₦airaland Forum

RodgersAkpafu:
A Naturalised citizen is not gonna get deported
Especially a white one
Especially a rich white one
A rich white male billionaire
All these are theatrics

The only lesson to learn here is NOT to give oxygen to far right donkeys because this is what always come out of it

lavida001:
They can’t cross the big blue Atlantic to the USA hence they are coming to a city near you. Many hotels to house them in clackton.

Zahra29:
Very interesting, as I've [b]never heard you criticise him on this forum, even when he was widely accused of making racist, incendiary comments.
[/b]
I've noticed and called out your bias from the start. Everyone is free to their own opinion, but I find it rather strange the depth of your obvious hate for her and that she is the only individual you routinely call out, as if there are no "incompetent loudmouths" in the actual governing party - you know, the ones who should be scrutinised more deeply and held to account. (If you don't know any, I can forward some names over for you to take a look at).

But like I said, opinions are like noses. Everyone's entitled to theirs, even ugly ones😂

Zahra29:
1. Thank goodness you have finally acknowledged your strange, extreme bias.

In any case, our competent PM appears to agree with the incompetent Kemi that "Tehran's atomic programme was 'a grave threat to international security" and that the "US has taken action to 'alleviate that threat". Sounds like he supports the attacks (not surprising as when it comes down to it, we will almost always side with the US).

2.What is not truthful/accurate was your claim of a "new" migration crisis, when there has been a significant Iranian migration crisis for a few years now. Clearly you were unaware.

Of course Iranians cannot sail or cross over to the US ( neither would Trump allow them in tbh) but to follow your reasoning, that is where they should be headed.

Zahra29:
1. Thank goodness you have finally acknowledged your strange, extreme bias.

In any case, our competent PM appears to agree with the incompetent Kemi that "Tehran's atomic programme was 'a grave threat to international security" and that the "US has taken action to 'alleviate that threat". Sounds like he supports the attacks (not surprising as when it comes down to it, we will almost always side with the US).

2.What is not truthful/accurate was your claim of a "new" migration crisis, when there has been a significant Iranian migration crisis for a few years now. Clearly you were unaware.

Of course Iranians cannot sail or cross over to the US ( neither would Trump allow them in tbh) but to follow your reasoning, that is where they should be headed.

Zahra29:
[/quote]1. Starmer is the UK PM. He is responsible for any UK military action, not Kemi or Reform or anyone else.

2. The UK has stated that the government was aware of, but not in any way involved, in the attacks on Fordow and other sites.

3. There is already a massive irregular migration issue with Iran. For a number of years running, Iranians have been in the top 5 (actually #1) of nationalities crossing the English channel by boat.

https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/briefings/people-crossing-the-english-channel-in-small-boats/

Maybe they'll switch over to the US instead as they are the direct combatants in this conflict, and not the UK.

justwise:
Trump just hit Iran with massive bomb.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/ckg3rzj8emjt

Zahra29:
My bad.

I naturally assumed

Zahra29:
Lol....always trying to paint me as a villain...

It was Labour who ordered this inquiry, whom you regularly praise as being non/less racist, so why have you made this a race or Zahra issue?
If you disapprove of the inquiry, you should direct your energy towards Starmer.

RodgersAkpafu:
Well...
Let's agree to disagree then ✌️ ✌️

Since you cannot see the under handedness going on here
1. And this your summary is NOT my position on the matter AT ALL
I'm not against punishing people who committed crimes

What I am against is giving it an ethnic face and making a political theatre of this whole thing

2 Even if I explain 100 times, you will still NOT GET IT, so there is no point further trying to explain to you
Just know on a final note, that the monster some of you are ignorantly feeding will grow and consume you all one-day
Ask Latinos of America what they are now going through under a Trump second presidency that they enabled..

Esp the Cubans

Peace ✌️

Lexusgs430:
O yes.... I did a module on EC legislation........ 😊😂

Lexusgs430:
How would they stop the small boats..... This is the million dollar question, labour and conservative government, could not solve....... 😁😂

If i was in charge of home office or the government of the day, I would start by repelling that useless ECHR...... Then those that travelled down by boats, would be immediately processed the second they arrive and sent back within 96 hours...... This would be the only positive deterrent....... 😁😊😂

Viruses:
Given a change in circumstance, people will practice what they condemn and justify their actions to their gullible faithfuls.

It's up to you to assume I'm referring to religious faithfuls to suit your narrative.

Viruses:
When made under duress, then it wasn't a choice.
We all have choices we can make freely, it depends on what is at stake.

By the way, I used politicians to make examples of their actions before and after they enter power, I don't know why you twisted it to religion. What is your motive?

Viruses:
We all have choices, it all depend on what is at stake.

Viruses:
It's obvious, hence I said people would practice what they condemn given a change in circumstance. While at it, they will find a way to justify their actions to their gullible faithfuls who would also see reasons with them.

Why do you think politicians always know the right things to do until they get into power and their gullible followers defend them before and after.

Zahra29:
1. You are the one who forever claims that X is infinitely worse than Y; and my point is that just because Y is more covert doesn't mean that it is much better than X such that it is only X that deserves your scrutiny and criticism. That's a biased and narrow minded position. Hope you understand now.

2. I'm not sure there are many Reform admirers here and those who have spoken out in favour of Reform/Farage in one way or another do not appear ignorant of their stated or potential policies. Just as many discerning and educated people voted for Trump in full awareness of his character flaws and predilections.
It's a free choice.
Afterall, all the ethnic minorities who voted for Labour solely because they believed they were more immigrant friendly and would introduce lenient policies - that's not how it's played out has it.

Zahra29:
1. 1. So as long as the hostility/discrimination is conducted covertly then it's okay.

2. Politics isn't for the naive.

Zahra29:
I hope you realise that many in the Muslim and Jewish community have abandoned the Labour party due to its history (and also on-going allegations) of discrimination. Many women also felt discriminated against by Labour's stance during the "what is a woman" fiasco and others.

Don't just pick on one party, be fair and call out discrimination of all forms (not just racism) in all parties and sectors.

The only parties that are relatively untainted so far are the Lib Dems and Greens, but all the mainstream parties have their issues with discrimination.

And even if Reform wanted to ban the burqa/ face coverings, they would be following the precedent set by several European countries that are regarded as progressive (France, Denmark etc). Even Muslim-majority countries have enforced bans, not just on the burqa, but also on the niqab, such as Algeria, Azerbaijan, and Bosnia.

A 2016 YouGov poll showed that 57% of the British public supported a ban on wearing the burka in the UK so it's not a completely outlandish and outright racist concept.

https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/16331-majority-public-backs-burka-ban

Zahra29:
Apparently she crowd sourced for her first PMQ and that's the question that came up the most 😂

justwise:
No, this is in-house , related to a comment made by the newest Reform member regarding Muslims

mex551:
. Use google , or even Ai, you might get your answer. Or better yet walk into any Barclays Bank near you and ask …….

mizGene:
Hmm, there were allusions to this right from the start...
Can you screen grab pls? The story is behind a pay wall.

Jamesclooney:
Now that BRP has been phased out, what happens when you add a new dependant?
Also, how long is the actual processing time for a standard application? I know it’s advertised as 8 weeks, but I’d like to hear from anyone with recent experience—was it faster or longer?

giselle237:
Maybe try insuring the car through a friend or relative with a long-standing British license who lives in the suburbs, and then add yourself as a secondary driver. You'll see a magic drop in the price.

Zahra29:
I'm not attempting to make any point sir, I'm simply agreeing with the rational comment you made earlier, - ergo inflammatory rhetoric from the likes of Starmer& co is likely to spark a national race riot(s) very soon , so it sounds like a good idea to start exploring non-racist lands.

Zahra29:
Thanks for this, it's a very salient point.

Especially as KS has actually joined in the immigrant bashing, talking about "island of strangers", it's highly likely that there will be a national race riot very soon, in every borough and city, with even middle class folk chasing out all their black neighbours.

Oh dear, sounds like it's time to activate a migration plan asap to the US where racism has thankfully ceased to exist in the 5 years since George Floyd/Black Lives Matter.