₦airaland Forum

Starhearts:
U mean say u be charged nd bail lawyer

No, I am not.
That was why I said; "we can OPINIONATE on it."

Thanks.

Jatuski:
https://dailypost.ng/2025/05/03/alleged-sexual-harassment-defend-yourself-instead-of-using-proxies-ex-minister-to-akpabio/

Can someone ask this woman?
Who has been using MEDIA PROPAGANDA so far in this Sexual Harassment Saga?
A. Natasha
B. Akpabio

Let's settle it once and for all on this nairaland.

Like for A
Share for B

Hmmm
It is best to calm down and study the case before jumping into conclusions.
Once the case is filed in court and we have access to the mean of the matter, then we can begin to opinionate on the major issue.

Thanks.

Fearurcreeator:
People wey go soon enter market

Lol
Funny

Emeskhalifa:
You dey mind dem?

They will never celebrate any progress we make in this country.

Ask him as an individual what he has contributed to the country nothing, aside lamentation

E tire me ooo
Some of us are not in support of a lot of things going wrong in the country but at the same time, we can rubbish our country or play down whatever good we are able to record in the private sector.

NwaliE01:
Bros, it's not a new thing. Even my church has been using it for about 2 years now.

My question is straight forward. I don't want to bring religion into this or I would have ask the name of the church and your evidence.

Thanks

NwaliE01:
We are truly backward..this is the past of many Countries abroad.

Backward?
How many countries and mention twenty Channels all over the world. Na everything be backward to una?

Thanks.

Bobloco:

Promise No 1:
I will arrest Yahaya Bello.
Fact checked: Promise Kept; he arrested Yahaya Bello

Promise No 2:
I will prosecute Yahaya Bello.
Fact checked: Promise Kept, he is prosecuting Yahaya Bello in a competent court of Jurisdiction. It now remains for the court to either declare him guilty or innocent of the charge. It is not in the place of the EFCC to make judgement.

VERDICT:
Here is my judgement. Since he kept his two promises, I find him not guilty and has no reason to resign.

I RISE

Why Democracy May Not Be the Best Choice for Nigeria and Africa: A Return to Monarchical Systems
By E A. Olubanji
(General Life Talker)

Democracy, while globally celebrated, has struggled to yield the intended results in Nigeria and much of Africa. Many of the continent's nations are marred by weak institutions, corruption, insecurity, and poor governance, despite decades of democratic experiments. On the other hand, Africa once thrived under indigenous monarchs that were better suited to the continent’s culture, traditions, and realities. A thoughtful revisit of monarchical systems, modernized for the present, may serve Africa better. Here are six key reasons:

Firstly, Strong, Centralized Leadership. In traditional African monarchies, leadership was deeply centralized, offering a strong, stable, and unified front. The king or queen was seen not merely as a political leader but as the spiritual and cultural heart of the people. In societies such as the Benin Kingdom, Oyo Empire, and ancient Mali, the monarchs wielded enough authority to swiftly implement decisions that protected and advanced their domains. Unlike modern democracies where power is often diluted among many offices and interests, monarchical systems allowed for decisive governance without the hindrance of bureaucratic deadlocks.
For example, the Ooni of Ife commanded respect across Yoruba land, not through political propaganda, but through centuries of loyalty and cultural authority. His words could halt wars or command collective action without the endless negotiations that paralyze modern governments. In today’s Nigeria, political (not ideological) disagreements between the executive, legislative, and judicial arms frequently delay or derail progress, and when there is a kind of parley, it is not to the best interest of the masses. Meanwhile, monarchs of old could unite their people under a singular vision.
Centralized leadership offered continuity, consistency, and rapid response to challenges, unlike the often-chaotic leadership transitions under democratic systems occasionally marred by the interception of military juntas and imposition of unpopular political figure heads who never waded the people's mandates. If carefully adapted, a modernized monarchy could bring back the strong, stable leadership Africa desperately needs.

Secondly, Deeper Cultural Connection. Democracy, as practiced in Nigeria and Africa today, is largely a Western import. It did not grow organically from African traditions but was instead imposed during and after colonial rule. As a result, it often clashes with indigenous values, leading to political alienation and weakened national identities. Monarchical systems, however, were deeply intertwined with the culture, religion, and social fabric of African societies.
The Benin Kingdom, under rulers like Oba Eweka I, demonstrated a seamless blending of governance with cultural heritage. Festivals, rites, leadership hierarchies, and even the administration of justice were all rooted in communal traditions. Leadership was sacred, a trust passed down through generations and bound by customs that the people understood and respected deeply.
In contrast, today's democratic institutions often seem foreign and detached. Voter apathy is high because many Africans do not feel a genuine connection to a system that operates with imported ideals rather than local realities. By revisiting the monarchical model, African societies could reconnect governance with their spiritual, social, and cultural roots. Leaders would not merely "govern" but embody the soul of their people, creating a governance system that feels authentic, natural, and deeply respected.

Thirdly, Greater Accountability to the People. Contrary to the popular assumption that democracy ensures greater accountability, many traditional African monarchs were remarkably answerable to their people. Their legitimacy depended not only on divine or ancestral approval but also on the collective satisfaction of their subjects. If a king abused his power, councils of elders, religious leaders, and sometimes even popular uprisings could remove or restrain him.
A vivid example is King Jaja of Opobo. Rising from slavery to become one of the wealthiest and most influential rulers in 19th-century Nigeria, King Jaja ruled with an acute sensitivity to the needs and ambitions of his people. His prosperity was tied to theirs; his reign marked significant improvements in trade, security, and social organization. Unlike modern politicians, who often vanish from public view after elections, traditional rulers lived among their people and could not escape public scrutiny.
Today’s democratically elected officials often enjoy immunity while in office, and corruption scandals are frequent. The layers of bureaucracy and the politics of impunity have made leaders less answerable to the common man. A revitalized monarchical system, with appropriate checks, could restore the direct, personal accountability that once characterized African leadership and built trust between rulers and the ruled.

Furthermore, Economic Stability and Prosperity. Before colonial interference and the advent of democracy, many African kingdoms enjoyed periods of extraordinary economic prosperity and stability under monarchical rule. The Mali Empire under Mansa Musa is a shining example. During his reign in the 14th century, Mali became one of the wealthiest empires in the world. Cities like Timbuktu became centers of commerce, education, and culture, attracting scholars, merchants, and artisans from across Africa and beyond.
Mansa Musa’s economic strategies were focused on sustainable development: strengthening trade routes, investing in education, and promoting religious tolerance, all while maintaining a stable political environment. Where is Timbuktu (Mali) today on the Global Economic World Map? Contrast this with modern Africa, especially Nigeria, where despite democratic governance, economic mismanagement, widespread unemployment, and poverty persist.
One of the great strengths of the monarchial system was long-term planning. Rulers invested in the future of their kingdoms, knowing that their descendants would inherit the land. In today’s democratic Nigeria, political leaders often focus on short-term gains — just enough to win the next election cycle — rather than sustainable growth. Reimagining governance with the long-term vision that monarchs traditionally embraced could unlock economic prosperity rooted in stability and generational wealth-building.

In addition, Merit-Based Leadership. In many traditional African societies, leadership was based not solely on hereditary succession but also on proven competence, bravery, and wisdom. While bloodlines were important, it was equally vital that a potential king or queen demonstrate the qualities necessary to lead effectively. Council elders and kingmakers would often refuse to install an heir deemed unworthy, ensuring that leadership was not purely automatic but earned.
Queen Amina of Zazzau (modern-day Zaria, Nigeria) is a stellar example. She was not merely born into royalty; she earned her throne through her exceptional military skill, intelligence, and leadership. Under her reign in the 16th century, the kingdom of Zazzau expanded considerably, became wealthier, and fortified itself against enemies.
In contrast, modern democracy in Nigeria has sometimes rewarded wealth, patronage, and manipulation over competence. Elections are frequently won not by the most capable leaders, but by those with the deepest pockets or strongest political machinery. By reinstating systems that reward true merit and leadership ability — even within a modernized monarchy — Africa can restore excellence to public governance.

Finally and very importantly, Improved Security and Law Enforcement. Security was a hallmark of pre-colonial monarchical systems. Monarchs took personal responsibility for the safety of their territories, establishing organized and highly disciplined military and policing structures. In the Oyo Empire, for example, the Alaafin maintained the Eso, a dedicated military class charged with internal security and external defense. Justice systems were swift, rooted in customary law, and generally effective in maintaining order.
Today, despite democracy, Nigeria struggles with chronic insecurity: terrorism, kidnapping, banditry, and communal violence are rampant. Security agencies are underfunded, politicized, and often act without coordination. The decentralized nature of democratic governance — with disputes between federal, state, and local authorities — further complicates rapid, effective responses to security threats.
Under the traditional monarchical system, leadership was more localized and community-based, allowing for swift intelligence gathering, immediate intervention, and a closer relationship between rulers and the people. A return to such a model, updated to fit contemporary realities, could dramatically improve security outcomes by ensuring faster decision-making, stronger community involvement, and leadership that sees the security of the people not as an obligation but as a sacred duty.

In conclusion, Democracy, noble in principle, has often stumbled in practice across Africa. Meanwhile, Africa’s indigenous monarchical systems once delivered unity, cultural coherence, accountability, economic prosperity, meritocratic leadership, and robust security. Rather than rigidly adhering to foreign governance models, Africa — and Nigeria in particular — should consider revisiting and modernizing its traditional systems. In doing so, it can build a governance structure truly rooted in its own history, culture, and values, and chart a future of stability, growth, and dignity.

Reference made to all past and present African Historians both of African and Non African descent.

IBIYOME: A MESSAGE OF BLASPHEMY AND MISREPRESENTATION OF JESUS.

It is no longer news that Ibiyome who is renowned for his controversial messages about prosperity has come under fire for his statement where he asserted clearly without mincing words that "JESUS NEVER VISITED THE POOR."

He was also heard to have said in his clarification of the earlier controversial statement to have caused another controversy by fueling the initial statement by saying "JESUS NEVER RELATED OR IDENTIFY WITH THE POOR" thereby advising his followers to only give to the poor but NEVER TO RELATE with them.

The ONE MILLION DOLLAR (I Never had a house) dangerous giver forgot to tell us who Jesus lived with and related with.
Let look deeper into the subject matter and fact check Ibiyome's double edged statements; VISIT and RELATE.

Firstly, Ibiyome claimed in his earlier statement that Jesus Never VISITED the Poor.
The Word "VISIT" means "a short stay at a place or a meeting."
DID JESUS VISIT THE POOR?
We must not shy from Ibiyome's questions which he asked us to fact check, so let's fact check to see whether he was right or wrong.
In LUKE 6:20
Luke 6:20
[20]Then Jesus turned to his disciples and said,
“God blesses you who are poor,
    for the Kingdom of God is yours.

Two things are to be noted in this verse:.
First, Jesus statement was to a certain group "HIS DISCIPLES".
Second, Jesus said this group were "POOR."

The above shows that Jesus regard his own DISCIPLES as being POOR. Meaning that PETER (one of the disciples being addressed) was also classified by Jesus as being POOR.
In MATTHEW 8:14 "Jesus VISITED Peter's (POOR MAN'S) HOUSE. The purpose of the VISIT was not to heal but to pay his friend a VISIT and then discovered that His Mother in law was sick with fever.
JESUS VISITING PETER WAS A PROOF THAT JESUS VISITED A POOR PERSON.

In Ibiyome's Second Blunder, he claimed that Jesus didn't RELATE with the poor.
DID JESUS RELATE WITH THE POOR?
The word RELATE means "a connection between two things or person."
Firstly, Jesus himself was a poor man when he was alive to show that he has a connection (RELATE) with the poor.
Matthew 8:19-20
[19]Then one of the teachers of religious law said to him, “Teacher, I will follow you wherever you go.”
[20]But Jesus replied, “Foxes have dens to live in, and birds have nests, but the Son of Man has no place even to lay his head.”

Secondly, Jesus advised his disciples and his rich host to RELATE with the poor and not only the rich. How can the person who advised people to bring the poor to their homes not have lived a life that makes him accessible to the poor?
Luke 14:12-14
[12]Then he turned to his host. “When you put on a luncheon or a banquet,” he said, “don’t invite your friends, brothers, relatives, and rich neighbors. For they will invite you back, and that will be your only reward.
[13]Instead, invite the poor, the crippled, the lame, and the blind.
[14]Then at the resurrection of the righteous, God will reward you for inviting those who could not repay you.”

IN CONCLUSION
It is obvious that Ibiyome in his failed attempt to misrepresent Jesus and the Christian Faith in a bid to drive home his PROSPERITY unGOSPEL has forgotten do enough research on the scriptures where it is obvious that Jesus and the early church associated with the poor and never preached CLASS DISTINCTION in the Church.

His unGOSPEL message was aimed to cause division in the church whereby the poor are seen as outcast and alien or treated like sinner (just as he compared them). His target is to create a future where only the rich would be given the opportunity to fellowship in the church as true brethren and the poor are seen as outsiders (remember what Fatoyinbo said that True COZA member cannot be poor meaning if you are a COZA member and you are poor, you are not a true member but an alien visitor).
Every believer must stand against the False DOCTRINE that is MISREPRESENTING what JESUS and the CHRISTIAN FAITH stands for. Let me end by saying:
Luke 6:20
[20]Then Jesus turned to his disciples and said,
“God blesses you who are poor,
    for the Kingdom of God is yours.

Written by E.A Olubanji
A Concerned 'HAPPILY AND CONTENTED POOR' Believer

Like I said in another thread; "Kwankwaso joining the APC is a done deal" but aligning the bigwigs in Kano politics is the most difficult political task in all the 36 states of the federation.
Let's wait and see how the Jagaban of politics will handle this delicate issue without creating fractions in the Kano APC leadership.

Thanks.

dapsoneh:
Your questions are the least of Tinubu's headache
At the moment, he is showing them that opposition can only exist if the incubent government allows it
So, Hell Rufai, Obi, Atiku .... How far?
The 3 fo ols who are forming opposition never even get their bearing as to whom they wan field ooo
Bunch of morrons! Someone who was never an incubent and with no suppprt from Buhari got there amd u think after he got hold of the power, he will let go off it? No be everybody be Jonathan ooo
Just wait small, u will still see more to come
Fayose is next in line!

It is clear that Fayose and Wike will be in the APC before the end of the year or after the PDP NEC meeting.
Sir, you can pass your message without insults to personalities. I think that will be more civil and right.

Thanks.

pquaver:
These questions are difficult for u because u no be jagaban.. Jagaban don show working.. He dey work e dey show.. Omo respect to him.. The man has good man management skills. Mehn

You have a point.
Can't just wait to see how the Ganduje/Kwankwaso rift will be settled and the Emir tussle.

Thanks.

Rilwayne001:
You really understimate Tinubu, when it comes to reconciliation

Sir
How can I underestimate a political master like Jagaban?
I am just curious to know how he will do it.
It's just curiosity.

Thanks.

Kwankwaso and Abba Yusuf joining the APC is just a matter of when?
But some questions need to be answered.
1. How will Kwankwaso and Ganduje be reconciled by the president?
2. How will be Emir tussle be settled by the warring parties? Who will be the substantive Emir of Kano?
3. The structure of the APC will be controlled by who? Ganduje who is the chairman or Abba Yusuf who is the Governor and normally should be the Leader of the party in the state of Kwankwaso who will like to be the godfather of the state's politics?

These questions need to be answered.

Thanks.

fergie001:
It's 99% done, he is moving.
The reason he hasn't declared publicly yet is because of the reason you gave.
Compensations here and there, the Omo-Agege and Nwoko issues is delaying the official announcement for now.

I think that is the major issue that needs to be clarified before any major move should be made by him so that he won't commit a political suicide if the two team up against him. Currently, they hold the party structure and that speaks volume.
But the issue of decamping into a ruling party is a big lacunar in our constitution and personally I do not think it's the best for our growing democracy.

Thanks

I believe he is already en route to APC. It is just a matter of when.
But a question comes to mind:
How will the APC and the president handle the Governor, Oborevwori, the Former Deputy Senate president, Ovie Omo Agege, a sitting Senator, Ned Nwoko, in the next primary election of the party with the three of them interested in the governorship sir of Delta state. Who will bend for who?
Likely outcomes:
1. Omo Agege and the Ned Nwoko will be offer the Senate for the governor to do his second term.
2. Omo Agege will decamp to PDP and pursue is dream of becoming the governor while Ned Nwoko stays in APC to continue his senatorial bid.
3. Both Omo Agege and Ned Nwoko decamp to different parties with one in PDP and the other in either LP or the coalition party(if it comes to fruition).

One of these three is a likely outcome if the governor decides to decamp.

Thanks.

I believe technology is an open space for everyone.
I do not believe in coercing people to get money from them, but if people love your message and teaching or prayer and subscribe to your channels, it is not bad if it is monetized.
Let me say this:
It is not meant for only pastors. Individuals who have something to offer be it the gospel or other innovative talent can annex the internet to maximize it.
Money should not be to motivation, but it comes naturally when you have something to offer online.

Thanks

gare:
Nothing like impeachment, it mean they are starting on a new slate, fubara would send names of commissioners, present a new budget, if he wants to decamp to APC well and fine for him

Thanks for your thoughts sir.
We hope they will jettison the bad blood and start on a new note for the interest of the citizens.
But based on the question of the op, we cannot shy away from the fact that if the imbroglio continues between the two warring parties, the issue of impeachment process is still a possibility.
And let me state that impeachment process do no ultimately means a successful impeachment of the governor. I believe it will only be a way of putting pressure on the governor till the next election cycle.

Thanks.

Validated:
Simple question, WHAT SECONDARY SCHOOL ...? You are writing theses. You go explain TIRE, NO EVIDENCE.
Did Tinubu not present a certificate to Chicago University? From where did he pull such HEIST?
OLOWOLE OFF COURSE!

Sir.
I do not know maybe you are an educationalist.
Tell me, if I want to gain admission to Chicago University today for a first degree, what are the documents I need to submit?

Thanks.

YoshiMaster:
Win N200,000 by mentioning the secondary school attended by the current president of Nigeria, Tinubu.

Let me educate a bit with all due respect to your person and perspective.

Do you know that I do not need to go to a secondary school to sit for WASSCE or NECSSCE? I can just apply in any school and sit during exams periods and get my certificate with going through from JSS 1-SSS2 in that school.

But to answer your question.
According to Wikipedia, Bola Ahmed TINUBU attended St John primary school, Aroloya, Lagos and the did his post primary in Children Home School in Ibadan.
The question is "Is Children Home School the same as secondary school certificate?" The answer is NO. Does not going to secondary school affect someone enrollment to the University outside the country? The answer is No.
You do not need to go to secondary school in Nigeria before you gain admission to Harvard or any other foreign school since your NECO is not recognized beyond Nigeria and your WAEC is not recognized outside Africa.
To gain admission over their, there are some examinations you need to write to text your previous knowledge. Once you passed, you are given admission to be a university student.
So, whether or not you go to secondary school here in Nigeria is useless as it is not a recognized certificate.
Where I currently work, it is not their business whether or not I went to secondary school, even though I did, but they never asked because it is useless. All they needed to give me the job was my degree and once confirmed that it was genuine, I got the job.
Do I even remember where I kept my WAEC certificate?

Thanks.

Dynamicboss:
Peter denied Jesus 3 times.

Man divorced wife 3 times.

Funny enough both statements have the same number of characters

Jokingly.
It's not the same number of characters.
The first has 16 characters 5+6+5=16
The second has 15 characters 3+8+4=15
Lol

Thabks

This man called TINUBU. I really do not understand what to call him.
Just less than two years in power and he has come close to the Lagos style of politics.
I can't imagine if he is in power for 8 years; opposition parties would only be annexes.

Thanks.

Personally, I believe one of these three issue will become a major headline for weeks after the six months elapse.
1. The sole administrator's tenure will be extended by another six months.
2. Fubara and the lawmakers will be reinstated and the impeachment process will be rekindled.
3. Fubara will be reinstated and he will swiftly process his decamping to the APC for protection.

One of these three will happen and none looks good for our democracy.
But what do I know? I am just saying my own.

Thanks.

Timely communication is Key.

May his soul sleep in hope till the day of resurrection.

I am not a fan of VDM but I know social media is not a terrorist organization.
Are there terrorists on social media? Yes, as there are terrorists everywhere even in our religion organizations. Should it be regulated? It depends on what regulations will be made. It's neither here nor there.

Thanks.

SmellingAnus:
it just shows you agree there is no scriptural evidence.. thanks..

Yes I agree. As I also agree that there are no scriptural evidence for a lot of things Jesus did.
Do you accept that Jesus did not visit the poor because he hated poverty and because they are poor? Please, don't evade my question.

Thanks.

SmellingAnus:
and I asked , is there a scriptural evidence to proove Jesus visited the poor?

Is there scriptural evidence that Jesus took his bath?
The answer to your question is NO.
No answer mine. Does the fact that there was no scriptural evidence to show that Jesus took his bath shows that Jesus never bathed? Please, answer my question.

Thanks.

SmellingAnus:
In other words you agree with the Pastor that Jesus never visited the poor... Okay noted...

I don't know where you saw an agreement sir.
The supposed pastor accused Jesus of discrimination and you want me to support him?
He said "Jesus did not visit any poor man BECAUSE THEY ARE POOR AND HE HATED POVERTY."
That is an allegation against our faith which should be round condemned across the board.

Thanks.