Ijebosb's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Ijebosb's Profile › Ijebosb's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 (of 58 pages)
bemeruca:Try to keep up, I know it's hard. Budaatum's posts are better because they are generally more reasoned, more informative and they bring perspective that I may not have had and lend the believe that he's researched them or thought through them. I don't always agree. But he at times makes illogical arguments to win. The opposite of reasoned. THis is what he is doing now. You can tell because he went from calling me racist, to then countryist, while using countryist wrong. Your posts on the other hand are trash. Not reasoned, not informative, not thought out. As if you turned your mind off and just regurgitated nonsense someone filled your ear with. Hope that brings some clarity to you. |
bemeruca:Most of what you, Basilico and Raum post is nonsensical tripe based on propaganda and emotions. It's clear you all had 3rd tier educations. You'd be schooled and made to look the bumbling fools you are in any circle I'm in. I guess it's easier when not so bright people like you three congregate together. You guys make each other feel smarter. Buda's posts are better as it seems he either reads more, is smarter or is better educated. But he's been making illogical arguments about this experience thing. And you can tell emotional arguments because they are illogical. And these emotional/illogical argument he's been making the last few days is because he can't emotionally accept the fact that you need experience on something to talk authentically about it. And to cap it off, he's using words such as countryist, he doesn't even understand the meaning of because he's so emotional. All he has to say, is you're right, I don't live in the US, so, I may not fully understand the culture. That would be it. But, he can't bring him to say something so logical and true. Because he has to be right. As to you. You're a lost cause. A degenerate. You literally spend your life here. In fact, you started lying about living in the US because I said you don't live in the US. That's not hurt and emotional? And to act like you just like to troll is BS as you've reported me and had me banned every time I called you an IDIOT. Every time. That seems like an emotional response to being insecure about your lack of intellect, No? When I have long been gone from here, you will still be here lying about living in the US. You're a purebred NUT. It's no surprise this thread is as trash as it is. People seem to like hearing themselves talk and so they repeat mis/disinformation they hear on right wing propaganda. And they like to talk around Americans as if that makes them superior to "other Nigerians". Why else devote so much time to a US thread, when the country you live in could use your support? What is the value of a thread if all it does is propagate misinformation? Well I guess people like you can't tell the difference. I don't care what you think of me. I came here to learn and discuss my ideas. Which is hard because this place is filled with bottom dwelling people like you and Basilico. So, if you think I'm an elitist jerk, don't give a fux. The strength of my argument is all that matters and you haven't been able to touch them. To that matter, what have you ever been right about? No wonder you've turned yourself into a Troll, I guess that's better than admitting you're not smart enough to engage in proper arguments. Lol. |
budaatum:From Racist to Countryist. Do you even know what a countryist is? Lol. Clearly you don't. budaatum:Interpreting, "you have to live somewhere to be able to understand it" to "get out of my country" is a nice logical leap. The same kind of thing Fox and co. are known for. Of course. Saying things over and over without any basis in fact of course makes it true. Yeah, that was sarcasm. The more you type the more you sound like Bemeruca. I guess hurt/emotional people all sound the same. As I said, I think it's clear you don't have any real convictions. You waffle when it's convenient to win arguments. Imagine, you've tried to call me a racist, now a countryist (though you don't seem to know what that means), next I'll be a sexist because I stated something obvious. |
budaatum:You must have forgotten, you're not in the US. So, even if I were white, I wouldn't be able to say that to you, would I? But this is a weird comment. The type of comment I'd expect from Fox and Oann. The type of comment that gives me a headache because it's filled more with grievance than logic. I think you've been watching those right wing echo chambers too often. Fyi, if you were in the US, you'd have a connection to the US, to be invested in it, right? If so, why would I care? But it does sound like something Raum would say and has says when I disagree with him. Maybe you can direct this comment to him instead. And it's not lost on me that you went to the extent of calling me a racist through some round about perverted logic. |
basilico:"I have no interest in the US", says the guy who spends 99% of his time on this forum in this US thread. The last guy, from this thread (Bemeruca), who said the same thing, pretended he moved to the US and still pretends he lives here. lol. Everyone in this thread who dedicates their lives to a country they don't live, should get a psych eval IMHO. #FactsOverFiction #BasilicoLyingAgainv #BasilicoIsALiar
|
budaatum:So you do get seem to get it. Except outside of topics regarding the US where you feel you can gain that knowledge just by blinking ur eyes three times. But your insecurity in all this is amusing. Like a child lashing out because he was told he was a child. Maybe you can dedicate another 10 posts to lashing out because I told you an immutable truth. |
bemeruca:I always left room for expertise based on intense study or knowledge. I give Budaatum that benefit of the doubt for the most part as he seems he does read, but once in a while he wades into areas he has no objective experience or expertise in, and doesn't acknowledge when that happens. You and Basilico on the other hand don't read or study anything and are intellectually lazy so I think much of what you post is Bullshit. |
budaatum:Maybe because you keep saying things like "buda's ego". I have a healthy ego which allows for the fact that I am not omniscient so there are things I don't know I don't know. budaatum:Again, It's a silly notion for anyone who lives in the US to believe someone would lie about that. People believe, only idiots don't get out of jury service. There is a financial cost as you have to be away from work for those days. If you are salaried you have to be paid, but if you work for yourself, it's a cost. They give you a $50 day stipend. My company pays me regardless. Most aren't willing to bear it. My neighbor did Grand Jury service I think it was for 1 or 2 months. He's retired though and wanted to get out of the house. How many people could do that? Could afford that if the work for themselves? budaatum:I don't care either way. I'm not one of those people who leads with it as most of my friends don't either. And I didn't lead with it here either. Your believe on that has 0 impact on my life. |
bemeruca:What the Bleep does this even mean? Is French only spoken in France? Wtf? Are you ok? They experienced the French language to learn the French language. Period! Speaking French does not mean you know anything about French culture. To go further, speaking French you learned on the computer does not mean you understand the cultural context in which to use certain words. How do I know.? I studied French in highshcool and my class did a trip to France, becasue the teacher thought it was important to do so . to 1.) have to be forced to speak it to get a better handle on it and 2.( to know how to effectively use the language. And she was right. I am convinced you don't understand the meaning of the words you use and you were also repeatedly dropped on your head as a child.. You idjit. |
bemeruca:The white men speaking your dialect were exposed to your dialect, Hence they experienced your dialect. Or did you think they woke up one day and just started speaking ur dialect. God, you're idjit. See Budaatum, this is the anti-intellectual Bullshit you are promoting with your emotional based screeds to make yourself feel better for not living in the US, yet assuming you know everything about it. Well done. |
budaatum:I don't give a shit what you question. Who are you to be questioning me? Let's keep it 100. The problem is that you have an emotional attachment to this argument. You don't live in the US, have never been to the US so you have to rationalize why you feel you have expert judgement on all things the US when all of Human hostory tells us to fully understand something you have to fully experience it. Now to Basilico. To preface this, Basilico doesn't live in the Us, lives in a country that doesn't use a jury system, doesn't really research and is prone to pulling ish out of his ass. So, when I say he doesn't understand US jury systems because he doesn't live in the US, it is based on my knowledge of Basilco such as the things I mentioned above. Yes, I use my brains to decipher people based on past interactions with them. Whereas in the US, every Tom, Dick and HArry, understands Jury duty. So, let's move onto your argument that you live in a place that has a jury system and so would explain why you may understand that I most likely served. That argument actually makes my point. You can understand it because you have a cultural reference of being called 3 times. Or you have experienced it. It also makes my point, again, why Basilico having no cultural reference to Jury Duty would think it is odd someone has sat on a jury 2x. Let me go further even though you may have a cultural reference to jury systems, you still don't have a cultural reference to Us jury systems and the culture that surrounds them. So, your understanding of Uk jury systems will only take you so far in reference to US Jury systems. Unless you believe you are omniscient of course. As I said, it's an ego thing. Imagine the ego on you to think you know everything about a place you've never been. I guess it's that same ego that allows you to refer to yourself in the 3rd person. |
budaatum:You picked the wrong hill to die on. Go ahead. Intimate I'm lying again. At a point your judgement is in question for trying to call me a liar about something so silly. And back to my point it would be silly if you lived in the US and understood the culture around jury service. People try to get out of it, not sit on them. But again neither you nor Basilico live here. So, where is that perspective coming from? Nowhere... And what I have I posted that I haven't had receipts to back up? Had to go into my file cabinet for these. You can google what these are.
|
budaatum:Basilico didn't understand how people are called for Jury duty. That is clear. 1.) Why would he? He doesn't live here so it doesn't affect him. And he doesn't seem like a voracious reader of non propaganda. 2.) The time frame is different from state to state. The frequency of being called almost ensures people will serve. The point of getting called to Jury Duty is so that people can serve on those juries. And because a lot of people actively try to get out of jury service, if you don't try to get out of it by lying to say you can't serve or lying to say that you are biased etc. etc, there's a good chance you'll serve on a jury. But, if you've ever been called, you may not understand that. So, if you don't live in the US, that is a cultural reference you would have no way of knowing. And why would I lie about serving? In the US, it's generally believed that only idiots can't get out of serving jury duty. And for that record what I have lied about in this thread?r As to you. You are a Nigerian who lives in the UK. You have two whole cultures I'm sure you are curious about and want to know the intricacies of. To spend so much of your free time on the US is nuts I think. Further, I've noticed a pattern with you, you get emotional and then seek attention/affirmation from the same people who abuse you. It's not an endearing quality. I didn't want to say it, but Bemeruca is right about you, even a broken clock is right 2x a day. You are two-faced. And to top it off, I'm not even sure what your true values are. You seem to flip flip readily because you don't want to lose arguments. Pick a lane. And fyi, this third person shit of calling yourself Buda makes you look nuts. I've warned you about getting at me and tried to be patient with you. As you can see, I've exhausted that patience. |
basilico:I guess people get summoned to Jury Duty so they won't serve on Juries. You're a fuxing idiot. But what a shocker that the guy who doesn't live in the US, and has no tangible interests in the US doesn't understand the requirements of US citizenship. Most of your posts here are trash, because you really don't understand the US and spend your days and nights posting misinformation. You guys make this thread a cesspool of misinformation. For what purpose? Because you want to hear yourself talk about something you don't understand? You've succeeded. Create more BS posts so you can feel like the smartest least informed person here. |
basilico:See Budaatum, here is a perfect example of someone not knowing what they are talking about because they don't understand US law/culture because they don't live in the US. As a US citizen you are required to appear if you are summoned for Jury Duty. I'm a US citizen and live in MA. I can be summoned once every 3 years. I cheat a little and postpone it for a year. So every 4 years. I believe in my civic duty so when I appear I don't try to get out of it by lying and saying I can't be impartial. I've been selected 2x. 1 was a long trial, I think 3 weeks. The other short, 1-2 days. The other times, sat read my kindle and waited. Most of the trials those days settled. If you want to spend your life deluged in topics regarding a country you've never been to, it might behoove you to understand it's basic customs and practices. Here is the 2019 postponement. I don't even think I had to serve because of Covid. Below that is the 2024 summons I postponed.
|
budaatum:You don't have any UK stations? Aren't you in the midst of an election? I'm sure there's some interesting things going on where you live. |
Good Article: Biden should have fired the Trump appointed Prosecutor once he got into office. At that point it became a political prosecution and Biden had too much belief in the rule of law to interfere.
|
Good article.
|
raumdeuter:You literally posted misinformation you were fed and are now talking about thinking for yourself. Why don't you tell us again how the NY state prosecution was the same DOJ office as the Federal Prosecution. Repeating misinformation and then acting like you know what you are talking about is common for you as you do it here often. Now tell me, how someone who is unstable and not rational can fill out a form saying they are stable and rational? What mens rea can they have in that moment? I'm sure the Supreme Court will also find the form illegal the way it is currently written. It hinges upon someone believing they are an addict. How many addicts think they are addicted? You see the difference in the fawning proganda your posts are based on and how my posts are constructed? That's the difference with someone who thinks for themselves. Let's go even further. How many other addicts have they prosecuted for owning guns.. I bet it's almost 0 if not 0. Let's go even further, they spend tons of money prosecuting this case, couldn't that money have been better spent in a case with better policy outcomes? That's the problem with this, the DOJ budget isn't infinite, and so they have to pick and choose priorities. How was this a priority? I can easily explain why Trump's prosecution was. How bout spending the Money we spent on Hunter on asylum cases to decrease the wait time.. etc. etc. But you haven't sat and thought this stuff out. Too complex for your small mind to understand. It's all "Biden's son got convicted.." Yay! |
raumdeuter:He said "mentally unstable people who can't think for themselves" while pushing untrue propaganda showing he is a "mentally unstable person who can't think for himself". lol 1.) It wasn't the same Justice Dept. One was a State prosecution the other Federal prosecution. State and Federal are two different entities. Even further, The Federal prosecutor was a Trump appointed prosecutor who Biden let stay on and was elevated to a Special Prosecutor. 2.) Just because we have 2 similar things doesn't mean they are the same. One thing can be right while, the other is wrong. Example: I can easily explain the policy objective behind the Trump prosecution: We don't want presidential candidates breaking campaign finance laws to deceive voters before an election. Because voters should be able to understand who they are voting for. Trump was the head of the organization, so we want to try Trump to prevent others from doing the same. Now you go ahead and explain why the Special prosecutor tried Hunter Biden and ex addict for lying on a gun form while let off the Gun store Dealer for lying or fraud on the same gun form. What was the social policy goal there? Was it to get more illegal guns off the street? If so, why not prosecute the gun dealer who clearly committed fraud? When you open your mind and think for yourself, the depth of analysis and understanding opens up. |
budaatum:I'm not sure your point. I've sat on juries and I've always thought that juries do their duty conscientiously and follow the evidence and law regardless of their feelings. So I think it makes my point. If the Supreme court found say X. And someone was tried of X. Most juries would convict if they found the evidence was there despite their feelings on X. I say most because some may nullify. |
Geovanni412:It does have political undertones. He was a Trump appointed attorney who Bill Barr let stay on, who Biden didn't fire when he took office. There was a plea deal between the parties that was aggressive for the crimes. They Trump appointed prosecutor went back on it because Republicans politicized it. If this wasn't Biden's son, this trial would have never happened. People rarely get prosecuted for this. In fact, to make this fair, anyone who smokes weed in the US and owns a gun, would be prosecuted. It is rare for this type of prosecution without an underlying crime with the gun. |
budaatum:Marijuana is illegal federally. This was a federal prosecution. Hunter lied on a federal gun form. So, anyone who smokes marijuana should be prosecuted just as Hunter was. That is the point CNN is making. |
The case “seemed like a waste of taxpayer dollars,” one female juror told CNN.https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/hunter-biden-trial-06-11-24#h_49def32184abfa994afffb9347a238e3 |
happney65:I agree with this sentiment and I think that's the reason why Biden is so determined to show that the RULE of LAW works by saying he won't pardon his son. He did commit a crime. And he was found guilty of it. But normally the Justice system works to advance Social policy. And brings cases to do such. The Justice system spent millions of dollars to convict an addict of having a gun for 10 days based on the fact he wrote a book to help others and called the police to report the gun his sister threw away What policy goals does this serve? And we haven't talked about how this treats one person differently than others. Weed is a controlled substance. So technically millions of Americans who smoke weed and own guns should be facing criminal charges as well like Hunter Biden. This was an overzealous prosecution. |
budaatum:This whole thing is a non-sequitur. I honestly don't even understand what this means. Let's leave alone the usage of the term "banana republic". People have somewhat contorted the meaning. The rule of law is determined by what the law is. At a point the constitution said a black person was equal to 3/4 a white person. Was that a "banana republic" based on what I think ur usage is? budaatum:You sound hurt, emotional and increasingly ridiculous. How many times have you spoken about me now? Grow up. Some of the things you say betray an ignorance of the US. Of course they do. As would some of the things I say would, if I spoke at length about the UK, only being there for short periods. Or did you think by watching US news, never studying US history, government and not ever stepping foot in the US, you'd know everything? There is that pride/ego I'm talking about. The truth is you can't know what you don't know. |
happney65:I keep going back and forth with Budattum about the dangers of right wing propaganda. Because it infiltrates the system. I'm not calling you out but this is an example. The point of Justice wearing a blind fold is that Justice should be meated out fairly and without favor. So, if you look at the plea deal, it was actually HARSHER than anyone else would have gotten. But Republicans politicized it and made the Trump appointed prosecutor backtrack. How do we know it was harsher, we can easily compare comparable cases. This gun case is rarely if every charged without an underlying crime. The Tax case is rarely charged criminally if people pay back their taxes. These aren't subjective statements, they can be objectively verified by going back and looking at similar cases. But Republicans politicized it, propagandized with the "sweetheart deal" verbiage. And good people repeat it and believe that he was in fact getting a sweetheart deal when he wasn't. Here is Trey Gowdy, no friend of the Biden's, who was a Prosecutor on this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DvstdFw-g-I |
This is a bad outcome. Hunter Biden was treated worse than anybody whose name wasn't Biden. 1.) This case is rarely every brought outside of someone suing the gun to commit a felony. 2.) Every American who smokes weed and buys a gun would be held to the same account. They are not. 3.) They immunized the gun store owner who sold Hunter the gun who forged the gun forms. Imagine a similar situation where a drug/gun dealer gets immunized so their testimony can be used to prosecute a drug/gun buyer. What governmental policy does that move forward? Biden should have fired this Trump appointed prosecutor when he became President. Democrats always try to hard to seem fair and they always get screwed by it. |
budaatum:I don't care what you discuss, I just care that your discussing it from a place of knowledge. And so let me be honest, some of things you say aren't said from a place of knowledge. Facts, wrong, law wrong, culture wrong. These are objective things. Less so than Bemeruca and Basilico, but still objectively wrong on some things. And then I have to tip-toe around it because at my core I don't like telling people they are wrong or calling people out unless they are dycks. A place where you're creeping up on. And to be frank, I think it's the height of pride to argue that you can know something without experiencing it. Maybe it's the scientific side of me, but I couldn't. I would need to immerse myself and study something fully until I wouldn't feel like a fraud or inauthentic talking about it. And so what is my goal? Is it to be right or gain knowledge. For me it's to gain knowledge. budaatum:You like these down low insults don't you? Leave them alone. Let's leave who reads what alone as well. I don't like listening to most of Fox News because the arguments are weak and made for dumb people. It's propaganda and so doesn't broaden my horizon and wastes my time. It offers 0 value to me. I can get the sum of that by reading a headlineon National Review let alone the article. What you are doing here is arguing against education/experience. The believe that you can understand something or know something second hand. But what you are doing is understanding that thing from the perspective of the medium you are watching/reading. A friend of mine got her PHD in french literature, spent years in France. Why was that necessary? Why didn't she read the stuff in a book? I find this argument you are making hard to understand. |
budaatum:Again. I am making inferences from what you are saying. If, you say people can move to other states. The inference from that is that you believe everyone has that ability(money, time etc) to move. Is that not the proper inference? If not what should I infer from that statement? budaatum:I also don't go to a Mental asylum and listen to what they have to say when they are eating pudding do I? Tell me what should I listen to them about. Christians who tell me to vote for Trump? People talking about law and order while calling felons from Jan. 6, prisoners? Tell me which one of the many inconsistent positions I should be paying attention to? I read the National Review which is supposed to be the intellectual side of the Conservative Movement if I need an alternate perspective. And that is difficult as well. The conservative ecosphere is a grift peddled to people like Basilico and Bemeruca. |
Amujale:Looks like you've been reading a lot of Right Wing Conservative sites. You should diversify your reading. |
budaatum:Hey, cut this shit out. I'm not insulting you. Cut the shit out. budaatum:They are so ineffective they have you watching them? I cant watch them, it hurts my head to listen to tortured logic. You said you watch Newsmaxx, Infowars, OAN and Fox? Why? If I want to understand conservative thought I read National Review and even that is a struggle for me (tortured logic) and all. I think when you minimize people, you start underestimating them. That's what Dems did when Republicans were winning local board seats, then state houses, then gerrymandering which lead to more State House seats, and super majoirites which passed ballot restriction efforts. Then to replacing appointing Republican judges like Judge Cannon and finally getting 3 justices appointed when Trump won. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 (of 58 pages)