not too bad. But they are both really young for marriage.

najib632:
Have you read his biography? Because it seems you have not and also you haven't read the Qur'an if you do that then I am 100% sure you'll change your mind you're saying this because of the media and also it seem like you have forgotten about our sworn enemy that'll do everything to make you enter hell

not interested

najib632:
No my friend Muhammad S.A.W. was a messenger of God, Allah sent him to guide the whole of mankind that they should avoid worshipping false God's and worship only one God. You see my friend one special that Allah gave prophet Muhammad is the Qur'an, the prophet Muhammad S.A.W. said that other prophets and messengers of God were given miracles and but I was given the Qur'an because even if an unbeliever reads it he will know that it is from God.

no he is an Arabic con man. He did not come for mankind.

najib632:
Allah means God

That con man Mohammed made up.

instead of her to go register in a gym and start keto she is here embarrassing her self before the whole world by allowing this scammer called pastor take advantage of her situation for his show.

lalasticlala front page Abeg lets use this example to educate the sheep.

hopefulLandlord:
when will sciencewatch start talking coherently?

I feel he's actually intelligent but can't tailor his words to fit the discussion, always rambling on and on and on; anyways I've seen improvements, he no longer hounds people with his "Emmanuel TV" "TB Joshua" bullsheet again erhm at least I haven't seen him do so for sometime

He does it on purpose don't get it twisted. he is a certified troll. It is best to ignore him.

ToZaraWithaZ:
So this is your new tactic. Anyone who says your opinion is bullshiit is being aggressive and rude, when such person is just being honest. Cool. Very cool.

As for me, I wouldn't care if anyone calls my argument bullshit, but would rather be focused on the substance of his argument and demand that he SHOWS me how my opinion is actually bullshiit. All these sentiments of yours are just you being emotional.

I consider Christianity bullshiit, the same way many Christians consider atheism stupid, soporofic, vapid, and irrational. But that doesn't stop me from engaging them in debates.

When the subject matter is a GENERAL ISSUE, that can be OBJECTIVELY analysed, then everyone can't be right, and there can be no "my opinion is valid, your opinion is valid" sentiments. We're talking FACTS not anyone's personal FEELINGS, so if your argument is empty and ridiculous, I would call it exactly what it is.

But when the subject matter is a PERSONAL ISSUE, that depends on each person's SUBJECTIVE PREFERENCE, then we can respect each other's feelings and opinions. For example, "Blue, or red, which color is better?". There is no "right" answer to this. "Jollof rice or Fried rice, which is more delicious?". Subjective. No "right" answer. "Is it alright to date a lady with huge behind?". This has also got to do with PERSONAL PREFERENCE. No one has any right to attack you over which ever answer you choose. We all have different TASTES.

So when I see you disregarding FACTS, abusing reason and logic, and tendering opinions and assumptions as TRUTH, I have the right to use whatever harsh word is appropriate. The same applies to you.

---

By the way, I never saw you apply this new rubbish you're preaching during your debates with CatfishBilly in the past. You were so rude that you attacked his character and every other thing you considered worth attacking

DO YOU MIND EXPLAINING YOURSELF?

You fùcking read him.

Modus operandus

1 creates a thread
2. says it is not a debate but just to get different opinions
3 see an opinion that he doesn't like
4 jumps on it
5 ask him why he disagrees
6 says you are being aggressive or don't want him to have his opinion
7 he moves goal post or starts talking about China LOL

hopefulLandlord:


I said "Abrahamic god does not exist" I didn't say "god does not exist"

And that includes Allah.

najib632:
There is no god but Allah, and why are saying there is no God

vaxx:
i partially agree with you... But your answer is more of egoism rather than the fact......


We human refuse to be call animal becuse of our brainpower, nothing more....and my taught is this ....do animals have the same thought with us, do they care to be human ?

Probably they also reject the idea of the human labeling supposing they are call human, since science hasn't develop mind reader.... That will be a question for another day....


Why should we reject the idea of animal labelling.....simple answer ...ego....

Ego is the root of supremacy.

this egoism with semi illiteracy, makes us believe we are the most supreme being in this universe ..nothing proof it.......


Human want to feel superior, and it is easy to do that with the animal kingdom, because animals do not reply nor care...may be they’ve got better things to do.....

Therefore we can bring in these human animals concept to the fact that they belong to the animal kingdom, and let them to believe what they want and be enlightened or ignorant for the rest of their lives.....:

I really like your perspective. The animal kingdom have characteristics that we share yet each group within each family are distinct in their own way. So we human believe the characteristics that make us different(I.E. Our brain power) is the reason why we are where we are today and makes us superior.

butterflyl1on:


Yes I want opinions which incidentally ifenes is and others have been providing.

Does classification change the true nature or the true nature does not deserve to be classified?

The term TRUE NATURE is the working term. Who can determine the true nature?

I have provided my opinion you are free to disagree and classify based on true nature according to you.

Unless this is a troll thread like the water thread.

butterflyl1on:


Ifenes disagrees with you.

and?? I thought you wanted opinions

The real question is do I really disagree with him?

answer; NO

the specie homo sapiens are animals with a difference.

all animals ain't the same bro that is why there is classification in the first place.

Biology 101

six kingdoms of living organisms


Plants, Animals, Protists, Fungi, Archaebacteria, Eubacteria. 


Man belong to the animal kingdom





Kingdom ____ animalia

Order____ Primates

phylum ___ chordata

Subphylum ___ vertebrates

Class ____ Mammalia

Genus ____ Homo

Specie ____ sapien


THE END.

eyinjuege:


That video you posted had nothing to do with abortion. There are loads of hit and run cases even in places where abortion is frowned upon. The reasons drivers don't stop really has nothing to do with abortion, whether gender selective or not

excactly the problem is cultural then add the compulsory one child policy note the word COMPULSORY with punishment for defaulterd then add the economic situation and overpopulation. After all China is not the only country where abortion is legal.

MarieSucre:


MY REPLY IS IN THE PICTURE BELOW. Please read thanks. This discussion is great.

thank you.

KanwuliaExtra:



It is a SURVIVAL topic!

thank you.
only The wearer of knows where the shoe pinches.

Op you skipped complications the mother and fetus may have.

mindfulness, Cococandy, Paperlace, shaybebaby, Baby124, pocohantas, lefulefu, tosyne2much, raggedyann, refiner, eyinjuege, thorpido, kanwuliaextra, Daeylar, pcguru1, acidosis, mariesucre, safarigirl, missyadorable, imaima1

butterflyl1on:


It's not set in stone because it's a choice and last time I checked EVERYONE has a right to this. And yes I would take a chance on both and I want to believe that a loving mother would do same. I cannot love my child more than my wife should and both of us would want the best for our child.

And the best for ANYONE is life! Be deformed but be alive. Say you are suffering but be alive. Change is the only thing that is constant. Nothing lasts forever. Suffering would not last forever.

You are going round in circles. You have said your opinion na,
loving mothers choose their lives too,
sometimes the choice is not between suffering or normal It is Btw life or death and the best is still life.

When you take the chance on both, both can die and they will be dead forever

Or you you think the mothers who had to make that choice are all hateful.

tintingz:
Suffering and homeless children are expose to danger, the risk of early death is very high, what's the point bringing them to the world when the owner is not ready to care for the child? A fetus can't survive on it own, the owner or carrier has every decision to terminate it or not.

We have read alot of report of mothers dumping babies in the bush, waste bin, nylon, roads, gutters etc do you like reading such stories? Do you like seeing children in the pic I posted?

his view is extreme ie whether extreme case or not no abortion.

He says assuming he had to choose btw his wife and fetus he will take the chance on both, but what will wifey say?

Then he turns around to tell me it's not set in stone, if it's not set in stone then it's pro-choice depending on the circumstances.

butterflyl1on:


Are you also the one fighting for the life of the person you want their fetus terminated? It's their life and not yours. Let them decide and not you.

So far we have seen people fight for their lives by either insisting on keeping or insisting on removing the fetus. It is not set in stone.

This is why I said EVERYONE is entitled to have an opinion. Do not speak for me when you are not the one in my situation. Simple.

Same way you are speaking for adult women who are rational enough to know want they want.

Btw a lot of illegal abortion occurs in Nigeria everyday so they already decided.

There is a reason it is called PRO CHOICE.

butterflyl1on:


Late or early is a no no for me. Feel free to hold your own opinion as I hold mine.

of course it's just your opinion as long as you ain't the one fighting for your life in that situation.