₦airaland Forum

https://msnbcmedia.msn.com/j/MSNBC/Components/Photo/_new/pb-110502-osama-bin-laden-fake-picture.photoblog900.jpg

The picture on the left is a file photo from Reuters. The center image was sent in by a number of readers as an email attachment--it's initial provenance is unknown. The image on the right is a blend of the two others we made here at msnbc.com.


[img]http://4.bp..com/-M3Jm8pv7HWE/Tb5TTmgBVFI/AAAAAAAAE_I/pJotD1tpVuk/s1600/osama-dead2.jpg[/img]

[size=5]We think that bin Laden 'death photo' is a fake[/size]

Please be forewarned that an image lower down on this post looks like the bloody face of a dead body. Some viewers might find it disturbing. We don’t think the wounds are real, but you still might not want to look at it.

An image circulating on the Internet and displayed on some television news programs abroad purports to show Osama bin Laden’s bloody corpse. No U.S. or Pakistani officials have confirmed its authenticity, and two U.S. officials have warned NBC News that the image is a hoax.

Based on an initial look into the image file, we agree, and think it’s a fake. At first glance, the pixelation around the “wound” area and the odd lack of transition between different colored cloth and flesh indicate that the image has been manipulated.


Furthermore, the facial expression and beard are very reminiscent of a 1998 image of bin Laden, the first picture shown below. Next to it, we show the original resolution of the “corpse” image as we’ve seen it (197 by 263 pixels), “flopped” 180 degrees on the horizontal axis to conform to the original 1998 image’s beard orientation. The third image is a blended image of the two, with the “corpse” image at 100 percent opacity below the original image at 43 percent opacity. The way the images “lock” in place at the mouth, beard and nose indicate to us that the image circulating on the Web and some foreign television outlets is nothing but a clumsy fake:

https://msnbcmedia.msn.com/j/MSNBC/Components/Photo/_new/pb-sy-ffake-bin-laden-photo.photoblog900.jpg

Iraqis in Baghdad watch a news broadcast on Arabic satellite news channel Al-Arabiya showing an image which has been circulating on the internet and allegedly shows the body of Al-Qaeda mastermind Osama bin Laden.


Source: http://photoblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/05/02/6568249-we-think-that-bin-laden-death-photo-is-a-fake

[flash=450,350]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3V0ISgosTlQ&feature=player_embedded[/flash]

OSAMA BIN LADEN DEAD - BARACK OBAMA SPEECH OFFICIAL BREAKING NEWS

[size=15pt]Gaddafi's youngest son Saif and three grandchildren killed in Nato air strike on Libya [/size]

Colonel Gaddafi’s youngest son Saif and three of his grandsons were killed last night in a NATO air strike, according to Libyan government officials

Saif al-Arab Gaddafi, a 29-year-old student, died in a bombing strike raid in the capital Tripoli.


The Libyan leader himself and his wife were also in the house at the time of the attack but both are said to have escaped unhurt.

The one-storey house is in a wealthy residential area just south of Gaddafi’s main compound.

The house was hit by at least three missiles. The roof had completely caved in and the bomb site was filled with mangled wreckage.

Saif, who had previously studied in Germany, was the youngest of Gaddafi’s six sons and shunned the limelight. He minimised public appearances, choosing to keep a low-profile, unlike his older brother, also called Saif, who was a prominent regime figure.

Libyan government spokesman Moussa Ibrahim said the airstrike was “a direct operation to assassinate the leader of this country”.

He added: “The leader himself is in good health. He was not harmed. The wife is also in good health.”


Source http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2011/05/01/gaddafi-s-youngest-son-saif-and-three-grandchildren-killed-in-nato-air-strike-on-libya-115875-23099017/

[flash=450,350]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8kmAEebjlU[/flash]
Gaddafi's youngest son and 3 grandchildren killed in NATO air strike

[flash=450,350]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oeUOd2hJNa8[/flash]   
Prince William is A Reptilian and the Anti-Christ

[flash=450,350]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Eb4cagTSss[/flash]

cap28:
Horus, how do you download videos so that the actual video clip shows up on the page?

To post videos so that the actual video clip shows up on the page
1-use the insert flash button
2-paste the video url between the 2 following: [flash=200,200][/flash]
3- replace the = sign by a / sign
4- delete the following part: watch?

preview your post and you can change the size of the video by changing the number inside [flash=200,200] can be resized to [flash=450,350]

cap28:
The Gambian govt have taken a stand against the neo colonial invasion of Ivory Coast and in this clip they issue a very ominous warning to africans about the coming recolonisation of the african continent:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QFmAaBGhUbU&NR=1

The Gambian govt is doing the right thing. The truth is coming out now.

[flash=450,350]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9rR8tn5NPyc[/flash]

[B]Americans journalists denounce coup d'état of France in Cote d'ivoire[/B]

[flash=450,350]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6c7NL21Gxw[/flash]

Video Updates From Japan - Liquefaction and Earthquake Damage - April 19, 2011

The truth is that those so-called wise and prudent theologians know absolutely nothing about the so-called resurrection simply because it never happened. Easter, or the celebration of the resurrection, is merely a tradition, a tradition that you have been taught from childhood, and coming into maturity you have accepted it because that is what you were taught. That is what you read bout. That is what your parents made you observed every Easter Sunday. Thus, you continued to go along with it and before you knew it, you had carelessly assumed what you now believe without question or proof. Easter is the feast of feasts celebrated in honor of the risen Christ. You have even reached the point where you will defend vigorously and emotionally your belief, a belief that can lead you straight to hell. It has become human nature to flow with the stream, and to go along with the crowd, to believe and perform like those around you. And, even when you stumble on the truth, you will not believe because like the majority of the people, you stubbornly refuse to believe what you are unwilling to believe. There is an old saying that says: He who is convinced against his will is of the same opinion still.

[flash=450,350]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00X_PrSICCQ&feature=player_embedded[/flash]

Prof. Molefi Asante on Libya & Cote D'Ivoire

Dr. Molefi Asante is Professor, Department of African American Studies at Temple University. Considered by his peers to be one of the most distinguished contemporary scholars, Asante has published 70 books, among the most recent are Maulana Karenga: An Intellectual Portrait, An Afrocentric Manifesto, Encyclopedia of African Religion, co-edited with Ama Mazama, The History of Africa: The Quest for Eternal Harmony, Cheikh Anta Diop: An Intellectual Portrait, Handbook of Black Studies, co-edited with Maulana Karenga, Encyclopedia of Black Studies, co-edited with Ama Mazama, Race, Rhetoric, and Identity: The Architecton of Soul, Erasing Racism: The Survival of the American Nation, Ancient Egyptian Philosophers, Scattered to the Wind, Custom and Culture of Egypt, and 100 Greatest African Americans. The second edition of his high school text, African American History: Journey of Liberation, 2nd Edition, is used in more than 400 schools throughout North America. The comprehensive Encyclopedia of African Religion, co-edited with Ama Mazama, will be published by Sage Publications in December 2008.

[flash=450,350]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQVRZtV8Kg0[/flash]

4,000 Ton China Missile Frigate Off Libya Coast

[flash=450,350]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3CsUw6K7LY[/flash]

Marie-Antoinette Singleton daughter of Laurent Gbagbo on CNN

Sagamite:
You surely are a dumb shyt!

Did [size=17pt]MY[/size] mother tell you the things she was sleeping with?

Cretin! Why do you have a brain of a rat?

The fact there is no news report of people dead from reputatble news institutions that are all in Abidjan reporting the war, you goat, shows that no way near 2300 could have died!

Fooooooooool!

The fact is that there is news report of people dead from reputatble news institutions that are all in Abidjan reporting the war and there is 2300 who have died!.

Did [size=15pt]MY[/size] mother tell you the things she was sleeping with?

Are you suffering from Dementia ? just re-read accurately your own quote above.

Cretin! Why do you have a brain of a rat?

Even a rat is smarter than you, and all your previous "posts" show us this fact. 
Try some breathing exercises 2 times a day to calm yourself and reduce your anxiety symptoms, otherwise I will have to report you to Moderator to correct your usual Off Topic behaviors.

You really are a shyt head!

Your language give us a clue of the type of "education" you received.

despite not having any idea what the true figure is.

This is what I asked you, to provide the true figure. You are too dumb to get it? And why you dont provide it?

You are reetarded.

Not at all, I am enought smart to realise that the kind of language you are using is a clear indication that your mother was impregnated by a dog nine months before your day of birth.

On this same thread, I debated with superboi and did not insult him because I spotted that he was at least trying to reason. And when he saw he was wrong, he did not argue.

Off topic, I am not interrested with your EGO battles with other Nairalanders.

You, I have never seen reason. Everytime you are dumb.

Not at all, I just tald you with accuracy who or "what" impregnated your mother nine months before your day of birth.

My blood boils when I see people with the brain of rats that have a right to vote.

So your blood boils every time you look at yourself in a mirror.

No reputable African site has the resources and connections to report such news. They copy it from the Western ones.

An ivorian website owner dont need to copy this news from the Western ones because the military camps who have been under bombardment are in Abidjan where the events hapened. Are you too dumb to ratiocinate that?

Explain how you picked a site that is honouring Gbagbo as a source for unproven data.

All the data are accurate. But even if you dont agree with those data, if there was a bombardment you should have at least found some data but you dont have any data about it, you cant provide any information. Why?

How can you go to a site that is pro-Gbagbo and then pick up a story that is a mere statement without any proof?

You dont have to agree with the information on this website, I am not here to enforce anything, but why with all your list of "reputable" site you are still unable to know how much people died after the bombardment?. If you dont agree with the number of 2300, you dont even try to provide us with some statistics of what you think is the true figure. I think you have not done any research to find out a number of victims or dont really care about knowing how much ivorians died in this unfortunate event.

Sagamite:
You are reetarded!

I never said you said any of those, I just gave you examples of claims that can be made like 2300 people killed that one can tell is bullshyt instantly without being there

Dont lie in your example you used the number of 80.000 not 2300.
But you still cannot provide any accurate number of people killed in the bombardment, so you still have no facts, no informations, so you agree that you dont know.

And you wonder why I called you reetarded?

No, you call all Nairalanders reetarded as usual when you are unable to provide accurate facts. Are you often under heavy stress when you use insults?

NO reputable site carried it. Not BBC, not Al-jazeera, not Reuters, not AFP, not CNN, CBS, not Sky, not Fox, not even fcking a Chinese or a Russian station.

AT LEAST!! you just answered the question, you just tald me what is for you a reputable site. WOW!! It took a long time for you to answer, but you are making some progress, dont be so desperate.
Mhhhh I can see from your list provided that there is no africans site; Does this mean that you do not think that an african site can be a reputable site?

Your cretinous arse went to some propaganda site

What kind of language is that? are you on drug?

propaganda site that is virtually unknown, obviously biased and that provided NO SHRED OF PROOF, to back up your mooronic claim.

And where are your facts about the number of deads after the bombardment?. Why are you sill unable to provide a number?. At the moment you are only able to use insults as usual but you still have no facts, as usual.

Sagamite:
How am I taking the word "reputable out of context"?

Have I even addressed it?

What I asked you is, again: What do you understand by the term reputable?

I don't know does not mean, under any sensible circumstances, that I can not eliminate bullshyt claims.

You can't come here and say the bombing killed 80,000 people and I would not know that is bullshyt because I don't know the figure.

You can't come here and say the bombing caused an earthquake and I would not know that is bullshyt because I don't know what happened.

You can't come here and say the bombing used bacterial warhead and I would not know that is bullshyt because I don't know the effect on the people.

Bullshyt is easy to spot by a smart mind.

Now answer, what do you understand by the term reputable?

Last chance!!!

Now answer, what do you understand by the term reputable?

Now answer, what do you understand by a irreputable site? (it is not the same word)
look again at the difference:
1-Irreputable
2-Reputable

Now look at the two words ( irreputable site) from your own post quoted below:

Quote from: Sagamite on Yesterday at 10:09:40 PM
You should have reasoned that if 2300 people (not 2, not 3, not 23, 2300 fcking people) were killed by a UN, a fcking UN action, it will be all over the news and you will have more reputable sites carrying the news. 2300 is even more than the number of people reported dead (1500) across the country and you think that amount will die in ONE ACTION and the reputable international press will not carry it?

This is not even a country were some state force is trying to control media coverage like Libya. Worse still, the action you stated is against the state forces so they will try and propagate the information if it was true.

You provided a link from a[b] irreputable site[/b] without any proof, just a claim. A site which's choice of words in its report is clearly one-sided and you want us to believe that?

Above was from your own post Yesterday at 10:09:40 PM, so you are dishonest.

You can't come here and say the bombing killed 80,000 people and I would not know that is bullshyt because I don't know the figure.

I never said that the bombing killed 80,000 people . At least you agree that you dont know the figure.

You can't come here and say the bombing caused an earthquake and I would not know that is bullshyt because I don't know what happened.

I never said that the bombing caused an earthquake.  At least you agree that you dont know what hapened.

You can't come here and say the bombing used bacterial warhead and I would not know that is bullshyt because I don't know the effect on the people.

No I never said that the bombing used bacterial warhead. At least you agree that you dont know nothing about the effect of bacterial warhead on people.

Bullshyt is easy to spot by a smart mind.

I agree and this is why I spoted all your bullshyt that you use just to convince me that you don't know nothing, about anything.

Sagamite:
Mate, that is not what I asked you.

What I asked you is: What do you understand by the term reputable?

Try again. The shredding has to be structured.

And that is not what I asked you too, with dishonesty you are taking the word reputable out of contex when you are the one who accused me first by using the two folowing words together: "irreputable site". This mean that you cannot provide any number of dead after the bombardment from any source anywhere. If you dont agree with the numbers, why are you unable to provide a number of dead?

There is no way 2300 will die that "my side" will not even speculate it, if not report it.

This is what I was thinking you dont know how much people died. And this lack of information is coming from "your side", not mine. At least we both agree on the fact that you dont know.

Sagamite:
No. You explain what you understand by the term reputable because it is quite an easy term.

What game are you playing?. You are so busy saying: I dont know what I am talking about, that you really dont know what you are talking about. It is you who accused me of using an irreputable site who talk about a number of 2300 deads after the Bombardment. So why is it an irreputable site?. Now from "your reputable site" how much deads do you have after the Bombardment? You didnt answer because you cant even answer. At least four military camps have been under heavy bombardarment. Inside those military camps there is  military personels and their family woman and childrens who live there, so they are in best position to know how much deads there is. People who do not have acces to military camp in Abidjan cannot give you any information about the number of deads. So how can you say that the number of deads is not correct if you dont have any informations?. You are unable to provide any information about an accurate number of deads.

RTI reported 2300 and your point is?

Yes 2300 people deads. Now from your side what information do you have about the number of deads? NONE, and you cant even answer. If you cannot provide any information about a number of dead after the bombardment, why do you keep talking about something you dont know about?, Or if you know give us the number of deads after the bombardment instead of using insults.

Sagamite:
What do you understand by reputable? As in reputable news agent/organisation.

Yes but you didnt answer the question 1 and question 2.
1- What do you call an irreputable site?
2- And what do you call a reputable site?
We will start with your definition of reputable site and irreputable site, it will be more simple.

And your point is?

The RTI (Radio Television Ivoirienne) talk also about 2300 dead after the Bombardment.
Now from "your reputable site" how much deads do you have after the Bombardment?

Sagamite:
You should have reasoned that if 2300 people (not 2, not 3, not 23, 2300 fcking people) were killed by a UN, a fcking UN action, it will be all over the news and you will have more reputable sites carrying the news. 2300 is even more than the number of people reported dead (1500) across the country and you think that amount will die in ONE ACTION and the reputable international press will not carry it?

This is not even a country were some state force is trying to control media coverage like Libya. Worse still, the action you stated is against the state forces so they will try and propagate the information if it was true.

You provided a link from a irreputable site without any proof, just a claim. A site which's choice of words in its report is clearly one-sided and you want us to believe that?

I don't blame you that much, your brain is just not capable. Simple!

1- What do you call an irreputable site?
2- And what do you call a reputable site?

Worse still, the action you stated is against the state forces so they will try and propagate the information if it was true.

This is excatly what they do on the RTI (Radio Television Ivoirienne)

Sagamite:
You are reetarded. (As usual)

I have been saying it for 3 years that you are one of the daftest 5 people on this site.

2300 my arse!

And your dumb arse brought some mooronic site to back up your stupidity?

Horus! It might just be time to end it, mate.

Do it!

https://www.amitbhawani.com/Images/G/Gun-Point-Suicide-Attempt.jpg

Save yourself from your useless brain. Destroy it! Kill the damn brain!

You are calling me retarted because I posted an article?. Did you read the article on the link that I provided?
I am not the author of the article, so what is the reason for this insult?

French Minister Alain Juppe justifiied the attack on the residence of the Head of State Laurent Gbagbo by the need to destroy all heavy weapons that the Ivorian military had in its possession to "protect civilians", but the bombings themselves caused about 2300 victims in Abidjan.


Source: http://www.blueteamci.com/englishversion/article.php?new=607

[size=17pt]Gbagbo troops 'hit' Ouattara hotel HQ[/size]

A hotel used by the internationally recognised president of Ivory Coast has come under attack
by forces loyal to his rival Laurent Gbagbo, reports say.

9 April 2011

Witnesses and a UN official say the Golf Hotel in Abidjan had come under mortar and small-arms fire, and the UK embassy has been evacuated.

Alassane Ouattara was judged to have won the presidential election, but Mr Gbagbo has refused to step down.

He has been surrounded in his residence for days by pro-Ouattara troops.

Reports suggested Saturday's fighting flared at around 1700 GMT.

"The FDS [pro-Gbagbo Defence and Security Forces] are attacking us and we are trying to push them back," one fighter with the pro-Ouattara forces told the AFP news agency.

"The firing is very very close. Snipers fired bursts from Kalashnikovs. The pro-Gbagbos are attacking us on all fronts," a hotel resident added.

AFP also reported that UN peacekeepers - tasked by the Security Council with protecting civilians in Ivory Coast - had fired back.

"The Golf Hotel was attacked with mortars," UN spokesman Hamadoun Toure said, adding that the attack had come from south of Abidjan's lagoon, away from the presidential residence.

"In conformity with our mandate to protect the Golf Hotel where President Ouattara and his team are, the peacekeepers responded by targeting the origin of the firing coming from the other side of the lagoon. We intentionally avoided the residence of President Gbagbo."

The decision to abandon the British embassy compound was taken after bullets hit the building and a mortar round landed in the garden.

The embassy is near the residence of Laurent Gbagbo.

Heavy weapons

Mr Ouattara's forces have swept down from the north of Ivory Coast over the past two weeks but much of Abidjan is dominated by Gbagbo supporters. Days of fighting have plunged the city into crisis.

The BBC's Mark Doyle, in Abidjan, says an estimated one million people have been made homeless by the recent fighting, and there are growing concerns for public health.

"The situation is tragic in certain neighbourhoods" of Abidjan, Carlos Geha, of the UN Office for the Co-ordination of Humanitarian Affairs (Ocha) told AFP.

"It is not medicine or material aid that is missing but the means to get them to those who need them."

It had appeared several days ago that Mr Gbagbo was on the verge of defeat but the upscale Plateau and Cocody areas of Abidjan are now fully in the control of his forces.

UN peacekeeping chief Alain Le Roy said late on Friday that Mr Gbagbo's followers had in fact made strong gains, having used a pause for negotiations as an opportunity to regroup.

Earlier this week Mr Ouattara's troops were reported to have isolated Mr Gbagbo in an underground bunker, but a pause in the fighting appears to have given his forces new resolve.

"They clearly used the lull of Tuesday as a trick to reinforce their position," Mr Le Roy said, referring to a dip in the fighting after three of Mr Gbagbo's generals requested talks.

Mr Le Roy said that there was evidence that his forces were still using weapons including tanks, M-21 rocket launchers, rocket-propelled grenade launchers and armoured personnel carriers.

Heavy weapons fire from Mr Gbagbo's forces targeted the French ambassador's residence in the city on Friday, the French embassy said, although this was denied by Mr Gbagbo's supporters.

On Saturday the remaining British presence in Abidjan left the city. A skeleton staff of two diplomats and 16 local staff were evacuated in a convoy of UN armoured vehicles.

The decision to evacuate was taken after bullets started coming in through the window and mortars landed in the garden, our correspondent says.

The UN has certified Mr Ouattara as the winner of November's run-off vote for president but Mr Gbagbo has refused to cede power.

Both men have been criticised for the actions of troops loyal to them during the crisis. Most recently Mr Ouattara's forces were criticised by Human Right Watch, which alleged they killed or raped hundreds of people in villages as they advanced on Abidjan.

Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-13026923

https://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/52016000/gif/_52016233_bloodyivorycoastmapagain.gif

The Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has said the UN and France had no right to take sides in the conflict.

“The UN peacekeepers and supporting French forces in Cote d’Ivoire have started military action, taking the side of Ouattara, carrying out air strikes on the positions held by supporters of Gbagbo. We are now looking into the legality of this situation, because the peacekeepers were authorized to remain neutral, nothing more. We’ve requested an emergency briefing in the UN Security Council. We will keep looking into the matter,” Lavrov stressed.

Limaoscar:
@Horus,
:oStop the silly smear campaign and get-off NL  AQAP and if you don't have anything else to do please go scratch your balls. The gory images you posted here came out of the Jos crises and NOT the current Ivorien Political Quagmire, ahn-ahn

Only Fools Duck When the Truth Is Thrown At Them.

[size=14pt]800 CIVILIANS EXECUTED BY ALASSANE OUATTARA REBELS IN GUIGLO, DUEKOUE AND DALOA: UNOCI SEEN AS AN ACCOMPLICE.[/size]

Abidjan-Côte d’Ivoire-04-1st -2011.According to a confidential report recently presented by UNOCI, report that Ban Ki-Moon has chosen to cover up and continue to lie to the world, “OUATTARA rebels murdered between 600 and 800 persons in DUEKOUE, GUIGLO and DALOA as soon as they have invested those cities” 3 days ago. The information circulating already in all foreign embassies in Ivory Coast will give the whole world a clear idea about the organization headed by BAN KI-MOON that many consider as “corrupt”. The international community should finally get an idea about the “democratically elected President” it intends to impose in Cote d’Ivoire. Someone that 95% of the real Ivoirian do not want and who is seen by foreign countries as the “solution to stop the violence in this African nation” even though the wisest voices advise a re-evaluation of the results or a simple repeated elections after a complete disarmament of OUATTARA rebels. At the last Security Council meeting on March 30, 2011, on the situation in Côte d’Ivoire, the Brazil, India and China demanded that “UNOCI executes its mandate of protecting civilians impartially and avoid becoming a party to the conflict. Peace-keeping soldiers should in no case be used to become the instrument of a change of regime in Côte d’Ivoire”. These countries had requested that, “delegations now have more time to consider the draft resolutions, which would allow the troop-contributing countries to give their point of view with respect to the use of their soldiers”. Well, as witnesses experiencing the real situation on the ground in Côte d’Ivoire, our correspondents, since a few months, are insisting on the behavior of the UN Forces who are arming, leading and carrying Ouattara killers. Doing so, we wanted hailing the serious observers of the Ivorian crisis so that they open the eyes to avoid a chaos in this country. The United Nations is therefore an accomplice of the executions of these 500 civilians they are supposed to protect as states their mission.

Source: http://actualites.ivorian.net/article/?p=1364

This crisis will not end now but will spread to the arab world. Now Iran will develop an Atomic Bomb by fear of western attacks.

@Sun of god
This is an excellent video, I hope it will open the mind of Nairalanders.