₦airaland Forum

This is from a US ally.
I said it when he was elected. The damage Trump will do to the US will be incalculable and won't be be able to be repaired in generations.
He wanted the Nobel Peace prize but will most likely be known as the US President who set off a global arms race.
The times we are living. Unbelievable.

Hey Raumdeuter, come and defend your demented GOD.
Tell us all how this is not crazy and blah blah blah

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/19/donald-trump-greenland-threats-nobel-prize-snub-letter

House should start impeachment hearings tomorrow. Or the cabinet should vote on the 25th amendment.
This is a Mad King moment.
Republican Congresspeople as well as the Conservatives on the Supreme Court should be ashamed of themselves.

This is Raumdueter's idol.

raumdeuter:
All you know about a family is a father playing WWE with his wife

So you can sit it out when the topic is about family

And yet, you seem to be the one defending pdf files, rapists, murderers and racists.
Great father figure you are.
Well done!

Imagine someone like you talking about someone else's values... Do you even know what that word is?

raumdeuter:
You will be qualified to talk about children when you have one of your own

I don't need one to know that a 15 yo girl is a child and a grown man shouldn't be talking about "tear rubber" in relation to them.

What's insane is that you think being a terrible human begin as a father is better than not being a father.
Spend less time on this forum defending Trump and more time figuring out why you are a terrible person.

raumdeuter:
Do you think someone who watched his dad turn his mom into a football kicking her at will will know what a good home will be like?

You keep talking about my dad while YOU are running around sexualizing teenagers and defending pdf file racists and murderous cops.
You should think deep about what VALUES YOU have and what values YOU will be leaving your children.

raumdeuter:
What would you know about wonderful homes given how you grew up

Do you think someone who writes post like this knows anything about a "good" home?

dayokanu:
If you are 30 then tia is not older than you. and she has the mileage of a 15-16yr old almost cha-cha tear rubber
Funmi I am not sure, she didnt have a boyfriend as at May this year but I dont know now, But the girl set die.
Why are you pitying yourself love?

Kaczynski:
Typical democrat always looking for a way to blame it on either trump or republican.

Trump takes someone's Nobel Peace Prize.
This momo wonders why people are blaming Trump.
Should I have found a way to fit Clinton into it?

raumdeuter:
You will know something about wonderful homes

Won't you

I know something about seeing something wrong and calling it out no matter the cost to me.
Seems like something you never learned that's why you spend your days being a sycophant to a pdf file, racist, megalomaniac.

Trump took a Nobel Peace Prize from someone else.
Let's not even get into the stolen valour.
What type of normal person would do that?
Is he going to hang it up and look at it?
And what did you say about that?

The good thing about Trump is he reveals people's characters.
Your character is clear - someone capable of defending pdf filers and murderers.

Obrigardo:
basilico said he judges pdof trump by his character lol
You must have very very bad eyesight
You didn't see the corruptions at least?

Well F here, f hate it here

I've been there with this thread.
You have to block Basilico at a minimum.
His posts add 0 value, but reading them will make you disgusted that there are people alive like him.

bayelsaowei:
No point my bro..

If someone cant see that Trump is vile, then I cant really help that person..

The scriptures say "bad association spoils good habits"

A lot of my nigerian brothers are almost turning vile by blindly following Trump..

Folks who grew up from wonderful homes and families almost turning vile because of a moronic white man somewhere, who doesnt give a hoot about them.

Did they really come from "wonderful homes"?

DeepSight:
+
You know this incident proves Trump was right when he said he could shoot a person dead on 5th Avenue and his supporters would still support him.

Yup, people in this thread would be rationalizing why the person had to be shot.

bayelsaowei:


You are shocked??

Trump is yet to shock the whole world..

He is yet to do the most disgusting thing

I guess I feel if I'm not shocked then I've accepted the absurdity of where the US is right now.

When is the US going to speak more forcefully about this level of corruption.

bayelsaowei:
Even if he himself is shot by one of US MC Oluomos men, he'd continue to support their actions..

He is a finished person..

Raumdeuteur is a thoroughly finished person.

Fortunately, US courts do a good job of weeding out finished people from their juries.
Reason why Trump and co won't take this to trial and most of Trump and co's other cases have failed in court.

raumdeuter:
The ICE officer who shot Renee saw a threat Renee and a car bearing on him after multiple warning to get out of the car, He knew if she ran over him with a 4,000 Pounds car he stood no chance, he warned Renee to get out of the car which she refused instead beared towards him and he shot the driver of the car to save his life. Using his head, instinct and training to save his life

Because murdering the driver is what stopped the car and allowed him to get out of the way.
Jesus.

This is your Brain on MAGA!

raumdeuter:
Why your point is braindead and stuuupid is because the officer never shot at her when she was not moving nor when she was reversing even though she was disobeying him

He shot at her when she moved towards him

What did the officer who shot Ashli Babbit see to justify his shooting?

Use of deadly force is intended to neutralize imminent threats. You still don't seem to grasp that.
What was the threat the officer was intending to naturalize. And would a gun have neutralized that threat?
That is the reason you aren't supposed to shoot at moving vehicles at is generally serves little purpose.

The officer who shot Ashley Babbit, saw a threat(mob of insurrectionists bearing down on him), retreated as far as he could go (barricaded himself and his protectees in a space) and knew that if anyone breached that space they were in mortal danger. So, he warned Babbitt multiple times to stop and then used the means to him to neutralize that threat (her advance and breach of a space he was protecting). He used his head and training.

The murderer you are defending put himself in harm's way by standing in front of a car, didn't retreat and used force that wasn't designed to stop whatever threat he thought he saw as it couldn't have stopped it.
Instead of using his head and training to move out of the way, he fired shots killing someone. (How much time and effort did it take for him to draw his weapon and try to shoot instead of moving out of the way?)

Any halfway intelligent person would understand the differences.
You are the common breed in this thread, of being not bright, a prolific liar and immoral to boot.

Keep on defending murder.
I'm sure tomorrow you'll be running your mouth about being a Christian.

Just to be clear, the argument Raumdeuter seems to be making is that the purpose of this officer shooting at a car wasn't to stop the threat (as it wouldn't have), but to punish(kill) the person driving because the officer believed they attempted to threaten them with it.

That is MURDER.
And that is UnAmerican

Raumdeuter, you have been arguing for Murder for the last few pages.
It shows what type of person you are and what type of people MAGA are.

raumdeuter:
I asked AI if an officer can shoot at a car and it says

This is why education is important

Holy Sh*t, this guy said education is important and then followed up to post something he clearly didn't read.

Again, what is the point of shooting at a car you can't stop with bullets?
Answer that question and you'll understand how ridiculous anything and everything else that comes out of your mouth is.

Your mind seems to be impenetrable to facts that don't' align with what you believe.
Unless you are 90, that is a dangerous way to live.

MAGA Minds.

Raumdeuter: The officer shot at the vehicle to stop it from hitting him.
Facts: At a close distance a bullet won't stop a vehicle from hitting you. He should have focused on getting out of the way.
Raumdeuter: The officer was smart and not emotional as he shot the vehicle to stop it from hitting him.

Tales from a #MAGAMIND

raumdeuter:
The officer did not shoot at her she her car was stationary
The officer did not shoot at her when she was reversing
The officer hot at her when she moved her car towards him

Repeat this 1000 times maybe you will finally understand some logic

I asked AI if shooting at a moving car would stop it.
This is its response.
Didn't even take AI to understand this, just a high school education.
That's why people defending it are generally High School dropouts.

raumdeuter:
The officer did not shoot at her she her car was stationary
The officer did not shoot at her when she was reversing
The officer hot at her when she moved her car towards him

Repeat this 1000 times maybe you will finally understand some logic

Holy Sh*t.
This is insane.
Do you even know what you are are arguing anymore?
The officer shot at her to do what? To do something he was trained to know wouldn't do what he supposedly intended (stop the vehicle).

Emotional Nigerian Men.

Let's try this again.
Write this 100x times and maybe you'll begin to understand.

The officer was trained to know that shooting at a moving car/driver at that distance would not stop the car from hitting him at that distance. It is not the movies.
The officer was trained to know that shooting at a moving car/driver at that distance would not stop the car from hitting him at that distance. It is not the movies.
The officer was trained to know that shooting at a moving car/driver at that distance would not stop the car from hitting him at that distance. It is not the movies.

cococandy:
He’s actually worse than a slow child 😞

What type of person would not be embarrassed by that?
He is what the world sees and understands about the US now.
Would anyone have a friend like that?

cococandy:
Him and that one called ibeokehie. Agbayas talking out of their bums. Then claiming their xtupid stances are not based on emotions

What they do in this thread, is just emotional rantings.
They feel a way and try to contort reality to that feeling.

raumdeuter:
When you are in front of a car, you do anything to stop the driver who is intent on hitting you
It takes having a brain to know that.

It's like facts don't enter your mind.
You would do anything except the thing that will stop the car from hitting you (getting out of the way).

Let's try this.
Type this 100 times on your computer

The officer was trained to know that shooting at a moving car/driver at that distance would not stop the car from hitting him at that distance. It is not the movies.
The officer was trained to know that shooting at a moving car/driver at that distance would not stop the car from hitting him at that distance. It is not the movies.
The officer was trained to know that shooting at a moving car/driver at that distance would not stop the car from hitting him at that distance. It is not the movies.

It's a sign of mental illness to have facts and still not internalize them.
Pure mental illness

This is Raumdeuter's Pappi
What type of insecure demented person would ever accept someone's Nobel Peace prize?

Raumdeuter would be in the middle of a train track with a train coming at him full speed and would pull out a gun to shoot the train and try to stop it instead of trying to jump out of the way.
#MAGAmind

raumdeuter:
This superhuman patience and ability to endure a car headon collision that you expect this ICE officer to endure, Are you able to do it?

You have rarely ever had to take a decision before so you can sit in the comfort of your moms basement and speculate

I always thought you were a science person, but your posts are littered with illiterate, non-educated, non-logical nonsense.

Listen.
1.) Shooting any car at that range would not stop it from hitting you at that range.
2.) So him shooting the car would have had 0 effect on him enduring/avoiding a head on collision.
Again, whether he shot the driver/car or not, the car would have not deviated from its position at that distance.
3.) What would have saved his life if she meant to hit him was getting out of the path of the car. Something he seemed to ut secondary to shooting the car. Most likely because he wasn't in the path.

You are celebrating him doing something (shooting a car) that had 0 effect on his survival if the car were aimed at him at that distance.
You know that and yet keep repeating it.

You seemed to have surrendered what was left of your mind to be a sycophant.

bayelsaowei:
If that woman really wanted to ram him to death the ICE agent would barely have had the chance to pull out his gun, let alone fire a shot.

DHS should provide that man before a court and let his innocence be tested objectively..

One day that ICE tout would be either pronounced innocent or guilty by a court..its just a matter of time..

Absolute Truth.
At that distance, she would have hit him if that were her intent.
And shooting the car wouldn't do anything.. physics and all.

That's why they won't allow an investigation and are instead spending time propagandizing.

raumdeuter:
He was trained to defend himself when his life looks to be in danger which is why he shot when the car came forward towards him

LOl @ being trained to defend himself by firing shots at a moving vehicle instead of getting out of the way.
He said "Let me do the one thing that won't stop this threat".
And Raumdeuter is like "Hell Yeah". See, he's well trained.

Logic for MAGA
God, ur a gold mine of absolute ridiculous nonsense.

raumdeuter:
He saw a threat and a weapon moving towards him and his instinct is to stop that car by stopping the driver

Instead of using emotions to claim he wanted to kill the woman, he would not have waited until she moved the car toward him

LOL @ trying to give a man a prize for poor instincts.
What's worse is that you are trumping his bad instincts to rationalize the fact he did what he wasn't trained to do, was in fact trained the opposite to do and so wasn't supposed to and murdered someone in the process.

Raumdeuter doing the sycophant dance, rationalizing the indefensible

raumdeuter:
He saw a threat and a weapon moving towards him and his instinct is to stop that car by stopping the driver

Instead of using emotions to claim he wanted to kill the woman, he would not have waited until she moved the car toward him

Oga, you might want to go read the definition of EMOTION.

Emotions are still shooting at a car you can't stop by shooting at it.
Emotions are not using/remembering your training and jumping out of the way of a car coming toward you because you know shooting at it will not stop it from hitting you.

Emotions are what you do each and everyday in this thread.
Writing nonsensical posts that are defied by facts and critical thinking.