₦airaland Forum

Regcom:
[s]Wait oo
Mr impossible
You posted a thread sef, shared a video. Ill give it to you that was barbaric and it doesnt represent Islam
But then smartie pants a fellow brother posted another video showing The same barbaric behaviour against muslims. Do you not understand that ur threads are a total waste of time!
So much for oppression, that fellow had the video but did not create a thread for it condeming not just the act oo..but the whole reliegion. You on the other hand mr wise guy, decided do disrespect the reliegion you are not smart go and sit down[/s].

Trash. Dat wat u sprew here. I created a trend for the Christian brothers to pray for d genocide hapening in d islamic country NOT OPPOSITION

Regcom:
Take a wild guess how much the israelis killed. Go and do your math before talking here, u even said it urself *estimate* and i hope you know what that implies.
My friend you havent posted anything stupid ill take the benefit of the doubt that you are from the 21st century. Abeg im not up for social debates on religion on social media your looking for someone to pick on im not your average muslim you think you can pick a fight with. Its pathetic. Islam and Christianity both have a sector that do not represent what the religion stands for. A while back during the religious crisis in Kano some group of so called Muslims barracded roads and started killing non muslims. The worst part of it is the insurgents couldnt even recite it themselves. They had someone else do the judging(what nonsense is that?). Southern Kaduna did the same. They killed thier own brothers because thier accents were like that of a Native Hausa.(How stupid)Not the newspapers, youtube or internet! Pick up a book and read whats going on around your countryNigerians killed Nigerians over nothing. Christians have killed and Muslims too. Mosques and Churces blown away.
Talk about better things
.

Oga. Am not debating or picking a fight with u, av pass dat level. Am only posting wat it seems 2 b posting.

Nevertheless, i agreed with wat u said up there. But dat dose not stop the brutal killing of people because of religon especially in the islamic country.. They kill either to convert people forcfully (which is against their wish) or they do dat to kill d infidels.

Abeg which other religon did those things nowadays

hockeyoilers:
http://www.pewforum.org/2015/04/02/muslims/
Went to Google like you said , this Christian website shows Islam ever increasing. Thanks! I had no idea just how fast Islam is growing!

Mister man ur source is irrelevant. Pls click below


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_religious_populations

Dat Wikipedia. Educate urself nd dont decive others

Regcom:
My friend you are a nuisance ha'an what is your own. Sending out hate crimes are you well. Do you ever wonder why these social platforms are being monitored and deleted for the safetly of ALL!! Did you go to school? Or did someone put you up to this. People are dying in Borno and you are here talking rubbish. Save yourself the embarrassment and talk about something else. $1 is 300 Naira, go and make a living Things are hard you are here blabbing. Jobs are tighter the market isnt stable, oil is low and you know what means fot Nigeria. Please my dear, Allow Islam it has been part of this world for centuries, and the number of muslims keeps increasing, since before your bloodline Islam has been practiced and it will be practiced. A lot has been said and done against it. It still dey Kampe, The leaderbof the free world went on Tv recently and applauded Muslims so i want to know what is your own. Madame shine your eye abeg

Dat bold up there. So islam kept increasing by forcing people to a religon And if they dont agree u kill them Even children lyk d 10 years old boy was killed nd u called dat PRACTISE RELIGON There is God ooo!!!

Well. Now i see how som1 thinks he can take lyfe easly on his hand. Wise up man, ur eeligion is a trear to d universe.

Point of correction islam is not increasing but decreasing. Go to google nd reserch urself estimate nomber of islam between 2014 and 2015 ,regardless of almost 70% of islamic countries are on war. Educate urself pls.

Ehh? See baba ooo

hockeyoilers:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjrxOwH-0Eg


.

It dosn't speak English pls.. Stop fabricating videos caused by Muslims havoc claiming to be from Christian. Dat is also in chad, Am islamic country

hockeyoilers:
Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword.

Matt 10:34

Misinterpretation of d verse, dat is wat u jst did. Do u want me to list them in ur quran nd surah

hockeyoilers:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2CPyJ3wppD4

Christian cannibals yet again. ..

Have u watched wat u posted Tell me that d Muslims did not start dat fight. Islam is pathetic, always looking 4 spiritual virgins.

Secondly chad is an islamic country. Hw many Christian country can start such fight U can imagin

Topeakintola:
[s]No surprises here

90% of those making the allegations are from IPOB region

This is becoming stale

Every hashtag campaign is always unsuccessful because the remaining 95% of Nigerians support Buhari

Create all the hashtags in the world, that is your business

Corruption must stop in Nigeria whether IPOB like it or not

I will take these IPOBs seriously when they create hashtag campaigning for the arrest and prosecution of Jona Ologogoro
[/s]

Av neva seen dis kin zombie be4. As in " this one is strooooooog, i say dis 1 is strooooog "

Jst imagin d rubbish he sprew here. Goosh !!

Muslim persecution of Christians has become a genocide!
Please pray for Christian minorities in Muslim countries.
Share this video!


http://i-supportisrael..co.il/2016/02/shocking-muslims-burned-alive-10-year.html?m=1

hockeyoilers:
Fathers can sell their daughters as slave girls to other men in the Bible:

Exodus 21:7-11
7. "If a man sells his daughter as a female slave, she is not to go free as the male slaves do.
8. "If she is displeasing in the eyes of her master who designated her for himself, then he shall let her be redeemed. He does not have authority to sell her to a foreign people because of his unfairness to her.
9. "If he designates her for his son [Note: "his son" means that the master is either her father's age or even much older!], he shall deal with her according to the custom of daughters.
10. "If he takes to himself another woman, he may not reduce her food, her clothing, or her conjugal rights.
11. "If he will not do these three things for her, then she shall go out for nothing, without payment of money.

First of all, did the daughter have any choice to be sold off by her father, married off by her master to either himself or his son? No!

Also, the fact that the master can either marry her or marry her off to his son, means that MOST LIKELY, SHE IS HIS DAUGHTER'S AGE and younger than his son!! So he's probably at least 30+ years older than her. Yet, he himself (her father's age or even MUCH older) can marry her

Am nt against u dat selling off daughters for money was not practice. They practice it all d tym. But for a claimed prophet to hav a sexual feeling 4 a child Wat kind of a man is dat.

This is an information age where such things dose noy sopose happening, but only the Muslims still practice child marrage dis days claiming to be lyk Mohammed....

Note wat u quote is an old testament which d Judaism practice NOT THE CHRISTIANS.

6- Ayatollah Montazeri.

The difference of age between men, and the women they married, in the primitive societies, was acceptable and customary. Also it was not indecent or lewd for older men to marry very young girls and people of those days did not deem that to be something immoral. Even up to this day, one can find marriages with very young girls among the Arabs. As a rule one should not compare the customs of the primitive and tribal societies with the customs of the modern and advanced societies of today.

Sina

I agree that primitive societies had some customs that are shocking to our modern sensitivity. Primitive people did a lot of things that appall us today. They had human and animal sacrifices; practiced gender discrimination, slavery and many forms of abuses of human rights. I am not condemning primitive societies for they did not know better. I am condemning modern people who follow a man who was a product of his primitive society. I am condemning a man who called himself the Prophet of Allah, the “Mercy of God in the worlds” Rahmatu’llah lil Alamin and the example for all mankind; who instead of setting the example of morality and rectitude followed the customs of his primitive society and thus reaffirmed them and perpetuated them as something to emulate. I am condemning a society that has forgotten its own past splendor and glory and is now trying to copy the customs of a primitive society and wants to establish their primeval precepts by following a man who a product of it.

Yes, we should not compare the customs of primitive and tribal societies with the customs of the modern and advanced societies of today. But why should we emulate them? Why should we follow them? Why should we accept their prophet who was incapable of breaking away from that primitiveness and barbarity?

If Muhammad were a prophet, he would have acted differently. He would have not followed the vices of his primitive society but would have set a new standard. If he followed them why should we following him? Doesn’t this make us the follower of those primitive societies?

On one hand Muslims study Muhammad’s life meticulously, try to imitate him in everything he did. They dress like him, shave like him, walk like him and talk like him, do as he did and live as he lived. They believe he was sent to be the example to all humanity. Yet you say that he did just what the ignorant people of his time used to do and we should forgive his sins because he was just a victim of his circumstances. How pitiful are we who have not seen this yet. Look what has befallen to our mighty nation that has forsaken its own glorious past and instead is blindly following a man who followed the customs of his primitive society. Could we sink deeper than this? Is there any humiliation more denigrating than this?

7- Ayatollah Montazeri

The issues of each time and place must be viewed according to the standards of their own time and place and not according to standards of other times and places. On the other hand we find that the Prophet (pbuh) practically did not confront with many customs of his own time that were not in contrast with the educational and spiritual goals of Islam, but dealt with them gradually and with realism in order to slowly eradicate them.

Sina

I agree that issues should be apprised in the context of to their own time and place. Something that was acceptable 1400 years ago in Arabia may not look that good today. Perhaps we should not judge those people so harshly. But the question is why should we follow them? The solutions that were appropriate then are no more suitable for our time. Why follow a doctrine that has lost its utility and is stuck in history?

Muslims are advised to follow the Sunnah of the Prophet. You say that the Prophet was an Arab, following the traditions of his own people, so what he did was right in that context. But by following him now aren’t we perpetuating those unfit and outdated customs of those Arabs of 1400 years ago?

You affirm that the Prophet did not confront those bad customs that were not in contrast with spiritual and educational goals of Islam. My question is then, what are the spiritual and educational goals of Islam? What is the main goal of Islam anyway? The Muslim’s answer is of course; to recognize that Allah is one and he does not have any partner and that Muhammad is His messenger. This is the main concern of Islam. Moral and ethical issues are secondary. All the sins can be forgiven. Theft, homicide, murder and pedophilia are forgivable, but assigning a partner to Allah is not.

Allah forgiveth not that partners should be set up with Him; but He forgiveth anything else, to whom He pleaseth; to set up partners with Allah is to devise a sin Most heinous indeedl. (Q.4: 48).

In other words, Saddam Hussein, Idi Amin, Ben Laden, Khalkhali and Khomeini will be forgiven, despite their crimes, because they were Muslims and did not set partners to Allah, but Gandhi who was a Hindu and as Muslims claim believed in a multitudes of deities will be burned for eternity in hell.

This Allah must be sick. He is a lunatic and a very miserable being for wanting so desperately to be known by his creatures and being so jealous. If this is the god of Muhammad he is not worthy of any praise. He should be locked in a mental hospice.

As to those bad habits of the people that the holy Prophet did not confront directly, but tried to deal with them gradually in order to eradicate them, what are they? In our world, pedophilia is a crime. It’s a shame that the Prophet did not consider pedophilia important enough to deal with it immediately because it did not contrast the spiritual goals of Islam. I would have been still happy if at least he had discouraged it. But no, he didn’t. He actually endorsed it by himself setting the example. This is not the way to “eradicate” something. This is the way to confirm it, to perpetuate it and to promote it.

Prior to Islam, we Iranians were a cultured people. We did not have these barbaric customs and traditions. Thanks to Islam these shameful traditions have also crept into our culture and are being practiced in our motherland.

Pedophilia is only one of the gifts of Islam to us. The holy Prophet endorsed many traditions that are equally despicable. Assassination of one’s enemies that is now so customary in our country was also a tradition of the Prophet. He used to send assassins to the houses of his enemies to kill them at night. The “honorable” members of the Islamic Regime of Iran are following that tradition of the messenger of Allah (peace be upon his immaculate soul).

4- Ayatollah Montazeri

The marriage of the Prophet with Ayesha took place in the first or second year of the Hijra at the insistence of her father Abu Bakr and some of his friends. The Prophet, for sometimes after the death of Khadijah, remained single. His main objective in accepting this marriage was for political reasons. The reason for this marriage was that the Prophet was under the intense pressure by his enemies like Abu Lahab and Abu Jahl and was completely dependant of the protection of other tribes. Abu Bakr had a lot of tribal influence. And rejecting his offer, in those conditions, for the Prophet was not prudent. In reality this marriage was symbolic and not to satisfy his sexual instinct, because, as a rule a 53-year-old man cannot have sexual feelings for a 9-year-old girl.

Sina

The Prophet did not marry Ayesha at the insistence of her father. There are many Hadiths that show it was the Prophet who desired her and asked Abu Bakr to give him his then 6-year-old daughter for marriage. In fact Abu Bakr was shocked by such a request. He objected that he was a foster brother to Muhammad, but the Prophet dismissed his concern saying that they were not real blood brothers and their oath of brotherhood was of no relevance in this case.

Sahih Bukhari 7.18
Narrated ‘Ursa:
The Prophet asked Abu Bakr for ‘Aisha’s hand in marriage. Abu Bakr said “But I am your brother.” The Prophet said, “You are my brother in Allah’s religion and His Book, but she (Aisha) is lawful for me to marry.”

Arabs were a primitive lot with little rules to abide. Yet they had some code of ethics that they honored scrupulously. For example, although they fought all the year round, they abstained from hostilities during certain holy months of the year. They also considered Mecca to be a holy city and did not make war against it. A foster son’s wife was deemed to be a daughter-in-law and they would not marry her. Also it was costmary that close friends made a pact of brotherhood and considered each other as true brothers. The Prophet disregarded all of these rules anytime they stood between him and his interests or wishes.

Abu Bakr and Muhammad had pledged to each other to be brothers. So according to their custom Aisha was like a niece to Muhammad. But that did not stop him to ask her hand even when she was only six years old.

However, this moral relativist prophet would use the same excuse to reject the daughter of Hamza who was also a foster brother to him because she was not pretty.

Sahih Bukhari V.7, B62, N. 37
Narrated Ibn ‘Abbas:
It was said to the Prophet, “Won’t you marry the daughter of Hamza?” He said, “She is my foster niece (brother’s daughter).”

Hamza was an uncle of Muhammad and in Islam marriage between cousins is permissible. Muhammad’s excuse was that Hamza is his foster brother. In the case of Abu Bakr, that excuse was irrelevant.

In the following Hadith the Prophet confided to Ahesha that he had dreamed of her before asking her hand from her father. Rules were to be bent whenever it suited him and were to be observed whenever they were convenient.

In the following hadith we can see that it was Muhammad who lusted Aisha when she was just a baby or a toddler.

Sahih Bukhari 9.140
Narrated ‘Aisha:
Allah’s Apostle said to me, “You were shown to me twice (in my dream) before I married you. I saw an angel carrying you in a silken piece of cloth, and I said to him, ‘Uncover (her),’ and behold, it was you. I said (to myself), ‘If this is from Allah, then it must happen.’ Then you were shown to me, the angel carrying you in a silken piece of cloth, and I said (to him), ‘Uncover (her), and behold, it was you. I said (to myself), ‘If this is from Allah, then it must happen.’ ”

The excuse that this marriage was for political convenience, although abhorrent on its own merit, can be dismissed easily. Abu Bakr was a good friend of Muhammad. He was one of his staunch followers and his foster brother. They were of the same tribe. Hence there was no need for the Apostle of Allah to sleep with the little daughter of his follower to foster his friendship. The evidence shows that Muhammad took advantage of this man’s devotion and abused the trust that he had in him. He coerced Abu Bakr into handing him his little girl. How could Abu Bakr deny the request of a man whom he believed to be a messenger of God?

Abu Jahl (the Father of Ignorance) was a derogatory nickname that Muhammad gave to Abul Hakam (the Father of Wisdom). It’s difficult to see in what ways sleeping with a 9-year-old girl would have protected Muhammad from him? As you said this marriage took place one or two years after Hijra. His enemies were in Mecca. Even if such a marriage could have protected the Prophet, which is absurd, he was already safe in Medina. This is a moot excuse.

Anyway, the point is not that Muhammad married a daughter of Abu Bakr. The point is that he had sex with a 9-year-old child. If you say it was done to protect himself, then he was an opportunist who raped a little girl to save his own life. Please don’t say it was not rape because a 9-year-old child is not mature enough to consent and if she cannot consent it is rape. Your defense incriminates your defendant even more than my accusations.

You said the marriage was symbolic. How symbolic it could be if Muhammad had sex with Aisha when she, according to her own testimony, was still playing with her toys? He then gave her a different kind of “toy” to play with that SURPRISED that little girl.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 90
Narrated Aisha:
When the Prophet married me, my mother came to me and made me enter the house (of the Prophet) and NOTHING SURPRISED ME BUT THE COMING OF ALLAH’S APOSTLE TO ME IN THE FORENOON.

You wrote, “As a rule a 53-year-old man cannot have sexual feelings for a 9-year-old girl.” That is absolutely true. This is precisely my point. Unfortunately we are not living in a perfect world and there are people who are psychologically disturbed and violate the rules. Even today there are old men who fantasize having sex with small children, keep their photos and exchange them on the Internet. They are known as pedophiles. To protect our children we put them in jail. If the Prophet hadn’t “surprised” that little girl in the same forenoon that her mother took her to his house, I could have accepted that the marriage was “symbolic”, even though its merits are not clear. But when we see that he consummated his marriage with that little girl in the same day, it is hard to see it as “symbolic”; symbolic of what? He set an example for all the pedophiles to rape little girls with impunity. Is this what he wanted to reach mankind?

5- Ayatollah Montazeri.

There is no doubt that the climatic conditions influence the physical and psychological growth of girls and their growth are more accelerated in hot climates.

Sina:

In the previous point you explained that the marriage was symbolic and “as a rule a 53-year-old man cannot have sexual feelings for a 9-year-old girl”. But now you are approaching from a totally different angle.

I am afraid, 9 year-old girls in Arabia are still 9-year-old children. Unless you advance a scientific evolutionary theory that human race has undergone a huge mutation during the last 1400 years and in those days women reached adulthood at the age of 9, the fact remains that Muhammad had sexual feelings for an underage girl and this was wrong. He even acted on that which makes is despicable and criminal.

To be convinced that 9-year-old children were always children, even during the time of the Prophet, all we have to do is look at another hadith narrated by Aisha herself. In the following hadith she is revealing that she was playing on a swing when her mother took her to the Prophet.

Sunan Abu-Dawud Book 41, Number 4915, also Number 4915 and Number 4915
Narrated Aisha, Ummul Mu’minin:
The Apostle of Allah (pbuh) married me when I was seven or six. When we came to Medina, some women came, according to Bishr’s version: Umm Ruman came to me when I was swinging. They took me, made me prepared and decorated me. I was then brought to the Apostle of Allah (pbuh), and he took up cohabitation with me when I was nine. She halted me at the door, and I burst into laughter.

And she used to play with her dolls.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 8, Book 73, Number 151
Narrated ‘Aisha:
I used to play with the dolls in the presence of the Prophet, and my girl friends also used to play with me. When Allah’s Apostle used to enter (my dwelling place) they used to hide themselves, but the Prophet would call them to join and play with me. (The playing with the dolls and similar images is forbidden, but it was allowed for ‘Aisha at that time, as she was a little girl, not yet reached the age of puberty.) (Fateh-al-Bari page 143, Vol.13)

Sahih Muslim Book 008, Number 3327:
‘A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) married her when she was seven years old, and he was taken to his house as a bride when she was nine, and her dolls were with her; and when he (the Holy Prophet) died she was eighteen years old.

As a rule one would say that if she was still playing with her dolls, she was not mature enough to learn about sex, first hand, from a man who could be her grandfather.

A scholar Ayatollah montazelli, and an ex muslim Ali sina debates on a question which says Muhammad married Ayesha when she was 6-years old and consummated his marriage with her when she was 9-years-old. How could a 54 year-old man, calling himself the messenger God and the example to follow have sexual feelings for a 9-year-old girl?

1- Ayatollah Montazeri

In those days the tradition of Marriage was based on tribal customs and rituals. The objective of marriage was mainly to foster friendship with the father of the bride and therefore the marriage of the Prophet with Ayesha was a political move.

Sina.

This is not a good excuse to marry an underage child. I am not bothered of the marriage of the prophet with a daughter of Abu Bakr, but the fact that Ayesha was a child. It is not proper for a messenger of God to have sexual feelings for a little girl and it is unconscionable to act on them. In this day and age if a 54-year-old man has an intercourse with a 9-year-old girl he will be jailed and prosecuted as a pedophile. Why should the Prophet be forgiven?

2. Ayatollah Montazeri.

The Prophet at the age of 25 married Khadijah, a woman who was 40-years-old and did not marry with another woman as long as she was alive. If the Prophet was a lustful man, he would not have married with an older woman and stay faithful to her all her life.

Sina:

Khadijah was a wealthy woman and the Prophet was a poor employee of her. Marrying a wealthy woman for him was climbing the ladder of social status. Being a poor young man, no one paid attention to him. Kadijah was to him a boon. She gave him the comfort and the ease of mind from financial worries. With a wealthy wife he could afford to retreat to his cave and let his imagination fly – meet Jinns, battle with Satan, converse with Gabriel, and other creatures that haunted his feeble mind.

The fact that Muhammad remained faithful to Khadijah was not due to his chastity or loyalty but because she was a powerful woman and he lived in her house eating her food and depending on her money for. At that time Muhammad had no followers and he would have lost everything had he offended his rich wife. That would have destroyed him completely.

However, he showed his true colors when he came to power and nothing could stop him from doing what he pleased. It was then that he broke all the norms of the decency by the leave of his Allah.

3- Ayatollah Montazeri.

The Prophets intention in marrying numerous old and widowed women, apart from sociopolitical considerations, was to foster their social status. Those were the days when women, especially slave girls, had little or no value and ignorance was such that they used to burry their daughters alive.

Sina.

The Prophet married Khadijah, as I explained above, for her wealth. After her death he married Ayesha who was only 6 years old and due to Abu Bakr’s request he did not consummate his marriage with her for three years. During this time he needed a woman. The non-believers would not marry him. They thought he was a lunatic. Among his handful of followers there were few eligible women with whom he could marry. Sauda was a Muslim woman and a widow. She was ideal under the circumstances. She could warm his bed and take care of his needs. He married her two months after the death of Kahdijah. Khadijah and Sauda were the only wives of the Prophet, with whom he married not for lust but out of necessity.

Hafza, the daughter of Omar also may have not been very beautiful, according to her own father and Muhammad may have married her to please his friend. Imagine being a woman and knowing that your husband has married you not for love but for political reasons.

His other wives were all beautiful young women in their teens. Muhammad married them or simply slept with them without marrying them only because of their looks. Sometimes he had to bend a few rules and make Allah reveal a few verses in order to allow him get what he wanted, as in the case of Zeinab Bent Jahsh, Mariyah and Aisha. None of his wives were suffering from malnutrition or were lonely poor widows prior to marrying him. The stories of Safiyah, Mariyah and Zeinab are love stories, flavored with lust, betrayal and crime.

You also correctly described the deplorable condition of the slave girls in those days, but you forgot to mention that those slave girls were free before the Prophet reduced them into slaves. Are you saying that these women should have been grateful to Muhammad for killing their loved ones and sell them in the markets to a Muslim who would use them as a maid and a sex slave?

U cant find oil in an igneous rock place in which d north ar part of. U will only wast ur tym drilling to d mesosphere of the earth.

Secoundly oil is mobipe. It not stagnant under d ground. I.e oil might b created in d chad basin but it dose not stay still unless if natue preval it.

Pls they should stop wasting our hard earn money 4 irrelivances.

Bubu nd lie Mohammed shuld go nd av their vacation picnics in madugiri. Then we will know that they ar technically defeated.

clean2:
the anti christ serpent coming out it shell emitting its venom. When it is warned that all catholics stands the risk of going to hell they contest such obvious fact. [b][/b]The truth cant be hidden.surely the catholics are on a broad way to hell

Hmm oga Hw did u know of them entering d hell

[s][/s]

princechinedu:
One man who is out to open many old “secrets” in the Catholic church is Pope Francis. Some of the beliefs that are held in the church but contrary to the loving nature of God are now being set aside by the Pope who was recently name The Man of The Year by TIME Magazine.
In his latest revelations, Pope Francis said:
“Through humility, soul searching, and prayerful contemplation we have gained a new understanding of certain dogmas. The church no longer believes in a literal hell where people suffer. This doctrine is incompatible with the infinite love of God. God is not a judge but a friend and a lover of humanity. God seeks not to condemn but only to embrace. Like the fable of Adam and Eve, we see hell as a literary device. Hell is merely a metaphor for the isolated soul, which like all souls ultimately will be united in love with God.”

In a shocking speech that is reverberating across the world, Pope Francis declared that:

“All religions are true, because they are true in the hearts of all those who believe in them. What other kind of truth is there? In the past, the church has been harsh on those it deemed morally wrong or sinful. Today, we no longer judge. Like a loving father, we never condemn our children. Our church is big enough for heterosexuals and homosexuals, for the pro-life and the pro-choice! For conservatives and liberals, even communists are welcome and have joined us. We all love and worship the same God.”
In the last six months, Catholic cardinals, bishops and theologians have been deliberating in the Vatican City, in discussing the future of the church and redefining long-held Catholic doctrines and dogmas. The Third Vatican Council, is the largest and most important since the Second Vatican Council was concluded in 1962.

Pope Francis convened the new council to “finally finish the work of the Second Vatican Council.”
The Third Vatican Council concluded with Pope Francis announcing that…
Catholicism is now a “modern and reasonable religion, which has undergone evolutionary changes. The time has come to abandon all intolerance. We must recognize that religious truth evolves and changes. Truth is not absolute or set in stone. Even atheists acknowledge the divine. Through acts of love and charity the atheist acknowledges God as well, and redeems his own soul, becoming an active participant in the redemption of humanity.”

One statement in the Pope’s speech has sent traditionalists into a fit of confusion and hysteria…

“God is changing and evolving as we are, For God lives in us and in our hearts. When we spread love and kindness in the world, we touch our own divinity and recognize it. The Bible is a beautiful holy book, but like all great and ancient works, some passages are outdated. Some even call for intolerance or judgement. The time has come to see these verses as later interpolations, contrary to the message of love and truth, which otherwise radiates through scripture. In accordance with our new understanding, we will begin to ordain women as cardinals, bishops and priests. In the future, it is my hope that we will have a woman pope one day. Let no door be closed to women that is open to men!”
A few cardinals in the Catholic church are against Pope Francis’ latest declarations. Watch out for the report.

WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS ABOUT THESE STATEMENTS….DROP YOUR COMMENTS!!!

http:///x0ifjkXqEb

Who posted dis trash here

As u can see. Baba obj is preparing 4 2019 election to sponsor som1. Buhari is a gonner. D question is who will baba sponsor in 2019

RickRichards:
What's funny? So you're a wailer? You need deliverance. Let me call prophetess Michellla for you. She's a real prayer warrior. I'm sure by the time she slams her giant bible on your head three times, you'll return to your right senses and the wailing will cease. Hallelujah!

who is dis zombie

VomeSchakleton:
LOL! Yet it's not the book getting constant "reformation" By fat and equally ugly men, somehow I dont blame them, I mean have you read the bible? Gives 50 shades of gray a run for its money, the sex part too. Stuupid puny minded infidel.

[b][/b]
dis 1 don already de call person infidels inside dis forum. wat if he see u face 2 face hmmmmm.

Dat of surah is worst. i will past dat 1 dis nit

In lie Mohammed voice. " blame it on GEJ" !D

VomeSchakleton:
Unlike the Bible, the Quran is actually the true word of God and can never be alteres just to please men like they did the bible.

Abeg no vex ooo. Hw many non Muslims have u killed

Pheals:
op. U can. Quote oya !! "Ye true believer ,never regard the Jews and Christians as your friends...if any of you befriends them,surely he is part of them .and allah will not guide such wicked people" ( sura5:54 and sura 2:120)

"When you meet those who are infidels, strike their necks until you have killed and wounded many of them" - sura 47:4






op should we continue quoting it i just hate arguing on religion s I wasn't born Muslim at all but u can only take advantages of those who can't read it not me

"Holuwathosine"

sowi. i might hav over read

i will past dat of surah 2morrow

hockeyoilers:
Quran can never be changed. I love every word of the Quran.

pls sir dont b a beast

if u like my post pls hit like 4 me


Am advicing non-Muslims in d north. with dis teaching i wonder if i will ever live wit a muslim in 1 roof. He can stab at night because his quran tells him so

My advice is we should embrace peace so that d universe will fit all of us.




oya lalasticala. will my trend go to fp

Merky brown, a philosophy in religon urged all islamic scolars to join hands to see if the Qur'an can be reformed to make islam a religon of peace. it is noted that Muslims follws those teaching that are prone to war resulting to terrorism found in most islamic countries like ISIS, boko haram, Al Quadi etc. He listed some of thses verses which inclues

1.We will cast terror into the hearts of Non Muslims. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them. Qur'an 8:12
2. Let not the Muslims take for friends or
helpers the Non Muslims. Qur'an 3:28,
3. Rouse the Muslims to the fight against
Non Muslims. Qur'an 8:65,
4. Then fight and slay the Non Muslims wherever ye find them, Qur'an 9:5,
5. Fight the Non Muslims, and God will punish them by your hands, cover them with shame. Qur'an 9:14,
6. O ye the Muslims take not for protectors your fathers and your brothers if they love Islam. Quran 9:23,
7. O ye the Muslims! Truly the Non Muslims are
unclean.Qur'an 9:28,
8. O ye Muslims! fight the Non-Muslims who gird you about, and let them find firmness in you. Quran 9:123,
9. Therefore, when ye meet the Non-Muslims, smite at their necks; At length. Qur'an 47:4,

These he stated need reformation for peace to reign among the islamic countries and among the univers

BeeBeeOoh:
God please bless WAILERS exceedingly, that's all I have to say..

who is dis zombie

RingimKabir:
You are really disgusting, you even made me think if you actually got a brain.

who is dis 1

Jesusloveyou:
d people that prepare d budget are they from space? Or d director in d office of state house that wanted to purchase more vehicle for buhari, is he apc or pdp, or did d same igbo man voted for buhari, we need to remove all this people that voted d ineffectual baboon from all d ministries, without that, change wil not come

In buhari's voice "am for everybody nd am 4 no body " so wat are u talking. is dat d meaning of tru federalism in ur dictionary

u ar realy a zombie man ooo. u shud go 2 aso ruck an tell him nah. mtcheeeew

This is a repented ZOMBIE

the wailers secretary should pls give his form



anyway check my signature

kennyman2000:
Lemme sit down and watch

This thread gonna be interesting!

Wailers Vs APCians.


Check my signature for ur customised wristband

Point of correction. it

WAILERS VS ZOMBIES