Johnydon22's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Johnydon22's Profile › Johnydon22's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 (of 489 pages)
aalangel:who would be in such clothing... Nice birthday concept though.. |
BobUg28:Yeah am december born boss.. Uuuhm little wonder what sir? |
ValerianSteel:The man be like.. Wetin this people wear me so? na so my life bend reach ... ... |
The man don deh old shaa.. liked this man cus of his neatness tho.. His recent scandal with his wife reduced my respect for him a bit cus i believe a man's first obligation is to his wife. . . Well he is my partner in the december birth month |
Feraz: Yes mostly the misty harmattan fog reveals the sun to be white and it even appears larger from here the earth's surface..mostly in the mornings |
lepasharon: the greatest flaw in the intelligent design argument is that is presents complexity as a basis for design. It asserts nature is complex therefore must have been designed, forgetting that something intelligent enough to design such complex system would even be more complex than that which it designed. So how come the super complex designer could exist without being designed by another designer but nature that should be less complex must require a designer. If one says the complex intelligent designer don't need another designer, that person has shown complexity doesn't really require a designer and so nullifies all his/her argument. There is no way for it to work.. |
[b][size=20]10.[/size]Revolution This is for the ones that think the sun is stationary... Well sorry but it is far from it.. Moons revolve around planets Planets around stars Stars around center of a galaxy the galaxies orbit some bigger galaxies or in a dance of gravitational beat. all matter in the universe goes on a jolly ride with the expansion of space time.. Our universe is constantly in motion.... Nothing is stagnant or stationary, there is always motion.. The sun is located in the milky way galaxy, in the Orion's arm of the galaxy which is one of the arms of the spiral galaxy.. Like every spiral galaxy, all the arms are swirling around the center of the galaxy.. Stars with planets, clouds and dust. So our sun alongside with all the solar system is in orbit around the milky way galaxy.. the milky way galaxy is 100,000light years in diameter, the sun (solar system) is about 27,000 light years away from the galactic center. so it takes about ±250 million years for the sun to complete one resolution around the galactic center. So yes the sun is not stationary... Picture below: The single dot points where the sun and entire planetary system is in the whole milky way galaxy[/b]
|
[size=20]9.[/size] Size Well you can guess this one, the sun is huge!!!!!!!!! The earth is almost like a dot compare the the size of this star. Its 1.3million km in diameter.. if you could fit the earth into the sun you can fit 1,300,000 earths into the sun.. https://theplanets.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/sun-size.jpg But wait up with that size the sun can easily pass to be one of the biggest object you may know but just hold up a bit ![]() the sun turns into a dot compared to some other stars .. When you compare the sun to one of the largest star in the universe CANIS MAJORIS.. The sun turns into a dot.. Canis majoris compared to the sun..
|
[size=20]8.[/size] Atmosphere The sun has an atmosphere of three main layers. Photosphere: The light engine where the light from the sun comes from.. the temperature here is around 5,800°c Chromosphere : The next layer after the photosphere, the temperature here increases to about 20,000°c and it emits light with more red on it. during a total solar eclipse you can this part as bordering red ends around the dark moon.. Corona: Corona is the outer plasma around the sun, it gets even hotter here around 1-2 million °c.
|
[size=20]7.[/size]Dark spots There are temporal phenomenon that appear to be very dark on the sun's photosphere in contrast to every other part of the sun. . These dark spots are called Sun Spots. And are caused by concentration of magnetic flux on that given region giving rise to decrease in temperature from every other point and so appears dark.
|
[size=20]6.[/size] Distance The distance of the earth from the sun is not constant, it changes slightest on the course of the earth's orbit around the sun. The earth has an elliptical orbit around the sun; Meaning the orbit is not perfectly or evenly circle around the sun but some points are nearer than others. The earth is closest to the sun at approximate 91million miles away and approximately 95million miles in it's farthest point.. https://www.physicalgeography.net/fundamentals/images/helions.jpg |
[b][size=20]5.[/size] Closest neighbour We see them at night twinkling and beaming down on us, little dots of lights lost in the dark blue of the night sky. In our mind we couldn't have imagined just how far and far away these little lights were from us. We couldn't fathom that most of the little stars we see in the night sky were by far larger, denser and hotter than our sun. Our sun is one out of billions of others in our home galaxy the milky way galaxy.. In the interstellar neighbourhood the closest star system to our own solar system is the Alpha centauri. The alpha centauri is 4.3light years away from us, this means it will take light (which is the fastest thing we know) 4 years to travel that distance. Alpha centauri is a triple star system with Two average stars Alpha centauri A and B and a smaller red dwarf Alpha centauri C. 1 light year is approximately 9trillion kilometers in earth's standard of measurement. N.B: It takes light approximately 8 minutes to travel from the sun to earth.. https://kencroswell.com/Alpha.BetaCentauri.X.Ap11.jpg[/b] |
[size=20]4.[/size] ENERGY The sun is the primary source of energy on earth, influences the change in the earth's climate, temperature, hydrogen circle, oxygen production (photosynthesis) Without the sun one can assert that life could never have emerged on earth.. Amount of energy that hits the earth from the sun is 1.336 kw per square meter.. the energy the sun gives out mostly is luminous that is 3.8 × 1026 joules per second. We are only using 1 out of 10,000 energy provided by the sun for us. . . Such enormous energy.. The solar panels we have now on earth can only convert 16% of the energy it gets into electricity, imagine what 50% could do for us.. https://jeffrey.darofamily.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/iStock_000016988110WEB.jpg |
[b] [size=20]3.[/size] The sun is 4.6 billion years old Yeah judging from life spans of Stars, we could say our sun is still a middle aged vibrant young lady.. Approximately 4.6 billion years old it will take up to about 5billion years old for it to exhaust it's hydrogen supply and therefore begin it's dying process. Our sun as an average star will die in a slow and very treacherous way.. Now it has an abundant supply of hydrogen to maintain nuclear fusion in it's core which provides all the energy. Hydrogen+hydrogen---> helium. when this hydrogen supply runs out, it will start fusing helium atom to make heavier elements. Helium + Helium -----> Iron, oxygen, Carbon. at this stage it turns into what we know as a Red giant.. Gets cooler but larger and appear bright yellowish-red. And that stage Mercury and Venus are goners and the earth will be as close to the sun as mercury.. then slowly and painfully shed off it's materials into outer space and collapse into a white dwarf about the size of earth ... for more stars more massive than the sun, their death comes in a more rather violent manner. a stupendous explosion called supernova.. so any living thing on earth by that time is roasted!!! Naaah don't worry, 5billion years is enough time to get dead. so it's not happening any time soon ..[/b]
|
bytemeister: Nope Augustus has officials to look after every province, there is no way he should have heard or even know of it. what is Pilate's job then? Israel was under Roman conquest and so was a province of Rome overseen by Pilate. Augustus Caesar practised traditional roman religion so i doubt if he had any reason to even pay mind to someone claiming to be birthed by Gods. there was far more important empire business required to have an emperor checking over individuals talk more lower class individuals from conquered provinces.. |
[size=20]2.[/size]The sun rotates No No not like an average planet out there, but yes the Sun rotates too.. The sun is a ball of Gas and so is not expected to rotate like most planets that are most times solid. It rotates at different intervals on distinct latitudinal lines across it... Faster on the equator and slower at the poles..
|
Teempakguy:And snow too |
bytemeister:Augustus Caesar was an Emperor of the Roman empire .. do you know what that meant? He was like a God among men in Rome.. (Augustus means Divine.. a title held only by gods before) I doubt if the emperor would travel all the way from rome to the Isreali province of the empire to meet some guy named Jesus. what business does the emperor have with a lower class citizen as one from a conquered province.. This is like saying why Buhari didn't meet you... (Emperor holds a lot more power and province than just a president..) The emperor doesn't need meet all his citizens.. |
[b]As Earth based life forms we all open our eyes to get familiar with the G-type star that hosts our planet which we know as the Sun. It provides an enormous amount of energy and support that it is not a joke that we would not be here without it.. Let us quickly run through 10 basic facts about our dear giant ball of Gas and perhaps get to know it a little bit better. [size=20]1.[/size]THE SUN IS WHITE.. What Seriously, it is even referred to as a yellow dwarf sometimes by the Astronomical body.. But in actuality Our sun is not yellow but white, its an average star that appear white in color .. Light travels in a spectrum of distinct colors (All colors actually).. White is not a color but the combination of all colors or put it in a more correct way.. WHITE is the source of all other colors.. so when this light from our sun hits the earth the earth's atmosphere scatter the light from the sun. The blue wavelength of light is scattered in the atmosphere giving our sky a blue color But the sky is actually colorless except for clouds The yellow wavelength are longer light wavelengths and so are more visible from the earth's surface giving the Sun a yellowish color from the surface. The atmosphere is also the reason why the stars far from us appear to be twinkling when we see then at night.. Picture: An Astronaut on a space walk selfie with the white sun and earth in the back ground.. [/b]
|
bytemeister: Are you referring to Augustus Caesar? |
If you ask me my own personal opinion though.. I hold most outstanding figures in ancient antiquities to be real historical figures. I think Jesus just like i also think Achilles and Odysseus were all real historical figures.. What is glaring in the stories to be fictitious works are the implausible preternatural claims like Achilles' mother was a goddess he couldn't be pierced, Odysseus went to tartarus or Jesus father was a god and strolled on oceans etc.. |
Krystalzkris:I can wait as long as she is not making me wait long or doesn't have a good reason for the wait.. |
This is nice ... Kudos bro |
ichommy: The key word is "BY FAITH" Faith is the act of believing something whether it is true or not. . .It entails insertion of stoic conviction assumed without reason and defended against reason. The only reason someone need believe something by faith is because there is no other reason to believe it in the first place I will like to throw out the whole idea of belief or faith, lets try to find things out not believe what ever assumption that comes to mind. |
Krystalzkris: No. you will have to ask to know why she said No.. The fate of the relationship depends on the reason she said "No".. Perhaps she wants to wait a little while longer then that's fine .. But if it's because she doesn't want to marry you then i believe the relationship should be over because you should be looking for someone who wants to marry you.. |
FOLYKAZE: Am sure i asserted this there have been many cosmological models to explain that which of course are all hypothetical and so must be treated as one. what ever you make off a hypothetical postulation a product of your own confusion.. You asked how the big bang theory did not assert nothing, and i gave you many scientific hypothesis on that not Johnydon22's.. Learn the difference between teaching you what a theory says in actuality and believing it Are you now admitting that Big bang, quatum fluntuation and M string is wrong? Oh meen you really lack basis comprehension.. I was simply teaching you that quantum fluctuation as a cause of big bang is a hypothetical postulstion.. I wonder how you understand simple things. Why bringing your scientific myth into this discussion? To save face? It is obvious this has gone into an emotional word batter instead of simple teaching.. Am done with it.. Mojority of atheists view the world materially and will explain it origin materially employing big bang theory so Big Bang becomes an atheistic theory? I see no reason you have to give the same measure for religion. Not everything they accounted for is myth. Alright then.. Still only possible in paper and not in reality. which of them? I didnt ask you to teach me. I asked you to explain the magical appearance of the Cosmos singularity which you did wih a fallacious model which cannot be substantiated in reality. I gave you hypothetical postulations which i told you were hypothetical and shouldn't be taken as truths but treated as hypothesis. Where ever your confusion over it comes from, i wouldn't know.. Eleduamare is infinite possibilities. So Yes Good then |
KingEbukasBlog: Still fails to grasp the simple concept of a biological metabolism. . . An automated machine never replicates the material rather it utilizes the ones available Biological cells in contact exchanges impulse to get a result .. You are not answering the question . In simpler terms , how did reproduction come out in life forms if NO DESIGNER made it that way I answered simply that reproduction is a resulting action in interactions of organism.. so it came about due to the metabolical tendency of a biological cells to replicate. And you dont see an input-output relationship or an interactive system as a design ? A big LOL bro I think the joke is on you.. Sand dunes are results from an interaction between wind and matter, not an invisible artist.. Wrong assertion . I dont know how micro chips are produced or even designed , so I should assume an intelligent mind is behind its production? Still falls back to the components of a micro-chip, if a micro-chip is a self replicating value and is determines to be a product of biological interactions. So biological cells are not inanimate micro-chips? Why not use an amoeba.. you don't know how an amoeba came to be then something designed it.. Do you need proof that your television was manufactured by a company that deals in electronics ?The inanimate representation ... #Sighs You are implying a wrong proposition - that all round things are moulded .exactly now you have arrived. well hope you can now apply that to yours which i represented it with..everything must have been designed.. Again , admitting a designer orchestrated the nature of natural processes is not foolish !Excluding this designer from causality is special pleading. Assuming up this designer without empirical back up is misplaced... You are lying to yourself here . You dont know or claim to know but you are sure a creator is not responsible and you go ahead and ridicule people who are sure a creator is responsible for life or the nature of the universe . There is a difference between filling a gap with assumptions and attendant behaviours than admitting one doesn't know. I have never seen where asking for empirical substantiation for a hypothesis becomes a ridicule.. The question was if these properties of elements were derived as a result of random processes i.e the difference between element A and element B is a result of mere random processes ? Difference in interacting values produces different result.. that is why there is no two you in this planet.. [quote[ You didnt answer my question . In simpler terms , how did cells derive the ability to replicate . Mitosis is just the name man gave it and tried to explain it though science[/quote] Replication as i put in a very basic term is just a result of the reaction within the value (cells).. And so the argument keeps going in circles.. |
FOLYKAZE:I think you confuse yourself between two distinct positions.. Me last i checked i have shown my stance on causality is "I don't know" until it is established empirically The theists tend to explain the universe with God. . .an unproveable character. One mistake you guys do with science is that most of you tend to treat scientific postulations as an immutable dogmatized assertion. Science is a method of consistent study and systematic deductions in order to reach a truthful approximation and there is no time it asserts to have reached absolute truth because it recognizes chances of being wrong.. Isnt this the same hypocrisy vook was arguing about? Y'all tend to rule theists claim as myth while your own claim as fact. Stereotypes can only make fallacious representations... I am positive most people differ in their stance on causality.. The point remains that atheists, science society is no different from religious folks who tend to explain things with unprovable substance. I am sure you need to start representing a value as it is and stop stereotypes. . I hope you once agreed with me that there is no prove to this quatum fluntuation. Nope understand my assertion.. I was referring to Quantum fluctuation in relation to Big bang theory not independently.. However, you keep throwing it here and there, forcing it on me like it is a fatual proposition and provable evidence to origin of the universe. The point is that you are not different from the religionist who you accuse of spreading myths. Seriously for goodness sake i was simply teaching you the actual propositions of the big bang theory. when will you people learn that teaching someone what a theory says is not same as believing it .. am sure i started by stating am not a Big Bang theorist but you go ahead and make the same mistake. agree to this.[b][i] A never ending chain of events (Causality) |
KingEbukasBlog:And you gave an example with an inanimate analogy.. you couldn't give example with one biological cell right.? Lets say the acon fruit or a corn. . . . When referring to biological processes give example with biological cells.. Let me ask you . How did living things derive the propensity to reproduce ? Because the above example is one . Reproduction the much i know it can be either asexual or sexual, it still arrives at that same point i proposed which is interactions of simpler values which leads to a resulting value So why a flower decide to be a flower (seeing that you are of the view that a mind did not make that a possibility Hahahaha but a flower didn't decide to be, it was just a result of the interacting elements. You didn't decide to be a male, the result came about because of the interactions of (Y) chromosome on the (X)…… It is simply the output of an interaction .. A creator's qualities is out of the question here . Because you can't explain the creators qualities does not mean that you should question the fact he created the creation . That you have no idea how something came to be doesn't mean you should assume a creator.. For such assertions you must provide empirical back up or your claim remains a hypothetical speculation. Planets are round, this doesn't mean they were moulded... So then can you give a better explanation for the species of life forms ? Until such knowledge is empirically ascertained, i see no reason why i should throw in an assumption. I wasn't there, no need to claim i know or bring on an explanation of something i have no idea of. Are you insinuating that these gases are a product of random chaotic events . What proof do you have to substantiate your supposed claim? Star cores: Nuclear fusion produces Helium from fusion of hydrogen atoms .. Hydrogen + hydrogen -----> Helium.. Helium + Helium ---> heavier elements ( Oxygen, iron etc) I am insinuating protons and electrons of an element are no different from the elements because that is what makes up an element.. H20 is water.. In summary , what makes a gas what it is .quarks , subatomic ,atomic particles. . . and so goes for every matter not just gases.. How did it derive the propensity to replicate itself if the proposition that it is designed to do so has been denied by you? It is simply a result of the reacting value within the intersecting subject.. Anymore assumptions you heap on it is of your own making. |
FOLYKAZE: I have never seen a scientist come out to insist these hypothesis are true until proven to be.. No one need believe and insist a hypothesis is true, that is the difference between a scientific hypothetical postulation and a religious dogma. One insists it is true and must be held as immutable while the other agrees to be a speculation that may be wrong until supported by facts. Neptune was once a hypothetical prediction by observing a little distortion of Uranus orbit.. until it was observed in actuality to be a planet. People should not hold hypothesis as truths but just a speculation of enquiry, to hold a hypothesis as truth is absurd.. I support big bang theory but to some extent. It is observable even with the naked eye that the universe is expanding. No doubt about that. But the problem I have with this theory has to do with something magically appearing from nothing. Quantum fluctuation is an actual phenomenon though the issue here is that no scientist is asserting it was the case in the big bang. I think you need to read the theory to grasp what it really propose.. i have never seen magically appear from no where Secondly, I am not arguing a catholic priest didnt propound big bang theory. I stated categorically that atheists use the theory to explain the origin of the universe thereby ruling out creator God and Goddidit theory. And by so doing you stereotyped every atheist. . i only showed you SOME theists agree with it just like SOME atheists. i believe it should have been better if you used SOME In Yoruba spirituality, Gods have father and son. However, they are silent on whom was the father or mother of Eledumare. So we dont know and dont care. Ok so it progresses into an infinite regression? |
KingEbukasBlog:lol You have to show me first that that paint has self replicating atoms just like natural elements have self replicating atoms. That's why you can simply drop an acon on the ground and it will germinate and turn into a giant tree.. There is a difference between a rubber flower and a biological flower.. So this means that there is a 100 percent factual certainty that a creator caused or is the cause of our universe ? Lmao where did this one come from.. It means i don't know neither do i claim to know.. -Creator: we will be needing proof of that complex entity by the way.. ? 1.So which scientific evidence do you wish to present that a single cell brought forth billions of life forms which have the propensity to continue or perpetuate their existence ?[b][i] Now you are employing evolution? You do not really know how to argue.. -First i have not brought anything about evolution -i have not asserted to be an evolutionist so where did this one come from? 2. What scientific evidence do you wish to present that simplest forms of matter - atoms , protons and electrons - brought heavenly bodies , gases and every other content of the universe ? But these gases are actually these simplest particles.. Protons, electrons are these gases.. How do you wish to differentiate something from what it really is? Just like saying how H20 brought water together when H20 is water itself. A simple demonstration of how simple cells can replicate into more complex cells is a process of Mitosis. where a single cell divides into two daughter cells |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 (of 489 pages)
...
..