₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: Register • Login • With Google • Trending • Recent • New

Stats: 3,345,484 members, 8,517,783 topics. Date: Friday, 13 November 2026 at 04:25 AM

Toggle theme

Johnydon22's Posts

Nairaland Forum › Johnydon22's Profile › Johnydon22's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 (of 489 pages)

Science/Technology › Re: 10 Most Strange Stars (known) In The Observable Universe.. by johnydon22(op): 1:28am On Jan 17, 2016
[b]5.. SMSS J031300.36-670839.3

Ok my life is officially ruined angry who in the world gives these names cus i could punch him right in the faceundecided

So well i think we will just this star Methuselah because that is exactly what it is..

This is the Oldest star we have observed in the universe yet.. 13.6billion years shocked.

This Star formed roughly more than 100million years after the Big Bang in cosmology and due to the low presence of iron and abundance of carbon elements it shows this starry Methuselah is a second generation star..

First generation Stars had older elements found in a young universe Helium, hydrogen and lithium and were short lived and the active nuclear reaction in their core led to formation of heavy metals transcending to newer stars after supernova.

So the newer the star the more heavy metals it should have.. But Methuselah has the lowest amount of heavy metals of any known star in our universe now.

1/10,000,000 of the suns iron composition.

So this Old guy has been blazing for 13.6billion years non-stop.. wow am impressed..

Someone get Methuselah a walking stick please.. grin
https://s4.gigacircle.com/media/s4_55c18b5187568.jpg
[/b]
Science/Technology › Re: 10 Most Strange Stars (known) In The Observable Universe.. by johnydon22(op): 1:02am On Jan 17, 2016
[b]6.. PSR J1311-3430

Yeah right? This name is freaky boring and annoying .. Yes i feel your pain too angry

But i think we got lucky here because this star with an incredibly long boring name up there have a more conventional name that we can use because the name up there is awfully outre.

So you can call this.. The black widow Pulsar

Ok first let me explain what a Pulsar is and then can say the very ominous feature of this particular special pulsar star.

A Pulsar is a special kind of neutron star (Neutron Stars are as a result of the collapse of a massive star under it's own gravity).. So Pulsars are a kind of neutron star that are very magnetized and so emits radio waves (Electromagnetic radiation)

There was a time we thought it was Aliens trying to contact us, oh what a disappointment it must have been when our guys realized it was just some naughty stars beaming down radio signals..grin

So back to business.. What makes The black widow Pulsar
very special is it has a Star in orbit around it with an orbital period of 94minutes now imagine how close it is..

Now the bizarre thing here is that The dwarf star in orbit around The black widow Pulsar is literally being cannibalized by it..

The more extreme intense electromagnetic radiations is beamed at the star more and more of it's materials are being shed off.

This ominous star is literally sending the poor companion to a slow and steady death that eventually it will become an actual widow when it's companion star is fully annihilated by it's act of cannibalism.

Can you really still ask why this star is given such a strange alias? Naah i think it fits it.. https://i.space.com/images/i/23146/original/pulsar-and-companion-star.jpg?1351183607
[/b]
Celebrities › Re: Did Fela Kuti Invent Twerking? (photo) by johnydon22(m): 5:46pm On Jan 16, 2016
TheFilmmaker:
Keep inventing dancing, while the world moves on with science and technology.

On Judgement day, the Lord shall ask you what you did with your life and you'll say, "I twerked, father. I twerked!"
Bro whatsapp me
Business › Re: ‘ghosts’ Set Shops Ablaze In Anambra Over High Cost Of Goods (photo) by johnydon22(m): 5:30pm On Jan 16, 2016
Africans ... The only place ghosts that are not supposed to eat or buy anything gets angry and burns shop when the prices of goods gets high..
Science/Technology › Re: 10 Most Strange Stars (known) In The Observable Universe.. by johnydon22(op):
7.. J0523

Yes above we paid homage to the biggest star we know, it is only fair that we accord similar recognition to the smallest star we know for now in the known universe.

J0523 is a red Dwarf star located at a distance of 40light years away from us ... A very small and low luminous star that we could barely spot it.

J0523 is slightly smaller than Jupiter shocked Imagine a Star that small right? grin

There are possibility that it will be the smallest star we ever will know but nature is so so unpredictable and crazy that when you think you know this, it surprises you with an even crazier fact.

We may yet find stars quite smaller than the J0523 but for now this dim tiny beauty holds the record for the smallest Star we know..

https://3.im.guokr.com/IBKT14msrxkz48kh3aYkeSp_x3v1DiWs-22AYsKsQjCAAgAAbAEAAEpQ.jpg

Size comparison of the sun, J0523 and jupiter
Science/Technology › Re: 10 Most Strange Stars (known) In The Observable Universe.. by johnydon22(op): 3:59pm On Jan 16, 2016
8..UY scuti

Give up for the largest star we know so far in the universe...

This enormous star is breathe taking, so large that it is out of the world and possibly a very good candidate for the biggest star known when more super gigantic stars are discovered.

And Canis Majoris thinks it's large undecided Haaaa Joker grin this star beats Canis to the deal..

Located 9,500 light years away from us, this star is so huge that it literally has a volume 5million times the volume of our own star we call the sun.

This star is so huge that if it is placed in the center of our solar system, it's largeness will cover up to the Orbit of Jupiter and possibly Saturn..

Our Gigantic sun literally looks like a spec of dust compared to this extremely humongous Sun..

https://i.imgur.com/7aYbwwY.png Look harder you will see the tiny sun in the picture showing a size comparison..
Science/Technology › Re: Answer This Question by johnydon22(m): 3:00pm On Jan 16, 2016
darealsola:
what if u woke up nd u saw urself nd ur family in another planet.wat will u do.as for me, i go dey chill for there


I will wake up again this time for real...
Science/Technology › Re: 10 Most Strange Stars (known) In The Observable Universe.. by johnydon22(op): 2:48pm On Jan 16, 2016
9,.The Castro Star System..

I call this the league of stars, this is a rare sight to behold in our chats of starry systems.

Here we have not a binary system or tripe but a league of 6 stars all orbiting a common central mass..

This is comprised of 3 distinct star systems together in an orbital dance of gravitational high-life to give us an incredibly rare but beautiful star system we know as the Castro System..

The star system boast of a mesh of distinct star types.. 2 type A hot huge stars and 4 type M dwarfs..

The Castro star system is 54 times brighter than our sun and appears in the Gemini constellation in our night sky..

Appears just like a single star in our sky but actually is a combination of 6 ..No wonder it remains one of the brightest most noticeable Star in the Gemini constellation

https://www.jb.man.ac.uk/astronomy/nightsky/AList/castor.jpg
Science/Technology › Re: 10 Most Strange Stars (known) In The Observable Universe.. by johnydon22(op): 2:23pm On Jan 16, 2016
[b]10.. hypervelocity Stars

Ok we have all seen shooting stars racing across the night sky like a fast brief blaze of a speeding ball of light.

Some of us use to shout "Luck!! Luck" at these celestial racer since it was believed to bestow luck on the person who could shout the required amount of luck before it disappears grin Aaaaah I miss my Childhood embarassed

Well as a matter of fact those are not stars, there are meteors.. it emits light once it enters into our atmosphere which of course is at an incredible speed.

So if you want to talk about actual, i mean what should have been referred to as shooting stars then talk about the Hypervelocity Stars cus they literally are shooting stars.

This is a very bizarre phenomenon where a star is speeding through space at an incredible speed. It is caused when a binary or triple star systems spinning under each other's gravity collides with a massive blackhole mostly at the center of a galaxy.

One of these stars are sucked in by the incredible gravitational well of a blackhole and the other (further one) is flung into space at an outrageous speed that it has enough velocity to escape the galaxy entirely which of course takes millions of years.

So imagine a blazing huge ball of light (star) speeding through speed at an incredible speed for millions of years..

https://56.media.tumblr.com/a92cfc699c2c6fb5454d5d3e1e2928fd/tumblr_mwlw1ws88y1ri1icuo1_1280.jpg
[/b]
Science/Technology › 10 Most Strange Stars (known) In The Observable Universe.. by johnydon22(op): 1:57pm On Jan 16, 2016
Before the inventions of telescopes we only had the luxury of observing stars from our night sky of which they roughly look different from each other just some tiny twinkling lights somewhere out there..

The invention of telescopes brought the universe closer to us and the stars became brighter and clearer. We learn that there is more to what we know than what we know already.

Development of telescopes like Powerful light mirror telescopes, radio telescopes, infra-red telescopes all looking into the vastness of deep space from outside the earth and countless Observatories scattered all over the planets.

The stars became even closer and clearer.. As we have gone through 10 Most strangest planets (Known) in the Observable universe.

Let us now go through 10 strangest most bizarre starry manifestations we know of

Christianity Etc › Re: Spirit Coins: Become Filthy Rich & Wealthy [FREE] by johnydon22(m): 11:29am On Jan 16, 2016
Divinerspell:
If religion, occultism and witchcrafts wasn't real, why are people getting paranormal results from their practices?

Don't tell me you have not read or watch real testimonies from real people that are into such practices?
Lmao... All i see are gullible individuals dubbing psychological phenomenons to be paranormal at the same time regurgitating con-tricks and flimsy placebo.

Please tell me how there is a money minting machine in the spirit world, tell me how your own con-scam is any different from others.

Mind showing us names of people who have benefited from your spirit coins that are now in the forbes list?
Christianity Etc › Re: Luciferean Series I: Understanding Christianity by johnydon22(m): 10:27am On Jan 16, 2016
samted:
What 'lot'? If you're as intelligent as you're trying to sound, you would know that generalisation doesn't quite show your brilliance. Because some people kill in the name of their god doesn't make all followers of that religion terrorists.
Exactly, many Christian does that even though some don't.. So how can you hope to plead a case for your religion to be exempted from slander and mockery and criticism when many in your religion accord same to others?
Where or who dyu identify with if I may ask?
Unnecessary question
Christianity Etc › Re: Luciferean Series I: Understanding Christianity by johnydon22(m):
Richirich713:
And where did this singularity come from? It's origin plz?
Oh i do not know.. It is an infinite value of both infinitely dense and hot which are energy values and energy always has

If a Atheist doesn't take that road he could just have ignored me, just like I ignored some comments u made on why Christians bother being good when I read them. I don't think Christians are good to avoid hell or to get in heaven but u easily stereotyped that view.
Learn from corrections
Thats why I quoted those who disagree with my conclusion, 2 of those atheists holds on to the multiverse but still admit the universe is fine-tuned. U said no one one with basic knowledge of astronomy who claim that.
you proposed the universe spells intelligence and i countered that ...

Exactly u think the fundamental constants happen by chance not design and that there's a natural explanation for it. But design is more probable, chance is extremely unlikely.
There was no chance here but results of natural reacting values.. Design is even more so because such Alien species capable of generating a distinct universe now leaves open an even more problem of their own complexity..
I don't think the desert screams out design, I think the precision of the constants do.
Exactly same way you do not find the artistic depiction of sand dunes to be designed is the same way the universal constants we find to observe do not scream design life rather emerges in relation to it's surrounding.. Any other life form can emerge in a scenario unsuitable for carbon based life..
I don't think u did, I was arguing for the explanation of the fine tuning of the universe.
If that were true u wouldn't be going off on why I said some atheists argue that the universe literally came from nothing.
My business is trying to stereotype atheists and put them in your own little bag of a specific world view..
U never give direct yes or no answers do u?
When i get reasonable questions. .
Physicists say so John, they calculated that if there's even the slightest change to these constants, there's no possibility of life.
Then i think you need to listen more to them because they refer to Life as regard carbon based life forms and this will be due to different manifestations of star formations or other phenomenons as regard space/time
no one said life gots to be all overs the universe.
Actually it's more like not waking up or even existing.
Lmao i thought the universe was designed for life? How come it still falls down to a random scenario that some part are and some are radically inhospitable
Universe was not design for life? If one those fundamental constants were off by the slightest there absolutely no chance of life.
What's the best explanation of the fine tuning?
I think design and it's surely the most probable and logical.
The universe was not designed for Life every compatible life form emerge in a specific environment with compatible elements... The universal constants do not in anyway spell design because every reaction gives out a specific result that will be totally distinct from another different reacting values.

The universe was so designed for life that some part of it spells impossibility to harbour life... That is such a precise design

Design surely leaves more problem than answers because the designer comes under the beam-light over it's own complexity and so here goes another need for another designer and we are dragged into an infinite regress.

Surely like i pointed out, an Amoeba in a pond would think the pond was designed for it because it suits it...
Christianity Etc › Re: Luciferean Series I: Understanding Christianity by johnydon22(m): 9:47am On Jan 16, 2016
samted:
Criticism is different from outright slander and abuses my friend. Saying that a religion is a sham or its followers are stupid is not criticism. Insulting something or someone because you hold different beliefs is a sign of gross ignorance. Check yourself.
Isn't this exactly same thing you lot do to other beliefs and religion and then hypocritically begs for yours to be exempted from such treatment..

Some even go as far as carrying out acts of terrorism by burning other people's place of worship, burning their own holy relics what other slander can get worse than that..
Christianity Etc › Re: Luciferean Series I: Understanding Christianity by johnydon22(m): 9:37am On Jan 16, 2016
Richirich713:
Again regardless how u trying to put it, it's still illogical. Nd Flew wasn't just talking about marble.
As he clearly says below:

"It is simply inconceivable that this would or could happen. And the same goes for any kind of matter. Once you understand the nature of matter, of mass-energy, you realize that, by its very nature, it could never become “aware,” never “think,” never say “I.” But the atheist position is that, at some point in the history of the universe, the impossible and the inconceivable took place. Undifferentiated matter (here we include energy), at some point, became “alive,” then conscious, then conceptually proficient, then an “I.” But returning to our table, we see why this is simply laughable. The table has none of the properties of being conscious and, given infinite time, it cannot “acquire” such properties" Anthony Flew
Hahahahahaha now we are shifting from Marble are we? wink. Isn't remarkable how you are now changing quotes? Isn't remarkable how you are now shifting the goal from Marble?

One thing both you and Andrew Flew what it is should understand: There are properties in each atom that makes them compatible for a particular reaction, once an atom looses such properties it is certainly impossible for it reaching such specified state.

So when Andrew Flew wants to ask a question worth answering he should have pointed at something with active biological properties but No he knew if he did the question was dead on arrival so he had to use an artificial object..

Logical blunder never go cheaper

1st u lied about the wooden table just to avoid answering the question, then u still went on to twist it the best u can still not to answer the question.
Lmao nobody reading wouldn't know i first thought it was a wooden table...

Now that it is clear you cannot show us where i defended the position of artificially rendered matter getting conscious.. 1st lie confirmed


That itself shows u were defending the position, it's only now u that u agree that the marble table can never became conscious.
More glaring lies... I wonder if you guys always realize people are reading this..

They will always see i never defended artificial inanimate object getting conscious but was the one telling both you and Andrew Flew how ridiculous that was..

Even the wooden table was finely used to show you both inanimate objects lack metabolical properties.. ..

By not answering directly I take is to defend the view especially if someone start twisting the question and lying by claiming it's about a wooden table.
Here we go more.
We searching for the best explanation of the universe complexity and fine tuning,not go into a infinite regress of trying to explain the explanation of the explanation, then the explanation of the explanation then.....
[b] You are trying to explain a complex problem with an even complex answer thereby creating an even more complex problem..

Since your argument rests that the complexity of the universe suggests it must require a creator, this creator must have been even more complex than the universe...

So since complexity must require a designer, this creator in turn must require a designer there can never be two ways about it..

If you argue the designer doesn't require another designer in order to exist then doesn't it show complexity doesn't need a designer? then it nullifies your argument that the universe requires a designer..

Pulling out an even more complex designer to explain a complex manifestation drags it into an infinite regress of complex problems and causal evolution because such super complex designer needs another designer going by the argument that complexity must require design, special pleading cannot work here.

In the ever colliding reacting values, it has been shown time and again that complex matter developed from interaction of simpler matters not poofing out complexly from a super complex source
[/b]

This is the happens when u read Richard Dawkins advice without looking what the real Philosophers have to say.
I'd rather have it if Richard Dawkins reads my own write ups..

Am not the one quoting people here.. am i?

Aah I See if a Atheist can't answer a simple question and is done twisting it, he then out of desperation tries to change to the topic to Christianity, just like u did earlier when u suddenly started talking about the bible.
Am sure the premise is so so on point.. You are accusing atheist of stating an artificial inanimate object can turn conscious but cannot even provide one atheist with such stance.

Now have been reminded that your own very religion holds such view... You wanna deny your religious theology? lmao.

The only reason I even answered the question was not to act like a coward by answering indirectly then attack strawmans. U did the same thing in your morality thread by bringing up Islam nd Christianity.
Another unnecessary yapper
Evens worst is the Christian view is nothing similar to the atheist, the man received conscious from a conscious and intelligent being.
why not show us how.. let me get a sculpture for you so you can breathe into it. you are conscious so am sure you can give it consciousness
.. hahahaha

Thanx 4 advice.
Lying for God is never a good way to argue
Christianity Etc › Re: Luciferean Series I: Understanding Christianity by johnydon22(m): 12:59am On Jan 16, 2016
Richirich713:
But it ain't alive nor conscious and that's the whole point of the question. No matter how u try to put it, a marble table can never become conscious.
And here goes more logical blunder.. A marble cannot produce light either because it lacks the interactive values necessary.. (So going by your convoluted logic since a Marble which is matter can't produce light every other matter can't.. )

Now you will realize how ridiculous and logically nonsensical it is to equate an artificially manipulate matter (marble) to every other matter abound..

But surely enough You are matter and you are conscious shows matter actually can be conscious.. That marble (artificial manipulation as a matter of fact) cannot get conscious doesn't equate such state with every matter..

So here is a logical blunder stemming from stereotypes.. Since marbles can't get conscious then all matters can't... Hear your logic huh?

This is what happens when you quote other people's idea even absurd ones

If I were an Atheist I wouldn't have a answer.
You don't really need to be because you are Matter
I'm talking to him right now, u clearing defending the possibility of a marble table becoming conscious.
Cognitive dissonance at it's peak.. I actually was the one showing you how ridiculous it was to equate a marble (inanimate object) with a matabolic entity that can birth consciousness.

Now show me where i defended that marble can turn conscious please quote that post... If you can't this will be your first lie

I am sure i am the one negating it here and showing you how ridiculous it is to even spew that, it is a mockery of logic


And if u not defending this view why haven't u given a firm "no" yet?
This is it... Please can't you give us the atheist that told you Marble table can get conscious...

If you can't it shows how well you can lie...this will be the 2nd

No we theists think life came from a eternal conscious intelligent being.
An eternal conscious being that is complex but somehow doesn't need to be designed as a matter of fact.. lmao..

Trying to explain a complex manifestation with an even more complex one..

Do not try to deviate from your Christian ideas.. we all know Christian theology proposes man moulded from sand.. That even proposes inanimate objects getting conscious at a even shorter amount of time

He didn't make a logical blunder u just saying he did since u don't have a answer to his question. Or maybe u do but u just won't say it.
You may read it up again, do i expect you to know it was a logical blunder when you are romancing the quote?
Christianity Etc › Re: Luciferean Series I: Understanding Christianity by johnydon22(m): 11:51pm On Jan 15, 2016
Richirich713:
Man U are on a strawman role 2night.


"Think for a minute of a marble table in front of you. Do you think that, given a trillion years or infinite time, this table could suddenly or gradually become conscious, aware of its surroundings, aware of its identity the way you are? " Anthony Flew

Where does he say wooden table?
Still falls to the same logical blunder because a marble being a product of glass, sand, clay, steel in extreme heat is a product of substances rid of normal chemical and biological activities..
[/b]
But consciousness didn't always exist according to atheists right?
[i]Am sure even you can answer that... You are matter and you are conscious and these awareness boils down to neuroperceptibility


So according to atheists a marble table could become conscious given the right amount of time.
Here we go, you will soon say i dabble into discussions without checking.. Now you have once again stereotyped from something i have never seen even one atheist say..

Please show us the atheist..

Secondly we are not the ones that think Life came from Sands being molded and breathed into


Anthony wasn't talking about wooden tables so no 1 needs to correct him, it's just u who needs to be corrected.
And Anthony made as much logical blunder as he would have if it were wooden tables
Christianity Etc › Re: Luciferean Series I: Understanding Christianity by johnydon22(m): 11:43pm On Jan 15, 2016
Richirich713:
Johnny the universe is finite nd contingent, whatever cuz the big bang was independent of space-time and cannot be any substance in the universe we know of.
Oh we back at this? .. I thought i gave a scientific name for such called "Singularity" in big bang cosmology is an infinite dense and hot point which is the cause of space/time, atomic and sub-atomic particles

Dear friend u seem to be the one who doesn't understand that, when u quote someone talking to some1 else make sure u remember he was talking to some1 else and not u.

Don't just rush in the discussion nd assume no atheist believes the world came from literally nothing.
And you stereotyped atheists by assuming because One thinks "Nothing" then all thinks "Nothing" ... When you have discussions with such you maintain their very personality in reference to their world view not stereotype the rest

No I just ignored u and decided to give u quotes from Atheist physicists to show u what I'm arguing for, namely the fine-tuning argument. I made that pretty clear when I brought up the precision of the of the fundamental constants of the universe at the end of my post.
Just like I ignored ur next post as soon as I saw u bring up Yahweh, since the fine-tuning argument can be use for Deism or Islam nd not just Christianity. Its main argument is for intelligence not whether this intelligent source is personal or not.[/quote]I think it shouldn't have been clear that examples are not synonymous to quotes that don't even support your proposition of intelligent design

This what happens when u jump into discussions without reading. This got nothing to do on what I was previously arguing for. It was so obvious I was arguing for intelligent design while rejecting physical necessity and mocking those who hold on to chance.
Wasn't that what that post actually addresses? That you find something to be supposedly designed doesn't mean it was..

Wasn't it why i gave the desert analogy? Who wouldn't say an invisible artist drew it, surely it was drawn straight from the mind of a conscious entity..

And to show you the serenity and precise depiction of some natural occurrence doesn't not connote design but rather pays homage to the interacting values.


Next time plz stick to what Richirich713 is arguing for.
Hell Yes that's exactly what i did
Quotes are good especially if the person has a PHD on what is being discussed. So it's good to provide some quotes to support ones claim.
Quotes are entirely different from pin pointing examples sir..

I know atheists on nairaland don't look at what the experts have to say, and won't dare quote historical scholars to support their claims that Jesus was created at the council of nicea. But that's for another topic.
Entirely your business with them

All I want to know is to do u consider the universe eternal or not?
Here we go...
Again you not getting the argument for intelligent design. U ain't getting why theists or even deists even use the teleologicial argument. It was probably the 1st argument u heard for the existence nd it's the most basic nd popular argument for God.
Countless times have i heard it and it feels old to hear it again...Buddle refutation comes to mind

When we observe the universe we realize that several fundamental constants need to have extremely precise values for the universe to exist or support life, if 1 of these constants were off by just a hair the universe wouldn't be able to support life or even exist. This is the fine tuning I'm talking about.

Either we were just extremely lucky or the universe was just finely tune due to physical necessity.
This is the point, you are a carbon based life and as such must find the conditions to which you find yourself to be exactly right..

Who says life cannot emerge if there is a slight change in fundamental constants.. "Life as regards carbon based"

Yet again the universe is not entirely conducive for life because there are several parts of the universe where the gravitational anomalies can rapture any complex molecule or extreme radiation makes it impossible.. was this also part of the design?

More like waking up and finding yourself in the Goldilock zone of the solar system and state it was specifically designed..



Lol how did I prove u right? I quote a few physicists suddenly means I agree with everything they believe. In fact I purposely quoted hawking since he is a Atheist , just like i quoted the other 2 atheists.
U need to look up fine-tuning argument. In fact here u go :
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine-tuned_Universe
Cheers

. Even an amoeba waking up in any random puddle out there would surely think the puddle was designed for it.

It just has the right temperature, right texture and wow the water is just fresh just as i like it..

Somewhere else deep in the cold glaciers also thrives micro-organisms fully adaptive to such extreme condition and same goes to the extremely hot volcanoes.

These life forms would also think these conditions were designed for life but under such conditions it is impossible for a human-life to thrive.

The universe was not designed for life, rather possible life forms evolved to suit it's present condition..
Christianity Etc › Re: Spirit Coins: Become Filthy Rich & Wealthy [FREE] by johnydon22(m): 9:27pm On Jan 15, 2016
denzmark:
Rubbish those useless coins couldn't make you wealthy and you wana make us rich with them
One thing with these scammers is that they carefully think these things through and try to block loop holes before selling these crap to the public..

He knew people were going to ask him to show us just how wealthy he is, his name should easily be on the forbes list since he doesn't even work for his money just some sexy Goddess give it to him free.

He knows we are gonna demand to know how rich he himself is, so he had to block that loop hole by pulling out "The Goddess told me not to use it myself" nonsense..

Looking for gullible simpletons to smear this load of crap on in order to extort them of the little money they have managed to earn with honest work
Christianity Etc › Re: Spirit Coins: Become Filthy Rich & Wealthy [FREE] by johnydon22(m): 9:22pm On Jan 15, 2016
Divinerspell:
What do you know about Occultism? It is ok by me if you don't believe in Occult but that doesn't stop Occultism from being effective and powerful.
Oh No it's not about me believing it. Its about substantiating your claims and stop selling these con-superstitions to the public..

-Buy Black cats every month
-send you money for courier or something like that
-if they can't find black cats they send you money to do it for them (which remarkably i wonder if the blood is not supposed to be sprinkled where they buried their spiritual coin)
-All other mumbo jumbo load of craps..

Lets show everybody just how powerful you are.. Tell me what colour of shirt am putting ON.. lets see how well your huge spirity powers work..

And please help me ask the Goddess of Wealth and riches what her Job was before humans invented the use of Trade by Barter and then money..?
Christianity Etc › Re: Spirit Coins: Become Filthy Rich & Wealthy [FREE] by johnydon22(m): 9:15pm On Jan 15, 2016
Divinerspell:
You don't know the importance of black cat in the Occult, do you?

If Occult money wasn't real, why are they ritual killing every time? Because blood is the only currency in the spiritual world!
This is like asking me if there was no Yahweh why are would the Christians burn heretics in the medieval times..

If there was no Allah why would muslims be blowing things up and beheading people..

Yes we have seen people drop food items as sacrifices on the floor, it doesn't mean anything eats it..

You may murder as many black cats as you want, it still doesn't add your name to the forbes list.

Neither are there spiritual money minting machines that prints cash... Bro stop selling these load of bullocks to people..

It's awfully delusional
Christianity Etc › Re: Breaking!!! The Mark Of The Beast Is Finally REVEALED!!! by johnydon22(m): 8:34pm On Jan 15, 2016
wordcat:
Just as BVN is also a mark of the beast yet you all were forced to do.
The more you look the more mentally deranged religions get..

See Obama is wearing a suite, a trouser and a shoe that is 3.. multiply it by 2
. Omg it's 6.shocked

That is 666 Obama is Anti-Christ..undecided

It's becoming very disturbing seeing such chronic psychosis.. Well i don't see it getting any better soon
Christianity Etc › Re: Luciferean Series I: Understanding Christianity by johnydon22(m): 6:55pm On Jan 15, 2016
Richirich713:
"Think for a minute of a marble table in front of you. Do you think that, given a trillion years or infinite time, this table could suddenly or gradually become conscious, aware of its surroundings, aware of its identity the way you are? " Anthony Flew
More quotes and a logical mockery..

Anthony flew forgot that table actually is made from wood which is taken from a tree which is a living organism that is actually aware of photo sensitivity in it's environment....


It's maybe too mentally challenging for u to realize matter doesn't just evolve into conscious.
Actually it is more challenging for you though to understand that it can and you are a typical example of a conscious matter.

Next time tell Anthony Flew the difference between a table and a tree which is Biological metabolism.. Once this action ceases (biological metabolism) there can never be a consciousness..

A table is made from an already DEAD tree so its like asking me if a dead human corpse will turn into a baby..

Consciousness is a product of a living entity (An entity with metabolical activities) not the other way round..
Christianity Etc › Re: Luciferean Series I: Understanding Christianity by johnydon22(m):
Richirich713:
Whatever it is it can't be a substance we know of in the universe since that would mean it's made of contingent substances. It also has to be independent space-time since that is also finite.
I think i have already given you the scientific answer to that.. "Singularity" as a matter of fact in the big bang cosmology is the starting point of space/time..

And what does literally nothing mean? When a atheists tells me the universe evolved from literally from nothing?
That my dear friend is between you and any individual that you discuss that with..


I guess nobody here has basic knowledge of astronomy or physics.

"The remarkable fact is that the values of these numbers seem to have been very finely adjusted to make possible the development of life". Hawking (physicist and cosmologist) -Atheist

"Wherever physicists look, they see examples of fine-tuning" Martin Rees (cosmologist and astrophysicist) -Atheist

"If anyone claims not to be surprised by the special features the universe has, he is hiding his head in the sand. These special features are surprising and unlikely" David Deutch (physicist) Atheist
And you just confirmed it..

I asked for examples of a precise natural manifestation that isn't random and i get quotes.. seriously?

You couldn't pin point maybe some phenomenons out there, you could pin point how the whole universe is one peaceful, serene place?

Don't you see the desert? Can't you see how calm and fine-tuned it is.. Can't you see the sand looks like wave waters, drawn lines parallel like a fine work of some invisible artist..

But oh sir behind that artistic work of a desertic sand dune is not an invisible artist. But a random chaotic event of blowing Wind on Sand..

Next time don't rush to pull out quotes you don't even understand..

I asked for examples and got quote..wow


What are u getting at? R suggesting the universe is eternal?
Am i supposed to teach you what a singularity is?



We must be very lucky people, if the cosmological constant was off by a hair we wouldn't be here. If the gravitational constant was off by just a hair we wouldn't be here.
It has been calculated that if the value of even one of the fundamental constants—the speed of light or the mass of an electron, for instance—had been to the slightest degree different, then no planet capable of permitting the evolution of human life could have formed.
It's as if the universe knew we were coming.
"The more I examine the universe and study the details of its architecture,” writes physicist Freeman Dyson, “the more evidence I find that the universe in some sense knew we were coming"
Again here we go more quotes.

If actually you had an idea on the cosmological constant was supposed to negate gravitational attraction and ensure a universe that is static in nature but as a matter of fact the universal expansion is accelerating showing the universe is even more random than we think.

Lets see another chance: Tell me the universal cosmological constant not just google up quotes..

You see? You proposed a designed intelligent universe only to come up with the observed universal constants.

Look more into astronomy, the universe is in no way a serene precise entity but rather a very chaotic random one and from these chaotic interactions comes resulting outcomes..

So why not try again and come up with actual examples ... and oh since you love Hawkins so much..

He actually is a Gnostic Atheist, the type that maintain There is no God and none necessary...

And you just proved me right... Stop the quotes and actually pull of some Astrophysics ..
Christianity Etc › Re: Satan Has No Power Over Us by johnydon22(m): 6:21pm On Jan 15, 2016
Slikbae:
I just pity you. You don't know how ignorant you are, and what's worse is that you think you're wise.

These things exist. They're not in the mind. They're not imaginary, they're very real. As real as you are and even more real.

Angels and demons are real. whether you believe it or not changes nothing.
Lets go again..

"Spend your life believing there are monsters and devils after you, you will live your life always being afraid of these imaginary enemies.."

Reminds me of dark stairs when we were kids..
Christianity Etc › Re: Jesus REALLY Is Coming Soon. BE READY!!! by johnydon22(m): 6:27pm On Jan 14, 2016
hahn:
Lol. You're a real clown dude. You should go into comedy grin

Bad news, even the devil doesn't exist. It's all in your mind. Bro, free yourself from such negative thinking and open your mind to the beauty the world has to offer. The world is bigger than a non-existent god, his arch enemy lucifer, flying donkeys, flying horses, senseless floods or even the concept of someone from Israel, who never existed by the way, dying for your sins.

Black man. Open your eyes
Matthew 16:28
"Truly I tell you, some who are standing here will not taste death before they
see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom."

That was Jesus to his apostles .. they are all dead more than 2000years now grin

Isn't time people forgot all these fables and myths and start living their life
Someone should think about that, take all the time in the world
Christianity Etc › Re: Jesus REALLY Is Coming Soon. BE READY!!! by johnydon22(m): 6:24pm On Jan 14, 2016
You lot have been yapping soon for more than 2,000 years now.. Common you need a dictionary not a bible..
Christianity Etc › Re: Am I An Atheist? by johnydon22(m): 6:22pm On Jan 14, 2016
Godwin2016:
Satan,that's what you are. I rebuke you in Jesus name
This one is becoming an atheist soon grin
Christianity Etc › Re: Muhammed And The Flying Horse by johnydon22(op): 4:36pm On Jan 14, 2016
frank317:
This thread is obviously embarrassing my Muslim friends. Johnny why now?

But this Empiree and Yazach no shame shaa. You only see their lips flapping so fast when you pick loopholes in the bible. Well uncle Mo must have been a clown, even my grandfather would have done better.

No b only flying horse... Na superman.
Hahahahahaha
Crime › Re: Man Rapes His 3-year-old Daughter In Jos (photos) by johnydon22(m): 3:36pm On Jan 14, 2016
Ooh shiiit... this is angry The man is a beast... they should have allowed the mob just beat am small.. flog that useless peni_s ... Big Fool angry

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 (of 489 pages)