₦airaland Forum

psoto: Someone help!!! This guy is breaking ‎​♏v̶̲̥̅ bones with his hard shake! Lolzzz...
I had a nice time in the court room that had no chief judge too

....

psoto: Tor! Issorai...

Really, it has always been alright ooo...

SBabaJ: Attending Bible School Is The Best Thing That Has Happened To Me In Recent Memory...

It was part of my initial plans, but farm didn't allow me...I still look forward to it!

psoto: OMG!!! What's this naa? Thought you would be more gentle after the Bible School experience. GC, would you concede τ̅☺ this?

Haaa!...What else do you expect??...That's a brave brother offering a helping hand...Such rarely happens in this House you know??.....Nah! He's still gentle ooo...Very gentle!

SBabaJ: Barrister God's Child....Can I Be Your Page? Like In That Shakespeare Story, Only That This Time We Shall Be Real Males Not Like The Women In The Tale. Let's Give Psoto Et Al A Run For Their Money!

Oh Yeah!...Lmao!!!...Its just a matter of time bro, situations like that are so inevitable...We'll give them a run when the time comes sir....Lol!!!!

SBabaJ: Thanks Moi Brother ....Ki Lo Shelz? ( Did I Try?)

hehehehehe....Of kois you did!....lolzzz

psoto: Good work. Case closed. Barrister GC, twas nice working with you. #Shakes hands.
The case lasted from 10:08pm τ̅☺ about 2:20am.
Lady D, all thanks τ̅☺ your joke.

Its my pleasure ma'am...The best 4 hours I've had in the courtroom so far...#ThumbsUp#...#Returns hand shake.

prodam: goodMorning,
been long i was here;
against my wish but inevitable;
not unconnected to the NYSC thingy;
about accounting for an office and issues relating to students unionism;
a usual process for all presidents on campus;
learnt a lesson in the process as regards proper documentation;
frustration encountered and conquered;
still looking forward to seeing the NYSC timetable;

Thank God
1luv...@IK, stay strong..

phd iz back..
I remain Loyal.

Sir PRODY!...You're welcome back to the House...We've really missed you!

peetash: Ok. Is designers allowed? Like DG trainers, nike round neck shirt and d like. I need to know this cos someone said a guy was once evicted cos of this.

Bro, it depends on the state oo!...But I think designers are allowed as long as it is all white...Their leniency can't be generalized sha...

SBabaJ: 1. A tribute to one of the smartest guys in my class who died last year.
2. A poem in memory of a Prof who died last week (using rhymes) "leave a mark"
3. A treatise on success
4. A compilation of themes on making the best of university education titled "The Essentials"
5. A 40-question humour-laden continuous assessment test on our class.

Wow!...That's brilliant!...#ThumbsUp#

princessmia: [b] wow.
U guys really slept late GC n 1st Lady.
Anyway, let me clarify my point b4 Lady D comes to clarify her joke.

1st: the joke is simply a joke. Yes it does have morals to be learned from it. But we took it too serious last night, trying to defend our gender. Both of them had their fault. The man, bin the head of the house n also needs a favour from the woman should hav broken the silence n communicated. The woman who bin the peace-keeper n home-maker, should not hav retaliated in punishment, but broken the silence. If she did that, the man would apologize for bin naughty. No harm done.

2ndly, the reason I made the comment about SOME women being more hardworking (with emphasis on some.), was as a result of the statement GC made.
If u go to my village in kogi state, go to the market for instance, u find few men there. Go to the farm, its the same story. Maybe coz I was brought up in the north where ladies r pampered n not allowed to work or stress. The man provides no matter how hard he must strive. The woman can help by selling things in the house, but datz d most she'll do. The man would push water, sell kolanuts, etc to make ends meet. An aunt of mine came from the village to visit n noticed a northern man pushing water for sale, n they were also the majority in the market selling foodstuffs (any woman u see, is probably from the west or south). She was amazed! Coz itz not possible to find such back home. I know our people r very proud. (Both males n females). So it restricts the males to do certain things. But the woman can't see her children going hungry n do nothing! Datz just my point. N I'm sure its not just my place u see somthing like that. The good news is, with civilization, comes wisdom. He goes to work n provides. Mostly with the wife assisting with her income too.

There is no 1 side. There are various ways of seeing the truth. Some ppl can choose to be blind to the truth even if it smacks them on the head. So, I think its best to stick to wat you believe in but try to learn or understand other point of views.
[/b]

Ooookay!...Now I get it...Thanks a lot for the clarification ma'am...#ThumbsUp#

CY09: Viewing this topic: Gods-child(m), CY09(m), SBabaJ(m), psoto(f) and 2 guest(s)
greetings to everyone in the house this evening!

Greetings Boss!!

psoto: Not really

#sighs#...Okay, I hear you!...I feel you sha...

psoto: No, don't say rationally or logically, you can say in most cases.

Yes, rationally or logically to me means; Acceptable and understandable...And if it happens in most cases, that means it is generally acceptable and understandable...And that means; You feel me.

Right??

psoto: Hmmmm...Thank God you said ALMOST the same, cos it isn't the same.

But you felt me, right??

psoto: Rationally and logically, whichever brings in lesser cash.

Rationally and logically, the husband can never be the one bringing in lesser cash...So therefore, the wife's input is expendable...

You feel me??

psoto: I feel it shouldn't be mandatory or compulsory for anyone, I feel they should understand how the sharing ratio will be between them. And not the husband having τ̅☺ deal with all the finances alone.

Yes, we're saying almost the same thing...The husband must be ready to deal with all finances alone, but the wife doesn't need to worry about dealing with the finances alone...

psoto: I can see you're misunderstanding me. I'm not saying the man should rather not work o, I'm saying they should support each other.

I'm not misunderstanding you at all...Support each other shey??...

But my question still stands; which of the supports should be expendable if worst would come to worst??

psoto: Voluntary for the wife? Then she doesn't qualify as a good wife τ̅☺ me.

So does she qualify as a good wife if the case is reversed??...Mandatory for the wife and Voluntary for the husband??

psoto: Are you for real? The woman shouldn't have had a job? You must be kidding me.

And would I have been for real if I tell you the husband shouldn't have had a job while the woman does??...Won't that be super-kidding??

psoto: Pardon him please. He has forgotten that this isn't Big Brother Africa where you have head of house.

Hehehhehehe.....I don't blame him ooo!....lolzzzz

psoto: I know what you want τ̅☺ hear is the wife's, but it isn't I̶̲̥̅̊n̶̲̥̅̊ all cases, especially if the husband isn't earning much.
Take it or leave, most couples don't depend on just the man's income, they have τ̅☺ pull resources together.

If its not in all cases, then its in most cases...And we both know what 'Majority' does...If the husband isn't earning much, the more reason why he can't oversleep cos he knows what's at stake...

If they pull resources together, its voluntary on the wife's part...Not mandatory...

Feel me??

psoto: And I'm saying the home might not run smoothly again if a woman becomes less serious and loses her job. For an average family, the category under which most families fall, things will change, they won't remain the same.

Then the more reason why the woman shouldn't have had any job at all in the first instance...Don't you think it would be worse if the man loses his own job??...

psoto: No I don't. I don't want a forceful and sarcastic agreement.

Alright then, I think CHUKS has gone...Lets just continue from where we stopped;...

psoto: And how is that?

You tagged the man unfortunate, therefore justifying the wife's action...How doesn't that contradict the moral lesson??

You said some guys think they're wise only for the girl to prove she's wiser...If they continue in that circle, how can effective communication be enhanced in their marriage??

ChuksBlaze: YES IT ME AND WHEN I BECOME HEAD OF THIS HOUSE I WILL MAKE IT MY FIRST JOB TO SACK U COS U WERE CSO AN U COULDN'T CARRY OUT THE EASY JOB OF getting ME FOR UR SO CALLED FIRST LADY PITTY

...hehhehehheeehee....Where did you learn that HOUSES have HEADS??

...And is SACKING really a JOB in Ghana??

...Thank GOD you know she is OUR FIRST LADY.....lolzzzzz

psoto: And how is that?

Please PSOTO, our Firstlady needs me right now...We'll come back to this okay??...Infact, I agree with everything you've been saying...A woman is must be serious & hardworking, her inputs her so so essential to the home....The man must have been unfortunate & unserious not to have called a truce with her the night before...

You feel me??

psoto: OMG!!! I should have known since yesterday. So you haven't been taking your medications? Little wonder.
Lord God, please CHUKS needs divine healing, please take control.

Haaaa!...Should I call an ambulance ma'am??....I think he needs a Veterinary Doctor...

ChuksBlaze: no need for the military cos I stand for freedom and I have the support of the pp

If you stand for freedom...Please what do you sit for??...Bondage??

You have the full support of 'pp'??...Which of the political parties ooo??....Prattling Potatoes??

ChuksBlaze: yea well ... I think we need change and order in this house cos since I started NO OnE PAYS THEIR BILLs AND OUR HEADS ARE NOT WORRIED. I believe I can bring the change that this house needs

#thinking#...He has started soliloquizing again...SMH

psoto: I've given you the only reason under which I'll feel you.
τ̅☺ the others, you'll have τ̅☺ look for the writer of the joke τ̅☺ help you with them.
I tagged the man 'unfortunate' because he was the one that got affected most by it.
But seriously, some guys think they're wise only for the girl τ̅☺ prove she's wiser

...It all boils down to a conclusion; you're contradicting the moral lesson of the story...

psoto: Unfortunately I can't give you one. But seriously, I can remember ‎​♏v̶̲̥̅ friends and I analysing a particular tribe whose women are more hardworking than the men. But I'm not concerned about that. What I'm concerned about is τ̅☺ correct the notion that women are less serious and can afford τ̅☺ jeopardize their jobs as against their male counterparts.

My sister, they can afford it...I'm not saying they're less serious, I'm saying they can be less serious and the home would still run smoothly...In contrast to the man being less serious and the home is expected to run smoothly...

If the woman is serious, then the husband has to be more serious...

psoto: I'm only going τ̅☺ feel you if you now agree that the woman's income isn't useless τ̅☺ the welfare of the couple.

I've always agreed it isn't useless....But I'm trying to accentuate on its negligibility...