Ozkar: lol. Dembele wasn't always like this o. Or at least, I don't think he was. The guy frustrate me yesterday ehn.
In the first half, when teammates are with the ball, he goes towards them instead of trying to exploit spaces between defenders. When he gets the ball, he just makes obvious passes.
One of the chances Messi created for him that he passed back, I was even more frustrated watching it than Messi who created the chance.
I suspect he's playing to instructions, but it's somewhat frustrating. Then our off-and-on vampire is always criticizing him.
The most frustrating thing about this one is, Barça aren't even serious about replacing him. No vigorous attempt, whatsoever.
Ozkar: Coutinho along with Semedo were my best players on the pitch in the first half.
So pleased that Coutinho is now more confident on the ball.
My delight is in his hunger for goals. He had several shots on target yesterday, and for each that didn't get to the back of the goal, one could see the agony in his eyes. That's what Dembele lacks. Lackadaisical attitude towards goalscoring. When faced by an empty goal, he'd rather pass.
TefBarzz: Suarez's a spent force...And the most annoying thing for me is that he keeps famzing with Messi.The one he rubs shoulders with is supposedly the best in the world,but he (Suarez)has been off for more than three seasons.
Funaki: He once told his son that “when soldiers lack discipline, the fault lies with their lord commander” . But when his men went wayward and raping women about, he blamed the death and rape of Rhaegar’s wife and children on everyone but himself
Ordered the specific execution of Rhaegar’s children; Orders the murder of two babies at the hands of two brutes but has the nerve to act shocked by the manner in which it was done. He tries to act like their mother, Elia never even crossed his mind- crown princess, a princess of Dorne- like she wouldn't obviously BE WITH her infant children in the place they were held hostage. Balks at the notion of ordering her rape... to the son whose lover he had raped by half his guardsmen, before making him rape her himself (this part wasnt in the show).
He orchestrated the red wedding and at the end tried to blame Frey and excuse himself from it.
This was the conversation between him and Tyrion.
“Was it a soft silk pillow that slew Robb Stark?” “It was to be an arrow, at Edmure Tully’s wedding feast. The boy was too wary in the field. He kept his men in good order, and surrounded himself with outriders and bodyguards.” “So Lord Walder slew him under his own roof, at his own table?” Tyrion made a fist. “What of Lady Catelyn?” “Slain as well, I’d say. A pair of wolfskins. Frey had intended to keep her captive, but perhaps something went awry.” “So much for guest right.” “The blood is on Walder Frey’s hands, not mine.”
The guy blamed everyone else but himself. That's hypocrisy.
raumdeuter: Ned with his honour was naive, He found out about the Lannisters incest and acted impulsively to blow the whistle and expel them. A family that is the richestbelieved to be the richest with many loyalists Baelish told him that this is the Capital and we are all liars here. Instead of him to relax and plan his strategy properly, he went fully to declare war and lost his head
Robb was naive and foolish, the most foolish man in the show. The Lannisters were killing his family but he couldn't touch the Lannisters. He even beheaded Karstark for striking 2 Lannister boys. Robb also reneged on a promise to marry Frey's daughter. He deserved to die
There is nothing admirable about Tywin, rather a hypocrite, He blasted Tyrion for whoremonging and desecrating the palace with whores, and the first chance he got was to take the same LovePeddler for himself. He was there watching the Joffrey misrule and did nothing about it, He was watching how Joffrey treated the Starks and said nothing He knew Tyrion did not kill Joffrey but went ahead to try and sentence him. Tyrion was the one who saved Kings Landing from Stannis but Tywin took the glory He was able to strategize his family into power because many of the other family leaders were not interested. Ned was never interested in ruling, Robert Baratheon though king will rather be elsewhere fvcking, hunting pigs and drinking wine, Balon Greyjoy was content in his island, Lady Arryn wanted to be left alone after her husband died
Oh, really? You mean, if Ned and that deserter had, together, seen a whitewalker and what it could do, and had both survived it, he wouldn't have spared his life, owing to he deserting because of an unusual stuff?
meforkene: If the NK wasn't coming anytime soon, Jon would behead the deserter once the judgement is passed. Remember Ned taught him that he that passes the judgement should swing the sword.
Also he passed the treason judgement on Olly and Co (those guys that killed him) and he killed them.....bearing in mind he had seen NK in Hardhome. Its complicated.
This answer has no connect, whatsoever, to the question.
Do you think Jon Snow as the warden of the North would behead a deserter from the Nightswatch? Let's assume that the night King is not coming anytime soon.
If yes. Why? If no. What are your reasons?
He wouldn't. If Ned himself had met, one on one with a walker before that execution, he wouldn't have decapitated that deserter.
Kaycee7: Did you watch the episode or did a friend just tell you the major events? Jaime's trial was the first thing that happened, way before Jon told her his true name. Also, if you were paying attention, you'd hear when she said her brother and she talked a lot about their father's murderer and what they'd do when they caught him. Jaime's one of the main reasons why she never knew her father and had to spend most of her life in exile, but you think he's unimportant to her.
You don't understand him. He's putting Daenerys in Jon's shoes.
Nicolars: Through out that scene, I was just pissed... If you're going to try Jamie, why the fvck did you lose your dragon in the process of begging cerci to join your army, so you can try him when he joins you
oyetpel: I know about the deviations from the book, but Ned was also killed in the book, same with Robb.
But was Jaime incapacitated in the book? Was Theon's c*ck cut in the books? Didn't Jorah continue to act as a subordinate to Dany? Was Dany not powerful and arrogant in the books? Did Cersei became a Queen in the book? Was Grey worm's d*ck cut in the books?
Fadedvoices2: According to seun ,Danny should go and rule the free cities .
Let Jon go and rule over river lands na
After someone struggled her whole life for the iron throne ,she should surrounder everything to Jon because he’s male . Jon is a good leader according to mr seun , na danny no be good leader abi ?
The only reason most of you don’t want danny on that throne is because she’s a woman and y’all are misogynistic pigs who don’t believe women should be what men are supposed to be.
I'd rather Brienne sit on that throne than Dany. Am I being misogynistic?
Ksslib: Maybe GRRM has become so attached to the last manuscript that he doesn't wanna let go, at any cost. The books have guzzled up a sizeable chunk of his life, I won't be surprised if he has become emotionally entangled with his work, down to the quantum level.
I thought I read something about him almost wrapping up the Publication & release of the final set.
Your assertion on it being one of the greatest work of fiction, I totally agree , even though I'm yet to read it. And with Game of Throne's popularity & religion-like reverence globally, I find it midly amusing , curious actually, that JK Rowling's Harry Potter franchise remains the highest grossing work of literature ever.
Or maybe GRRM's just needs time to get to that level & surpass it. He ought be a billionaire already.
Rowling has a larger reading end. It's children fiction. More reason why the movies have a wide audience. They are PG 13.
Olamyyde: Why did 2 goals come immediately when semedo came in?
It's your supposition. You're trying to make us believe two goals were supposedly scored simply because Semedo was brought on. And we're asking you how he contributed to the goals. By contribution, I mean, scoring, assisting, setting up a through pass to the assister or creating a defence splitting chance. But no, for the first goal, you gave us an attack chain, featuring Semedo throwing in a ball to the person who passed to the person who assisted the goal.
For the second goal, you've said nothing so far. Just that Messi scored.
The first answer is invalid because anyone could have thrown that ball to Pique. It didn't require any unique skill to do it. Or you're telling us Semedo has the Mida's touch?
Olamyyde: The first goal came in immediately when semedo came in.
Semedo gave a throw in to pique who passed to alena who passed to alba who passed to the scorer suarez, mins later messi scored. I guess that's just coincidence.
You're crediting goal contribution to a player who initiated an attack chain. Who is the fifth player down the line in the chain.
You mean, if MATS passes to Pique, who passes to Rakitic, who passes to Messi, who passes to Dembele, who finally scores, MATS is the reason for the goal?