₦airaland Forum

SoundLock:
Of course anyone can write anything on the internet, but I've actually watched videos by some of the officials that I listed in my post where they reaffirmed everything that was stated. You just have to do your research.

In terms of video documentation, the videos on this link gives credence to the claims.

https://m.youtube.com/results?search_query=Cometa+report

SoundLock:
https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_cometareport01a.htm

The link above is the full document.

SoundLock:
Of course. These statements were culled from the document formulated by French government in 1999. The document was called COMETA REPORT.

The study was carried out during several years by an independent group of former "auditors" at the very serious Institute of Higher Studies for National Defence, or IHEDN ("Institut des hautes études de défense nationale", and of qualified experts from various fields. Before its public release, it had been sent to French President of the Republic Jacques Chirac, and to Prime minister Lionel Jospin.

The Report is prefaced by General Bernard Norlain, of the Air Force, former Director of IHEDN, and it begins with a preamble by André Lebeau, former President of the National Center for Space Studies ("Centre national d'études spatiales", CNES),the French equivalent of NASA.

SoundLock:
Below are statements made by Astronaunts and Intelligence Operatives.


ASTRONAUTS

"I believe that these extraterrestrial vehicles and their crews are visiting this planet from other planets which obviously are a little more technically advanced than we are here on Earth."
— Colonel Gordon Cooper, Mercury & Gemini Astronaut

"I happen to be privileged enough to be in on the fact that we have been visited on this planet and the UFO phenomenon is real. It has been covered up by governments for quite some time now."
— Captain Edgar Mitchell, Apollo 14 Astronaut

"I was testing a P-51 fighter in Minneapolis when I spotted this object...It looked like a saucer, a disk. About the same time, I realized that it was suddenly going away from me - and there I was, running at about 300 miles per hour. I tracked it for a little way, and then all of a sudden the damn thing just took off. It pulled about a 45 degree climbing turn and accelerated and just flat disappeared."
— Captain Donald Slayton, Mercury Astronaut

"For nearly 50 years, the secrecy apparatus within the United States Government has kept from the public UFO and alien contact information." "We have contact with alien cultures."
— Astronaut Dr. Brian O'Leary

NASA, CIA, ARMY, AIR FORCE ETC

"Behind the scenes, high-ranking Air Force officers are soberly concerned about the UFOs. But through official secrecy and ridicule, many citizens are led to believe that unknown flying objects are nonsense."
— Admiral Roscoe Hillenkoetter, first Director of the CIA, 1947-1950

"We had a job to do, whether right or wrong, to keep the public from getting excited."
— Dr. J. Allen Hynek, Scientific consultant for Air Force Project Blue Book

"Of course UFOs are real, and they are interplanetary. The cumulative evidence for the existence of UFOs is quite overwhelming and I accept the fact of their existence."
— Air Chief Marshall Lord Hugh Dowding, Commanding Officer of the Royal Air Force during WWII

"Let there be no doubt. Alien technology harvested from the infamous saucer crash in Roswell, N.Mex., in July 1947 led directly to the development of the integrated circuit chip, laser and fibre optic technologies, particle beams, electromagnetic propulsion systems, depleted uranium projectiles, stealth capabilities, and many others. How do I know? I was in charge! I think the kids on this planet are wise to the truth, and I think we ought to give it to them. I think they deserve it."
— Colonel Philip Corso, Former head of the Foreign Technology Desk for United States Army Research and Development, National Security Council member, Eisenhower Administration.

"Unidentified Flying Objects are entering our atmosphere at very high speeds and obviously under intelligent control. We must solve this riddle without delay."
--- Rear Admiral Delmar Fahrney USNR

SoundLock:
The Dogon People:

The Dogon are an ancient tribe living in Mali, West Africa. They claim to be the living conduit between heaven and Earth and to possess not only knowledge of the cosmos, but of man’s true origins.
The Dogon are believed to be of Egyptian descent and their astronomical lore goes back thousands of years to 3200 BC. For centuries the Dogon successfully managed to remain isolated from neighboring influences as well as from capture by Islamic slave traders. Their cultural, oral and written history stayed miraculously intact. What they kept hidden from the rest of the world is quite amazing.

According to one of their oldest legends, a race called the “Nommos” visited the Earth from the star Sirius many millennia ago. The Dogon learned from the Nommos that there was a companion star (Sirius B) orbiting the Sirius star (the brightest star in the sky near the constellation Orion) where the Nommos came from. They landed on Earth in an “ark” that made a spinning decent to the ground with great noise and wind.
In the 1930’s two French anthropologists, Marcel Griaule and Germain Dieterlen, recorded this legend from four Dogon priests. The tribal elders not only shared their amazing understanding of Astronomy but Physics as well. They knew that the Earth was not flat, as many primitive tribes believed, but a spherical orbiting body in ‘space’.

Somehow they knew a companion star exists to Sirius A, even though Sirius B wasn’t visible to the naked eye until it was photographed by a large space telescope in 1970. While scientists had long suspected its existence since as early as 1844, none could confirm what was speculated as a “white dwarf” star smaller than Earth.
Some modern-day scientists scoff at the Dogon’s early knowledge of the cosmos, yet have a hard time explaining how the Dogon came to possess a 400-year old artifact that apparently depicts the Sirius configuration. Since the 13th Century they have also performed a “Sigui” ceremony every 60 years to celebrate the cycle of these stars, somehow accurately knowing that this is approximately how long it takes for Sirius A to orbit Sirius B. (The next one is expected to occur n 2027.)

Scientists also find it hard to explain how the Dogons knew about the super-density of Sirius B, a fact only discovered a few years before the anthropologists recorded the Dogon stories. The Dogons legend goes on to say that the Nommos also furnished the Dogon’s with some interesting information about our own solar system: That the planet Jupiter has four major moons, that Saturn has rings, and that planets orbit the sun. These were all facts discovered by Westerners only after Galileo invented the telescope.
As larger and more powerful telescopes explore the Sirius system, they may be able to validate another Dogon legend of a third star—Sirius C. According to Dogon legend, the Nommos lived on a small planet that orbits Sirius C. A planet that was dying out for some unknown reason which caused the Nommos to seek habitation elsewhere. (Most scientists do not consider any part of the Sirius system a prime candidate for life.)
However, in 1995 gravitational studies showed the possible presence of a brown dwarf star orbiting around Sirius (a Sirius C) with a six-year orbital period. More has yet to be learned.

The Dogon correctly define the key components of matter from atoms to quarks to the vibrating threads of string theory, all in the proper sequence, as supported by explicit tribal drawings. This, too, they learned from the Nommos, which they called the Gods that descended from the sky in a vessel accompanied by fire and thunder. They revealed that these Beings resembled amphibious creatures who were clothed in grey and were responsible for giving rise to all of mankind.

SoundLock:
I think I've done a good job in laying out my arguments for my first proposition. I'll move on to laying out arguments for my second proposition which is: That aliens have existed in our past and even contemporarily.

SoundLock:
You ask very good questions.

Even if we grant that pre-human primates did have a consciousness similar to ours, it doesn't detract from the plausibility of my proposition, as the other human "evolved" features I listed, which you appended to, show lack of natural evolutionary consistency. Neanderthals although having allegedly diverged from a shared common ancestor with us, still possessed the characteristic prehuman anatomical features which humans lack.

Sorry about the delay.

vaxx:
And likewise in principle all living things were made of all these element , plants grow in soil (any of a large number of soils) and they get some of their substance from it, but really, plants are made mostly of water, oxygen, and carbon, none of which come from the soil. And the same goes for us.

sholytomx:
Have you notice this also cos I have overtime. I even ask others both young and old and they confirmed it: You clean and redress your bed before going to sleep at night and when you wake up "You Find little Sand on your Bed" not just dust but Sands....Note I wash my leg thoroughly many time just to confirm is not the sand from my Leg.....Pls try to give attention to it if you have not and explain to me Why that Happen.... As I said earlier this are just a neutral evidence to prove that the Bible is Right.

vaxx:
The finished product of man,plant and animal is matter. scientifically we are composed of air and water. just little presence of silicon which is found in the high quantify in the dust. so the idea we are created out of dust is hanging. but i have read a scientific report that try to validate the claim.

nwabekeyi:
good, that's a very good one.

So if we share 50% DNA with plants, is it simply a basis to say that humans were not just created separately like some people claim?

nwabekeyi:
this facts are inaccurate though I commend your questioning, it's good for science but let it be known to you that drastic civilization and hominid activities caused drastic climate changes, faster than it has ever occurred hence a need to adapt to the changes.

Earth’s climate has always been in a state of flux. Ever since our ancestors branched off the primate evolutionary tree millions of years ago, the planet has faced drastic swings between moist and dry periods, as well as long-lived glacial freezes and thaws. It’s clear that early humans were able to survive such changes—our existence confirms their success. But a growing number of scientists think that major climate shifts may have also forged some of the defining traits of humanity.

Roughly between 3 and 2.5 million years ago, the lineage of ‘Lucy’ [Australopithecus afarensis] became extinct and the first members of our own genus, Homo, appeared. The first simple stone tools also appeared with those fossils, which featured some modern traits like bigger brains. Then, between 2 million and 1.5 million years ago, we see Homo erectus. That bigger-brained hominin had a skeleton very much like our own, more sophisticated tools like double-bladed axes and new behaviors that led early humans out of Africa for the first time.

Both of these events happened at times when the local climate was undergoing dramatic shifts. We know, for instance, that some 3 million years ago—around the time the first Homo species appeared—Africa was switching from wooded areas to open grasslands as the climate dried out. This straightforward change in scenery may be part of why early humans evolved away from climbing and toward walking upright. But recent evidence collected from the seafloor gives an even more detailed look at the climate change during this period.

SoundLock:
The ability to formulate an abstract representation of our conscious experiences through our thoughts; the constant awareness of the fact that we are alive and that we are going to die and the facility to act on the basis of this awareness.

SoundLock:
Good to know you are aware of the truth.

SoundLock:
By human consciousness I mean the awareness of ourselves as individual conscious creatures, capable of internalization and abstraction of our experiences and the understanding of our existential limitations.

SoundLock:
Big Foot

Big foot, also known as Sasquatch is a hairy, upright-walking, ape-like being who reportedly dwells in the wilderness and forests and leaves behind large footprints. There have been over 1000 reports of encounters with this creature, despite the fact that mainstream science tends to dismiss all these claims. Most people describe the creature as walking upright like a human would, able to use his hands, able to see at night, being incredibly strong and having defined brow ridges & no protruding forehead. Few people have claimed to have even been captured by the creature including a Canadian prospector named Albert Ostman who described in detail his chilling experience.

If the reports people are making are true, then it would make sense to assume that Bigfoot is most likely a descendant of the "prehuman" primates, especially given that he shares their features.

But mere reports about bigfoot aren't very compelling. How about if we had a documented case of humans in recent times interacting with non-human upright walking, hairy, primates? Well we actually do.

SoundLock:
The miraculous transformation in skull morphology within such short period of time isn't the only indication that humans didn't evolve through natural evolution. There are other transformations:

Development of the anatomical necessities that enabled speech, which developed simultaneously with the instinct for speech - This alone is a miracle, given the short period of time.

The loss of thick hair on the body and the development of the mechanism for perspiration.

The change in bone size and density.

The development of larger prefrontal cortex.

The evolution of consciousness - something only humans possess.

Amongst others.

Bear in mind that all these changes occurred at the same time within that short span of time. This isn't how evolution works. A single mutation of this sort occurs quite rarely during the process of evolution and even when it does, it develops slowly over a long period of time. But we are forced to believed multiple large scale mutations of this sort occurred all at once and were all positive? How ridiculous.

SoundLock:
Please observe the above images carefully. They are arranged in the order:

Homo-habilis
Homo-heidelbergensis
Homo-rhodesiensis
Homo-sapiens (us)

According to orthodox science, the first three primates preceded us. The homo habilis evolved around 2.4 million years ago. Homo- heidelbergensis walked the earth around 700,000 years to 300,000 years, while the Homo-rhodesiensis walked the earth around 400,000 - 150,000. Humans are said to have evolve from either of the later two around 300,000 years.

Now compare those skulls. If you do this comparison carefully, you'd see that the human skull is significantly different from the other skulls - It doesn't possess that defined protruding brow ridge and it's jaws aren't pushed out. The eyes if examined closely are also different as they aren't built for nocturnal vision like the others. Another important difference is the forehead. All the other skull do not posses protruding foreheads. Only the human skull does.

For over 2.3 million years of evolution the facial morphology of primates stayed similar. But just between 700,000 years and 300,000 years during the evolution of humans, science wants us to believe this facial structure transformed into that that of humans. It's preposterous to believe such changes would occur over a short period of time, especially given that it stayed the same over 2 million years. The evidence points only to two possibilities - The acceleration of the evolution of primates (hence creating us) through advanced forms of genetic engineering or the creation of humans anew.

realmindz:
@johnydon22, I know you have been observing this otem for a while....As an intelligent being, what do you make of him? He has written up to 100 pages with consistency and sequence. Plus histories of several tribes and cultures which makes me wonder.

sonmvayina:
Well, maybe you missed it... My point is that jesus is not a Jewish name because it is not a Jewish story..

nwabekeyi:
let's take for example that your native name is oluwaseun which means thankgod in English and then someone from england anglicized your name to 'olewuseni", will that make any sense to you or anybody who knows the original name?

Will it no make more sense if he calls you by the direct translation "ThankGod" instead of the Anglicized "olewuseni" ? Cos I'm thinking that he will not be referring to you if he calls you by the later

sonmvayina:
The jesus story is not Jewish at all... It is Greek /roman in origin.
Firstly the jews don't have the idea of God mating with human beings as part of their belief. It is a roman ideology.
Secondly, the messiah the prophets spoke about is from the shoot of David and is coming to rule here on earth. His kingdom is right here on earth.. He is ruling in a peaceful world.. No more wars and oppression.

Thirdly the messiah will die a natural death after a long rule.

Finally the name of the messiah is David.. He will build the temple and restore the daily sacrifice to marduk (the God of the old testament).

God is not a man or human being..

nwabekeyi:
now my point is, if the original name is "Yeshua" and it means "salvation" and "soteria" in English and Greek respectively, will there be anything wrong with praying in the original "Yeshua" instead of praying in the name of an anglicized version with no direct meaning?

Or maybe we should just start praying in the word "savior" which is the original translation in English rather than praying in an anglicized name with no direct meaning?

nwabekeyi:
How did we arrived at the name "Jesus"?

What's the etymology of this name?

From my little research, I discovered that the name means absolutely nothing in Hebrew or any other semitic language of Isreal.

If Jesus was said to be Hebrew and the name means nothing in Hebrew even when you try to give a literal translation, so how then did the name come to be?

What language was the name Jesus coined from and what's it's literal translation in Hebrew?
I stand to be corrected, I just need to know the literal meaning of the name " Jesus"


Butterflyleo
Budaatum
Otemsapien
Johnydon22

obinna58:
I was so disappointed after reading some part of the book


This shit is what I've been hearing about since I was a kid

budaatum:
Forgive me.

Is dna and genes the same thing?

nwabekeyi:
tag me when you open the thread

vaxx:
i like Ur honest, but i assume Most likely? we may end into Dumber humans. why? There is compelling evidence our brains have grown smaller in the last 10,000 years, and despite attempts to paint this news in optimism, the most sensible explanation is that since the rise of agriculture and division of labor, intelligence simply no longer has the individual survival value it had for our more distant ancestors.


if we do not intervene by taking control of our genetic destiny (a most dangerous and unsettling path) or destroy ourselves in one way or another, we can expect that auto-domestication to continue until we are barely able to maintain the technology handed down by our enlightenment ancestors. Then, eventually, life will throw us a curve ball we can’t handle, and like any dumb brute, we’ll go extinct.

That will be an ignoble end for the only species ever to arise with the capacity to envision a better one, and it’s a theme often explored in my writing.

in all honest, i assume that the early men who propound creationist idea are smarter than us, while our generation will likely be smarter than the next generation

SoundLock:
I don't think any human completely understands life at the molecular level.

I never said humans aren't involved in the process of evolution. I said that the process of our creation ie our evolution, must l have been accelerated and I provided evidence why. All you have to do is read my earlier arguments which you've since failed to refute convincingly.

On the issue of the existence of this super being, I can't tell you the name or nature of the being that could have been involved in our creation or acceleration of our evolution, but I can provide evidence for existence of beings of higher intelligence that have been involved in our ancient past.