₦airaland Forum

fergie001:
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid0xfNrd5PwgxY46KuaQ1t3krk3xXBGMxNZzqQ2QsGv4S8PLrBMNjYpq7h1MhcPMC64l&id=100068850777180&mibextid=2JQ9oc

He was always going to move.he will be apc guber candidate in 2025.,

Kukutente23:
See the nonsense that is coming out of this boy's mouth
Go and give the phone back to your nurse
And remind her to give you your injections

Atiku is a failure.dont fall under the camerounian shadow kid

Kukutente23:
This boy.
Read the section well na and make use of your innermost brain if any to digest what you're reading

Stop vomiting yabaleft made trash and take the usual pills.aplly commonsense lad.atiiku is a serial loser

Kukutente23:
You sound confused
Go and read 232(2) and stop arguing about what you don't know
What the op is claiming is that SC can't take new evidences since it doesn't have original jurisdiction on criminal matters
Use your brain

See full stupidity on display.if you had read it clearly,you won't vomit rubbish your juvenice rubbish.the SC do not have original jurisdiction on any matter whether criminal or civil except on matters between states or states and fg.atiku lame evidence will be trashed as usual kid

Kukutente23:
Where's it written that 232 applies to election cases?

Where is it written that it is for only civil cases? Is there any electoral case that goes direct to the apex?

Kukutente23:
The case is a civil case Oga
It's election petition case not forgery
Shift!!

Forgery specifically is a criminal case.section 232 applies to election cases too

fergie001:
It was sent by a Good Samaritan, e dey house for hard copy.

A bit busy, I will read when I am lesser busy.

This isn't full na.you for send the link

Idiotseverywher:
. Guy some times your comments and arguments baffles me, you don't sense at all

It should not,it is the truth.ofvourse it won't make sense to dull,dumb people.

DMerciful:
I can stay out kf APC matter if they disappear.
APC is a satanic party

Apc will rule forever

fergie001:
Obvious because Ariwoola was attacked last year that he was biased. Kekere-Ekun started from the Lagos High Court and was recommended to go higher by the former Lagos Gov.

Someone a bit different is cool, however, Kekere-Ekun could still lead it because Ariwoola doesn't want to be on the panel. Uwani Abba-Aji & Agim are rumoured to be on the panel.

Hmmm.you never reach house?

Spy360:
Sadly I can't upload pix.

You don't need to.the case is dead,just media trial

DMerciful:
Remember that the Supreme Court made Lawan and Akpabio senatorial candidates in elections they never contested.

Yes because their opponents failed to prove that they won and also the law is that only the party can decide who their candidate is and the nwc said it is akpabio and lawan.by the way you hate apc so why not stay out of Apc matter

DMerciful:
The constitution said anyone that presents a forged certificate. Here, the drafters of the constitution are not only looking at profiting from forgery but also looking at acts of dishonesty. A dishonest person should not be allowed to manage public wealth and thats who a forger is.

And the supreme court have severally stated that that forgery must be related to constitutional qualifications stated in section 177-182

slivertongue:
the Court can't absolve him from GCL.

As far as the court does not indict him, he is fine

fergie001:
Yes.... Dattijo is retiring this month.

Ariwoola & Kekere-Ekun recused themselves for obvious reasons.

Garba is on the panel too.

I don't know the obvious reasons except for tribalism but a Yoruba being there means nothing.who else is on the panel

greggng:
Mark my word even if he spend 8years nothing will change . No hatred meant ... I still see Padi Padi govt ...

It will sir.things have started changing gradually

Spy360:
It's still technicalities.

Someone stole my dress and wore it to a party. I arrest the person while still wearing the dress. Then you ask me to prove how he entered my house to steal the dress. How will I know? He is the one to explain that not me. What's undisputable is that he is wearing the stolen dress.

The certificate Tinubu is holding could not be authenticated by CSU. That proves forgery. It's left for Tinubu to explain how he got the certificate not Atiku. There's no such thing as third party vendors in the deposition by CSU.

You didn't read the complete deposition then.read the entire thing.the registrar clearly said they can't authenticate the one submitted to inec since it is not before them.he also said replacements are usually from third party vendors.tinubu need not prove anything since it is not a trial proceedings or a normal court trial but a depository.atiku needs to prove everything.he had the advantages.

In any case,the apex court will not even admit it

slivertongue:
The court is not the creator of GCL or the false claim made by Tinubu. regardless of what the court says Tinubu is officially a forger, he lied under oath. I had doubted the accusations but with what he filled with his handwriting i now believe he is what he is accused of.

Tinubu is innocent until proven guilty by a court of law.how dare you say he is an official forger? I thought you are law abiding

DMerciful:
It is not what qualifies him but what disqualifies him. Anyone that presents a forged certificate to INEC stands disqualified.

This has nothing to do with DSS because they're not the issuing authority.

Why do you think the country has been going down from beginning? Because we bend the constitution to suit us irrespective of what is true and right.

DSS is not an issuing authority but they are constitutionally empowered to investigate criminal acts and forgery is a criminal act therefore the court cannot discountenance their findings.
The supreme court has stated in agi vs ayade 2015 and APM vs abiodun 2019 that mere forgery of document is not disqualification but the forged document must be part of the one mentioned by the constitution or without that forged document,the candidate ceases to be qualified.in order words,the forgery must have given him undue advantage

greggng:
I don't care who supports who . I believe in rule of law....freedom of speech is a human right . Everything need to be tested in court...justice should prevail ...cos without justice then there will be civil disobedient...That is not good for our image

It is unfortunate but you better picture a 4 year period with tinubu in it

Spy360:
No don't. These are technicalities even though they are cogent. But what we want is substantial justice.

For you to get substantial justice,you must follow a laid down procedure substantially.you cannot break a law and expect the law to help you.technicalities are legal

Spy360:
Well he did find out that Tinubu submitted a fake certificate to INEC. Tinubu has already confirmed it by stating it was gotten from a third party vendor.

The school already implied that replacement are usually from vendors which is legal in USA corroborating what tinubu said.what atiku would have done is to find out which vejdor,whether it was done with the school permission and also to get the school to clearly disown and write to the court disowning the cert not just hanging on mere speculations.

fergie001:
I will send it just that it's hard copy and I no dey house. Please bear with me!

I will it's just that after now,you will forget and to track you online na wahala..

I heard inyang okoro will chair the apex panel

greggng:
Don't say that ...I won't agree with you . The fact is that anyone not supporting tinubu is deemed to be obi fans...Recall atiku got more votes than obi and there combined votes us more than 14m while tinubu got 8m ...you expect that atiku only got support from.obidient ...Are you implying that atiku fans are not supporting him? Only hatred will.make anyone think like this .

Most atiku voters are quiet people or aren't loud on social media.atiku himself said most of his supporters are northern illiterates with no access to the social media.obi people dominate the media.
Apart from that,I am a prominent figure in nairaland.i am conversant with most monikers here.i know those who are tinubu,atiku and obi fans here or FB.we can do a headcount if you want.oga,the facts are unarguable,most of those supporting this case are obi fans.i can count all atiku fans here

Spy360:
Is this the technicality you people want to use to defend Tinubu?

I asked a simple question. If CSU gave Enahoro-Ebah Tinubu's certificate then which one did Tinubu present to INEC?

It is for atiku to find out not tinubu.

Antoeni:
APC And Its Sick President, Senators & Reps

Pdp lost two reps members in taraba

aswani:
Of course that IPOBidient can fault it well well, the logical reasoning and well structured arguments, put forward by the eminent SAN, contained in the post doesn't favour Peter Obi.

I wanted to open a post on this based on that last paragraph on Sunday but after seeing this objective post,I just fastforrward it

greggng:
You think you are talking to illiterates..obi wasn't the one dragging tinubu ...the last time I checked it was atiku that took him to court ...as usual you start chasing shadows.

I agree but most of the people attacking tinubu are obi fans not atiku people.but moreover Fergie explained everything to you in a well detailed manner

DMerciful:
Why was Enugu gov not removed by the tribunal despite bringing NYSC?

1) DSS countered nysc thereby creating reasonable or probable doubt
2) nysc said he actually served and two files were opened for him.
3) nysc is not even a constitutional requirement for the forged document the constitution is contemplating doesn't include nysc.
4) without nysc,the governor is still qualified

DMerciful:
The Supreme Court is a court of public policy and not a court of technicalities.

It is not the policy of Nigeria to allow a certificate forger to remain as president!

For tinubu to be removed,you must bring conclusive proof and you must do it on time and with the right procedures.atiku failed to do this

fergie001:
This doesn't need any legal postulation.... The Supreme Court will return Tinubu and lambast the appellants for going on a circus show.


David Lyon's case is different. His case was pre-election and was well-marshalled from the "get-go".

A. The case of inconsistencies of names has been overtaken by recent Supreme Court Judgements. David Lyon's is no more obtainable today.

B. That was also the Electoral Act 2010, this is Electoral Act 2022. There is a slight distinction between a false affidavit and forgery. Even that of David Lyon wasn't forgery but false representation of his affidavit on his INEC forms.


These issues were not canvassed at the lower Courts. The onus is on the petitioner to prove beyond any reasonable doubts. You cannot ambush the other Party by bringing up fresh issues on Appeal at the Supreme Court.

Just maybe if these issues had some "teeth" at the pre-hearing stages, there might have been some success.

Again, whatever he has entered there has been over-taken by virtue of the fact that they are pre-election and fall under Section 29(5) of the Electoral Act.

Again, honorary citizenship grants neither rights nor privileges but is just a symbolic gesture.

Fergie001,why are you tormenting me na? Send me this thing na.

Antoeni:
Supreme Court Should Not Forget Say
Men Mount Ooo

For where? So they should rule wrongly