₦airaland Forum

Ibime:
Spambot done do me strong thing

Anyway, Ijebos, you can keep me out of your neurotic streams of consciousness. Nothing consine me with the gunk in your mind

It is fêêmale traits to keep butting into other people's conversation uninvited. You can Google Jay Z lyrics on Heart of the City for the reference, and put MAGA hat on him.

I no fit talk more before Spambot carry me go Sanko again

Ask yourself why every time you need to insult someone you compare them to a woman.
My man's quoting rap as an authority.
Jesus christ.

The Vibe War
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/trump-iran-attack-no-intel-nuclear-1235369641/

Ibime:
Biden struck Yemen in January 2025. You have been here on this platform expressing the things you hold dearly

So why didn't we hear from you in January 2025?

LAMBA

"You’re criticizing the company for allowing the oil spill to happen, but what about that time I saw you litter at the park.”

Ibime:
Great for that woman. Don't think cos I support defanging an enemy of every Western value I hold, I am suddenly a MAGA. Your emotions have started making you talk to the voices in your head.

Well, what you chose to be insults, soyboy and "women traits" show a predilection towards misogyny.
A soyboy is not a real man right?
And only real men want to fight wars.
Here we have a women who is most definitely not a man flying a B-2 bomber dropping bombs on people.
So by your analysis she must have got her job by DEI because she's not a real man and only real men can do real man things like flying planes.

MAGA is an ideology predicated on things like spoken misogyny and dictatorial/autocratic beliefs. Things you have been trumpeting in your recent posts.
Might of as well don the red cap.

Ibime tell me, was this woman "man" enough to fly this mission or is this DEI?

Ibime:
Try not be jumping in other people's conversations uninvited. It's a feminine trait

Please point me to your outrage over Congressional approval when Biden struck Yemen

Congress has powers to declare war, not to approve every strike

You think if soldiers spot an enemy or opportunity somewhere, they will be waiting to put a call through for Congress to debate the matter for 2 weeks while the enemy slips away?

A little sensitive there huh? I won't go down your path of misogyny.
Go rest. You're too old to be sounding like Bemeruca.

Might want to go over the US Constitution or the War Powers Act before speaking on things you have no clue.
As to the example, Yes, that's the point of both.
It gives the President leeway for quick retaliatory strikes under imminent circumstances yet forces him to seek Congressional Approval for things that may take us to war that aren't imminent.
Bombing Iran's Nuclear facilities because they may make Nuclear weapons one day when our own Intelligence Agencies say they don't want Nuclear weapons is not an imminent threat.
I'm sure you'll start arguing what imminent means next.
And the deliberation is the point as it is necessary to allow time for the case to be tested if we are to commit young men to die.
But ey, it's easier when soldiers can respawn in those video games you play.

Just admit you just like dictatorships with leaders that align to your views or go back to talking about soyboys.
Because this fact based reasoning thing isn't your strong suit.

Ibime:
You want loud mouth congress to be debating strike on nuclear site so the enemy can be following and lose element of surprise

Haven't you just made his point?
Either you agree with how a democracy runs or you don't.
You seem to prefer autocratic dictatorial rule where one man makes his decision to go to war on vibes.

In a democracy we don't sacrifice the rule of law, debate and the Constitution for expediency.

AmazonTopaz:
It didn't become a formal political ideology until the 1960s but I argue that it ended World War 2 and the Cold War.

I don't even need it to work. I need it to deter mad people who aim to destroy Democracies and don't embrace Liberal ideals on Human rights etc.

I think it's giving it too much credit for WW2 and the Cold War.
But I don't only think it doesn't work, I think it has the opposite effects.

People will fight for what they want, propping up a government doesn't do that.
Look at Iraq and Afghanistan.
What we can do is show those people a different way to live and allow them to choose it.

Look at 9/11. Do you really think Bin Laden attacked the US because of our "freedoms"?
No, it was because of US intervention in the Middle East.
It's odd that Americans feel that we are the only ones who want self determination.

nateevs:
I already responded to Ibime on this same topic earlier today.

You will find in this instance that the hate for Iran trumps the needs to be democratic, until the need to be democratic actually affects us.

What Ibime has displayed to us here is the exact reason Trump won the elections. Just like the Hispanics voted to hurt other people (until it came full circle on them), the likes of Ibime are saying Trump is allowed to hurt other people, and I don't care if he's undemocratic about it.

You see A40 say, "I am anti-war but......"


You are either anti-war or you are not. If there's a but, it means your principles never got limit-tested.


The grand problem is with handing more power to the maniac (Trump) we are allowing to fight our "fights". This maniac does not understand boundaries of power. Whilst today it is the Arabians, tomorrow it will be the blacks. Then we would suddenly want him to be democratic.

Yeah, that's the frustrating and disappointing thing about reading Ibime.
You can't be for democracy and the rule of law only when it suits you.
Then it's no longer democracy or the rule of law.

Ted Cruz on the legality of what Trump did.
Oh, this was when it was a Dem President.

AmazonTopaz:
Since 2023, I have realized that I am a neoconservative when it comes fo foreign policy. I am very pro-West and I welcome criticisms of the West because of my liberal values however, I don't think the West should sit down and let the bad guys win.

I don't like the Iranian regime, I want a regime change. I hate Trump, MAGA, Netanyahu etc but I rather dine with them (God forbid) than with Iranian Mullahs and it's terroristic proxies across the globe.

I support calling out the hypocrisy of the West because they are big time hypocrites but I will tolerate that hypocrisy over a tyrannical, theocratic, authoritarian and radical Islamist regime holding onto power anywhere in the World and causing harm against Muslim women and women in general.

Thank you.

When and where has neoconservatism worked?

This is from the War Powers Act.
Trump broke the law on something as substantial as bombing Iran.
You can't be for the law only when you choose.

bemeruca:
☝️☝️☝️

The information above is most likely untrue and cannot be verified.

I hope this instantiate the obligatory method

BemerucaChatGpt at it again.
What is the probability you had ever heard the word "instantiate" before ChatGpt used it for you? I reckon 0%
Insecurity is a terrible thing.

cococandy:
People who have actually served in a military capacity or have family members in service are usually not this giddy/flippant about war. They know first hand what the potential consequences are.

I want the non-emotional-alpha-warmongers on this thread to go pick up weapons and fight this war that they so badly want our husbands and sons to die in. Since they are so brave and logical and we are not 🙄🙄

How would they warmonger if they had to actually face consequences by leaving the safe havens of their keyboards outside of the US and US interests.

During the Iraq War we had a long debate over it which Congress ultimately voted. Here Trump decided in about 1 week by himself to bomb Iran without Congress voting or even telling non Republican members of Congress. America is broken and is now dragging the world down with it. What message has China taken away from this if it ever wanted to bomb Taiwan?

Everything Trump does is not thought out.
But Ibime is safely chortling and giddy in the UK.

Ibime:
I'm in simpatico with Bemeruca and you are in sympatico with Tucker Carlson and Alex Jones

Just shows who is the middle on this issue and who is on the extreme

Yes in simpatico with a man who pretends to live in the US and uses ChatGPT to write his posts?
Glad you said it.

Yes and being on the side of Donald Trump says what?
Go rest. You clearly haven't thought this path through.

My Guy said Trump is in the middle.

Ibime:


Now he is saying Israel and Iran are the same

So he should pick the one where he can practice his Søyboy lifestyle in peace

20% of Israel is Muslim

The only disbarring element to not participating in Israel's democracy is genocidal sectarianism, but not covering your hair, being a Søybøy etc disbars you from participating in Irans. So he should pick a side, and we know he has already picked. FREE IRAN placard coming soon

At one point I thought you were a rational person.
People just be unmasking themselves.

He said soyboy... that you think because you're a keyboard warrior for a war you'll never face the consequences of makes you a man is depressing.
My guy go rest.
We have an epidemic of wanne be men who play at being a man.

At your big age you should probably be drinking soy milk as its less inflammatory.
But it's more expensive. And I guess being healthy is not manly... God.

No wonder you're in simpatico with Bemerca, your IQ's are closer together than I thought.

bemeruca:
Ibime, see how his emotions are making him write gibberish.

WTF is "US Black American rap Lyrics"?

You're like the Lindsey Graham of this thread.
Always clinging onto someone for validation.

First SlyFox, then Raumdeuter, now Ibime.

bemeruca:
Ibime, see how his emotions are making him write gibberish.

WTF is "US Black American rap Lyrics"?

Try: "Chatgpt, what is black American rap".
Might be hard for you to understand since you've never been to the US.

Ibime:
Don't worry, you will soon be holding up FREE IRAN placard. That's how you go from supporting democracies to supporting sectarian theocracies by tapping into emotions

Gaslighting and lying seems to be the only way people who support Israel can argue.
You can simply say you support Israel's apartheid state without saying I support Iran.
But to make your support of Israel palatable you have to compare it to Iran.

I think Israel and Iran are two sides of the same coin.

Israel is a democracy? For whom?
Do Arab citizens enjoy the same democracy as Jewish citizens?

I don't care about Iran.
I care that the US is promoting clear Evil in my name.
I also care that Trump is destroying the Democracy and putting US interests in harm's way at the behest of what should be a client state.

bemeruca:
Emotions are starting to manifest

<<Bemeruca: ChatGpt write this with more gravitas>>

bemeruca:
Maybe ChatGPT is behind this response too. You've got your offramp for losing an argument while trying to defend terrorists. I expect you to stick with it.

Imagine being so embarrassed of who you are you pretend to live in the US.
And imagine being so embarrassed of how bad your English is you turn to ChatGpt to write forum posts.

Clearly you've been losing your battle with the English language daily.

bemeruca:
Chat GPT wrote that? lol.
Which is why I said those are not my thoughts or opinions. Look for information, copy, paste, do one or two edits, and summarize, rephrase, etc.

Those were two drafts of what I wanted to share. I just forgot to delete one after rephrasing. But assuming it was ChatGPT doesn’t change anything.

The point is still clear. Israel bombed Iraq's Nuclear Program, and there was no war.

"I couldn't have used ChatGpt to write the post for me because I plagiarized it and copied and pasted it from someone online". -ChatGPTBemeruca

Should have asked ChatGpt to make up a better story for you.

cococandy:
Netanyahu also said Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. and we found out 3 trillion dollars in debt and 4.8k dead soldiers later that was a lie. Same play book by a blood thirsty old man.

Putin, Trump, Netanyahu etc.
Men at the end or almost at the end of their lives. They won’t have to live with the consequences of their actions in these coming decades. But they don’t mind upending the world for the future generations in their sick dick measuring contests.

It's a repeat of Netanyahu's greatest hit.
It seems the same party that fell for it last time would have learned their lesson this time.

cococandy:
Under Obama, We had a nuclear treaty with Iran that stipulated they were allowed to stop abiding by some of the nuclear restrictions if America breaks their side of the deal. We lift sanctions on them and they stop their nuclear activities.

Trump pulled us out of that treaty in 2018 because his jealousy of Obama knew no bounds. He was just out to dismantle everything Obama achieved in his presidency.

Trump IS THE REASON why this is happening. Just putting it out there so the dirty brainwashed liars don’t conflate the facts.

This. Imagine how hard the Republicans would be pushing this narrative if it were reversed. I remember seeing a chart a few days ago where you can see the Increase in Iranian enrichment after the ending of the deal.

It was a god deal understanding Iran is a sovereign country and if you want a sovereign country to do something you have to cut a deal with some incentives.

Ibime:
Please explain this to ijebos who couldn't control his emotions and tried to equate your Saudi journalist beheading as being equivalent to a journalist catching a stray bullet in warzone. You done mistakenly carry am go where he no know, nigga come dey dump all the gunk in his mind on me.

1.) A stray bullet indeed.

In the documentary, a former Biden administration official, whose voice is distorted to protect his identity, says a U.S. review initially concluded Abu Akleh's killing was intentional and that the soldier who fired the fatal shot would have been aware he was shooting at a journalist.
https://www.npr.org/2025/05/08/nx-s1-5384894/documentary-israeli-soldier-al-jazeera-journalist-shireen-abu-akleh

Intentionally bomb a US ship by plane and boat, friendly fire.
Intentionally kill a Journalist, stray bullet.
You seem incapable of not rationalizing everything Israel does. Generally that stems from an over-emotional connection.
You should figure where that bias comes from that you dehumanize yourself in service of a country you have no allegiance to.

2.) I ain't your nigga. The dictionary is vast. At your big age you should really try to use it. Calling people "Nigga" ain't it. You should know better.
Stop appropriating a culture you don't understand and pretending to be something you aren't.

All the rest is you losing an argument and crying.
Go cap for Israel some more.
Maybe they'll let you be a 2nd class citizen there.

Ibime:
Proof of deliberate shooting in the head sanctioned by the Israeli Government?

We all know it's either a stray bullet, or an individual soldier gone beserk

All you Søyboys know to do is get emotional about collateral damage and not concerned about deliberate and indiscriminate genocide sanctioned by Hamas and Iran

Beheading is a a deliberate act of bloodlust from someone who savours the murder. In order to equate Israel with the barbarous terrorists you support, you start lying accusing them of the same things the terrorists are known for, like beheadings

Soyboy? It's always funny how certain topics turn seemingly reasonable people into trolling internet tough guys.
If you can't win your argument without insulting people, it's probably because your argument is weak.
And you should stay on topics you have a chance on winning or failing less at.

But, you seem to be getting emotional about this.
You should take that energy and google Israel's history, complete with all their bombing campaigns and attacks on allies (King David Hotel bombing), attacks on US ships (USS Liberty), assassination attempts (Lord Moyne) and all the "individual soldiers" who "went berserk" and have killed Westernerners and innocent Palestinians.

You seem to be long on words and short on an actual understanding of the history of the country you cap for.
Do your research.