SirShymexx: Lmao...you don't have to tell me about Akala. I know Akala - he's Ms. Dynamite's younger brother lol. I'm a grime head, and I used to clash people in secondary sch. on the bus and everywhere. Do you know Black the Ripper, Lowkey, Swiss, Poet etc..? Even Jaja Soze of PDC is also in the conscious thing. Cap, I'm not the guy you should be educating about black people, and the experience in the UK - I've been part of the movement since my Uni days - from LDN to Birmingham. C'mon now, I used to run around with Rastas and JA mandem who wear dashiki every summer. And I've been to loads of seminars about black consciousness and Afrocentricism everywhere. From Ashra Kwesi, to Dr. Molefi Asante, to Dr. Leonard Jeffries etc..
I understand ya point and I share certain sentiments as well. However, I'm looking at the bigger picture vis-a-vis certain policies Tony Blair's government effected, and why he needs to be lauded for what he did. It might be small, but it did touch a lot of lives. I've seen Akala and Swiss allude to the same thing, and almost everything I posited to you. You can go dig up YouTube for their interviews during the London riots.
Yes, the UK was built on the sweat of black folks - but hey, times have changed and the indigenous folks own their land. We can all sit down and cry all day, but that won't change anything. And we can't go to war with them cos we're just a meagre 3% of the population, and I'm sure half of our population is made up of Uncle Toms and Aunt Tomasinas who will never go against Massa. So, what are we going to do? - absolutely nothing. Evidently, it's better to make the best out of what we've got and focus on wealth creation and how to make our communities better. Institutionalised racism is an unwinnable war. We can critique it, but there is nothing we can do about it. Worrying about things like that will just make you depressed - been there, done that - it's a new dawn.
Anyway, though Akala is mixed, he doesn't see himself as black British - he aligns more with his Jamaican and black roots. I honestly don't know why you always tout the black British thing...it's a choice and not everyone aligns with it.
Also shymmexx I see where you are in your life. I am feeling the same way black people's minds are FUBAR. We can't win and we need to do what we can to make our lives and communities better and stop thinking about our struggle it will get you depressed.
cap28: He is absolutely brilliant my brother, very very intelligent yet humble. These are the sort of young black men that are needed in the community to educate and motivate the younger ones coming up. Thanks for posting those videos. The guy is a gem and his knowledge and intelligence is outstanding.
The problem is that most young black people worship people in media who are coons and sell outs We need to find a new definition of success.
cap28: Chuka Umunna is a token black puppet who does not represent the interests of the average black person in the UK so I don't see his appointment as a plus for black people in general.
When was the last time you heard Chuka Umunna addressing issues of inequality, discrimination and deaths of black men in police custody?
With regard to Nigerians running around in the UK - how many of them have good jobs? Majority do the jobs that british people don't want, actually thats one of the reasons why New Labour relaxed immigration laws as they need cheap labour to keep their economy ticking over.
You say that blacks should simply put up with institutionalised racism because the UK is not our country - it seems as if you've forgotten that Britain's wealth was built on the blood and sweat of slavery, colonialism and now immigrant labour, surely black people deserve to be treated as equals in a country which was built on the blood and sweat of their ancestors?
Anyway theres a black british guy i'd like you to listen to, you might know him his name is Akala - I have a lot of respect for him - see what you think:
You listen to Akala? This guy is my favorite rapper he is so smart. He changed my life listening to his music and watching his lectures, videos and interviews.
cap28: In order to get into power and hold onto power. I believe he now knows that if he adopts the same stance on economic policy that he had in 1983 he will be removed again by the west.
So who do we vie for? Want aristede in haiti overt thrown twice why can't he still do what he did before.
cap28: My worst suspicions have now been fully confirmed - Buhari has been given the seal of approval by one of the worlds worst war criminals - Tony Blair - that says it all - any Nigerian who expects anything different under the incoming Buhari regime needs to have a psychiatric assessment. I used to be a Buhari fan because I thought he was the same man that he was 30 years ago, now I realise he is just another sell out.
cap28: Bros the implications of buhari's actions are that he will remain in office for as long as he likes provided that he does as he is told
Naira vs. US Dollar
Africa Facts 157 : When the Naira (Nigerian currency) was stronger than the American Dollar in 1984. IMF (International Monetary Fund) asked then Nigerian Head of State Maj. General Muhammadu #BUHARI to devalue Nigeria's currency (Naira), he refused.
Few months Later he was toppled in a Palace coup by Gen. Ibrahim Babangida (US puppet) who later devalued the Naira using IMF and SAP (Structural Adjustment Programme).
please read this wikileaks document of 2003 after that tell me what you think might be going on in Nigeria concerning same Tinubu and US rooting for Buhari
We need to stop worrying about other Muslim countries, we need to care about Africans on the incontinent and the diaspora. ALso you know Buhari went to US war college for school? But duriing the 80s he did well as the leader of Nigeria. I would prefer him to GEJ
phe44u: God will save us no matter what they planned to do all i know is that Nigeria is passing through a difficult time now,but very soon we are going to overcome.
Why are we always waiting on god to save us? Can't we save ourselves?
The objectives of the US military presence in Africa are well documented: counter Chinese influence and control strategic locations and natural resources including oil reserves. This was confirmed more than 8 years ago by the US State Department:
In 2007, US State Department advisor Dr. J. Peter Pham commented on AFRICOM’s strategic objectives of “protecting access to hydrocarbons and other strategic resources which Africa has in abundance, a task which includes ensuring against the vulnerability of those natural riches and ensuring that no other interested third parties, such as China, India, Japan, or Russia, obtain monopolies or preferential treatment.” (Nile Bowie, CIA Covert Ops in Nigeria: Fertile Ground for US Sponsored Balkanization Global Research, 11 April 2012)
At the beginning of February, AFRICOM’s “head General David Rodriguez called for a large-scale US-led ‘counterinsurgency’ campaign against groups in West Africa during remarks at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, DC:
In similar remarks at a the US Army West Point academy last week, US Special Operations Command (SOCOM) chief General Joseph Votel said that US commando teams must prepare for new deployments against Boko Haram and the Islamic State. ” (Thomas Gaist, US AFRICOM Commander Calls for “Huge” Military Campaign in West Africa, World Socialist Web Site, February 02, 2015)
Mark P. Fancher highlighted the hypocrisy and the “imperialist arrogance” of western countries, which “notwithstanding the universal condemnation of colonialism”, are evermore willing “to publicly declare (without apologies) their plans to expand and coordinate their military presence in Africa.” (Mark P. Fancher, Arrogant Western Military Coordination and the New/Old Threat to Africa, Black Agenda Report, 4 February 2015)
Now more troops from Benin, Cameroon, Niger, Nigeria and Chad are being sent to fight against Boko Haram.
This new war on yet another shadowy terrorist entity in Africa is reminiscent of the failed Kony 2012 propaganda campaign cloaked in humanitarian ideals. It is used as a smoke screen to avoid addressing the issue of the victims of the war on terror, the real causes of terrorism and to justify another military invasion. It is true that Boko Haram makes victims, however the goal of Western intervention in Africa is not to come to their rescue.
The deadliest conflict in the world since the Second World War and still raging is happening in Congo and the Western elite and its media couldn’t care less. That alone shows that military interventions are not intended to save lives.
To understand why the media focuses on Boko Haram, we need to know what it is and who is behind it. What is the underlying context, what interests are being served?
Is Boko Haram another US clandestine operation?
Boko Haram is based in northeast Nigeria, the most populated country and largest economy in Africa. Nigeria is the largest oil producer of the continent with 3.4% of the World’s reserves of crude oil.
In May 2014, African Renaissance News published an in-depth report on Boko Haram, wondering whether it could be another CIA covert operation to take control of Nigeria:
[T]he greatest prize for AFRICOM and its goal to plant a PAX AMERICANA in Africa would be when it succeeds in the most strategic African country, NIGERIA. This is where the raging issue of BOKO HARAM and the widely reported prediction by the United States Intelligence Council on the disintegration of Nigeria by 2015 comes into perspective…(Atheling P Reginald Mavengira, “Humanitarian Intervention” in Nigeria: Is the Boko Haram Insurgency Another CIA Covert Operation? Wikileaks, African Renaissance News, May 08, 2014)
In the 70′s an 80′s Nigeria assisted several African countries “in clear opposition and defiance to the interests of the United States and its western allies which resulted in a setback for Western initiatives in Africa at the time.” (Ibid.)
Nigeria exerted its influence in the region through the leadership of the Economic Community of West African States Monitoring Group (ECOMOG, right), an army consisting of soldiers from various African countries and set up by the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and which intervened in the Liberian civil war in the 90′s. Liberia was founded in 1821 by the US and led by American-Liberians for over a century.
The Western powers, first and foremost the US, are obviously not willing to let Africans have a multinational army in which they have no leading role. ACRI, which later became Africom, was formed in 2000 to contain Nigeria’s influence and counter ECOMOG, thus avoiding the emergence of an African military force led by Africans.
According to Wikileaks reports mentioned in Mavengira’s article above, the US embassy in Nigeria serves as an
“operating base for wide and far reaching acts of subversion against Nigeriawhich include but [are] not limited to eavesdropping on Nigerian government communication, financial espionage on leading Nigerians, support and funding of subversive groups and insurgents, sponsoring of divisive propaganda among the disparate groups of Nigeria and the use of visa blackmail to induce and coerce high ranking Nigerians into acting in favour of US interests.” (Mavengira, op., cit., emphasis added)
Mavengira is part of the GREENWHITE Coalition, “a citizen’s volunteer watchdog made up of Nigerians of all ethnic groups and religious persuasions.” He writes that the ultimate goal of the American clandestine operations in his country is “to eliminate Nigeria as a potential strategic rival to the US in the African continent.” (Ibid.)
An investigation into Boko Haram by the Greenwhite Coalition revealed that the “Boko Haram campaign is a covert operation organized by the American Central Intelligence Agency, CIA and coordinated by the American Embassy in Nigeria.” The U.S has used its embassy for covert operations before. The one in Benghazi was proven to be a base for a covert gun-running operation to arm the mercenaries fighting against Bashar Al-Assad in Syria. As for the embassy in Ukraine, a video from November 2013 emerged recently showing a Ukrainian parliamentarian exposing it as the central point of yet another clandestine operation designed to foment civil unrest and overthrow the democratically-elected government.
The Greenwhite Coalition report on Boko Haram reveals a three stage plan of the National Intelligence Council of the United States to “Pakistanize” Nigeria, internationalize the crisis and divide the country under a UN mandate and occupying force. The plan “predicts” Nigeria’s disintegration for 2015. It is worth quoting at length:
The whole [National Intelligence Council] report actually is a coded statement of intentions on how [by] using destabilization plots the US plans to eventually dismember Nigeria […]
Stage 1: Pakistanizing Nigeria
With the scourge of Boko Haram as an existential reality, in the coming months the spate of bombings and attacks on public buildings are likely to escalate.
The goal is to exacerbate tension and mutual suspicion among adherents of the two faiths in Nigeria and leading to sectarian violence [...]
Stage 2: Internationalizing the Crisis
[T]here will be calls from the United States, European Union and United Nations for a halt to the violence. [...] For effect, there will be carpet bombing coverage by the International media on the Nigerian crisis with so-called experts discussing all the ramifications who will strive to create the impression that only benevolent foreign intervention could resolve the crisis.
Stage 3: The Great Carve out under UN Mandate
There will be proposals first for an international peace keeping force to intervene and separate the warring groups and or for a UN mandate for various parts of Nigeria to come under mandated occupying powers. Of course behind the scenes the US and its allies would have secretly worked out which areas of Nigeria to occupy guided as it were by naked economic interests […] (Ibid., emphasis added)
In 2012, Nile Bowie wrote:
The Nigerian Tribune has reported that Boko Haram receives funding from different groups from Saudi Arabia and the UK, specifically from the Al-Muntada Trust Fund, headquartered in the United Kingdom and Saudi Arabia’s Islamic World Society [8]. During an interview conducted by Al-Jazeera with Abu Mousab Abdel Wadoud, the AQIM leader states that Algeria-based organizations have provided arms to Nigeria’s Boko Haram movement “to defend Muslims in Nigeria and stop the advance of a minority of Crusaders” [9].
It remains highly documented that members of Al-Qaeda (AQIM) and the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) who fought among the Libyan rebels directly received arms [10] and logistical support [11] from NATO bloc countries during the Libyan conflict in 2011[...]
Image: Abdelhakim Belhadj, rebel leader during the 2011 war in Libya and former commander of the Al-Qaeda-linked Libyan Islamic Fighting Group.
As covertly supporting terrorist organizations to achieve foreign policy aims appears to be the commanding prerequisite of foreign policy operations under the Obama Administration, Boko Haram exists as a separate arm of the US destabilization apparatus, aimed at shattering Africa’s most populous nation and biggest potential market. (Nile Bowie, CIA Covert Ops in Nigeria: Fertile Ground for US Sponsored Balkanization Global Research, 11 April 2012)
Reports also indicate that some Nigerian commanders may be involved in fuelling the insurgency.
According to the report, a Nigerian soldier in Borno state confirmed that Boko Haram attacked Gamboru Ngala in their presence but their commander asked them not to repel the attack. The soldier told BBC Hausa Service that choppers hovered in the air while the attacks were ongoing. 300 people were killed, houses and a market burnt while soldiers watched and were ordered not to render assistance to those being attacked. The soldier said that the Boko Haram insurgency will end when superior officers in the army cease to fuel it.
At the abductions of Chibok girls, one soldier in an interview told SaharaReporters,
“…we were ordered to arrest vehicles carrying the girls but just as we started the mission, another order was issued that we should pull back. I can assure you, nobody gave us any directives to look for anybody.”
Some soldiers suspect that their commanders reveal military operations to the Boko Haram sect. (Audu Liberty Oseni, Who is Protecting Boko Haram. Is the Nigerian Government involved in a Conspiracy?, africanexecutive.com, May 28, 2014)
Could it be that these commanders have been coerced by elements in the U.S. embassy, as suggested by the aforementioned Greewhite Coalition investigation?
Boko Haram: The next chapter in the fraudulent, costly, destructive and murderous war on terror?
It has been clearly demonstrated that the so-called war on terror has increased terrorism. As Nick Turse explained:
[Ten] years after Washington began pouring taxpayer dollars into counterterrorism and stability efforts across Africa and its forces first began operating from Camp Lemonnier [Djibouti], the continent has experienced profound changes, just not those the U.S. sought. The University of Birmingham’s Berny Sèbe ticks off post-revolutionary Libya, the collapse of Mali, the rise of Boko Haram in Nigeria, the coup in the Central African Republic, and violence in Africa’s Great Lakes region as evidence of increasing volatility. “The continent is certainly more unstable today than it was in the early 2000s, when the U.S. started to intervene more directly,” he told me. (Nick Turse, The Terror Diaspora: The U.S. Military and Obama’s Scramble for Africa, Tom Dispatch, June 18, 2013)
What exactly does the U.S. seek in Africa?
When it comes to overseas interventions, decades of history have shown that the stated intents of the U.S. Army are never its real intents. The real intent is never to save humans, but always to save profits and power. US-NATO interventions do not save. They kill.
US-led interventions since the beginning of the century have killed hundreds of thousands, if not over a million innocent people. It’s hard to tell because NATO does not really want to know how many civilians it kills. As The Guardian noted in August 2011, except for a brief period, there was “no high-profile international project dedicated to recording deaths in the Libya conflict”.
In February 2014, “at least 21,000 civilians [were] estimated to have died violent deaths as a result of the war” in Afghanistan according to Cost of War. As for Iraq, by May 2014 “at least 133,000 civilians [were] killed by direct violence since the invasion.”
As for Libya, the mainstream media first lied about the fact that Gaddafi initiated the violence by attacking peaceful protesters, a false narrative intended to demonize Gaddafi and galvanize public opinion in favour of yet another military intervention. As the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs reported, “violence was actually initiated by the protesters.”
It stated further:
The government responded to the rebels militarily but never intentionally targeted civilians or resorted to “indiscriminate” force, as Western media claimed […]
The biggest misconception about NATO’s intervention is that it saved lives and benefited Libya and its neighbors. In reality, when NATO intervened in mid-March 2011, Qaddafi already had regained control of most of Libya, while the rebels were retreating rapidly toward Egypt. Thus, the conflict was about to end, barely six weeks after it started, at a toll of about 1,000 dead, including soldiers, rebels, and civilians caught in the crossfire. By intervening, NATO enabled the rebels to resume their attack, which prolonged the war for another seven months and caused at least 7,000 more deaths. (Alan Kuperman, Lessons from Libya: How Not to Intervene, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, September 2013)
Despite these figures, the media will once again try to convince us that what the world needs most at the moment is to get rid of the terrorist group Boko Haram and that a military intervention is the only solution, even though the so-called war on terror has actually increased terrorism globally. As Washington’s Blog pointed out in 2013, “global terrorism had been falling from 1992 until 2004… but has been skyrocketing since 2004.”
The Guardian reported back in November 2014:
The Global Terrorism Index recorded almost 18,000 deaths last year, a jump of about 60% over the previous year. Four groups were responsible for most of them: Islamic State (Isis) in Iraq and Syria; Boko Haram in Nigeria; the Taliban in Afghanistan; and al-Qaida in various parts of the world. (Ewen MacAskill, Fivefold increase in terrorism fatalities since 9/11, says report, The Guardian, November, 18, 2014)
What the Guardian fails to mention is that all these groups, including Boko Haram and the Islamic State, have been, in one way or another, armed, trained and financed by the US-NATO alliance and their allies in the Middle East.
Thanks to the covert support of Western countries, arms dealers and bankers profiting from killing and destruction, the war on terror is alive and well. The West advocates for endless military interventions, pretending to ignore the real causes of terrorism and the reason why it expands, hiding its role in it and thereby clearly showing its real intent: fuelling terrorism to destabilize and destroy nations, thus justifying military invasion and achieving their conquest of the African continent’s richest lands under the pretext of saving the world from terror.
Since when is Nigeria colonized by America. WHy do we celebrate American holidays, do Jewish people celebrate German holidays? Do Armenians celebrate Turkish holidays? Do Arabs celebrate Israeli holidays?
US Africa Command (AFRICOM) head General David Rodriguez called for a large-scale US-led “counterinsurgency” campaign against groups in West Africa during remarks at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, DC last week.
Rodriguez’s statements are part of a coordinated campaign by the US to massively expand its military operations in the resource-rich region, as it combats the influence of China and other powers.
The US should prepare for operations in at least four West African countries as part of a “huge international and multinational” response aimed at forces affiliated with Boko Haram, Rodriguez said.
AFRICOM is already preparing an “across the board response to the threat,” Rodriguez said.
Echoing recent comments from US Secretary of State John Kerry during his visit to Lagos, Nigera that the US is ready to “do more” militarily in Nigeria, Rodriguez called on the Nigerian government to “let us help more and more.”
In similar remarks at a the US Army West Point academy last week, US Special Operations Command (SOCOM) chief General Joseph Votel said that US commando teams must prepare for new deployments against Boko Haram and the Islamic State.
“[Boko Haram] is creating fertile ground for expansion into other areas,” Votel said.
“While it isn’t a direct threat to the homeland, it is impacting indirectly our interests in this particular area and creating another area of instability,” the top US special forces officer said.
Votel warned that radical Islamic groups are gaining tens of thousands of new fighters.
Votel cited ongoing SOCOM operations in the Philippines, begun in 2002, as a model for how US commandos can project US power by building relations with allied militaries. Votel will travel to Norway in early February to talk with NATO allies about US war preparations, including new military operations in the Arctic directed against Russia, according to Defense News .
Rodriguez and Votel’s statements coincided with plans announced by the African Union last week to deploy a 7,500-strong multinational force in the name of fighting Boko Haram and “other extremist groups.”
The AU multinational force will serve as the vehicle for further infiltration of US forces into West Africa, while providing support for and legitimizing the already significant US military presence in the strategically crucial, resource region. The intervention will proceed amidst elaborate war game exercises led by US Special Operations Command (SOCOM), known as Operation Flintlock, to be coordinated with a number of West African and European militaries beginning in mid-February.
US Congressional leaders are also pushing for a new war in Nigeria and the surrounding region. Chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee Ed Royce was scheduled to meet with the Nigerian ambassador to the US today, Ade Adefuye, known to be a strong advocate of US military intervention in Nigeria, according to Nigeria’s the Guardian.
Representatives Patrick Meehan and Peter King demanded that the US implement “a comprehensive strategy to address Boko Haram’s growing lethality” in letters to Secretary Kerry posted in mid-January.
The Obama administration is also preparing to approve the sale of Cobra jet fighters to Nigerian government, according to the Guardian.
Last week, Chadian jet fighters and ground troops launched cross-border attacks against the Nigerian towns of Gamboru, Kolfata and Malumfatori, reportedly driving Boko Haram fighters out of the area. Boko Haram launched repeated assaults against northern capital of Maiduguri, home to some 2 million residents, reportedly utilizing heavy weapons including RPGs and artillery. The Nigerian military claims that hundreds of Boko Haram fighters were killed during the attacks.
South African mercenaries are fighting alongside Nigerian troops against the militants, according to reports late this week.
GenBuhari: My friend use your logic a little bit. Why bomb a rag tag bunch of militants?
BH is creation of imperialists to destabilize Nigeria, so they may break us up. The urgency at this time is that they fear Buhari may gain power and scupper their plan.
The elections are unlikely to hold as scheduled unless Nigerians wakeup to their game.
The bombings are clearing Nigerian territory to be taken over by French puppets Chad & Cameroon
Keep calling it a conspiracy theory until you see the blood of your family and friend s flowing on the streets.
Most Africans are brainwashed and don't want to know the truth. WHen you give it to them in plain sight they call you cospiracy theorist. We need to start having Pan African news stations so we can wake up!! Read this news.
Swizdoe: Maybe its safe to say france is also behind al-shabbab because they want somalia too and al-qaeda islamic maghreb in mali and northern africa and even ISIS in far away middle east....... Rubbish France have got better things to worry about than this trash
France is all over Africa, has been for 500 years.
Materialism, consumerism, conspicuous consumption. Africans love everything European.. the cars, shoes, lifestyle, house, everyhing.. Your oppressor is your master, you standard, your ideal.
Horus: The same AFP international news outlet who lied by claiming that Saddam Hussein got weapons of mass destruction? , yeah riight! I believe you. . Same reportage when they bombed the same Nigerian town of Gamboru on the same day. The Chadians will not use outdated transport helicopters when they can use their MiG-29s fighter jets. (below)
thoth: Not really, i came down for the election. I am just intent on observing. it's preparations, execution and the post-election processes. After that i am done.
Stay safe brother . I really love your posts and the way you think. There are not many people of African descent who think like you. It is hard to find and quite disheartening. You need to stay alive and spread your message to more people.
Let the ancestors bless you brother, you are a warrior in the information and knowledge battle.
thoth: i don't even have a voters card,and i am not preparing to vote for anybody, i am rather preoccupied with things that matters to me at the moment. if you ask me they are ready to make a soup pie of the country.
PS: I hate Jonathan with passion.
Are you going to leave before elections to be safe?
thoth: I don't want to say things you would ask me to prove, not that i can't provide a proof but that i wouldn't want to. However there are questions Policy Makers asks themselves when weighing a decision and the options which provides the least loss gets chosen.
Buhari lacks vision for the whole nation and is only concerned about the north, this particular trait on its own is a recipe for disaster in Nigeria in its current state, something the imperialist knew very well and ready to exploit. APC is an imperialist(foreign backed and controlled) party. The amount of borrowings and the massive privatization carried out in those states governed by APC is a perfect mirror of Western economic directives .They literally owe billions of dollars in debt. You should carefully look at the debts owed by APC governed states,the institution which they owe these debts, what infrastructure is still left at the hands of the states they govern,their anti mass and pro capital ideology present a certain belief that the government hates the poor, the implication of this fact will be further explained below. Buhari’s aversion to parasitic international banking cartels that are hell bent on destroying Africa (IMF/World Bank) and the coziness of previous and present APC candidates towards same imperialist institutions represents a dangerous case of conflict of interest which could only lead to difficulties in implementing social policies, such delays would only serve the interests of our foreign enemies in further confusing, dividing and incapacitating the Nigerian government thereby achieving an all round failure as a nation. Again this is not the main fear but a pointer to existence of a more dangerous situation. Buhari is anti-elitist with a socialist leaning, APC candidates previous and present(except BUHARI) are strongly pro-elitist with a lassie affair strong neoliberals stand, in this condition every national security apparatus that is worthy of that title will always come to several conclusions none which bodes well for Nigeria as a unified entity. A few of these outcomes can listed as. Buhari will win but will not serve his full tenure as the president which will then result in the breakup of Nigeria and civil war: with the western imperialist prediction that Nigeria will breakup by 2015 in mind, and the subsequent appearance of terrorism in the form of Bokoharam, the heightened tribal sentiments that sorrounds Nigerian politics, If Buhari wins the presidential election, the CIA might choose to assassinate him in order to have the north interpret it as a ploy by the southern Nigerians to deny them a position that they won free and fair, violence will follow which enemy agents whom are expecting such outcomes will fan and support with weapons,logistics and diplomatic support and raise it to a full blown civil war. GEJ’s stupid decisions to allow foreign security agents into the nations security apparatus has given the enemies the opportunities to recruit as much insiders as possible making it easier to assassinate any president in office and incapacitate the national security’s efforts to contain the violence that follows. APC candidates are few whom has not blown their cover as western puppets. Can we sincerely ask what happens if Buhari gets assassinated ? I came back to Nigeria in August and has remained till now, i can tell you that the situation in the nation itself is not reflected neither in the news or in the net and i really wonder why, there is a sort of ripe tension in the atmosphere, all the Hausa guys in the east are going back North since early January and many Southerners in the north are coming down South ,this has never been witnessed before in the history of Nigeria, such ripe fear and expectation of disaster ready to be plucked by any "socially Aware" enemy nation with a functioning Psy-Ops team. The callousness by which the politicians go about their business irrespective of what is going on is bone chilling. The Mallam that guards my house just informed me he will be leaving on the 8th of next month, i never bothered to ask him why.
The truth is that it does not matter anymore whom we vote for, the country would never survive 4 more years of democracy. The USA refused to classify Boko Haram as a terrorist organization why ? Could it be that they hope to support them tomorrow as was the case of Libya ? When the mayhem starts Boko Haram being the only group with western support can easily rally the whole north and become the arrowhead. I am in no mood to write actually, i guess what i have written might not make much sense, between keeping some information to myself and trying to make a point i guess that's much i can give.
Keep on writing, you should make blog and get your information out to more people. Also are you pro Goodluck and PDP? If you don't like PDP or APC who do you vote for?
Politics › Re: Buhari In London, With Tony Blair, Saraki & Amosun by igbo2011(m): 12:53am On Feb 23, 2015
