vaxx:
go thorough very well, you will realise you just agree with me....

your personal quote '' so the only thing linking all atheist together is the lack of belief in god'' this is what i am saying , what binds atheist together is base on faith and not on knowledge....... which make it share the same strong similarities with religion

vaxx:
do not be too personal on this issue...may be i am not getting it right...the forum is meant to share knowledge.... so see yourself as one who is part of the global knowledge center...

you personally do not believe GOD EXIST AND I THINK most if not all ATHEIST like you do not believe GOD EXIST....IS THIS GENERAL AGREEMENT among atheist WORLDWIDE not base on faith position ....

faith is a believe system about a particular phenomenon rather than proof(free dictionary)so atheism is not a claim of knowledge but faith

so tell me if most atheist do not share the same believe system? or is the agreement of atheism that GOD do not exist objectively verified ?

your reply may convinced me...

vaxx:
OK, i agree with you for the sake of argument.....

but what if i say atheism is base on faith like religion. will you deny it?

vaxx:
no two words of grammar are the same, i never said so.....but in this contest ,they mean the same thing....

look at the contest in which he use it''subjectivity can unearth objective truths BUT even when it hasn't it doesn't make the objective truth any less objective''

hopefulLandlord:


its self explanatory and not in anyway confusing so I'm surprised you interpreted it the way you did

I'll try to explain and break it down as much as I could

before science discovered malaria, was it objectively existing? of course yes but humans had no idea, they just notice themselves falling sick and dying shortly after, they kept sacrificing to gods thinking the sickness is spiritual

Science eventually discovered what it is and much later, made a cure for it

Now, while the humans of those days thought their knowledge that the infection is spiritual is objective in their own "subjective" view, it did not in anyway change/invalidate the fact that its not spiritual

Same way that people then assert the moon created light on its own did not change the objectivity that the moon relies on the sun to reflect (not create) light

in the same vein, a tree the fell in the wilderness has fallen whether an observer is there or not

Objectivity does NOT in anyway affect objectivity one bit


I hope you get my point now

vaxx:
how will you translate this word of yours ''subjectivity can unearth objective truths'' hopefullanlord

tartar9:

Likewise in Islam

A woman can wear gold but a man can't

A woman can wear silk but a man can't

A woman can dance but not the man(makruh)

A man must provide for all the needs not the woman

A man goes to war,not the woman

.
.
.
Why aren't these also called oppression of men?
Everything must not be seen only with the lens of oppression and subjugation.
We are equal but not the same.

@Seun.

Seun:
Ok, let’s talk about equality.

When a man can marry four wives while a woman can only have one husband, is that equal?

When a man can beat a disobedient wife, but a woman can’t beat a disobedient husband, is that equal?

When a woman’s inheritance is half of what her brothers inherit, is that equal?

When the testimony of 2 women is equal in weight to the testimony of 1 man, is that equal?

When a rape victim is imprisoned in Dubai and her rapist is allowed to leave the country, is that equal?

1Sharon:
Naijadeyhia account was last seen on January 1st this year

https://www.nairaland.com/naijadeyhia

Otematum

abduljabbar4:


Anyone can add anything to encyclopedia. If you check the references you will see 'scripture' and 'catholic encyclopedia'. Cant you give me something from a historian just like the way i told you about Muhammed bello who wrote about Queen Amina?

Im quite busy now

abduljabbar4:


[s]So far none of you has been able to show me a good source outside the Bible. I need something from historians that is why i didnt mention Bilal (an African) who worked with prophet Muhammad because i cant prove it without using an islamic source but talked about people like Bayajidda, Usman Danfodio, queen Amina, etc.

Just search "history of religion in Africa" and read from different sources to see things for yourself[/s]

abduljabbar4:


I dont take references from the Bible as an evidence. with all due respect

abduljabbar4:
Islam came to Africa almost during the time of the Prophet. I will add more details later cos i can see that one poster up there has started emulating the al taqqiya style of the bible already

lilmax:
why are you acting like a toy?

Zykod:


you just admitted your problem. It's all yours. I don't want. Bye

Zykod:



tell them you've been trying to ask her out for years first and then you'll be taken seriously, till then get lost

Dayvhid:
Asslicker

Zykod:



[s]If you can boldy tell me what this is about today then you are vindicated, until then swerve. I owe you nothing and need no validations.[/s]

Zykod:



[s]May God forgive you. You can tell me when and where i went after her. You came in just a few minutes you're rambling rubbish, go to the past ten pages and find your answers there. eediot[/s]

Zykod:


start by saying you wanted to ask her out, but didn't find a way through, and then you'll be taken seriously, till then go repay the loan you took before EFCC fynds you eediot

DJHANDSOME:
Bro, This is an emotional outburst, her reason for this might not be psychology, but frustration.

She wants to get married. I think that's the message she is trying to send.

Spasmic:
Shame. What a pathetic human being. This girl needs urgent psychological help. She is currently tethering on the verge of self harm or suicide. Ignore the fact that she presented this in a light tone. She is really psychologically disturbed. I'll advice that no man ask her out let alone propose to her until she has gotten the needed psychiatric help. This is the kind of woman that would murder her lover and his mistress in cold blood if he makes the mistake of cheating on her.

NightHound:
I don't know if I would agree with the term social "deception". If something can be adopted by culture through introduction and debate, then it only shows once again that nothing which exists is inherently good or bad, but is only perceived as good or bad depending on how we are affected by it. Because we are the center of our own universe at this moment in time, good or bad is defined by how it affects us either as individuals or as a collective race. That is how laws are made, they are humanocentric. From our perspective, the killing of a chicken, for instance, is not considered evil if it provides food for human beings.

If our perception gives quality and value to specific actions instead of the action having its own absolute and independent value, then its value cannot be permanent. And that is because human perception is fickle changes over time as the picture of the world becomes clearer to us. The aspects of conservative culture have been ratified in society by the same fickle perception which now ratifies elements of liberal culture. The reluctance to accept certain things by the conservative mind is due to his refusal to accept the broader perspectives that technological advancement allows, and not because something is inherently bad. Nothing is inherently bad.

Murder, for instance, is perceived to be bad because it threatens human life. If that were not the case, there would be no sense in banning murder, and it wouldn't be bad. Homosexuality is perceived to be a threat to the perpetuation of the human race, but it is not. And it is in proving that something does not affect us negatively (or threaten our existence) either as individuals or as a race, that the essence of discussion lies. And once proven, perception changes and ratifies actions. With tech advancement, homosexual couples have found ways to contribute to procreation. And people have recognized the hypocrisy of denying same-sex parents the opportunity to raise children, when children are being raised in homes where there's a single parent or where there is disaccord in a traditional setting - where the quality of care cannot be measured and compared explicitly. So, if we cannot say how it threatens us, how can we keep qualifying something as bad when there is no inherent value to begin with?

You're right about the stages (progression) of shock to veneration (or acceptance at least). But it isn't deception. It's just a re-evaluation of our reality through perception.

CrEaToRmalden:
Idiot, is it today that your brain made you remember your encounter with them ?
since 2005. As for the chase, I'm sure you tried running with your friends and that made them suspicious.
they prolly thought it was a stolen vehicle.
The ish is that Nigerians don't have respect for their own forces, when a force man says stop, just stop because they may get angry and become suspicious of you.


#SarsStands

nairanaira12:



The way you act during relationship will show what you will do in marriage. I'm sure you are wise enough to know that

nairanaira12:
Set

Can you show me where I said waking up early should be left to only one person? You will live better if you read with more understanding before commenting. In my own home, my parents taught us, both male and female, to wake up early. A mature woman sleeping till 7am when she will resume at work by 8am is an irresponsible woman with poor upbringing.