₦airaland Forum

KingEbukasBlog:
Stop defending him jare ... He clearly meant "heard" ... johnydon22 even admitted the mistake by saying that some atheists aint scientists

Google's boy stop forming smart ... ignorance my ass

I said [size=20] Atheist doesnt mean scientist.. [/size] habaa... come on ur straw man is just too glaring ...

KingEbukasBlog:
You felt you were better in science than Logica ...

Now that is your baseless assumptive assertion.. doesn't count

KingEbukasBlog:
Its common sense , you aint math inclined ... so I get the ignorance=> basically you guys will have smaller families and then fizzle out naturally .

It's quite simple. Owing to the number of children to be born and indoctrinated religions will have an increase in population.. it is a very simple thing to grab.

Percentage of atheists in relation to the general population of the world then will be relatively low.. That is a simple maths still doesn't imply decrease.. Its just like saying 27% of 50 and 27% of 100

But they forgot one tiny winy factor, most atheists were once indoctrinated in one shitty belief or the other before turning atheistic, so skepticism is a natural thing

KingEbukasBlog:
Logica got me laughing out loud ... dude was forming smart . He obviously got this crappy knowledge from an atheist website .And dude you aint a scientist so I don't get your laughter

You see? You lack comprehension problem.. did i claim to be a scientist

Thirdly Atheist [size=20] doesn't mean[/size] scientist

That was my post... Do you still need more explanation?

Funny... All from the same link and i didn't still see fizzle out there too or maybe i must have missed something huh?

DProDG:
Nope, you LIED, as usual...



That's from the article that you "read".^^^

Lol... I told you before, the dude is just desperate Just murdered himself with his own link proving he didnt even read it

KingEbukasBlog:
smh Lol atheists nikkars will always be fun to debate with

Lol.. Logica asserted the big bang can still be heard, how does that concern Johnydon22?

lmao..You're probably already loosing your wits... Go read about the big bang

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang and stop asking me questions from someone else's analogy...

Thirdly atheist doesnt mean scientist I can see you are probably confused by both

valmunich:
Exactly. . .

Simply prove his existence!

Him, her, it whatever they say it is But proving it seems impossible

efficiencie:
ma guy a trial will convince yu...go to a river and do your thingy and you'l experience the influence of spirit wives 1st hand...bro, these are dark spirits and what does the dark do? It makes these spirits invisible to even discerning prophets!

Forget that yeye superstition jareee

DProDG:
You're not deceiving anybody

Lol no be small thing... the dude's desperate attempt to protect his beliefs just turned into frustration..

KingEbukasBlog:
johnydon22 , I expected a "yes" or "no" answer . Since my expectation is now specified , so was there an actual explosion in the theory ? Please answer "yes" or "no"

And my answer was very straight, i provided a link for you to go help yourself to all you need to know about the big bang

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang Now go help yourself ok

KingEbukasBlog:
Hey johnnydon22 , there was no actual explosion or bang in the big BANG theory RIGHT ?

I still don't know why johnnydon22 doesn't reply me

You see stuffs like this are very simple.. Go read the big bang theory

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang You can search more sources and read them up.

then direct your rebuttals to scientists, prove them wrong and collect a nobel price..

Nope thats not it... you are way very so so very wrong

here is the question, just two nice simple words

[size=20]Prove it [/size]

Will fvcking go back, the correct all my mistakes on my way up again.. hit all the kittys i've missed and all the funs o failed to have..

UncleSnr:
The Jewish deity's son is coming back soon.
#TeamFearSkyDaddyAndSon

Lol no be small thing ooo

malvisguy212:
like I said in this thread https://www.nairaland.com/2239640/why-fear-death . Until you and your atheists friends find proof that Christianity is false, you and your friends will keep on trembling with fear(will Jesus come?what if am wrong?what will I say to him?) soo many question.

If you guys are fully convinced Jesus will not come, non of you guys will coment here,

You do realize you are sick

If any atheist think a sky fairy will come down to earth, will that person still be termed an athesit?

You need to go get ur act together

An atheist fear ur mythology and wishful thinking? prrrrrrrrrrrrrf joke of the century... We aint you

Misogynist2014:
Tired of beating about the bush. I think atheists should be meek people seeking to know if God actually exists by throwing questions and giving good replies especially on cogent ones that lead to change of faith. Just a simple question of 'is it true the universe came from an intelligent or non intelligent process?',requiring a simple yes or no has turned into what millions of letters has been typed. SMH.

Now it is process, no longer source or plain intelligence... Lol You really need to go get a grip

Misogynist2014:
YHWH

Lmao funny... what about El the sumerian supreme God that predates yahweh with thousands of years.

What about Ea the mesopotamian version, To you it is the jewish version... hahahahahaha..

So according to you, ur god is the origin of consciousness, ur god as you make us believe is an entity with consciousness, so what is the origin of ur god's consciousness..

And why do you say its the jewish deity yahweh and not the ones i listed above or a thousand and one others creators (deities) humanity worship?

Misogynist2014:
Are you conscious? If so, why do you reject conscious origin without proof?

Which conscious origin if i may ask?

Misogynist2014:
It is you that is unable to comprehend simple question. I didn't ask whether universe is intelligent or not, all I asked for is whether it is true that the universe is either intelligent or non intelligent. There is nowhere I asked you to choose one.

here is your post

Is it true that the universe is either from an intelligent source or from non
intelligent source.

Now take a very long look at that word "source"..
it baffles me how you contradicted you initial post with a contradictory post as in the bolded above..

U asked whether it is of intelligent or unintelligent source, and to determine this source we must first know how the universe started before knowing the source.

you changed your stance now by asserting that you question is whether the universe is intelligent or not

is it true that the universe is either intelligent or unitellgient

And to this question, it is very laughable cus for something to be intelligent it must possess consciousness...

Misogynist2014:
A source that requires intelligence.

So how did the universe start?

let us now determine if it required an intelligent or unintelligent source

Misogynist2014:
All I see is someone who knows where an argument is heading to, who then wants to do everything in his power to stop it. You know what non intelligence is, but its intelligent you are not sure about , but, Yes I will define "intelligent", after that, I expect your reply.
in- tel- li- gent Translate Button
[in- tel-i-j uh nt]
adjective
1.
having good understanding or a high mental capacity; quick to comprehend, as persons
or animals:
an intelligent student.
2.
displaying or characterized by quickness of understanding, sound thought, or good
judgment:
an intelligent reply.

Dude you totally lack comprehension... I asked you what you meant by intelligent source as used in your post and you went ahead and defined intelligent for me..

How can you reconcile your definition of intelligent as seen on the above post to your analogy of the universe being from an intelligent source..

To be clear [size=20] what do you mean by intelligent source[/size]

Misogynist2014:
This is different, I only asked if you know it is the two ways we can explore, unlike then when I was taking sides, so therefore, we've never had an argument like this before. Now answer my question, do you agree that the universe is EITHER from an intelligent source or a non intelligent source?

Now can you tell me what you mean by intelligent and non intelligent stuff?

lets see if you even understand your analogy

MrPresident1:
Disjointed rabble.

Evolution is scientific, there is no discontinuity between science and faith in God, understanding and situation in proper context is what wannabes like you seriously lack.

The greatest scientists are men of deep faith, the more you know the more awed you are. I am a scientist. I believe in God. I am awed by the powers of the universe. I am awed by a God so powerful yet so humbly to reveal Himself to man. This is what the Holy Writs are all about, showing mankind the way to God. The Way to Good. The revelation of God to man.

Your sins have blinded you.

You will be punished because your disbelief is the product of a bad mind. If you were good, you would have found Him, He would have revealed Himself to you.

Prove me wrong!

..lol..this seems to me just like another bigoted emotional yarn buttered in with the funny hell threat as usual..

Ooh i have seen this shiiit before... Wouldnt bother

Misogynist2014:
I've seen arguments like this times and times before, let me ask you one question, is it true that it our universe either originated from intelligent or non intelligent source?

..lmao.. and what do you refer to as intelligent in this case??

... Am sure i have had this type of argument with you before you may do well to go and check..

I am sure i fully made it clear I do not know how the universe started neither do i claim to know, i opened my eyes after not before it

enilove:
You should have asked whether science can create animals ,birds and fishes.

Science is nothing but getting information about existence of things that already in existence. That is why science cannot create BLOOD OR FLESH.

Define science sir

Misogynist2014:
Did it claim it exists?

Neither did it claim any deity exists.. Religions make that claim without proof, the same way i just made a claim of a blue flying dragon with diamond wings exists without proof. . . The similarity is Both claims were made without proof and science cannot disprove any it remains an unsubstantiated claim

Misogynist2014:
Read this sweet poem, one of the things I enjoy when reading Bible.
28:12 But where shall wisdom be found? and where is the place of understanding?28:13 Man knoweth not the price thereof; neither is it found in the land of the living.28:14 The depth saith, It is not in me: and the sea saith, It is not with me.28:15 It cannot be gotten for gold, neither shall silver be weighed for the price thereof.28:16 It cannot be valued with the gold of Ophir, with the precious onyx, or the sapphire.28:17 The gold and the crystal cannot equal it: and the exchange of it shall not be for jewels of fine gold.28:18 No mention shall be made of coral, or of pearls: for the price of wisdom is above rubies.28:19 The topaz of Ethiopia shall not equal it, neither shall it be valued with pure gold.28:20 Whence then cometh wisdom? and where is the place of understanding?28:21 Seeing it is hid from the eyes of all living, and kept close from the fowls of the air.28:22 Destruction and death say, We have heard the fame thereof with our ears.28:23 God understandeth the way thereof, and he knoweth the place thereof.28:24 For he looketh to the ends of the earth, and seeth under the whole heaven;28:25 To make the weight for the winds; and he weigheth the waters by measure.28:26 When he made a decree for the rain, and a way for the lightning of the thunder:28:27 Then did he see it, and declare it; he prepared it, yea, and searched it out.28:28 And unto man he said, Behold, the fear of the LORD, that is wisdom; and to depart from evil is understanding. Job

Bro please i beg you to stop trolling my posts, if you cannot discuss the point i raise but rather copy and paste an out of context post . please and please i beg you DONT BOTHER REPLYING MY POST THAT IS NOT DIRECTED TO YOU Please its becoming annoying..

what you just pasted up there, do not relate to my post in anyway. . please stop it i beg you.

Can science prove that a blue flying dragon with diamond wings dont exist?

MrPresident1:
So the world is governed by coincidence and disorder right? and you are just a freak of nature right? Do I adequately present the grundnorm of atheism?

..lmao atheism doesnt entail being an evolunist.. atheism is just simply disbelief in any deity

.. so bringing up a scientific theory like evolution have nothing to do with atheism instead you should direct your rebuttals to scientist and collect a Nobel price

All these things listed here have been happening thousands of years back.. Now they are special.. lol.. christians shaaa..

nsiazu:
He's not called Gods but GOD and is the only one bearing capital GOD.

By who? when did the word GOD emerge? who determined that only the capital letter should be used for your god?

what is the difference in meaning between god and God
?