₦airaland Forum

Funlordjnr:



See some bitter _twats already condeming the woman over a non issue! 1st these frustrated bonobo monkeys claimed she could not enter the u.s because she is corrupt......now as she don fall in yankee dem don turn to gucci stylists in order to only dey check the price tags of all her kaya! Chai!



Shoe this, watch that, versace headtie, calvin klein toothpick, armani toothpaste? Which kind bad belle be dis na?




Did her husband not declare assets of over N300,000,000? So what's the problem? So other wives of presidents don't wear chopard or carry hermes bags? Even rich teenagers across the world use such items Talk less of a 1st lady!



Abeg make una no allow una suffer head lifestyles and unending painment to cause una to remain eternally foolish!

Abeg no mind them, they think she should limit her apparels no further than Alaba or Warri market like their aunties or mama; forgetting that as wife of the president she would be mingling with royalty and multi billionaires - any of whom can easily afford to dash her such a watch, without batting an eyelash as if it is ordinary 50k to them.

mightyhazell:
u can do berra almajiri. Don't let the kunu brain shut down so easily. Avail me som sport,will u?

With reference to brain types, why not google symptoms of KURU, it might help you understand the Cannibalistic cause of the gibberish you've been typing - yes, go on and amuse me some more.

mightyhazell:
ur ret.arded joke can only be on ur re.tarded self. Who knows the victim of sharia whose hand u used in this hideos display.

LOL @ gibberish rant of a pained CANNIBAL

mightyhazell:
who cares wot almajiri means from ur point of view. In nigerian context,we all knw wot almajiri stands for!

And wots dat in a plate u posted? Ur supper? Didt know almajiri has added cannibalism 2 his litany of atrocities. Interesting...

Then the purpose to offend is defeated since I am not offended.
LOL, I laugh; because the joke is on you - ignoramus.

nextprince:
No, he thinks the word Almajiri is an insult, not knowing that we proudly answer the description. Imagine calling me a scholar/student and u think u have insulted me, if not ignorance.

Don't mind them; that's the level of their stupidity.

mightyhazell:
u and who was talking about treatment meted out 2 thieves. My concern in ur silly comment was jumping in 2 demonise the south,wen ur region has always been a killing field since time immemorial. Though mob justice is v bad,and I will condemn it till eternity,it will still look berra that a thief was killed extrajudicially than hundreds of innocent people being murdered by animals in human skin,all because a cartoon was made thousands of miles away. I won't go further 2 mock the man made ills ravaging ur people and stuffs like dat because dat will be jumping in2 d sewer with u. Am already feeling some loss of dignity,engaging u in dis back and forth as it is . Goodbye almajiri

Another display of ignorance cultivated by (biased southern) media misinformation and fashioned by an intransigent stereotypical mindset.

The difference is clear: as already mentioned nothing could be more animalistic than Cannibalism, at least one can even excuse those you mentioned that kill because of cartoon and say they were motivated based on a principle (in this case religion); yet there can be no excuse for those that kill and consume their own kind for mere pleasure - Tufiakwa!

Furthermore, you confirmed your ignorance by calling me Almajijri, thinking that you had insulted me - well, I've got news for you; Almajiri simply means scholar or a student, and therefore a badge I'd gladly wear anytime; so by all means go ahead and call me Almajiri till eternity.

BTW, a plate of Cannibal pepper soup, its possible you may like it.

royalfamily:
If not igbos who 're we expecting again ..... Let them face the wrath of the law it what dey call for.

Didn't even have to play the videos to guess who were involved - tarnishing our image as usual.

I have no problem with the sentence; he did the crime and should serve the time - though this case pre - dates the non grazing law because the young man was clearly being jailed for causing damage to somebody's property; not for just grazing - Fayose had nothing to do with it.

This is how we also deal with such culprits in the north; though in most cases it doesn't end up with jail sentences because the offenders are often willing to pay for the damage or their cattle are confiscated and sold off to pay off the farmer - no big deal.

mightyhazell:
was only considering the lighter scenerios in both regions. Now if we are 2 consider worse case scenerios,..I.e where a few hardened southern criminals caught in the act are lit up b4 police arrives,north still takes the barbarism cake,...wot wit burning up buildings wit scores of ppl in it just because a 'non indigene' rescued a 'blasphemer',...and a whole lotta folding litanies of similar occurences in dat region. A region where thousands of innocent souls are killed just because of a cartoon drawn in far away denmark can't really be talking about 'difference btw north and south' in terms of barbarism,..not dat any1 is proud of either scenerios

We were talking about the difference in treatment meted out to thieves when caught between the two regions and you suddenly shifted the goal post by switching on to mention a few specific headline grabbing crimes in the north - already sensationalised by your biased southern press.

First of all; taking the issue of chopping of hands, I can assure you that this a rare occurrence and that there couldn't have more than 5 cases (at most 10 cases) since the enactment of the Sharia penal code in the north; it therefore pales in comparison to the daily stripping of thieves naked and roasting them alive, in broad daylight which is common in the south.

Secondly, when it comes to horrific crimes there is nothing more despicable and horrible than cannibalism; yet we still hear even today of restaurants being found and closed down for serving human meat.
No need to elaborate of your more common vices such as ritualism, cultism, armed robbery, kidnapping, human trafficking, drug trafficking, 419, baby factories, prostitution, rape including paedophilic incest etc; indeed if you want to have an idea of the prevalence of these crimes in the south, simply take a stroll into the crime section of this forum - need I say more?

adconline:
You attempt at justifying a blogger's explanation of GMB's speech is subpar. You should have known that transcripts are provided by USIP not your roadside hungry blogger.
Provide a transcript or unedited video since the one posted is " edited" according to you. A comparison is based on 2 two known/tested conditions.
I have told you before, GMB is not known for intellectual and contextual meanings. He's gaffe-prone,and doesn't care about his utterances. Sycophantic followers like you are always left to do " let me explain" damage control.
Laundry list of his blunders
He went to Germany and didn't know the name of his host, Angela Merkel
He did not know the difference president and chancellor of Germany, even though President Joachim Gauck as the ceremonial head, had received him and Angela Merkel chaired and hosted the G8 summit.
He didn't know that west Germany stopped existing in 1990s
He submitted "ministerail"list instead of "ministerial" list
He copied 2016 budget from 2015 budget, but was still riddled with errors.
He took back the 2016 budget through the back door ( missing budget"
During the 97% vs 5%, a more articulate leader would have used 100% agregate point. 97% vs 5% = 102%, why not 97% vs 3%??
His supervised the padded 2016 budget.
He plagiarized part of his 2015 inauguration speech ( I belong to nobody part)
His aides stole the original of "change starts with me" from their original creators
He plagiarized his "change starts with me" speech by coping Obama's speech at Grant Park, Chicago, word for word.
GMB is a gift that keeps giving and a bad student cos he still crews it up when he has been served with expo.
BTW, At USIP, during the 97% vs 5% speech, he admitted that he could not trust his memory. No wonder his paid sycophants shielded him from debates, but once he travels outside the country, he loses such protection from his sycophantic aides and the world gets to see the best of him. He's antithesis of contextual meaning!!

You are really incorrigible and very silly to a fault, clearly unable to stay focused on the relevant issues of an argument; while going round and round in circles like a headless chicken without adding anymore substance to your position.

Try sticking to the fundamental issue at hand: that Buhari was being misquoted out of context by the propagation of a shorter edited version of his speech.

You argued that this wasn't true and went on to prove me right by providing a link to the very shorter Youtube version :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYUBTU2ZgFY
While on the other hand, I was able to produce both link and the actual Youtube full version of the speech along with the culled transcripts from a blog (link also provided) - see my previous post.

Your present position is quite untenable and naive: that the full version is not authentic because it did not directly come from organisers of the event (USIP) while hypocritically holding on to yours; even though both evidences were sourced from the very same Youtube source - forgetting that the president made his speech at a public event covered by the world media and that since then records of the proceedings have been made freely available to anyone with access to the internet and search engines such as google, Youtube etc.

Your propaganda has failed; repeating a lie over and over again does not necessarily make it true; you can continue to wallow in your own ignorance but the rest of are now more the wiser and will not be fooled again.
The evidence is still out there and it is irrefutable; anyone can cross check it: Buhari clarified his position by concluding unambiguously by stating that: "I have made an undertaking that I belong to everybody, I belong to no body. If I come clearly and marginalise a certain group because they didn’t vote for me then I have already contradicted myself and I am sure people will be quick to pick that against me.”
Prove to me that he didn't conclude with those words - if you don't like it, then go and jump into the nearest lagoon - stop lying.

As for the other irrelevant drivel you wrote, well you should know by now where to stuff it - I have no time for nonsense .

adconline:
Gotta love how GMB zombie followers love conspiracy theories! US Institute Peace Center where Buhari made that speech posted that video. The referenced video links you posted are not working- video unavailable.
A blog that is trying to "classify" what GMB had intended to say is a weak attempt to change the facts as enunciated by GMB.
Now, do you have an idea what is credible source? USIP is one while your wannabe bloggers are not. How could USIP edit a video in order to misrepresent his statement?
You're fighting credibly-sourced facts with emotions and no facts.
You have to show unedited video from USIP to prove your case.
You have to show transcribed speech obtained from USIP.
It smacks of intelectual dishonesty when you're trying to rebut a credible evidence from a credible organisation with "misinformation" from roadside bloggers. I know folks like u think that everybody is out to get your hero, GMB, but USIP ( if u had heard about it prior to this conversation) doesn't fit the profile of a wailer. It's a super-credible organisation unlike other sites u listed. Let's compare apple vs apple.

Then you ought to throw away the cheap phone you are using and change your ISP because all the links I provided are still working; unless of course you are a terrible liar still in denial even in the face of irrefutable facts before him - a common trait among your ilk.

Lets even assume you cannot access the blog through the provided link, why then can't you play the two videos provided (each along with its youtube link) - don't say they too are not working or that you hard of hearing to hear the full speech for yourself.

There is a famous adage in law which says: 'he who demands for equity must come with clean hands' meaning you cannot have your cake and eat.

You therefore got to be silly to presume that it is ok for you source evidence from youtube and at the same time reject another from the same source - how hypocritical.

Don't forget your post is still out there along with the youtube video link you uploaded as evidence; it is there for all to see and judge your woeful attempt to propagate the ongoing malicious propaganda against the president as well as your foolish attempt to cover up your own shameful shortcoming.

mightyhazell:
the thieves will prefer southern treatment(a few slaps and blows) to northern treatment(chopping off their hands and legs) dereby increasing the sea of amputee beggars on our roads

Rubbish!
You not only naked and beat them to pulp but also roast them alive; then turn around have the audacity to call those that only cut off the hand barbaric - what bloody hypocrites!

dokiOloye:
Chaii.
This illiterate says he wants to diversify d economy.
He come de spend big money de find d same oil wey he wan diversify from.
Brothers and sisters,U see why having an education is good.

Its a pity that with all your education, you still cannot see that diversification does not necessarily mean or is restricted to multiple commodities/services but also can include diversifying inwards within the same commodity in terms of its possible sources.
Currently, Nigeria is in a vulnerable position having placed all its eggs i.e. energy sources (oil and gas) in the same basket; that is why the NDA were able to hold it at ransom.
Diversification in this regards is not only strategic but necessary; otherwise its supplies will continue to remain very vulnerable in event of major disasters, sabotage or war.
Funny how a so called illiterate seems to think and see far beyond the horizons of the presumed educated - so much for the quality of this much touted education.

dominique:
At least, they've not been stripped naked and beaten to a pulp or even lynched.

Thats the difference between north and south

gowaga68:
You said nothing but the truth.
I vividly remember how some incidents happened yet the blames were on the fulani herds men, also know how they kill people along K/Ala -Takum road before and after Gbise.
All we pray for is peace!

Yes indeed, the truth always has a way of coming out.

Rolings:
You have said it all
Hope the Igbos will be able to understand all you've written and not call you a Zombie because it has been proven that those gully erosion ravaged mud hut enclaves lack the ability to comprehend the truth and only see anything illegal or criminal as the right thing to do

Let me shut up my mouth before they start displaying their ignorance

FULANI HERDSMEN GET BLAMED ALL THE TIME but nobody sees the criminality of cattle rustling by the farming communities.

Ignore those rabble rousers, never back down, don't be afraid to speak out; because the more you allow them expose their ignorance the more they lose credibility and therefore undermine their grand agenda to spread hatred and division between Nigerians - through deliberate misinformation/propaganda.

Currently, they still have the support of the media in perpetuating such propaganda, as many of them own or are embedded within the various media houses; yet the truth is slowly coming out, while you and I can do something about it by challenging and speaking out against such blatant misleading misinformation wherever we may encounter it - silence them with the truth.

NOETHNICITY:
God will not forgive all those haters who deliberately slander the President by twisting his words thereby distorting facts in other to elicit negative reaction against the President.
This strategy clearly will not work given that the pple who actually voted Buhari re not foools and they see beyond their noses.
Cc; adconline

My brother, they shall not succeed even though they may have the media on their side but God is always on the side of truth; and the truth shall prevail, as the likes of adconline and his ilk shall continue to expose themselves - Insha Allah!
PMB himself is aware and had spoken of such ppl who have invested fortunes towards maligning him.

^^^^^Military has constitutional right to intervene including killing anyone who take up arms and threatens the national integrity - the same goes in any country of this world; so stop being sentimental.

vchykp:
.lolx.. nigeria is really growing .. even benue habours gangsters, well, all thanks to nemesis.

They are not just ordinary gangsters: they get hired by politicians for elections, in between rob and attack their own communities; but most importantly attack and rustle cattle from the Fulanis, who in turn (because they cannot differentiate between them and their communities) take reprisal action against both and consequently get blamed for most of the hostilities - for political reasons.

adconline:
You are just being obtuse. I can stand folks that are obliviously ignorant, but have no nano respect for willfully ignorant folks like you.

The narrative that Buhari spoke in context and was taken out context is a sheer fallacy. He's not known to be a masterful speaker who uses words to project different meanings. He's not your average Naija politicians who choose word carefully.
The moderator of the Q&A- ( this wasn't in a speech format) had to explain the meaning of inclusive as posed by Dr Pauline Baker, who asked how GMB he would run an inclusive government and development in particular reference to ND.

Then, GMB didn't fully grasp the question and what inclusive meant, so the moderator had to break it down for him to understand. He had to confer with the moderator and made the following remarks " I hope you have copies of the elections results, 97% that gave me their votes CANNOT in all HONESTY be treated equally with regions that gave me 5%)

Now, Dr Baker, is a Nigerian expert, has lived and worked in Naija, so she knowingly brought up that issue and GMB clearly spelt out how he would pursue governance in relation to ND issues and inclusive goverment.

GMB makes it easy for his followers and regular folks to understand, but makes it very difficult for his PR to manage after he's done the damage.
Keep living in denial


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYUBTU2ZgFY

If anyone is being obtuse and intellectually lazy, it's you; since even after explaining to you that Buhari was being misquoted out of context based on a small portion of his speech, you went right ahead to confirm my position by uploading a Youtube link to exactly such an edited shorter version.
That is also exactly why I earlier said that you and your ilk are dishonest co-travellers, prone towards twisting facts to suit your nefarious agenda.
You must have thought that most of us are gullible, without independent minds and independent access to the internet and therefore likely to blindly buy into your manufactured version of the truth without question - well, how so wrong, you've miscalculated yet again.

For those following this argument, kindly watch the fuller video version of the video here as well as the transcripts, and notice the intended deception in the shorter edited version as being propagated by the likes of [b]adconline [/b]and his co-travellers in order to put the president in bad light.

VIDEO:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mm_VEkxyiKw
CULLED ARTICLE INCLUDING TRANSCRIPT AND ARGUMENT ON THE MATTER:

In what appears a deliberate attempt paint and different picture and paint President Buhari in bad light, a section of the online media yesterday went to press stating that the president said he wont give attention to the Niger Delta region because the people there didn’t vote for him.

The statement Buhari was purported to have made was cut in half with the first theory part presented to tarnish the president’s image and the remaining cut off. Buhari was answering a question on Amnesty, Bunkering and Inclusive governance for the Niger Delta. He addressed the fears of his government not being inclusive with the purposely misquoted piece.

Buhari had said that it was fair to treat those who gave him 97% better than those who gave him 5% and that that was politics, but however he can never do that as it is against the constitution and it will violate his promise of being committed to no one or owned by no one, and committed to all and owned by all.

Listen:

Below is the text of the president’s statement in question. The ones in bold is the part that was deliberately left out.

“I hope you have a copy of the election results. Literally constituencies, for example, that gave me 97 per cent, cannot in all honesty be treated, on some issues, [the same way as] some constituencies that gave me five per cent. I think these are political realities. While certainly there will be justice for everybody; everybody will enjoy their constitutional rights, where the party in constituencies that by either sheer hard work made sure they got their people [to vote] and ensure their votes count, they must feel that the government has appreciated the effort they put in putting the government in place. I think this is really fair. By the constitution, no state can be excluded from government, so there is no way even if I were to show gratitude to those constituencies that voted heavily for me against those that didn’t even vote for me, they have the protection of the government. And I have made an undertaking that I belong to everybody, I belong to no body. If I come clearly and marginalize a certain group because they didn’t vote for me then I have already contradicted myself and I am sure people will be quick to pick that against me.”

—

Buhari was dead honest. It is fair to treat those who fought and voted for you better than those who fought for the corrupt incumbent and voted against you. That’s human, fair, political and expected. He however said luckily for them and as he has promised, the constitution does not allow that, which is the beauty of democracy and unlike his predecessors who punished opposition states, he will treat everyone equally as he has promised in his inauguration speech.

Watch the full video below for the statement:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=paLHi4ieE7A

http://abusidiqu.com/full-video-what-buhari-truly-said-about-those-who-voted-and-did-not-vote-for-him/

Jokerman:
U lie... Why didn't Obasanjo complain or why didnt Nigeria go into recession after Nigeria greatest thief and looter left power??

Or is there any govt dat stole more than Abacha??

Its not a lie but a fact that no government enjoyed so much revenue and achieved little with it, except loot and squandered it away, than the Jonathan administration - where an individual with no visible income other than a very questionable want away perm sec position would claim ownership of over $34 million as mere leftover money from personal medical expenses.

DeleteNonsense:
Where were Nigeria territorial integrity when barkasi peninsula was ceded to Cameroun?

Bakassi was ceded by virtue of a court judgement, after the two countries had agreed to go on trial and be bounded by the terms and conditions of the international court of arbitration; it wasn't ceded to a bunch of riff raffs because they could come up with baseless claims of genocide and marginalisation.

mekaboy:
The Naira is wailing, food is wailing, inflation is wailing,unemployment is wailing and you are hailing.

All of the above being the consequences of your hero who unashamedly declared that Stealing is not Corruption, then went forth and presided over the unprecedented looting of this country - in other words robbing you and many more of their yesterday, today and future; yet you found no wrong in him but in person trying hard to salvage us from the mess he caused.

mekaboy:
[s]As they packaged President Buhari and sold to us,they turned all his weaknesses to strength. They began devalue quality education because of PMB.

They said all those who are educated have nothing to offer, therefore PMB was the best choice.

This even discouraged those who intended to go to the highest level of education. Since the highly educated devalued the importance of quality education just to sell their candidate.

They said even if he presents NEPA bills as certificate, they will vote for him.

The signs of what to come were showing when he promised to stabilise global oil price. They laughed it off and said they still stand with NEPA certificate.

Finally with massive propaganda and threats, the NEPA certificate was placed above the PHD in ASO Rock.

In less than 2 years, the entire country began to witness the power of the NEPA certificate.

Those who had masters degree, PHD etc, who were gainfully employed, suddenly became unemployed.

You can place NEPA certificate above PHP and still want to work with your degree.

The certificate hit the financial sector and Naira went from 215 to 425.

The wind of the NEPA certificate blew over food prices,fuel and every other commodities and prices skyrocketed. Rice from 7k to 22k, fuel from 86 to 145 , inflation from 9% to 17.6%.

Now this certificate is encouraging exam Malpractice. Motivating students to copy the works of others to present as theirs.

Since its NEPA certificate, it's not hard to acquire. So students in universities can easily copy other people's final projects and submit as theirs.

JP Morgan threatened to delist Nigeria, they said they can go to hell, we stand by NEPA certificate. IMF came and advised earlier of devaluation. They said IMF can go to hell, what the IMF people have are degrees and NEPA certificate is more valuable.

They flew to China with the NEPA certificate and said they have a solution that will bring the dollar to its knees. I waited patiently for the details of the deal that NEPA certificate could broker that PHD couldn't.

Today this NEPA certificate has set our economy back, the certificates holder has become humble and now willing to implement all the advices it got from degree holders, including borrowing from IMF.

Now, we have all seen the power of the NEPA certificate, the question is, can we trust this NEPA certificate to borrow on our behalf and utilise the funds[/s]?

Behold! The tortured lament of a pained wailer!

adconline:
What an arrogant display of willful ignorance and sophisticated idiocy. In 2016, we're talking about realtime video evidence which on Youtube and you are talking about transcript. I would take an unedited speech captured live on video vs a transcribed speech. You are just being obtuse!!
If there is anything that is transparent about GMB, it's his knack for expressing his strongly-held views unintelligently without wit or context. He lacks EQ-emotional intelligence as a leader, which makes it easier for folks to visualize his mindset.
GMB is a man with no PC, emotional, intelligent and contextual filters. He says it how he feels!
BTW, I watched it live and it was agonizingly dreadful that a president had never heard of the the word - inclusive-
Like president like follower

Try looking into the mirror and you may likely see the reflection of that willfully sophisticated ignorant person you are talking about; who is seemingly not only intellectually deficient but also poor in memory or simply, blatantly dishonest in argument.

Remember, you spoke of pictures from Google not video evidence sourced from YouTube - or have you forgotten?- in case you have; let me remind you.

'I have no time to upload pictures for folks like who are wilfully ignorant. Google is ur best resource'.- your words not mine.

Now tell me, since when are pictures the same as video and why you think the latter is more superior to the transcribed version of speech?
I was initially even willing to be generous and excuse your obvious gaff on the basis that one could remotely argue that videos are essentially the same as a series of pictures taken in quick succession separated by short time intervals; until you hit the nail into your own head by carelessly referring to real time evidence.

As I have already mentioned, I am not ready to engage you in an argument based on conjectures and innuendos or where the goal post in such argument can suddenly be dishonestly switched at will; but only on facts where the evidence is to be placed out there under public scrutiny for re-examination.

I specifically proposed the transcript version of the president's speech (reproduced vertum by vertum) because it is the most practical medium for this purpose - and yes indeed, this may partly explain, even in 2016 and possibly for many generations to come, why courts worldwide (dealing with simple misdemeanors to serious cases bordering on life and death) still prefer (where possible) transcript records over and above other media of record keeping.

Pls, if you are still serious, then take up my challenge: reproduce Buhari's speech, let us publicly re-examine it here and judge whether he was correctly quoted or wrongly being quoted out of context.

Aufbauh:
You are spot on in your assertion.
If it that easy GEJ the biafran abducted hero would have given them an independent state during his own reign.

GEJ not only used and dumped them but similarly more or less told them bluntly to forget about Biafra when he made his famous declaration that 'the amalgamation of Nigeria was ordained by God'
http://www.premiumtimesng.com/news/152255-nigerias-amalgamation-ordained-god-jonathan.html

@TOPIC:
By virtue of his oath of office, Buhari or any subsequent president would have no choice on the issue of Biafra, because he or she would have sworn to uphold the constitution and Nigeria's territorial integrity - those attacking Buhari are simply ignorant or looking for an excuse to justify their hatred for him.

adconline:
I have no time to upload pictures for folks like who are wilfully ignorant. Google is ur best resource. 1: he didn't know what inclusive meant, implying that it wasn't not in his dictionary and wont implement inclusivity in his govt.
2: He said in all honesty he would not treat the regions that gave him 97% votes same with regions that gave him 5%, BTW, GMB isn't wittily evasive to speak in a contextual manner.
3. Ok fine, can he fix the country for the 97%?

Listen, stop exhibiting all the attributes of an educated illiterate and the intellectually lazy.

Who is talking about uploading pictures? - certainly not me.
It is obvious that you have a problem with basic comprehension; otherwise you would have noticed the word TRANSCRIPT in my post, which would have done away with the need for any pictorial evidence except for the transcribed (i.e. written version) of the president's speech to be held up for public scrutiny as I had earlier challenged.

FYI, PMB's speech was quite lengthy; it had a beginning, middle and (quite importantly on this issue) a conclusion.
I clearly recall PMB began with a description of what was normal and expected to happen following an election victory such as his at that time i.e sharing of the bounties of victory between himself and his supporters - in that case, the 97% that voted for him against the 5% that didn't; but quickly added that he couldn't do that even if he had wanted to and went on to give reasons: among which were that the constitution wouldn't allow it and therefore risked impeachment should he try it; but most importantly he himself didn't want to do it and concluded by repeating his commitment to his earlier declaration that he belonged to nobody but to everybody.

Unfortunately since then, some miscreants and most disappointingly some media houses had decided to take out only the short the portion containing the 97% versus 5% and twisted it out of context to give it a negative interpretation other than the original intended message. What is even more sad is the fact that this misleading version is what many Nigerians have been conditioned to believe.

I am still challenging you or anyone who thinks otherwise to prove me wrong; otherwise, pls don't engage me again in further riff raff arguments lacking in both intellectual and factual merit.

adconline:
because you are oblivious to what is divisive just like Buhari was to inclusive.. A president who said "in all honesty" so how true can it be??

If you are really serious, then kindly take up my challenge; upload the entire speech of the president and let us analyse it together before this forum so as to prove whether or not he is being accurately quoted by your ilk and many more - otherwise I really don't have time for such pea brained empty arguments that mean and prove nothing.