₦airaland Forum

donstan18:
This image Nihilist posted says it all...

Very glaring to everyone to see he went for goal.

Maybe he was creating chance for Keeper, it can never be Kimmich.

Very very very glaring.
The way dem dey talk am, e go be like say most of us no play field football to understand all these basics

donstan18:
This one choke!!!

Na like this intelligent players dey create chances.



Isn’t it obvious he went for goal??

Did you notice his leg position?
Does that leg position looks like a leg that intended a pass?

donstan18:
“If Kimmich followed Harvertz movement”

They are about to start blaming Kimmich.

They’ve stole his credit to give it to Fraudvertz, they are about to start blaming him for Fraudvertz miss.

E tire me oo.
But they won't blame Muller for not making the run when havertz finally scored the goal

Havertz10:
I gave him credit for the liverpool goal, gave him credit for the sacking of Lampard, if I can find a position for mount that will utilize his skills, I will support him


My problem is mount playing as a 10 with only 3 open play assists in 70games

I want us to win things and we can't if mount is the creative cog of the team

Didn't you watch the FA cup final, how many chances did mount create? We have lost 2 finals because of his limitations, if havertz didn't make that run , who knows if we would have beaten man city that day, football is a game of fine margins, coronavirus crises has gifted us a good player, and I will drag anybody that wants to hinder the progress of the club

What is the job of a striker if not to make runs?
Havertz made the fine run
Mount gave the weighted pass

Why is it now Mount fault for spotting havertz run instead of praising Mount?

nihilistjnr:
Ogbeni stop it

You mean somebody in this position here is trying to pass to somebody behind him that he cannot even see?

I mean....

You can imagine na.

Havertz10:
if kimmich followed havertz movement, he would have easily tapped in that goal, it's not havertz fault that he moved late

Using the final position of kimmich to argue against havertz's intention is comical, where did the ball drop after havertz's touch? In front of goal or on the line?

You're getting ridiculous the more and more you type.

In that situation, if really he wants to create chance for kimmich, it ought to be on a plate. Ozil in that situation, you'll know that that's really chance creation cos of the way the pass will drop and not something going wide.

Blaming kimmich for rescuing havertz shot on target

nihilistjnr:
There is no single point in that sequence where Havertz even looks at Kimmich before he takes his shot. Pic 1 below is the start of the sequence. You can see that Havertz is in front of Kimmich looking at the ball.

He called for the ball at the near post and then ran there to make the shot. The first time he sees Kimmich is after he turned to omo iya teacher and kicked the ball to throwin. He didnt even know Kimmich was there to pass to. Funny thing is that Kimmich was unmaked all through, so Havertz hadn't called for the ball, Gosens should have sent to Kimmich at the far post for an easy tap in.

However it's clear that Germany were targeting that channel. Havertz had been making that run to the near post all game, and it's from that exact position that he scored his goal.

He missed his shot, that's a normal thing. But see where Kimmich went to rescue the ball...who creates a 'chance' to there?

Alaye dont piss on us and call it rain. Ah an.

A player wants to pass to teammates in that position but

1... His leg position is adjusted to play in a way to direct the ball to the far corner (slant diagonal) instead of sideway if it was a pass

2... The ball moved more towards the post side than towards his horizontal side were it's expected for a teammate to run and meet it.

Na person/people wey no play ball for big pitch naim dem fit sell their story to

User09:
Let's just agree to disagree

No P

User09:
Please rewatch that gif again. His movement prior basically created a chance out of nothing.

Y'all need to start watching games based on actual actions and passive actions. There's a lot of gap in your football knowledge based on the above

What created the chance was kimmich keeping that ball alive before it went out of play.

What havertz did that I credited him for was reading that play smartly and his quick thinking made him get to that ball before the keeper. Saying he didn't mean to aim for goal is just you being sentimental and insincere.

Truly, when Madonna says
"you only see what your eyes want to see"
Na really true.

Havertz fans only see wetin dia eyes wan see, even if it means seeing false stuffs as truth.

So many false stuffs they've twisted just to elevate havertz more than he really is or push another silly agenda.

Make una kwantinue

donstan18:
That’s why we aren’t relenting anytime soon, we know they are pained we do it better than them.



Person wey say “Fvck Halland” because of a tapin goal from Fraudvertz against Portugal.

Lol.... I swear, na just say una sabi troll havertz pass more than how they're trolling Mount.
Person wey no too know the origin go think say na una just dey beef havertz unnecessarily, but na issue like this dey cause am

nihilistjnr:
Faamm the Havertz literally played penalty to throwin there.

Imagine the revisionist agenda

Lol... Like I know he was smart and sharp enough to read that ball, but to claim that ball was an intended pass? That ball wey dey go throw in
Mehn, Havertz10 no try for there.

The agenda too choke gan

User09:
Agree. Which is why there's always the false 9 thing with him and not a proper 9. He also likes to be and move around the box

If we chose to play 4 atb next season, I would deploy him as a 10 or 9(if we were out of options) but if we stick with the 3-4-3, He'll be ok as the false 9.

The one place I dont want to see him is on the wings especially in England where pace is all that matters to them

You're agreeing he chose to create chance instead of scoring that goal? Like that shot was an intended pass?

When most guys don't take you guys matters on havertz serious, na okoto yarns like this dey cause am.

Havertz10:
I think his predator instincts are devastating in the box but I don't think that he a pure striker like haaland, see the 2nd goal against Portugal, he created it out of nothing, a true striker would have gone for goal

He chose to create a chance for his teammates

https://j.gifs.com/PjZN1W.gif

Person was going for goal and he missed goal, you say na create him create for teammate. Abi the teammate was smart enough to keep that ball alive.

You claim that mount fans overhype him which might be true sometimes, but tbh you're not different from them.

Just out of the blues, you call "shot off target" chance creation. Hilarious!!

LostMyZeal:

What a damage control technique employed by the renowned silvadunce

This one pass Pogboom masterclass oh
Hohohoho...las las, ole ni everybody

donstan18:
His fanboiz should respect British players working their a$$ out to take Chelsea to the next level, they should stop discrediting them and hyping German frauds because of price tag.

. Lol...
This wan na personal vendetta in olamide voice

SyIvalord:
Allow me hate Liverfool and their players in peace. Jota is a bench warming fraud as far as I am concerned. That idîôt is one of the chief reasons Portugal had a poor Euros campaign and Bruno is taking all the blame.

Lol... Chai!!
You for hint me say na cruise you wan catch since na.

mostob:
Na Runnarsson own ridiculous pass. Somebody said he looked like a primary school kid Manning a goal post.

I swear...
How that guy take get arsenal connect?
Mehn, some people chi strong for this life o

donstan18:
He should be loaned out to develop.

Mehn and havertz10 na fire for fire for havertz and Mount matter I swear

Wetin havertz do you?

falseprophet:

Ah... Even false prophet dey laugh.

Odikwa serious

Trevor012:
Jota started 27matches out of the 34matchday squad he was involved in at Wolves before moving to Liverpool. He was not a bench player.

Thank you....

@sylvalord

CrystalTiger:
Thought I was the only one surprised at that Jota agenda..

it's really surprising brother.
Who will know wolves and not know Jota?

O wrong nao

mostob:
It is true. But Soares is actually not mediocre though he is not what we needed at that time...Runar was recommended. Na only Willian 's deal looked mediocre.

Cedric isn't bad and he can be good as a sub. The few times he played either lb/rb he didn't underwhelm. Why Arteta decided to use xhaka over him later in the season was surprising

Runarsson, I don't just know what to say. We are not confident with him, we don't trust him yet we bought him and just decided he's not good enough. Same thing with Saliba. Sometimes I don't know what those people at the top are thinking.

As for Williian.. He just personifies who our board really are. Nuff said

johnjunior39:
Isak , so that we will be reading, his contribution was great when he is suppose to be scoring goal.
Hahahaha abeg no

SyIvalord:
How many matches did Jota start for Wolves before Liverpool signed him?

he was their key player 2018/2019, and 2019/2020 team. Mostly in first 11.

In fact, him and Jimenez have a special understanding most times I watched them play. I'm surprised you're saying a whole Jota is a bench player in that wolves team.

kodded:
If you thought that kolasinac was terribele, then watch tavarez in action.

According to so many benfica fans, he is so terrible that they are celebrating his departure and they are wondering why would arsenal buy such an awful player.


Las las arteta and medicore players are like bread and butter

Chai!!
Tell me you're joking?

Mehn, we don enter am for Arteta hand if true

SyIvalord:
Jota was a bench player at Wolves before signing for Liverpool, how much you expect make them give am before? Let them sign a player like Haaland and put him on under 300,000 per week and then I’ll agree they are shrewd. It’s easy to sign average or slightly above average players and put them on 200,000 or below. That club is complete shît.

Jota bench player?
Which of the Jota abeg, cos I'm not sure it's diogo Jota.

Na who been dey bench am?

SyIvalord:
They will have to improve those salaries soon or they will lose the players. Wijnaldum left because he wasn’t satisfied with the contract offer.

Well, salah have signed improved contract and it's still not up to £250k. Even if Mane signs new extension, with their shrewdness that might still be max £200k. Look at Jota that's good that signed 5yrs contract on £90k, by the time he wants to improve it after good display, it might be up to 180k(or less) for another 5yrs. That's great negotiation if you ask me
Wijnaldum is 30yrs and they might use age as a factor in easily Allowing him to go while buying another great Mf to replace him

Well we just watch and see, but what I'm really applauding their shrewdness.

TrebleChamp:
I even stated here that maybe the FA is trying to reduce Sancho's value, to enable United sign him. Now that he is here, i am hoping for the best. CB, a DM and a SF (incase Cavani gets injured) is still top priority..

Yeah... One thing is to get them and hope that Ole uses the seemingly strong bench that might be on parade.
Cos that Europa final still shock me sha

LMDyaya:
maybe they earned very low amounts at previous clubs. But liverpool better sort out,this set of players are getting older while at that stage its all about money


That is what i am talking about ,but trust me at united, they would all ask for 200k plus

Most of these players earn low amount at their previous clubs before earning astronomically wen they move to England.

Partey was earning £45-47k pw at Athletico but is now receiving 250k at arsenal.
Bruno was earning 40k or less at sporting but now he's earning between the range of 150-180k.

Do you see where I'm coming from?

handelex:

Lol... Shey you don see the 15million difference na

[quote author=BlueAngel444 post=103258331][/quote]Oh
Bruno 180k
Maguire 189k

I guess Maguire was world class.

After Trevor will be telling me another thing