISH. NO MATH. . . . NO GRADUATION!!!!

GBAJUE FIRST CLASS ACCOUNTANT WEY FAIL MATH AND ENGLISH? ? ? ?

What did CSU say in the deposition

Omowale2023:
In Nigeria they are.

When will you answer my questions.
If you know you won't engage in intelligent conversations. Don't bother to quoting me again. And I won't bother to quoting you either.

Kindly leave my thread but know that atiku has lost at the apex court sir

KanwuliaExtra:
Lies!

TIEFNUBU did not graduate according to CSU.
So what “certificate” are we talking about?😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Madam,abeg comot from my thread.you are incorrigible.yoi are just hateful,nothing else.it is a waste engaging you intelligently

Omowale2023:
Assumptions are the lowest forms of Knowledge.
Did you assume you graduated from a university?
Bros abeg.....shift, make I see road.

Swerve sir.in the eyes of the law,tinubu cert is regular.atiku has lost this

KanwuliaExtra:
We know!
I also have a certificate from an online vendor.
But it will NEVER leave my sitting room wall.

My real certificate is with my SCHOOL for all to see.

Any certificate denied by the legitimate issuing faculty is FAKE!

AGBADO-BBC take note!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Tinubu till 2031

Omowale2023:
Lol.....be whining yourself. They never said that, what they said is; replacements are done by third party, provided they take permission from the school, so you are telling me that I can just go to the cafe and print a document from a 3rd party without letting the school know?. You people are creating a false narrative here. Even Harvard can never say they allow 3rd party to print their certificates without express permission from the school. Pls I asked you a question from the first comment. You haven't replied me.

Oga,they said it can be done offsite and there is no record of those that make such requests so it is assumed that tinubu requested for it

BoldBrainz:
What you're trying to say in essence is that CSU has no hands in Tinubu's replacement diploma but a third-party(offline) vendor, right?

Tinubu applied to CSU who then issued him a cert from an offline vendor

Omowale2023:
Where's written In our constitution that we accept certificates from Offsite Vendors?

You people keep implicating yourselves the more. This statement is self-Indicting. Better delete this comment immediately

According to the us education system,off-site certs are not forgery

KanwuliaExtra:
TIEFUNUB NEVER GRADUATED.
Both TIEFNUBU and CSU ARE FORGERS. . . . .



TIEFUNUB NEVER GRADUATED.
Both TIEFNUBU and CSU ARE FORGERS. . . . .



TIEFUNUB NEVER GRADUATED.
Both TIEFNUBU and CSU ARE FORGERS. . . . .



TIEFUNUB NEVER GRADUATED.
Both TIEFNUBU and CSU ARE FORGERS. . . . .



TIEFUNUB NEVER GRADUATED.
Both TIEFNUBU and CSU ARE FORGERS. . . . .



TIEFUNUB NEVER GRADUATED.
Both TIEFNUBU and CSU ARE FORGERS. . . . .



TIEFUNUB NEVER GRADUATED.
Both TIEFNUBU and CSU ARE FORGERS. . . . .





TIEFUNUB NEVER GRADUATED.
Both TIEFNUBU and CSU ARE FORGERS. . . . .



TIEFUNUB NEVER GRADUATED.
Both TIEFNUBU and CSU ARE FORGERS. . . . .

If CSU are forgers,it means tinubu has won the case

Omowale2023:
That's can only be done by the express authority of the school. And they never recieved any request from Tinubu.

Not true.they don't keep records of requests so they can't tell whether he requested or not

Omowale2023:
Lol.....the Issuing Body is CSU, and they said the Document submitted by Tinubu to INEC didn't come from them. That's Forgery already, altering documents and submitting documents not issued from the Issuing body or Institutional authority is "FORGERY"

So what's else are you looking for?
What are you trying to justify?
Does Nigeria submit 3rd party documents for elected post?
Did you submit 3rd Party documents to get a job?

Oga,they said replacement are done off-site not by them

KanwuliaExtra:
CSU did not issue TIEFNUBU'S FAKE INEC CERTIFICATE.

Simple.

Irreparable HARM loading.

TIENUBU IS IN HIDING. . . SHAME NOR LET AM COME OUT.

Justice will not come from the GBAJUE SUPREME COURT OF NIGERIA.

JUSTICE WILL COME FROM THE PEOPLE OF NIGERIA.


#TINUBU MUST GO

It was issued by vendors offsite

I have read the 127 page CSU deposition.the questions were asked by Atiku's lawyer Angela Liu.csu were represented by Hayes and tinubu by Vic Henderson.

On page 24,the registrar said the seals has changed severally between 1979 till date.( Therefore tinubu cert is consistent with CSU records)
He also stated that due to the xerox machine,documents can come out differently.

He also said that there is no original diploma on tinubu's file meaning tinubu picked it but there exist a re ordered,recreated copy which wasn't picked.
On page 29,he admitted that they can't completely get templates from 1979 anymore.

Liu showed him a copy of a replacement order form on page 32-34 and the registrar said those that need replacements fill it but they do not keep records of those that requested therefore cannot remember if tinubu requested or not.
On page 40,he refused to authenticate the degree copy submitted to inec because it wasn't before them but said their former counsel Jamal Orr certified it.
On page 57,he said diplomas are generally ceremonial in USA but transcripts are more relevant.

Then tinubu lawyer Henderson started questioning him.at page 77,he stated that he can only speculate about what happened before he started working at CSU and isn't sure.
At page 100,he admitted that replacements are done off-site not in the university. On page 102 he admitted that differences in dates of birth of tinubu and the F in the Daley college transcript is likely human error based on his experience esp ast at 1979,things were typed manually.
Atiku lawyer at page 122 tried to ask about inec again and the registrar said he won't comment on that.he also stated that he didn't play any role in tinubu's certification and schooling and therefore cannot comment accurately on them.
Atiku lawyer asked him if he is familiar with forged documents and if he can mention notable forgers.tinubu lawyers objected and she didn't pursue that forgery part.i think this is where atiku lost it...

In summary,no forgery was established.forgery is criminal in nature and must be proven beyond reasonable doubt and atiku lawyer failed to do so.she could have gotten the registrar to admit that tinubu cert is forged but failed.she could have gotten the registrar to find out the list of off-site vendors and which one tinubu cert could be traced to but she failed to.once there is doubt or speculations or uncertainty in criminal evidences,it will be resolved in favour of the defendants.tinubu has totally won this.



Cc mynd44
Nplfmod
Fergie001
Helinues
Litigator
Penguin2
Mrvitalis
Immaculatejoe
Cajal
Donphilopus
Generalpula
Afamed

seunmsg:
Someone from the south east or south south wouldn't have been a bad idea. Mr President needs to balance the appointments going to the south among all southern regions.

I agree

valentineuwakwe:
Instead of addressing the nation over the scandals your certificate and identity has put the country.....you are hear asking the supreme court to dismiss a case that has so much facts about the schools and certificates you claim to posses....
I hope the national broadcasting commission NBC will sanction you the way they have been sanction others for trying to gag the supreme court over a decision not yet deliberated upon!

Which facts