Johnydon22's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Johnydon22's Profile › Johnydon22's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 (of 489 pages)
NairalandSARS:Picture it this way, The same reason why a star burns is the same reason why a nuclear bomb explodes. So it could be argued that nuclear bombs are in fact little stars created by humans |
Sapiosexuality:Probably all of them. It hinges on an apocalyptic setting: Mostly viewed religiously, Atomic expositions: Scientific, Warfare: Politics and many more kabbala |
GoodMuyis:Nope just the act of cherrypicking upsets me thus the need for me to create this thread. what if they are busy somewhere else.Yeah probably on a thread with full frontal confrontation, and word banters. The proposition that Law is no longer valid is a "Defensive Mechanism" for some who fail in morality, we are not done with Tue law not yet.Pauline Christianity: Grace above actions The Law in its entirety, has subdivision just as DoctorAlien had explained, Moral, Ceremonial, Laws for Nazarite, Priest, Pregnant women and those in period, virgin etcfair enough If you look at the and count its about 600 or almost, but then they are not all applicable to everyone. for example am a man but I can't be practising ceremonial law for pregnant women impossible.All right? there some law that are SPECIFIC to the Israelite and is not applicable to other e.g. Laws for Passover.First council of Jerusalem was to debate whether gentile who become Christians are supposed to be circumcised or not. In other words is whether they should be brought under the law or not. [That is in fact the origin of "the law no longer holds" in christianity] Severing christiandom from the law was one of the acts that fully divorced the growing christian cult from Judaism. It was at some point just bunch of Judaic adherents who believed Jesus was the messiah and Son of God. If we continued the breakdown, one will realise that a lot of the law is not applicable to Christian. But those one regarding morality is applicable to all.Stoning a non-virgin bride clearly hinges on morality. This is where many Christian are confused.Probably |
felixomor:LOL okay brother, thanks anyway |
felixomor:This still doesn't help |
“The second angel poured out his bowl on the sea, and it turned into blood like that of a dead person, and every living thing in the sea died. and the stars in the sky fell to earth, as figs drop from a fig tree when shaken by a strong wind.” [The book of revelation] The stars burn millions of a billion billion miles away, beautiful glowing balls of light that dance in our night sky entertaining us with a cosmic grandeur that reminds us of our insignificance. The gigantic balls of fire burn so far away that the entirety of our existence is not enough to reach them, so big that our mediocre planet seem like a mot of dust in contrast to them. how then will the stars fall, how then can they be the cause of our doom? During the world war 2, human warfare changed forever, the first atomic bomb was dropped. the story has it that when the atomic bomb hit it’s mark, the pilot who had flown the payload to it’s destination looked on with a pale face at the horror that went up in the mushroom cloud and he exclaimed. “Oh my God, what have we done?” I do not know the authenticity of this account but i agree with the temerity of it’s argument. What have we done? Even God himself would look on with awe and surprise at the extent of our ferocity. Secrets only himself knew we have unraveled and have turned it’s beauty into a beast against ourselves. we have discovered the secrets of the Gods, the hush-hush whispers of the atom, we have unwrapped the secrets of the stars. So as i look at that apocalyptic line in the book of revelation, i do not concern myself in the authenticity of this prophecy, i find myself in a ground where i have little or no faith in prophecies, i do not look at the skies to find the stars that pose imminent threat to us, i look to the earth. I look at the innocent blue marble ever so quiet from the outside but a troublesome specie have brought the stars into their palms. we have ourselves created the stars that will mar us, change the course of our history and may be the determining factor of our fate. We are each, all of us solar powered in some ways, the secrets of stars that once sustained our lives, now is our greatest doom. I look at the thousands of nuclear weapons on earth, unnecessary stars waiting to be unleashed, an impending doom waiting for the pull of a trigger. Humanity have never been threatened as we now are, all by the makings of our hand. "Through a darkness like the bottom of hell, I could hear the voices of the other students calling for their mothers. And at the base of the bridge, inside a big cistern that had been dug out there, was a mother weeping, holding above her head a Unclad baby that was burned red all over its body. And another mother was crying and sobbing as she gave her burned breast to her baby. In the cistern the students stood with only their heads above the water, and their two hands, which they clasped as they imploringly cried and screamed, calling for their parents. But every single person who passed was wounded, all of them, and there was no one, there was no one to turn to for help. And the singed hair on the heads of the people was frizzled and whitish and covered with dust. They did not appear to be human, not creatures of this world. [Narration by a Hiroshima bomb survivor] The aftermath of a nuclear explosion, i dread to imagine on a more grander scale than that of hiroshima; The radioactive rays would turn the rivers red, it would be unsafe for aqua biology and humans, the ashes will rise to the sky blotting out the light from the sun, days and nights like would grow dimmer, colder and paler, like the very life have been sucked out of this world. vegetation would suffer greatly due to lack of direct sunlight, the rains would be as black as tar as we toil wth intense radioactivity from within. offsprings would suffer terrible mutation, life on earth would never be the same, hiroshima is but a warning from hell. Nuclear weapons are burning stars in our palms, the same power than lights the sun, explodes in a nuclear bomb, we must congratulate ourselves for achieving this feat but then we must caution ourselves to what we intend to do with it. it seems to me that the more we know the more foolish we become. there have been an international treaty apparently after the failed plan of the united states to test a nuclear weapon in space; this treaty states that no country is to use any kind of nuclear power in space. this more than anything reveals the idiocy of human politics, how is it not ok to use nuclear power in space where it poses less threat to us but it is very ok to have nuclear explosives aimed at the earth? If there is anywhere that nuclear power should be utilised at all, it is in space, this nonsensical treaty by simpletons in the place of power is the reason why there are no nuclear powered space crafts today but there are thousands of nuclear powered bombs scattered in many nations of the earth. we congratulate ourselves on our humanity, we would detonate no nuclear weapon in a lifeless space but on a world full of life we can and will aim these weapons at. the irony of this treaty is that the sun itself is a nuclear powered machine. The stars that may light the flames that will burn this earth will not come from outside this world, it will come from within and we ourselves would light the match stick. As shared on my forum: Johnyskystories_com and Facebook wall. What are your thoughts on this? |
geoworldedu:Just adding verses and chapters to it brother |
Martinez19:Hahahahahaha that is no ones fault, you gave it to the Lord |
DoctorAlien:This doesn't seem to satisfy the purpose and question this thread brings to the table. The question bothers on the status of the Law. I gave several examples of Old testament Laws still used to judge till this day, for example: Jehovah Witnesses do not eat Pork because the Law forbids it, the person i quoted on the OP brought up the levitical law against tattoo. (Clearly these two are not explicit parts of the 10 commandments) Now on the same page, many christian sects eat pork with the excuse that the law no longer holds, still they pay tithe and back this practise up with the old testament laws. This is a doctrinal, theological contradiction if you will. If the law no longer holds then it no longer does, meaning you can be okay with having a tattoo or being gay as much as you can be with eating pork or wearing clothing of different materials. But if you chose to obey some part of this old laws and not the others then it falls to the dishonesty practise of cherrypicking. If we are not to have tattoos because the law is against it, if we are expected to pay tithes because the law expects it then we might as well keep every other part of the law. So the question is; Do we or do we not? Or is the cherrypicking the way? |
701ecilana:You cannot be so sure |
DoctorAlien:Kill a proven non-virgin wife : Deuteronomy 22:13-21 Kill stubborn son: Deuteronomy 21:18-21 So are these ceremonial or moral codecs? |
DoctorAlien:So tell me which law does this example fall under "If your wife was not a virgin on her wedding night, bring her out and she'd be stoned to death" " Kill members of your relation who wants to make you serve other gods" Please are these morally hinged or ceremonial? |
Martinez19:LOL calm down abeg... una blood too dey hot here well well |
Martinez19:which literally means the Law still stands and wasn't nullified? well that isn't my problem, my problem is: If the Law stands then practise all of it, if not don't practise any of it. I hope they learn from it |
hopefulLandlord:Honestly!!! I do not appreciate the hypocrisy one bit |
chemystery:bump!! |
hopefulLandlord:Hahahaha well that sounds interesting!!! |
Proudgorgeousga:I am more concerned with everyone coming to a reasonable conclusion, are we to do away with the old testament or not, why do we still need to quote them in defence on our stance of moral issues. If they are no longer valid then they become less an argument, if they are still valid then why are we not keeping all. |
dalaman:Everyone is allowed to cherry pick the ones they agree with and do away with the ones consonant with their ideas and thoughts but wouldn't that place doctrinal validity into question since the biblical canon is manoeuvred as one deem fit Saint Augustine once said: If you believe some part of the scripture and not the other, it is not the scripture you believe but yourself |
"It is in the old testament and jesus already done away with the old testament laws so they don't apply anymore" This is a typical punch line by Christians everywhere on mostly issues about Morality and ethics, religious guidance and theology. Everyone is always quick to bring up that theological defence "It is the old testament" The Old testament laws has been done away with, we are no longer bound by the laws of Moses; These answers are convenient when you bring up problems like "Why don't you stone your non-virgin brides, why do you eat pork, why do you wear clothing from different materials? But then again is the Old testament Laws done ? Cut remarkably when it is convenient Christians always invokes the Old testament Laws, example of such is when it comes to the problem of tithing, or the Issue of homosexuality or tattoos and many other issues that they would require biblical backings to accept or condemn. Take for instance on a thread about the Christian ideas on tattoos, a good brother pulled out the Leviticus codec Ericsdm55:Seems that the whole plot is a dance around of "pick the ones you like, the ones you don't like just say Jesus has done away with them, they no longer apply" The whole notion of old testament Laws being done away with seem to me to be a mere excuse to exempt themselves from laws they find extremely barbaric and abhorrent in the Bible but the ones that can be related with in the new world is totally fine to be derived by old testament codecs. So the question is: Are we done with the Law or not. Just make up your mind and stick to it. If the Law is done then on what basis would you condemn people who go consonant to these charges like Homosexuals, non-titters, people who draw tattoo. If you can invoke the Old testament commandments or laws to condemn some acts it means the laws are not done therefore there is need for you to resurrect every bit of the law and practise, unless you think God got those laws real wrong. Are we done or not? |
Ericsdm55:You guys should just make up your mind once and for all, does the law (Old testament Law) still Apply or not? |
Lexusgs430:hahahahaha but that soup make sense shaa |
UncleSnr:Haaaay God this people naff just finished me self |
UncleSnr:mac is about 6gb chai |
AgentOfAllah:Asin eeehn real bump!! ![]() |
sonofluc1fer:damn!!! savagery over load.. laid the cross of jesus at his feet and ran away ![]() |
AgentOfAllah:i nearly fall comot my chair for here...had it been my laptop fell off sonofluc1fer would have paid for it the guy nearly murder me with laugh ![]() |
sonofluc1fer:
|
butterflylion:gbosaaaa the question has a problem you have agreed.. my work is done, i'm glad you did yourself. well done bro, well done!!! ![]() |
butterflylion:now you have agreed there was a problem with your question which then leads back to my first reply the problems are paradoxical therefore invalidates the premise of the argument thus the need for you to review your question and please critically think about the question you wish to ask next time.you are asking for critical thinking for questions that doesn't measure up to critical thinking .. haaaaaaaa!!! ![]() So let's hear what next you've got |
butterflylion:perfectly suitable reply to this is this one AgentOfAllah: |
butterflylion:Argumentative implications my friend, simple implications - you don't even grasp your own problems AgentOfAllah: |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 (of 489 pages)

