₦airaland Forum

Tobiloba24072:
Diesel electric are usually more quiet than nuclear when running in batteries, but it doesn't have the endurance and power a nuclear submarine has, and power is needed when you lunch and to power computing devices of ballistic missiles.

there are nuclear armed de subs and the US has actually purchased nuclear armed DE subs instead of nuclear powered subs lately

Abohboy:
I'm praying that ActionSA don't win but i've seen a lot more of their posters then those of DA and EFF but if they win it would have a negative impact on us Nigerians in the country.

unfortunately ActionSA are not contesting any municipalities in my area however the DA has done an awesome job in my area but ActionSA has my vote for the next national election, its time all the illegal immigrants fvck off out of SA

Just30:


Looks like you are proclaiming your deficiencies on me

lol I'm not the one that was confused between socialism and a command economy that was all you mate

Xbee007:
Australians went for the better deal. France was going to provide them with diesel powered subs while Americans nuclear powered. By the way, America seriously need to keep the military industrial complex alive especially now that they have pulled out of Afghanistan.

doubt that was the reason since diesel electric subs are much cheaper to maintain and except for endurance DE subs actually offer a lot of advantages over nuclear subs especially DE subs fitted with aip

Hueman:
Go to Europe. Africa is not your habitat. You people literally have the highest rate of skin cancer for a reason

don't confuse all white people with Boers mate skin cancer is very low in the Afrikaner population, its things like genetically inherited cholesterol which is a problem in Afrikaner populations

Just30:
says the guy who doesn't know something that everybody already knows

says the guy who doesn't know the difference between a command economy, a socialist economy and a capitalist economy

Abohboy:
I mean they might ANC is dying so it's between EFF and DA for now if only Julius Malema wasn't so keen on increasing immigration then South Africans wouldn't be so against his government

EFF is losing support... Granted the DA as well!! However parties like ActionSA which has a very very hard stance against immigrants might see a massive surge in support.

Hueman:
China isn’t destroying Africa our leaders just aren’t holding them accountable. If our leaders wants us to benefit from China trade deals they’ll make sure of it. For instance that Ibadan to Lagos train station increased our railway sector revenue by 33%

so how in the actual fvck is dat not different to what you said here:

Hueman:
On the top of my head I can tell you that Australia and Canada has a bunch of mining companies in Africa destroying the continent. .

Hueman:
When EFF goes into power hopefully they deal with you roaches and put you inside re-education centres lol That white supremacist beliefs will be beaten out of your body in Jesus name!

lol the EFF coming in to power??

WTF you smoking bru

Just30:
you absolutely know nothing

says the man that thinks Nordic countries are socialist

Hueman:
On the top of my head I can tell you that Australia and Canada has a bunch of mining companies in Africa destroying the continent. Switzerland is used as a money laundering front for billionaires and corrupt politicians. Sigapore is a tax heaven. Norway got oil companies destroying the niger delta. Sweden got multi national companies using child labour.

but China ain't destroying Africa ...... Oh the fvcking Irony

Hueman:
Ewwww you’re a white African. Sorry us real Africans will never accept you after all the harms and damages you’ve caused on our continent. I don’t mind seeing Indians as Africans but white people it’s over. U people have caused too much problems. The only white Africans I respect are the ones that commit class suicide and dedicate their life to dismantling the oppressive system their ancestors built. If not you can shut it and leave us alone.

luckily I don't care about the "blame the whitey" mentality neither do I care about your approval

Abohboy:
Because of it's position in the world did I not mention that? This is literally part of the GCSE course in England there's a whole topic on Singapore and the main point is that 20% of the worlds trade goes through the strait of malacca which is where Singapore is all they had to do was build a port and the money flew in enmasse

is Singapore the only country in the Malacca strait?

Abohboy:
Strategic positioning they couldn't actually destroy Singapore a targeted attack on Singapore would destroy a lot of the worlds trade as in the Malacca strait is essential to world trade if they destabilized Singapore they'd be destabilizing their own nation

And why has it become such a strategic country??

Abohboy:
Yes because it was a predominantly white nation so wasn't stopped from making full use and benefit of its resources and before you bring up South Korea and Japan one of them is an American puppet and the other one was already developed from their imperialistic tendencies in the past so they couldn't stop them from developing further added to that they had to give billions in reparations for the nuclear bombings

What's your excuse on Singapore?

Abohboy:
Not necessarily they colonized the place but what made them rich was the resources which were not previously exploited by the populace now from different perspectives this can be right or wrong for some people, one point of view is that the resources of the land belonged to the Aboriginals and them exploiting them without the permission of the people is evil and hence yes they became rich from colonization and another point of view is that the Aboriginals had no intention and no knowledge of the resources they had so there's nothing wrong with immigrants exploiting it as long as they compensate them for the land. But personally i'd have to do more research on Australia because it's not a topic that i've read anything about to be frank.

Long story short it was capitalism that made Australians rich...

mtisTheQubit:
You need to go back to where it all started. Where did ths so called capitalist get their wealth from in the first place... do i need to wail about it

You can wail al you want bru still doesn't change the argument since if what he said was true then 90% of African countries should be rolling in the cash right now

mtisTheQubit:
The so called Australians or Canadians were never the natives of those lands..They were colonialists who felt entitled to stick around just like Kaburus of south africa.so don't twist things

Context!!! your boy claimed the only reason capitalist countries like the UK,US and others are rich is because of colonisation....now all I'm pointing out is that those same colonised countries are now wealthy today thanks to capitalism.....

mtisTheQubit:
So funny so apartheid SA was socialist in nature..must have targeted only specific group coz blacks might not agree with you on that

I said it was more socialist in nature in terms of it's economic structure. That doesn't mean Black SAns benefitted from it!!

Jeez!! Logic Bru!!

Abohboy:
They sit at the top due to continued oppression and the capitalist societies that are at top are not fully capitalist like England they embraced aspects of Socialism for their welfare systems.

oppression of whom?

ALSO!! Social benefits doesn't = Socialism

Abohboy:
I did they were at first immigrants then became colonizers if you want me to answer the question then they were ultimately colonizers

Ok the question I actually wanted you to answer is, did Australians get rich through colonisation, and if yes then how?

Just30:
This is shameful

The fact that you even thought that a command economy was the same as socialism...

Please don't engage on this topic again, you are not equipped for it

SMH.........

"In a purely socialist system, all legal production and distribution decisions are made by the government, and individuals rely on the state for everything from food to healthcare. The government determines the output and pricing levels of these goods and services."

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/socialism.asp

Educate yourself!!

Just30:
They are all socialist states politically and to a large extent economically

Then you really need to go back to school because there economic systems aren't socialist in the slightest.

Abohboy:
They were immigrants by the original definition it is only when they began introducing their own languages and laws claimed land and started taking resources of the people that they became colonizers same way the Portugese and British began as merchants and missionaries then transitioned into slave trade

Just answer the question bru

Abohboy:
Some Australians were prisoners but most of them are immigrants how many immigrants could they have sent for the population to have grown to 25 million in 300 years?

immigrants or colonisers? Did Australia get rich on the back of aboriginals ?

mtisTheQubit:
The so called Australians or Canadians were never the natives of those lands..They were colonialists who felt entitled to stick around just like Kaburus of south africa.so don't twist things

Australians we're actually prisoners my bru they went there with nothing and against there will!!

Just30:
you have a limited view of socialism and that is why you are struggling.... And it's sad

You are even confusing socialism with a mixed economy or a command economy where the government set prices of goods and services.

Start learning

And yet you think the Nordic system is socialist after what you said above

The fvcking irony

theenchanter:
u guys said d same thing.....

I said income equality not income inequality!!!

Just30:
there is no Capitalist society at the top when it comes to income equality...

They are all socialist nations .... Income equality (equity of incomes) is one of the Hallmark of socialism.

Denmark, Norway, New Zealand, Sweden, Switzerland.... All capitalist countries mate

mtisTheQubit:
Yes like you just stated Capitalism only benefits the top layer .in ths case the Boers Now I know why y've not jumped out an why you defend Capitalism coz ya a beneficiary of the system

capitalism is an economic system which by definition promotes freedom and hardwork, don't confuse political oppression like apartheid with capitalism, in fact the Apartheid government was more socialist in nature than the current one.

mtisTheQubit:
Forget about Singapore for once an concentrate on the rest..They all in a way benefited from colonialism.where do you think those white Canadians an Australians came from? Read about how Switzerland become rich ..they all benefited in one way or another you African

you are contradicting yourself, you said capitalist countries got rich through colonialism.... Now you are saying colonised countries got rich through colonialism.....so what is it now??

mtisTheQubit:
Let's just say you Kaburus ( Boers) [b]are just stuck here just like rest of africans.[/b]otherwuse if you had a chance to jump out you would have done that long time ago..an keep on praising the so call caoitalism .just look at your country..the poverty I see while the minority own everything..do you think if SA practiced socialism we could have those white ghettos

actually statistically Boere have it the easiest when it comes to immigration since they on average are the wealthiest ethnic group in SA possibly even Sub Sahara Africa..... And yet we still remain

Secondly its been the more populist/socialist policies that have destroyed our economy not capitalism..... So yeah