Goodenoch's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Goodenoch's Profile › Goodenoch's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 (of 21 pages)
It appears that the difference between the pace at which this woman's mouth runs and that at which her brain functions is growing larger with each passing day - https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/2060321/russians-seize-kemi-badenoch-comments |
Goke7:Lol, I just want to have my options open. I've actually had a draft on my G:Drive since 2023 but just never proceeded. I am still extremely reluctant but the way the new whitepaper is implemented will determine our calculations. |
jedisco:I completely agree with everything you've said. That ability to start and run one's own business with great ease is, in my view, the biggest positive about the USA, and definitely the biggest attraction for me. That's why they're the center of innovation. |
Goodenoch:Another thing is job security. Women in the USA routinely go back to work weeks after childbirth, because they have little or no statutory maternity leave and very little paid time off, which I find absolutely insane. Now even with employment, there's much less security and the job that gives you your healthcare insurance and/or the income with which you pay for it yourself can be taken away with very little notice. Again it boils down to the specifics of each person's job and contract but the prevailing statistics are key because things usually regress to the mean in stats and also in real life. Edit: Just checked the stats and apparently One out of every four mothers in the US returns to work less than 2 weeks after having her baby. Worse than I thought. https://newmomhealth.com/selfcare/returning-to-work/ |
jedisco:1. We're discussing individual choices but overall statistics give an inkling of the average experience, as opposed to focusing on outliers which is what people earning 75k in the UK or 150k in the US are (both circa top 15% earners in each country). You're fully right though, about using savings to self-insure, and that's where individual analysis comes into play. There are certain salaries which would make me pack my bags and get on a flight this evening to NY, but again statistics reflect that such offers are very rare and that's where using public health stats to assess individual risk vecomes neccessary. 2. As to why most US people aren't calling for a public healthcare system, I don't know but it doesn't matter. Populaces around the world regularly vote for foolish things that come to bite them in the butt. 3. I'm not saying the UK NHS is the best healthcare system in the world. It's very good and substantially justifies the tax levels, is my sole point. Obviously there are a lot of areas that need to be optimized but the UK ranks very high on the vast majority of public health metrics. |
jedisco:It's not falling through the cracks when between half and two thirds of bankruptcies are due to health issues. https://www.ilr.cornell.edu/scheinman-institute/blog/john-august-healthcare/healthcare-insights-how-medical-debt-crushing-100-million-americans Health outcomes are also the worst among developed countries. It has the the lowest life expectancy at birth, the highest death rates for avoidable or treatable conditions, the highest maternal and infant mortality, and among the highest suicide rates. https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2023/jan/us-health-care-global-perspective-2022 Even when you do get health insurance, the companies can and do arbitrarily deny claims and leave people with no recourse, often to literally drop dead. https://archive.is/NW5fP These are facts, not scaremongering. I do agree about earning potential though. Personally tidying things up to put my EB1 petition in for that reason but I'm still in doubt as to whether to actually go when it comes, and healthcare is a top consideration in that. I also agree the NHS’s sustainability is in question, but I doubt that even when it's adjusted like adding payments for some things, it'll get to the disastrous level that US healthcare currently is at. Overall, for me, living in the UK and paying the high taxes to fund things like healthcare, security, welfare etc. feels like paying into an insurance policy — I might not need it often and I'm unlikely to use the healthcare system in particular much (age) or get any benefits (income), but the peace of mind and collective safety net are very strong incentives. |
Goke7:I believe strongly that they do. People literally die in the US due to not having money to pay for medication. The UK is great in that respect, especially compared to a place like the US. And it's not just healthcare, also security, public transport, public amenities etc. I do agree that people being too quick to become dependent on benefits is a problem, but that's a separate issue - the threshholds need to be higher so only people who actually need them can get them. |
Meogom:… This doesn’t seem very transparent or definite. How much more are the other quotes you’ve gotten? |
TouchOfSpice:Buy your house. Before the whitepaper is implemented and takes effect it'll likely be ¬a year, and before you decide plus actually put everything in place to leave if that's what you want to do, it'll likely be another year. Ergo, the options are keep paying your landlord's mortgage between now and then and if you then decide not to leave, try to buy a house at prices that have appreciated over 2 years, or buy now and sell when you want to leave having benefited from price appreciation of the equity in your home. P.S. I realise there are several other factors e.g. how close you are to leaving to another country (e.g. do you have Canadian PR already?), how much you could get in terms of savings returns on the deposit, how much more or less your mortgage would be vs your current rent, etc. so do a detailed analysis is necessary, but I believe buying now would be better for most. |
Viruses:Hm? Isn’t the bolded a huge deal by itself? Personally I’m much much less interested in citizenship than in the ability to switch employers without having to deal with sponsorship issues. I came to the UK not because I was suffering in NG but because a lot of the biggest employers in my profession are here, and work visa limitations are a serious hurdle in accessing some of them. Also, business is a priority for me and the UK would be a great base for many reasons. I have been very fortunate in the roles I’ve secured and have been able to make substantial progress still (about to be sponsored by the third organisation in less than 3 years) but I’m certain that if sponsorship was not an issue I’d be earning a lot more plus be able to start and run my own business without limitations, and the benefits of that freedom will only continue to compound over time. I don’t have any issues with paying the IHS or whatever - its an irritant but not a huge deal in the large scheme of things. But having to limit what work/business I can do for 5 more years? Huge issue. I’m not too bothered because I’m confident that whatever metrics they use to measure contribution, I’d be very much on fast track side based on profession, tax or whatever, but it’s still very annoying to have that uncertainty. Point is I’m surprised anyone thinks that the freedom to change careers/employers at will is not a serious thing to not have for 5 additional years. |
Zahra29:No offence intended; genuinely, but I have to say I'm not sure if you genuinely have difficulty understanding what has been said said or if you're just pretending, so let me put it in simpler words. Hopefully that helps you see how it's not mutually exclusive to say that Starmer is competent and Badenough is an incompetent hypocrite even if they are supporting similar policies. Starmer's competence was never about the kind of policies and whether I agree with him or not - it was always about his ability to get things done. He has set out a clear plan for reforming the immigration system that the Tories bungled. Point is - my description of him as being competent was never about where on the spectrum his policies were or whether they benefited me as an individual. Now to Kemi Badenough. She's incompetent and that is becoming painfully obvious to even her most ardent supporters by the day. I hear people are out buying cabbages already... She failed in her various cabinet posts and is failing in her current role. Her only accomplishments have been the various culture wars she managed to fight. There's no comparison. Anybody who disputes this should list her accomplishments in office - trade deals etc or any landmark policies she delivered. |
https://qz.com/donald-trump-u-s-u-k-keir-starmer-trade-deal-tariffs-1851779699 Quiet competence at work again. And again, no be by Cho Cho Cho. |
Cyberknight:https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/may/07/dont-mention-the-local-elections-keir-and-kemi-sign-non-aggression-pact-at-pmqs
|
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/may/06/uk-and-india-agree-trade-deal-after-three-years-of-negotiations Quiet competence. To quote the young'uns, "no be by cho cho cho". Hopefully madam Olukemi Olufunto Badenough, defender of western civilization, will see what her mates are doing in the same portfolio where all she managed was culture warring and punchlines. |
mex551:The comparison is not equal because if you overpay your mortgage and reduce the term as a result, you will then be able to invest what you would usually pay for the mortgage + the overpayment. E.g. if that 250 overpayment reduces your term by 5 years, you would then invest the normal mortgage sum + the 250 over the remaining 5 years. I've modeled it thanks to ChatGPT and even though the difference is not as stark as 330k v 90k, it's still a lot of money with our figures, so I'm now evaluating whether it would be better for us to stop overpaying. It reminds me of what Madam Ticha once said about not wanting to pay off any mortgage early because of how low the interest is. Obvs there are other factors like whether one will be able to not touch that money for the duration, and the psychological benefit of being mortgage free. Thanks for sharing. |
Zahra29:Doesn't matter what Starmer described it as. I don't care. You weren't quoting him - you were speaking for yourself in the posts I quoted, and it clearly contradicts what you're saying in your own case. Unless you are saying that we can assume that everything you say is you parrotting Starmer or some other person's statements? Everything else you said is you just trying to distract from the very simple question I asked. All the talk about people falsifying funds or whatnot is irrelevant because those are clearly illegal acts and are out of scope of my post which clearly emphasised people who came in legally. As to people switching from one visa to another etc, the point is still that they came in legally and switched legally. Now that the route is closed, people can't do it anymore, but at the time, it was fully legal. Not interested in any back and forth around this though. My point is clear and I'm sure it's clear to you and everyone else, however much you might try to muddy the waters. |
ukay2:Has saved or will save you £91,000 over the lifetime of the mortgage assuming you continue to overpay by that sum throughout the term? Two very different things. |
Zahra29:While I am unconcerned about your heritage and the discussion around it here, your usage of the word 'loophole' reminded me of your post above: It's interesting that you believe that a route to enter the UK and immediatley become citizens that your forebears took wasn't a loophole because it was fully legal at the time, but when others took another route that was also fully legal (as confirmed by the Upper Immigration Tribunal), you described it as a loophole that has been exposed, implying it was somehow shady. Zahra29:There's also this one where you referred to a fully legal route; the characteristics of which were stated clearly by the UK and even used to advertise for foreign students to come study here, as a backdoor used 'by some nationalities.' Again the term 'backdoor' strongly implies deception. Those routes may have or will be changed in the future, but they were fully legal at the time, just like your forebears came and became citizens but that route was closed later. So my question is how come the route your forebears took was defintitely not a loophole because it was within the law at the time but when others used legal routes too, you believe they were using loopholes and backdoors? |
OgbeniOptional:What protests or shouts or anything have you done in respect of the country's issues? Tally them up and list them against what the fellow in question has, and you might see why people are agitated about what happened to him. I don't follow the guy at all and have a long list of reservations about what and how he does things, but I do know that his advocacy has been helpful for many people. |
UnconventionalT:I think it's a good idea to get a lawyer. Not sure how much the job means to him but my assessment is that there's a chance getting a lawyer involved might help and that's worth the expense. It may also not change anything but I think it's definitely worth the punt. The more urgent thing to do might be to write to the company explaining that there's no danger that they are violating the laws by employing him because he has a pending application. That's going to be their highest concern. What I would do is to have the lawyer contact the HO first and then write a mail to the workplace restating the legal position above while attaching the latest correspondence to the HO from his lawyer, with evidence of his original applications and any other follow-ups to the workplace, so they are aware that he has taken urgent steps to clarify things. |
tenminutesmaths:Since it appears that both of you are very religious and hold the pastor in high regard, I suggest you go back to the pastor and give him the full, unedited details of these challenges. It doesn't appear that there's anyone else who can play that neutral mediator role between you both. It will be impossible for any mediation to work well if you're only telling half the things bothering you though - it'll just lead to pent-up resentment. I've been married for a way shorter time than you have so I'm far from an expert - hopefully you can get advice from others who are more experienced. I wish you the best though. |
justwise:Exactly my thoughts. How they said they treated her and how they treated her when other people were around to see very likely differed from how they treated her when there were no witnesses. Not discounting that some people can just 'turn Judas', anyway, but I'm skeptical of anyone who imports a houseboy/girl (I think calling it a 'maid' relationship is dressing it up) in the first place. |
justwise:Last trip earlier this year, none of the officers from the various agencies asked us for money. There are cameras everywhere in the places where you interact with them and they were scrupulous about not requesting anything - even indirectly. All our interactions were refreshingly professional. Several officers were suspended last year and enforcement is much stricter now, per the announcements. My experience is that where people often have to pay is because they're trying to do things that are against the rules e.g. parking, luggage issues, having more people than allowed accompany them into the terminal etc. |
LORETA:Fish is allowed. Meat is not. https://www.gov.uk/bringing-food-into-great-britain/meat-dairy-fish-animal-products |
Hkana:Presented passports and BRP and they only looked at the passports and checked on their systems. We had the share code docs saved on our phones as well though, but we weren’t asked. The whose share code thing doesn’t seem to have gotten any traction so far. |
jedisco:Yes, and just a couple of days ago the US VP was talking about how the UK and UK are likely close to a deal. There have been issues recently with Chinese investments like the British Steel Deal and the Bradwell 2 proposed nuclear plant but again one can see Starmer handling the issues speedily and effectively while avoiding any diplomatic fallout. The reality is that the fellow is quietly competent. Not bombastic like certain other folk, and he certainly has faltered here and there but he's clearly a steady pair of hands and exactly what the country needs in these times of serious uncertainty. |
jedisco:Lol! I missed that and have just looked it up. It has always been clear that she's incompetent, and that culture wars are her only forte. It's unsurprising to see that she's a liar, to boot. Now that she's in a top job and she can't hide behind anyone (while undermining them as she did Sunak), even her supporters can see through her easily. |
EJIOGBENIMI:Re the bolded - Do check to be sure you can do that as new builds often have permitted development rights removed, which would mean that you will have to do a full planning application for the conversion, and not just get building control approval. Depending on why the permitted development rights were removed, it may be difficult to get that approval. For instance, if it's tied to the number of parking spaces available around the house. |
jedisco:Easy - She would have said they are bum wipers who don't contribute anything so to hell with them. |
https://www.instagram.com/p/C-M9NiGIU9i/ Some fun. |
Zahra29:It’s deduction - drawing from your previous comments to understand what you mean with new ones, even when you try to disguise them with irrelevancies as usual. It’s called logic. You might find it useful to read about. |

