₦airaland Forum

Aufbauh:
The Wailing Wailers are of course the most disgraceful, colourfully shameless and with zilch credibility. The reason being that, everything they criticize today, they once cheered and supported. Their only anger with anything today is that Goodluck Jonathan is no longer president. For most of them, they would cheer the stealing of billions of dollars, defend same and even protest if you start the prosecution process of the suspects, all because they supported Goodluck Jonathan. They do not love Nigeria and even if they wail from now till 2090, those who know better will never take them seriously.

u are a proud ZOMBIE




wailers a zombie spotted!!!

my guy u are a proud ZOMBIE


wailers a zombie spotted!!!

Macclane:
How funny ur post is
; ;DD

guy take am easy wit me nah

With the aticles of ali sina the founder of freedom faith. Millions of people are leaving islam around the world after finding d truth what islam ment to them. here are some greeting letters to ali sina

Hello Ali,
I finally joined your website as a registered
member. I just wanted to let you know how my
journey began and how your website was largely
responsible for my leaving Islam and now
completely detesting the so called religion of
peace. I live in Fiji. We have a largely secular
government with the predominant religion being
Christianity, followed by Hinduism and then
Islam. Fiji Muslims are basically Indians whose
forefathers were converted to Islam. They came
to Fiji with Hindus as labourers for the sugar
cane plantations. They number only about 36000
or so but are very influential in that we have
Muslim schools mosques, etc. all over the place.
The good thing is on the grandeur scheme of
things the Muslims in Fiji are largely Minion’s in
that they follow the faith blindly without much
thought or analysis. This does two things it
keeps them away from fundamentalism and also
quite ignorant to the many ills in the faith. I was
born into one such home. Middle class so called
good Muslims. I was taught the Arabic version of
the Quran by the time I was 4 years old. I
finished the learning of the Quran by 10 or so
and slowly through training etc. became the area
Imam by the time I was about 15 or 16years old
meaning I was leading about 50 men in prayer.
The one good thing in Fiji is that Western
Education is compulsory and thus I attended and
finished high school. During the later years of my
schooling as I learnt more about science the
questions started coming and it did not take me
long to drift away from the religion. Added with
the peer pressure of a largely western life style
practised by my friends I sort of became a non-
practising Muslim which caused much conflict
with my parents.
Anyway over the years i did all the usual things
got married to a non-Muslim converted her had a
child started a business etc. etc.
When I turned 35 I kinda had faith crises. The
guilt and fear of not conforming to my faith plus
the sudden realization that I was not immortal
pushed me towards Islam again. I have seen this
happening to many Muslims who as they get
older seem to reawaken the virus as you put it
so well. In the ensuing 2 or 3 years i became
somewhat devout. It was in the year 2010 when
after saying my ZOHAR prayer in my office
during Ramadan that something in my head said
“am I doing the right thing”. All those questions
that I had as a young rebel started flooding back.
My research started on the web and within a few
hours of reading and searching I came across
your website. Needless to say I did not sleep
that night as all that I knew or thought to be
true was shattered. It’s almost like having a
trusted loving partner cheat on you only this is
deeper and more painful as one models his or
her life around this belief that we have the key
to the truth and therefor heaven. For quite a few
nights after that I read and researched and it
became clear that I was part of a cult and my
beliefs were shattered. My journey to
enlightenment had begun. Within a year or so I
went from being a born again Muslim to
someone who detests Islam with every fiber of
my being. I hated the fact that I tried to impose
this cult onto my wife and daughter and even to
my wife’s niece.
To this day I abhor the process of brainwashing
that a Muslim (all religions do the same) child
goes through. I hated the fact the fact that I
wasted so many years of my life not really living
like a human being free of all men made bull
crap despite that fact that I lived a rebellious life
in my twenties there were certain things you still
did not do like eating non halal foods etc. By this
time thanks to you and the website and my own
verifications I had well and truly left Islam. It
was the hardest thing I ever did and I am very
proud of myself for doing so. I know many
readers will agree with this and that is that Islam
is like the HIV virus it takes over your whole life
and it takes a great deal of courage to part from
it.
In the last few years I studied Christianity,
Hinduism, and Buddhism. I found Christianity to
be simply a milder version of Islam and quite
frankly the Quran is just the Old Testament on
steroids. There is some truth to the philosophy
and fundamental belief systems of the Eastern
faiths like cause and effect Karma etc. but
overall the rituals are illogical. I have since
started looking for scientific evidence on survival
after bodily death and this is when things got
really interesting. I have read and researched
near death experiences (NDErs), evidence of
Reincarnation, Death bed visions, mediumship,
sightings of Ghosts and spirits etcm etc. After
exhaustive research I have concluded that we do
survive death and we do have a soul. I am also
certain that there is a creator and an energy
source that we all seem to be part of but it does
not have anything to do with any of the
organized stupidity which we call religion.
I believe I am now a much better human being.
My journey has been hard but the resulting
knowledge and subsequent mental freedom that I
have granted myself and to my family has been
worth it.
I also agree entirely with you that the west or
the civilized world has to stop Islam now and call
a spade a spade. We are running around in
circles by being politically correct. Islam is and
always has been the greatest threat to humanity.
We must stop it now or regret the consequences
forever.
I am so ashamed to be called a Muslim that I am
changing my name so that I no longer identify
with this cult.
I want to thank you very, very much to have
taken the time and for having the courage to put
up this website. For some of us it really has
been a life changer.
Warm Regards

Hi Ali,
Thanks for your previous reply to my email.
Honestly, I left Islam thanks to your website a
couple of years ago and thanks to my little
understanding of English so I was able to grasp all
your writings. But, I left Islam completely after I
bought your book. No more 5 times prayers and
fasting after that and no more love to Muhammad.
The only person who knows I am no longer muslim
is my very long time best friend. He is very
educated and has long list of overseas education.
He is a very nice person and always kind to me.
We care each other. We share every knowledge we
have.
I have shared your site to him. At first he was
impressed with your understanding of Islam and
started to view Muhammad lower than he did
before.
Now, he changed his mind about Islam since he
learned from Hamza Yusuf ( an American convert
to Islam) that he converted to Islam thanks to his
Near Death Experience.
Can you explain it to us , If Islam is lie, why
Hamza Yusuf’s NDE is effective to take him to
Islam as well as those who meet Jesus in NDE?
This is going to be my discussion with my best
friend.
Thanks for your answer.
Millions of people have reported NDE. I have
been reading their stories in www.nderf.org since
last year and so far I read 500 of them. I also
watched more than 200 stories of NDE on
Youtube.
People who die report a variety of experiences.
Some see God and heaven and others are sent
to hell. Some just hover over their bodies and
don’t leave this plane of existence and then
reenter their bodies.
The experiences can be diverse depending of
their intensity. Although these people see a
glimpse of the other life their understanding does
not improve. Each interprets their experience
based on their limited understanding. One person
who had a near death experience and did not
leave this world, saw his body and then move
away travelling through the town and flying over
the trees. He felt very good but then he became
scared that if he did not return he may die. So
he returned to his body. He asserted that heaven
and hell don’t exist because in his NDE he saw
neither of them.
Is he right? This is like a person taking a boat
and going to UK, landing on a shore and looking
around seeing no houses and no people. He then
returns, .........

for more visit
www.faithfreedom.org/category/leaving-islam/

Am a good islamic scolar...


pls d mods should take it easy wit me ooi

There is a lot of debate between Muslims and
non-Muslims about wife-beating. Something I’ve
noticed a lot is that people are often talking
passed each other on the issues, making it
difficult to figure out what the truth is. So I
wanted to bring some clarity.
One issue that non-Muslims, and especially ex-
Muslims, bring up is the verse in the Quran 4:34.
Now, there are a few different interpretations of
this verse, and what you’ll find is that some of
them are worse than others. But also, you’ll
notice that the Muslims that are siding with the
least bad ones, are actually claiming that they
are good , in other words not evil . So what I’m
going to do is present two translations, one from
each end of the spectrum of badness.
On one end of the spectrum we have the
translation by Sahih International [1]:
“Men are in charge of women by [right of] what
Allah has given one over the other and what they
spend [for maintenance] from their wealth. So
righteous women are devoutly obedient, guarding
in [the husband’s] absence what Allah would
have them guard. But those [wives] from whom
you fear arrogance – [first] advise them; [then if
they persist], forsake them in bed; and [finally],
strike them. But if they obey you [once more],
seek no means against them. Indeed, Allah is
ever Exalted and Grand.”
Notice the part that says “Men are in charge of
women…” and “…righteous women are devoutly
obedient [to their husbands]…” This means that
husbands have authority over their wives. In
other words, wives are supposed to be obey their
husbands’ commands. Notice also that it tells
husbands how to deal with their wives when they
disobey – if she continues to disobey, the
husband is allowed to strike his wife, and that he
is supposed to stop as soon as obedience is
restored (“But if obey you [once more], seek no
means against them.”).
On the other end of the spectrum we have the
translation by Mir Ahmed Ali [2]:
“Men have authority over women on account of
the qualities with which God hath caused one of
them to excel the other and for what they spend
of their property. And as to those whose
perverseness ye fear, admonish them and avoid
them in beds and beat them (lightly) and if they
comply then seek not a way against them.
Indeed, Allah is ever Exalted and Grand.”
Let’s talk about how the translations are
consistent, and how they contradict. As for the
consistencies, they both say: (1) that men have
authority over their wives, in other words, wives
are supposed to obey their husbands commands,
and (2) that one of the ways that a husband is
allowed to deal with his wife in the case of
disobeying him is to beat her, and that he should
stop beating her as soon as obedience is
restored.
Now before I get into the inconsistencies, I’d like
to talk about how some Muslims understand this
verse. They say that the part about the husband
having authority over his wife is actually about
the man being responsible for the wife’s care,
and in return for that responsibility, the wife
should respect her husband. But this is the same
meaning. It means the wife should do as her
husband asks. It’s the same as how lots of
parents treat their children. They tell their
children to respect them, and when children don’t
do what their parents tell them to do, the parents
say ‘you don’t respect me.’ So it’s the same
concept. They want obedience, and they expect
it because the husband is responsible for the
wife’s care. Never mind the fact that more and
more families have both spouses working, while
the wife still does all of the traditional work of
the wife, which means that in these families, the
wife is actually taking on more responsibility than
the husband. So in these families, if authority
should be given to the one that is most
responsible for family matters, then should the
husband respect and obey the wife? No! They
should be a team. They should work together.
They should discuss their disagreements
rationally as a means of coming to
agreement. No authority. No submission. And
about respect, it should be mutual, not one way!
Now for the inconsistencies. The second
translation involves a qualifier on how to do the
beating. It says to beat ‘lightly,’ while the first
translation doesn’t have this ‘lightly’ qualifier.
First I’d like to say that reading the Arabic, there
is no ‘lightly’ qualifier. Second, it’s in the Hadith,
not the Quran, where Mohamed said that the
beating should be ‘light’[3]. Third, and this is the
really interesting part, for the Muslims who think
that ‘beat lightly’ is the correct interpretation,
I’ve noticed that they think that this solves the
problem — that if ‘beat lightly’ is the correct
interpretation, then everything is fine, nothing is
wrong. This is so utterly ridiculous. It’s ignoring
reality. It’s basically saying, “you guys who claim
that the ‘lightly’ interpretation is wrong, are
wrong. And since you are wrong about that, you
are wrong about everything else about that verse
too. The Quran is perfect.” Um, but what about
the part about authority/obedience and the part
that allows initiating violence (lightly or not) as a
means of resolving disputes?
Let’s be very clear about this. The Quran is
advocating the following: There will be no
violence between you and your husband as long
as you obey him, and if you disobey him, your
husband has the right to initiate violence on you
in order to restore your obedience, and as soon
as you obey again, he is commanded to
immediately stop the violence on you. To clarify
the issue, let’s look at this from another
perspective. Do you think it’s right to say: There
will be peace as long as you obey my commands,
and if you disobey, I have the right to initiate war
on you in order to restore obedience, and as
soon as obedience is restored, I will make peace
again. This is pure evil. This is saying that the
one in the authority position is the master of the
slave – the slave being the one in the
submissive position. The slave is supposed to
obey his master, or suffer beatings at the hands
of the master. How can this be defended? Saying
that the beating should be ‘light’ is not a
defense. Initiating violence on a person in
response to a dispute is evil. Doing it lightly, is
still evil!
A second inconsistency between the two
translations is where the first translation says,
and if you fear your wife’s “arrogance,” and the
second translation says, and if you fear your
wife’s “perverseness.” I think that these are
pretty much saying the same thing, but some
Muslims have interpreted the “perverseness” part
to mean adultery. Now I’d rather not argue why
that’s wrong because it doesn’t matter to my
point, meaning that my point stands whether that
part is wrong or not. So the second translation,
and I mean the less aggressive interpretation, is
saying that husbands have authority over their
wives, in other words, women are supposed to
obey them, and that in cases where the wife
commits adultery, then her husband has the right
to beat her to make her obey again (to stop
committing adultery). Notice how this less
aggressive interpretation doesn’t say what men
are allowed to do in cases where their wives
disobey in general. So this doesn’t make any
sense. But again, even if this interpretation is
correct, it’s still evil to initiate violence on
someone for adultery. The right thing to do in a
case like this is to “agree to disagree.” That
means that the people in the dispute still
disagree about the main issue, but they at least
agree to not resort to violence, and so they leave
each other alone. In other words, in cases of the
woman committing adultery, the husband should
divorce her, not beat her. So why didn’t the
Quran outlaw initiating violence in cases of
adultery and instruct husbands to seek divorce
instead?
Another problem with this verse, and I mean
even the least aggressive interpretation, is that it
doesn’t say that wives have the right to beat
their husbands if the husband commits adultery.
Why the inequality? Well, it’s because the Quran
sees the husband as the master, and the wife as
the slave. In this framework, why would the
slave have the right to beat the master? That
would uproot the whole dynamic of the

How the Quran lied about Mary and Jesus
Christ’s birth?
By Mohammad Asghar
2005/04/18
Syeda Muneeba Masood, a devout Muslim
woman, wrote in Banglarnari: Ibn Jarir and others
narrated that one day Maryam ran out of water.
She asked her cousin, Yusuf, the son of Yaqub to
go with her to get some. He declined, saying he
had his sufficiency for that day, so Maryam went
to fetch water alone. There, she found Jibril,
whom Allah had sent to her in the shape of a
man.
Response: This is what the Quran tells us
about Mary, the mother of Jesus Christ. My
tafsir of the Quranic verses and the inferences I
have drawn from them are more realistic than
what Ibn Jarir and others have narrated about
her and her conception with a son whose father
was not a human being but Allah Himself:
19: Sura Maryam, or Mary
It seems to us that Allah always derived
great pleasure from violent deaths of His
beloved people. Not only in the case of John but
also in the case of Jesus Christ, He looked the
other way when the Jews of Jerusalem put His
beloved son to excruciating pains before putting
him to death through crucifixion, a method of
execution the very thought of which makes many
of us tremble today with extreme fear. But the
people of the past were not like the people of
today: like Allah, they, too, took great pleasure
from great pains they inflicted on their victims.
And yet, we, the common folks, believe that
the same Allah can save us from the tyranny of
our rulers, without giving any thought to His past
failures! This blind belief in many of us
developed from reading what are stated in some
of the most disgusting Books we call Religious
Scriptures; they being made sweet and effective
by the preaching of the priests of all hue and
characters.
With their forceful voice, the priests can lift
many listeners off their feet. With their well
articulated but often circuitous arguments, they
can turn a rat into a lion. With the power of their
penetrating eyes, they can mesmerize even
those who refuse to be influenced by anything
they do not believe without verifying its efficacy
or truthfulness.
Fooling people in the name of religions has
become a high-paying job for many people. It is
their priesthood that helps them thrive in this
world. It is their ability to fool others that has
turned many of them into multi-millionaires; their
economically hard-pressed victims being unable
to draw any tangible benefit from any of the
things they tell them in their sermons. Yet, they
flock to their congregations to be fooled again
and again.
How long humans would continue to be
fooled, we do not know. But we are sure of one
thing and it is this: the sharks in the garbs of
priests would continue to feast on their
unsuspecting victims for so long as they would
not be able to realize their tactics and the
banality of their religious sermons.
The story of Zakariya and John over (as
stated in the beginning of Sura Maryam), Allah
asked Muhammad to relate or narrate in the
Quran the story of Mary: how she left her people
and took herself to a solitary place to the east.
Following His instruction, this is what
Muhammad narrated, in his own words, in the
Quran:
Verse 17: She placed a screen (to screen
herself) from them; then We sent to her our angel,
and he appeared before her as a man in all
respects.
Verse 18: She said: I seek refuge from thee to
(Allah) Most Gracious: (come not near) if thou dost
fear Allah:
Verse 19: He said: Nay, I am only a messenger
from thy Lord, (to announce) to thee the gift of a
holy son.
Verse 20: She said: How shall I have a son,
seeing that no man has touched me, and I am not
unchaste?
Verse 21: He said: So (it will be): they Lord
saith, ‘That is easy for Me: and (We wish) to
appoint him as a Sign unto men and Mercy from
Us’: it is a matter (so) decreed.
Muhammad’s ability to narrate Mary’s story
was not better than Allah’s ability. In fact, both
of them seem to be handicapped by their
inability to narrate clearly the stories of the past,
most of which were, though, essential for laying
the foundation of Islam.
Moreover, he contradicted himself in many
places of the Quran. His statement in verse 17 is
one of them. In this verse, he said that just one
angel i.e. Gabriel had appeared before Mary as a
man in all respects. He made quite a different
statement in verse 3:42 and 45.
According to these verses, the number of
angels who assembled in Mary’s chamber was
not only more than one; they even fought over
the question of who among them was going to
take care of her. This contradiction makes it
abundantly clear that the Quran is a brainchild of
Muhammad and that to attribute its contents to
Allah is simply a fallacious invention on the part
of the Muslims.
Despite the fact that some of the verses,
quoted above, belong to the category of unclear
verses, yet, we will make our best efforts to find
out what exactly they mean and what lessons
we humans are supposed to take from them.
Improving upon the part of Mary’s story that
was narrated by Allah in Sura al-Imran,
Muhammad tells us through verse 16, above, that
there was a time in her life when she withdrew
from her family and went to a place in the East
where she hid herself behind a screen, without
giving a reason for her doing such an irrational
thing. Some Muslim scholars, Maulana Abul
Modudi, being one of them, explained Mary’s
action thus:
Dedicated by her mother to the worship of
Allah, Mary took up residence in a chamber of
Baitul Muqqadus {it being the other name of the
Farthest Mosque, or Masjidul Aqsa, mentioned in
17:1} under the supervision of prophet Zakariya.
Her chamber was located in the eastside of it.
Following a requirement of isolationism {known
as ehtehkaf in Arabic} practiced by the
isolationists, she hung a curtain to hide herself
from the eyes of the onlookers. [1]
The structure the learned scholar he has
referred to as Baitul Muqqadus did not exist at
the time Mary is believed to have lived. It was
built in 690 A.D., or thereabouts by the Muslim
Caliph Abd-ul-Malik at the grounds where once
stood the Temple of Solomon . Titus destroyed it
in 70 A.D., whereafter it was never rebuilt.
Hence, his attempt at clarifying Muhammad’s
statement is not only misplaced, it is also a
blatant lie. [2]
Whatever the location of the place, the verse
does not give us a clear-cut reason that required
a young Mary to withdraw herself from her
family, and to move to the east, unless the
prophet under whose care she was given by her
mother had made her pregnant.


If u lyk my post hit lyk 4 me!!!!

Ahmedhussain3463:
wht change hs ur phd brought to d country wen d oil was booming?

guy which 1 bubu don do gej beta as d economy de stable under him. Dis 1 jst enta scater d economy 4 8 month. Abeg recive small sence ooo

came 2 collect space




abeg check my signature jooor ;8

As 4 me, am a proud wailer with certificate oo ( not nepa bill)




which 1 are u a wailer or a zombie. let count d vote



oya comment. ........ nd if u ar a wailer lyk me, HIT "LIKE" 4 ME !!!!!!!!!!

Emekamex:
Body odour toh bad

guy u 2 much ooo. u wan kill me with laugh

How i wish the cost of one of his trips is in my bank account ;o oboi i go hammer.

Instead of wasting N280 million each trip practicing " AROUND THE WORLD IN 80 DAYS " why don't he use d money to help d poor ravaging especially in d north

he has already visited india, kenya, us, UAE, chad, niger, etc. have any other country president visited him bubu de fall our hands ooo. he is making us look lyk a begger








abeg check my signat.... incase u are intrested :8

wat wrong in using gas gas is cheaper nd cleaner when used than kero. and it last long..... if ur gramma no fit use am , abeg go teach am!!
Na bubu put us 4 dis mess




ehee. abeg check my sign

came to book space





whatch out for my signature

Aisha jollof rice loading....



my signature pls

Pls is it with d substantial weapon dat GEJ bourght?



check out my sign

Hey nijaaa. pls som1 shuld call bubu 4 us oooi








check out my signature

bubu de practise " AROUND D WORLD IN 80 DAYS" ; D
Who don watch dat movie

eligibility:
You are one of the few unreasonable Christian ever met in my life. Firstly, it has been debunked severally that the bastard boko haram are not Muslims.
أفﻻ تعقلون

Muslims are Muslims. all what they knoe is to kill d infidels in which d boko boys are one of them. so stop d cover

but wait o. u sef how many infidels have u killed let me calculate d nomber of virgins u will get

it still remains muslem ar bad.....

InvertedHammer:
/
Because I know. I am a Catholic who chose to be enlightened.

Most of you were born into different denominations and refuse to learn beyond the propaganda you were fed. You didn't choose Catholicism. Your parents shoved it down your throat.
/

Point of correction, my parent nd siblings are aglicans i am d only 1 of d family attending catholic. they did not push me nd they are not complaining because all churches are d same

U that is a catolic be4 tell us wat u know nd stop sprewing rubbish

greggng:
pls dont compare me with anybody. i am uniquely made so am entitled to my opinion and i stand by it

may God fogive u

greggng:
I won't attend catholic church again until the decision is reversed.

A muslim can never say. it only in Christian that som1 will sprew rubbish lyk dis.

who is beggin u 2 attend. Are u attending church for a prist or for God

wonders shall neva end

InvertedHammer:
/


Catholic church does not speak for God. The history of Catholicism is littered with oppression, money laundry and murder.


/

shhhh oga. if u dont know anything about catolic jst shut up.

I know u ar one of these warehouse churches, dat dosnt mean u will critosize other churches.

How did u know catolic church dose not speek for God

RUBBISH !!!

Sman37:
[/color][color=#006600]I hate does who run deir mout like a rain falling frm the sky abt what u know noting about
christian ar d highest populated spinster in d whol world, the highest prostitution around globe and the highest furnicators so whos religion has d worst rating in term of marriage
pls am looking for dat authentic verse in d bible wher it says christin should marry jusr a wife
TANK GOD muslims on deir own wish ar instruct by ALLAH to marry 1 or woman bt u must b just among dem
now what did bible say abt marryn 1 wife and what did bible say abt a christian who did 2,3 wifes and wht is d punishemen on him am waitin for a sincere answer plsI hate does who run deir mout like a rain falling frm the sky abt what u know noting about
christian ar d highest populated spinster in d whol world, the highest prostitution around globe and the highest furnicators so whos religion has d worst rating in term of marriage
pls am looking for dat authentic verse in d bible wher it says christin should marry jusr a wife
TANK GOD muslims on deir own wish ar instruct by ALLAH to marry 1 or woman bt u must b just among dem
now what did bible say abt marryn 1 wife and what did bible say abt a christian who did 2,3 wifes and wht is d punishemen on him am waitin for a sincere answer plsI hate does who run deir mout like a rain falling frm the sky abt what u know noting about
christian ar d highest populated spinster in d whol world, the highest prostitution around globe and the highest furnicators so whos religion has d worst rating in term of marriage
pls am looking for dat authentic verse in d bible wher it says christin should marry jusr a wife
TANK GOD muslims on deir own wish ar instruct by ALLAH to marry 1 or woman bt u must b just among dem
now what did bible say abt marryn 1 wife and what did bible say abt a christian who did 2,3 wifes and wht is d punishemen on him am waitin for a sincere answer pls

[/s][s]

Rubbish

After this she should go nd hide ooo. the boko boys will be comming 4 her head next

Just imagin if the pastor came with koran in the musque for donation. what will they do to him Dat sucide mission. he will go nd write his will first be4 doing dat

MUSLIM ARE BAD EEE:8

benpedro:
buhari just said december and not december 2015 you IPOB tout.Wailing wailers,buhari must rule you until 2019 and lie Mohammed your information minister.nonsense!

so d december dat he ment was specified abi? it might mean next year or next 5 years or 40 years december abi?

pls brother beg ur God lfor ittle sence. nd also pray dat ur God will protect u as buhari is protecting his citizen. amen

shalom

DropShot:
Not again!

Though it's news like this that gives wailers and IPODs orgasm, the fact remains that Boko bastards have largely been decimated.

To finally eradicate them, citizens have to be very vigilant. Suicide bombings cannot be 100% prevented by the military without civilians being very watchful.

[s][/s] mtcheeeeew rubbish



NEXT!!!!!!!

maybe dat wat d kenya President thought him

nxt he will take over d financial minster so dat he can steal more yams wit his shovel

rhabs:
How many under age girls get pregnan without marriage in south?

can u compare it with d child marrage / pregnancy ravaging in d north

Mr. it better my sister got pregnant at a mature age without marrage than to be married and bleeped with uncircumcised dick which will damage ha womanhood at early age

hmm nah waw oo