Goodenoch's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Goodenoch's Profile › Goodenoch's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 21 pages)
HustlaOfLagos:April 2026. https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2025-11-20/debates/E3CE324D-7597-40C5-8697-DB48AA843CFC/MigrationSettlementPathway#contribution-44475956-0A57-466A-A4EA-7A7FD64AAD83 |
WanderingChild:1. What alternative options? 2. Don't mislead people. Your SIPP and your entitlement to stay in the UK are two separate things. You can draw from your SIPP when you reach the appropriate age even if you leave the UK either directly or by transferring it into a foreign scheme,depending on the country. I am very particular about this pension matter because Ive seen many people stop contributions because of misleading half-baked information they've got from social media. There are very few investments people can make that will be as beneficial as paying into their pensions,especially if they're higher rate payers. Feel free to tell us what you recommend if you disagree. Also, property - why would people not buy property because they have a longer route to settlement? If they don't buy they continue paying rent but if they buy and then leave the country it's as simple as selling it and taking the cash wherever they're going. Except for edge cases the vast majority of people would make a profit doing that. |
Viruses:The debt is specifically 'no current litigation, NHS, tax or other government debt.' |
Cyberknight:No it's gross salary. Elsewhere in the statement they say the intent is to match it to what people earn to be in the higher and additional rate tax thresholds. |
Zahra29:You don't say. |
Zahra29:Lol. If you say so. |
Zahra29:In comparison with Badenoch (because it's obvious that's the parallel you're trying to draw) yes, she is being very decisive and her policies are very firm and some might say harsh, but you haven't seen her say anything derogatory about immigrants in general or Pakistanis in particular right? Her comments have been, as far as I've seen, decisive but dignified, unlike Badenoch's constant rants. None of the referring to people on skilled worker visas as being in the country to wash bums, that she doesn't identify as bring of Pakistani heritage; that she doesn't want to be identified with certain Pakistani ethnic groups because they are her "historical enemies"; that maternity pay is excessive; that autism confers several advantages; lying outright that her children can't get Pakistani citizenship because she's a woman etc etc. So while I can't speak for the Pakistani immigrant community Im reasonably sure most fully understand she is a British minister and her priority is to the country, and so won't begrudge her in any way. But they definitely would if she begins launching random attacks on them every Eke market day. THAT is primarily why people despise Badenough, not because of any policy actions she has taken or supported. P.S. If anyone has a minute, try searching 'shabbana Mahmood Pakistan' and 'kemi badenoch Nigeria' and see how the results differ. It's actually quite interesting. |
Ohraykon:I'm not a 'Sir' yet, boss. Still working to get that knighthood. ![]() Hope the interview went well. |
jedisco:This has made me laugh so much this morning. That first 1 billion monstrosity of a house in Pinnock has to be the most absurd thing I've seen in a long time. I do think there's still value to be had, and we have purchased some large tracts (several acres each) in places in the outskirts of the city we went to Uni in and believe based on our knowledge of the place will be in demand decades from now. The idea is that we'll use them for mini estates or similar in 20, 30 years' time years or just sell them, but it's not a core part of our investing thesis. Mostly a fire and forget thing with non-essential funds (and honestly there's probably a big sentimental aspect as well). I think the same thing will apply to many University cities/towns. I don't think anyone seeking medium-term returns should be investing in real estate in Nigeria from the UK. There are a plethora of ways to invest your money in the UK with much lower risk (although with the currency stablizing that factor seems to be going away so the risk profile might change significantly). The only exception I previously looked into was short lets in Lagos/Abuka but I concluded they aren't particularly viable given the kinds of prices covered in this video. |
Ohraykon:No personal experience but these seem helpful: https://www.reddit.com/r/ukvisa/comments/1e704n5/just_had_my_study_visa_interview_today/ https://www.reddit.com/r/ukvisa/comments/1f5tg33/15hour_ukvi_interviewdid_i_mess_up_seeking_advice/ Best of luck! |
Everybody knows that in the speeches by Farage, Badenough and their ilk attacking migrants and gradually turning 'Boriswave' into an epithet, the references to benefits are always said in the context of being on the dole - not contributing and only taking from the government. It's never about the other 'benefits' that are still available to working and reasonably earning families (which SW holders are, by default). But hey, let the Ostriches keep their heads in the sand. |
HustlaOfLagos:I doubt the bolded, unless it's for much larger families than a single person or a couple like we have been saying. I just checked, and even the housing gets netted against the full UC money, based on my (admittedly very brief) checks just now. ETA: There's a benefit cap as well; far less than that - https://www.swindon.gov.uk/info/20013/benefits_and_swindon_money_matters/681/benefit_cap But yes the summary is as you've said in the last paragraph. I have never seen anyone who came in as a student or SW who's even remotely thinking about benefits as a goal post ILR. Me wey I dey hustle so me and my madam can retire at 55 na him I go dey aim for UC? Abeg. |
bigtt76:💯 Just to say it's not 300 per week ó it's 300 PER MONTH. If you’re single and under 25 £316.98 If you’re single and 25 or over £400.14 If you live with your partner and you’re both under 25 £497.55 (for you both) If you live with your partner and either of you are 25 or over £628.10 (for you both) Yes it surprised me too when I found out. So Joe Public thinks I'm planning that the very day after ILR I'll tell my wife "Honey we have arrived, it's time to stop working and start living off the British state by sharing our free largesse of 600 pounds every month" 🤣 |
bigtt76:The bolded is the bit that gets me every time. You think I paid 20k plus upfront for my one year masters (apart from application fee, IHS etc) as part of some grand strategy to sit down waiting for 300 ish pounds per month? As how nau. What will I do with that? Of course there are other benefits that people are entitled to but the fundamental point is why on earth would someone who paid such substantial sums be thought to be planning to become reliant on benefits? |
Anyone else get the feeling that Meghan and Harry have been treated far harsher than Andrew, both by the royal family and the general British populace? Every other day there’s a hit piece in rags like the Mirror, Telegraph etc about Meghan and there’s even a thriving cesspool of a subreddit dedicated solely to attacking Meghan. I wonder why. Lol just kidding - actually, I don’t. |
HustlaOfLagos:Lol no. Eton is by money and connections. Not the one you asked, but they are tests for grammar schools. They’re academically selective so the perception is that they provide higher quality education compared to state schools without needing to pay private school fees. |
Found this hilarious. You will, too: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DMa-AbsOPqg |
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DObsRoMjzGZ/?igsh=MTc1NnZ6ZmZ5azM3dA== https://archive.is/W9ahu Violent, lawless, broken Britain? The facts tell a different story “The populist narrative of a migrant-driven crimewave is catnip on social media and oil to the wheels of Reform. But it is so far from the truth that we’re in danger of losing sight of the country we live in.” |
HustlaOfLagos:maybe marry someone in healthcare? Just kidding o ![]() Yes, that's the general one: This is what I'm referring to: https://www.gov.uk/apply-immigration-health-surcharge-refund/tier-2-visa-medical-professional |
HustlaOfLagos:Yes, had to pay application fees plus IHS each time. Been a chunk each time. Good thing is - if you or your spouse are in health and care (the industry, not the visa), you will be able to claim back the IHS fee installmentally. I only felt guilt in the first place because it was a fairly small (by employee numbers) outfit but next couple of places have been massive organisations so much less personal. |
HustlaOfLagos:Honestly if they do this I would have zero problems with it. I genuinely understand the concerns about benefits - it’s not only immigrants they’re trying to cut benefits for after all, also citizens and even old people. The whole benefits system is broken. And also, logically, if you’re a skilled worker you shouldn’t be in need of benefits as such, except if a mishap of some kind occurs. BUT, being tied to sponsorship for 10 years? That, I cannot bear. I’m on my third sponsorship now in less than 3 years and while I’ve made substantial jumps in earnings each time and am in a single digit percentile of earners at <30 so have lots to be thankful for, but I know it’s still less than I would be earning without the hindrance of sponsorship, and that gap will only continue to widen. |
Jamesclooney:USA on EB2 or EB1. EB1 might be preferable if you're more advanced in your career but for most people already doing well in their careers EB2 is attainable with a few months of work to prep, and it's even better for a family because the lag time between submission > approval > priority date becoming current gives enough breathing space to put affairs in order before leaving the UK. The USA jobs market is much stronger and you'll get paid a lot more if you have a solid profile, ceteris paribus. |
NosyNursy:No. That cannot be the full story. Paying that much in PAYE means you’ve been earning substantially more elsewhere since this tax year began (I suspect this is additional bank work you’re doing in addition to your main job because this is certainly not anyone’s full time earnings per month). Alternatively, something major is wrong somewhere. Again, if your tax code is the 1257l you would pay 0 tax on this income. That’s not my opinion - it is the law. Show the full thing let’s see your tax code and the deductions. |
NosyNursy:Pension is not a tax though, is it? You can choose to cancel your contribution at any time (although of course that would be a massively foolish thing for anyone to do). Anyway, this is definitely not the full story because you would pay 0 PAYE if that was truly your full earnings per month. NI contributions would also be negligible. Overall, I’m a staunch believer that the UK is not overtaxed. Everything we benefit from (even though we cannot access benefits lol) needs to be paid for - infrastructure, security etc - and it’s very middle of the table compared with many other countries with similar systems: https://taxpolicy.org.uk/2025/06/27/uk-workers-tax-wedge-infographics/ |
The ironic thing about this Kemi episode is that in the coming years she’ll be a (maybe “THE”) textbook example of a Glass Cliff scenario, despite all her protestations about her identity and its role or lack thereof in her career. In fact, I’m going to periodically check this Wiki page about the Glass Cliff to see when she gets added to the examples: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glass_cliff |
elengine:Please don’t, bros. You, and this space, are better than this. |
AlphaUno:Firstly and most crucially, that rate is higher than what you can get elsewhere eg Barclays. Secondly, £269 is absurdly high for insurances (I'm assuming this includes life and income protection and critical illness - all reduing cover?). Analyse which one you'll really need e.g. you may not need income protection depending on what the sickness absence policy is where you work. You may also not need life insurance. Even if you do, you wil ALWAYS get a better deal by yourself. Start from the comparison websites. Also, how come your MA chose a term for you? That's odd. Normally they would discuss with you and let you decide. Given your profile, I'm not sure why Barclays would refuse you. I've just looked at their criteria and there's no restriction on people on visas in terms of new build or not as far as I can see (I'm not a expert so I may well be missing something). In any case, what you should do is get another MA. This is too big a decision for you to stay with an advisor whom you're not sure is working in your best interests, out of politeness or whatever. The first mistake was in engaging the MA recommended by your seller but you can still remedy that by getting another advisor to doube-check whether you can get from a Barclays or somewhere else with a lower rate. |
gabiomoesu:Don’t you think this conversation you’re having is better suited for DMs? |
Ogonsbaba:The conventional wisdom for an ‘immigrant’ is typically to go for 5 as that gives some stability and also because the fees you’ll pay for the initial deal and for remortgages often cancel out the reduced interest rates of shorter terms. I’d caveat with my own experience though, because we would have gone for 2 years if we had figured this : we recently put a chunk of funds into a conversion/renovation, and the value of the house has increased substantially as a result (confirmed by a surveyor) but our fix was for five years and while we could break the mortgage, it’d cost quite a bit in early repayment fees. In short, if you’re going to be doing work to increase the value of the house, consider going for two years so you can benefit from the increased value sooner. |




