₦airaland Forum

KingEbukasBlog:
Haters will always hate . 6-1 no be beans !

We playing Turtle Ham semi final FA CUP

Final : Chelsea vs 10-2

Winners : Chelsea

That's just the way it is

lmaoooooooo
Tottenham and arsene wengerArsenal
Disgracing England since the beginning of time
Btw neymars penalty was undeserved and the foul on Di Maria was overlooked
The way barca players were diving around the field was so pathetic
Xavi would be so disappointed he made his career in that club

There is no rapture bro
There is no end time
There is no Jesus

Pidgin2:
This is a sensitive topic. As a Christian, my personal opinion remains that it is very wrong for a male believer to be a gynecologist

1) Examining the breast of a woman that is not your wife as a heterosexual male is wrong
2) Examining the private parts of a female that isn't your wife is totally wrong
3) Some male doctors develop feelings for their patients and vice versa
4) Our sight is a gateway to temptation
5) If a woman examines the private parts of a male patient how will he feel, assuming he has a wife, how will she feel?

I can go on but let me stop here, it is wrong and no religions supports it

baby boo I'm an unbeliever
So I can be your gynaecologist

KingEbukasBlog:
It is not wrong .

What makes an action evil is the immoral intention of the doer . These examinations are for the well being of the woman . Any male who cannot control his sexual urges shouldn't be a gynecologist and if the female feels she can't handle being with a male gynecologist , she should visit the female ones .

Even sef , when doctors enter the TPJ mode ( temporal-parietal junction ) , they tend to focus on the task at hand blocking out emotional turbulence or distractions including sexual urges . They are trained to do so .

So dear , no worries .

I hope you're proud of the way your team has cheated thier way to the quarter finals of the champions league!

Unnessacary noise

Hell isn't real

FSBoperator:
Google :

God particle
CERN
Jacobs ladder.


Scientists are searching for the "God particle". That secret and undetectable force behind the fabric of the universe .

Scientist are more likely to be conservative and God fearing

ooh jeez. The Higgs boson doesn't mean what you think it means

OLAADEGBU:
The evidence of God is all around you. When I look at a building, how do I know that there was a builder? I can't see him, hear him, touch, smell or taste him. The evidence of a builder is the building I'm looking at. In other words, the building is the proof positive that there was a builder. The building is the product of the intelligence of the builder. Living things are also evidence of design. Wouldn't it be logical to assume that if man's highly intelligent brain designed the computer, then the human brain was also the product of design? There is your evidence.

that's great but this does not PROVE the Abrahamic god
This is what we've been asking since

4everGod:
Johnny walker... Can you show me where the OP mentioned the Abrahamic God in his post? Since you feel that none of what he said touches the Abrahamic God can you please then tell us which God the lie of evolution says is the creator of the universe?

Can you prove that the "Arahamic God" as it were is not Legit? That is all we also have been asking for since? Help our ignorance will you?
Rather than doing that all we have ever gotten from you lot are caterwauling and name calling and nothing else. If you cannot disprove the "Abrahamic God" how then did you arrive at His non existence?

Think Johnny walker, Think!

oga
You have returned eh

mrmrmister:
Lmfao

Atheists are these, atheists are those...

Bla bla bla bla bla

Perform miracle, they can't.

But they can eat grass, drink dettol, roll on the streets.

SMH

don't mind them
Lets hope athiests would not give them hypertension

Somebody should please tell this fuy that evolution is not an atheistic ideology
There are also thiestic evolutionists
Even if evolution is a lie it does not PROVE that the Abrahamic God is the creator of the universe
Prove the Abrahamic god is legit
That's all we've been asking for since
Instead we get continuos misinterpreted arguements and "If we evolved from monkeys why are there still monkeys" "how can non life create life" bla bla bla
Smh

smartkev:
[s]I've been supporting this club for long enough to witness a few historic comebacks and scrutinize a few. All these years and one fact is for sure, ‘We Don’t Give Up'. That’s not us. We take on challenges by the collars and bulls by the horns, no matter how hard the situation is. Be it, Dynamo Kyviv (1993), Atletico Madrid (1997), Chelsea (2000), Sevilla (2010) or Milan (2013). When history calls at Camp Nou, we answer. We hit back when our backs are against the ropes.
Tonight is no different. We have qualify for the next round i believe that and we have clinch a victory tonight. A win, with quality football, after such a devastating defeat in the first leg, would be nothing less than jubilation for me, to qualify for the next round will go down as the greatest in history books. Difficult, very difficult, but not impossible. If it’s possible for anyone, it’s possible for us!
So, for one more time, when the lights are brightest, colors the boldest, cheers the loudest, let’s shout for this crest and the team one more time. BARCA! BARCA! BAAARCA!......[/s]

sharrap

Edenoscar:
I just remembered a couple of barca fans
cc jonbellion hopefullandlord
what's up nah?

me
Barcelona??
Please my heart belongs to real Madrid
Lol believe me I am enjoying this

hopefulLandlord:
my claim still stands

most Christians in developed countries have interpreted Adam and Eve to be metamorphical

even Kingebukasblog has claimed it to be metamorphic too

lol
I'm sure blueAgent still believes in a literal Noahs ark

OLAADEGBU:
[s]You should rather prove that God does not exist or forever hold your peace. [/s]

are you insane
Where did I ever say god does not exist
Do you even know how you sound
You are making the claim
I have a very large flying penis inside my drawer
Prove that I don't
This is how you should
Stop assuming all athiests support gnostic atheism

Wow
What an idiotic thread

Of all the christian beliefs. Young earth creationism is the most absurd

OLAADEGBU:
Is your brain intelligently designed?

it's laughable that you literally believe in a 6000 year old 7-day creation universe
Arguing with fundamental christians- note the fundamental part... is like talking to a retarded brick wall

hahn:
No it is not. But when 4000 people claim to know the builder and none of them correlates then it is safe to assume they are all nuts and are playing guess games. It is even more ridiculous when the claim of one of them is broken down into 30,000 places

that's what these people don't get
It's not about whether gods exist or not
You make the extraordinary claim that he has a favourite tribe, interacts with mankind and is the only true god out of all the gods that humanity has and are still worshiping who FYI also make the same outlandish claim
It's very simple:
Prove it or shut the fukk up

CatfishBilly:
Christians shouldn't wear clothes too since God said not to wear garments of mixed fabric.

loool
The question was quite foolish

enshy:
GodsMopol, skeendyke, felixomor, MZLady39.
The atheist just admitted folly and wont even argue it.
The Bible said it in Psalm 14:1 'the fool has said in his heart that there is no God, they are corrupt, they have done abominable works and none doeth good oo '
Isnt this evidence of Bible's infallible Truth?
Tell me what Gen 1 and Gen 2 says, Ild walk you through the path of understanding for we have the auction of the Holy Ghost and he teacheth us all things!

so this makes the biblical claims true?
So in other words the bible is right because the bible says it's right
Hokay

Sapiosexuality:
Depends? I'm done with you.

you are not getting the point
What part of atheism is not a there is no god claim for every athiest don't you understand
Smh
Bye

Sapiosexuality:
Just like you are an atheist now and also agnostic. Smh.

kind of like a De-facto athiest hovering around diesm

The annoying thing is that the christians make the claim of not just any god- the god of Isreal will start
-arguing for diesm
Or
-tell you to probe them wrong

GodsMopol:
When God created man, God created a perfect man but with a Bible as an instructor. Man left the Bible God gave them, and listened to the voice of a stranger(devil)

We might be fooled to think that Adam and Eve saw lack and needs and inadequacies during the duration of their stay in Eden. It was said that, man shall die if man eats, evidently, Man has an eternal life.

If man hadn't fall, God won't send Jesus to come, and moreover, if Adam or Eve had eaten, the other who have not chosen to eat, would be a cover to the other, so evidently, someone would stand as a covering to the other in the sense that, the prince with a purr blood line is on the front seat- Kingly.

But, here is Adam and Eve, they ate, but what we ignorantly ignore from the story is the fact that mam died spiritually, and that was what Jesus came to restore. Our ability to live forever as God has predestined for man. I wouldn't say man lived in the flesh in those days, there was a glory covering around them.

I believe they were naked, and their eyes was closed. Those are two mysteries, I think the third is, they ran to gather leaves, they never did this before, why now, I still don't understand how man was before man fell, but I doubt if man was a flesh.

I also ask, when Adam got up when God took his rib to form Eve, Adam was deep asleep, but his spirit was not sleeping. So God took the rib, Adam was sleeping, but his spirit was with his body, and God went somewhere where Adam could not see the creation of Eve and God came with Eve, and Adam could scan and see this woman, he sees the bone, and here is another point.

God brought all animals to Adam to name, Adam didn't name them, but God programmed Adam for that assignment, so whenever Adam looks at an animal. He just from programming know what to name those animals, and here is Adam naming Eve with that same programmed system, a program that didn't see the unclothedness of Eve, but saw a different view, that view is not the sight, the view is seeing as God sees, the view is faith, Shalom

your own is bad oo

Sapiosexuality:
Would I be wrong to say an atheist is someone who believes there's no God?

no you would not
Depends on the athiest

Sapiosexuality:
Can one also be permitted to say that Theists are those who belief there's a God but can't say with absolute certainty?

yes
When I was a thiest I was also agnostic

Sapiosexuality:
What does this mean?

it means that why they don't believe any gods exist they can't say so with absolute certainty.
So though it is very unlikely it is not improbable- like a celestial teapot
PS: religion answers nothing

Isaac Newton was a great guy
He invented calculus- the course that gave me a hard time in my first year in college
Interestingly he was also an Aryan christian- an outdated form of Christianity which did not believe in the trinity- a sect of christians that DoctorAlien would have made conspiracy theories about if they were popular today and would also be rejected by christian fundamentalists
But hey
just realise that you can never win with the christians

hopefulLandlord:
exactly what I've been telling them

but I guess it's easier to attack atheism while arguing for deism as we've seen Christians turn fake deists recently

I don't take them seriously anymore
The Abrahamic god is always crushed when the arguenent is solely on Christianity so they start hiding under diestic views like they have a valid point

Sapiosexuality:
But this one group speak of revelations from a supreme being, speak a strange language(speaking in tongues) which even our science have not shown to be forged, does some healings which their members attest to. Aren't their stories logical enough for a belief in whatever they believe in? I'm not holding brief for theism. Do we just assume they are all lying to themselves?

Now let's look at the atheist. First, the absence of evidence is neither the absence nor presence of existence. The atheist's hold on truth here is on the absence of evidence. Is this logical. Shouldn't criticism and any position come with understanding? What's the 'understanding' behind atheism?

Is this why atheism is more sensible?

Then what are we talking about. Isn't atheism a belief? Aren't beliefs built on faith even though there could be sometimes some logic behind them? How's atheism different or even smarter than theism?

actually all athiests...or most are agnostic when it comes to the concept of god outside religious fables