₦airaland Forum

Spartacus: House of Ashur Episode 5.

The episode was absolute fire. Love the dialogue, the subtle shades and insults, the fight scenes and heck, that knacking. Choi! Some Nubian nudity... Hell yeah.

DieRich5:
Stranger things is moving like GOT last season so far and this is the worst season to me

I won't bother watching Stranger Things, but I think that GOT scene made pretty good sense. Like the world is ending, and if I'm going to die, I sure won't die a virgin. 🤦

Might be a publicity stunt.

Faboosuarez:
Nail on the coffin. That scene where she stuttered and said "but yu are my chaperone". I just laughed

SPOILER ALERT

The fact they used her eggs and started experimenting on them, without her permission is a clear signal all their niceness is just acting.

Even when the joining started, they never asked anyone to join them, they just invaded people's mind all for the show of because they can. Also, when Zosia made that example of if Carol see someone drowning what will she do etc. That was when I knew they were not to be treated with kids glove.

I mean, this is simple, someone who is drowning know damn well they're drowning. Zosia told Carol she's drowning, that she doesn't know it yet. Wouldn't it be prudent to wait for her to know she's drowning before doing the thing they do. Or, we haven't seen someone who is drowning, and we jump in to save them, after saving them, we get a big fvck_you, why? Because the person was actually wanting to commit suicide.

Men, there is everything wrong with that joining, everything.

budaatum:
I think Anita Wise has very wisely accurately described joseph 1832.

Like you, she jumped to conclusion. I hope you both didn't hit your head on that tub?

Faboosuarez:
Carol's mistake was sleeping with zosia like wtf

Manuosos statement slaps hard "do u want to save the world or get the gel"

Sleeping with Zosia isn't the mistake. Allowing her feelings get the best of her, is her mistake.

That dude from Africa sure knows what he is doing. Banging_ the heck out of them, and still getting information from them.

I won't be surprise if they start showing their true colors.

Anita Wise isn't very wise. Seeing how she jumped to make hasty generalization and non sequitur comment.

budaatum:
.

budaatum:
Almost, says you? As in, you failed to make me give you a glimpse of the treasure underneath said skirt? Makes me wonder who's showing whom what.

if that was my intention, believe me, you'd have been drenched in sweat, sighing... Hehehe.

For your information, my world does revolve around me. And from your desire to try to show me otherwise, it seems to be revolving around you too, or you'd have moved along by now. But you and I know you can't.

Which information. The one you refuse sharing about what color of panties you wearing?

Oh please...

GloriousGbola:
I think anal sex is a bridge too far [inspired by porn clips of women with washed and bleached orifices who are very eager] but yes a lot of women and men ARE sexually conservative and get more so after they get married

I hear those who engage in it say, the hole is tighter, and haven't really been ravaged by too many dicks_ 🤦

folake4u:
1. Inform who? I thought your married friend was talking about married men in general.

2. Lol tell your fellow men to go after women that are best suited for them.

3. Oh yes, I blame women who don't show their true self in the dating stage.

4. I don't know Joe, I'm not married yet but never say never.

Now. Lemme rephrase. How will you feel/react if your boyfriend ask you for anal_ sex?

budaatum:
I don't want cake from you because I can make my own better cake. Just stop with the unnecessary insults please or go on my ignored list and enjoy your own cake.

unnecessary insults? Now first off, how do you know your own cake is better than mine, like you've ever tasted mine.

I'm saying the above because I do not want you to deprive me of the content of your mind that I have faith you might develop and possess, please.

that's exactly my intent. To deprive you of my mind because I wonder how you can jump to conclusions and just conclude a possess one, albeit a healthy one. Know what they say about assumption, I'll tell you what Pen in Undersiege 2: Dark Territory thought "it is the mother of all fvck-ups_".

You can't put "magnificent things" next to stupid juvenile things, because it's pretty much like putting new wines in old skins.

Now this is all you trying to state and define things according to how you see and view them. Little did you forget, the world doesn't revolve around you. It never have, it never will.

And to be honest, a poet ought to know the consequences of such a needless faux pax!

You can't take subtle jabs at me using euphemism, thinking I won't notice.

Judging how you almost threw your skirt up, when I took a slight jab at you, I'd say you really do think the world revolve around you. I'm here to show you it's not. It's why I said earlier, you're unbearably naive.

folake4u:
Ah na wa. I think there should be some form of compromise in that area, I think.

Hmmm if the married men are craving for anāl sêx, the ideal thing to do is for them to unleash their fantasies on their spouses but again, people marry for various reasons quite alright but it is foolhardy to marry due to societal expectations and then cheat on your partner.

In all honesty, Men are the cause of this problem. If you like having sex so much, you're better off with someone who aligns with you on that instead of stringing along an innocent woman who has a low libido and expecting her to do prisoner style sex position or other forms of extreme positions. The solution is simple: Marry a sexually expressive woman that shares same value with you.

I have a few married women I talk to, friends and colleagues alike. I was talking with one recently and she told me she would speak to me later as she's going to do one or two, we both laughed heartily to it.

Again, there are women these days that are now really sexually expressive about what they want. I'd take my circle of friends as an example. My friend cancelled an engagement with a man after careful thinking, we asked her what's up and she said he didn't satisfy her and it was a big problem she can't allow to slide.

1. Did she inform him, before she canceled him?

2. That should tell you a thing or two.

3. I can equally blame women, who don't reveal their naughtiness when dating a man, all in the name of "he will see me as a how".

4. How will you react if your spouse ask you for anal_ sex?

budaatum:
Well, you are making it very easy to be ignored since I don't generally entertain boys who resort to insults because their egos have been bruised.

Temper Temper. Party pooper. No cake for you. Lmao.

budaatum:
What a shameful juvenile immature thought, though its noted you did not limit it to girls, though I bet you are implying girls.

Amongst the magnificent things I said in that awesome post, that is only what you can pick, no?

BlackViper:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9zTLAWXu1U


https://dailypost.ng/2025/12/21/dangote-threatens-kaduna-businessman-kailani-mohammed-with-n100bn-lawsuit-over-alleged-defamation/

E don set.

I've never seen Dangote engage in any legal tussle, neither have I seen him respond to any statement made against his person.

budaatum:
I'm telling it to you who thinks "10 good years writing poems about sex_ and all that comes with it" is a thing to boast of and be proud of.

Feel free to ignore me though.

I'm also telling it to you, who thinks their powerful brain is powerful, when infact, it is as powerful as a badly baked puff puff.

I can't ignore you, atleast not now. You're too naive to ignore. Hehehe.

folake4u:
Haba. Enjoyment shouldn't be limited to side chiçks/hoes nau. What happened to marrying the person who share same sexual libido with you?

Or am I missing something? Why do men not marry people who share same sexual libido with them? But rather do extra marital affairs.

What if the woman is unhappy in the marriage? You can't consider her feelings?

Goodluck to all married folks.

When it comes to your spouse, enjoying sex is something very dicey. As your sexual appetite might differ from his/hers.

A married friend of mine, once told me she cringe with the way married men now crave anal_ sex. Now such appetite can only or should I say, might only be satisfied with side chics_ and hoes_ etc.

People marry according to societal expectations. And many married women are very shy and timid about their sexual appetite. They think it makes them look like hoes_ to their husbands. You can ask your female married friends, even the ones here, how many times they've ever initiated sex with their husbands. Their answer will shock you.

Many women/men are unhappy in their marriage. Don't let them fool you. Ones unhappiness shouldn't deprive the other of their wet desires....

folake4u:
Well, the title of this thread is "Withholding Intimacy in Marriage is Abuse". I'm not married but I hear lots of preachings from male and female clerics alike that even if the women aren't in the mood, they should open their legs willingly.

So the mounting activity becomes more like a "duty" or "chore" rather than enjoyment.

sex to your spouse is a duty. Enjoyment is for side chics, hoes_ and the likes. Both party owe it to themselves never to deny each other that duty.

I know for a fact, women don't usually initial sex, still, it is what it is. As the title of the thread say, "withholding intimacy in marriage is abuse".

When you withhold sex from your spouse, is abuse. I get it totally if one party say he or she is tired. I totally do, but to use "unhappiness' as an excuse. Come on!.

folake4u:
Ugh. I know about the jelly.

I'm more concerned some folks would want to mount an unwilling mountee especially as she's unhappy.

Happiness doesn't quite come into it. Consent is Everest. Especially when she open her legs, willingly.

Desire to us Was like a double death,
Swift dying Of our mingled breath, Evaporation Of an unknown strange perfume,
Between us quickly In a naked Room.

Budaatum. So you think Langston Hughes wasn't serious minded when he wrote this masterpiece of a poem?

budaatum:
Actually, a whole "10 good years writing poems about sex_ and all that comes with it" shows me how unserious you are, and that I'm being stup¹d if I engage you much further.

You should tell that to poets like Langston Hughes, Muta Baruka who spent years writing about things they seem important, don't you think so?

budaatum:
I don't even do gender at all, least they get blinded by t¹ts, as they do, when I'm blinding them with my mind.

joseph 1832 has been trying for weeks now but still hasn't learnt he's hopelessly failing woefully. But I'm very certain he'd get bored pretty soon and slink away or start engaging his brain to stay.

You should put your 'good brains' to use, and do some back research on my moniker, before you jump to conclusions. Hehehe

budaatum:
I think folake 4u and I just don't reason like you do, but I'm very certain it bothers us not that you think we are naive.

Oh well, a more intimate conversation with you both, will def like you know we reason a whole lot alike.

budaatum:
I think this is one thing that joseph 1832 does not comprehend, and he thinks he can drag others down to his level of unseriousness.

I spent 10 good years writing poems about sex_ and all that comes with it. That should tell you how serious minded I am. Lol.

folake4u:
What happened.

Why are you mounting someone who's dry down there? There's no pleasure when someone's writhing in pain.

THis is exactly why I said you're very naive. You think unhappiness makes women dry? Beside, whatever happen to KY jelly?

folake4u:
Lol smh. So what do you want to educate me on?
Mtchewww.

Many things...

budaatum:
No one should want to mount an unhappy person for any reason unless its someone you are just paying to service you. And even then, I must wonder why any man will pay to mount an unhappy olosho.

I wouldn't even buy pepper from an unhappy market seller, so why will I mount a person who is not happy, most especially if their unhappiness is of their own doing?

Oh Like folake you're also very naive.

GloriousGbola:
Trolling mode activated 👿😈

Doesn't matter had sex


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQlIhraqL7o?si=kfU9eDeRw-IGKUVP

Bonus points for checking out the chicks grossed out expressions

Hallelujah!. 🙌

folake4u:
Toh. Exactly.

If sex workers are like this, then imagine how it is for regular people.

Your response indicate you're still naive in some areas, care for me to educate you?

folake4u:
I'm a serious minded individual.

Yeah right, yOu can tell that to gloriousgbola_ I'm sure the gloriousness of his gbola_ will listen.

folake4u:
Or better still, avoid workplace romance totally.

So like you to ignore the humour and deflect.

GloriousGbola:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxuUkYiaUc8

Lmao.

Glorious you no serious.

folake4u:
It's crazy that some people like Nazgul and co think women don't have standards and rules are made for only men they don't like.

A better answer indeed is the rules are stricter when they don't like you but the standard remains.

Oh the rules and standard thingy with women have been known to me for years...

Take the case of girls who ply their trade in brothels. It's not every customer they shag, and those they even shag, the rules usually apply: no boobs_ touching, no kissing, no sucking etc.

So, if hoes_ can have rules and standard... 🤦

budaatum:
No, the only reason why I'd want my husband to mount me, is not only when I am pleased with him, though I definitely will not be mounted when he makes me unhappy.

I see. Now what if that unhappiness is of your own doing?

stillmaticOG:
War between land and see definitely has to be the most useless series I saw this year.

Ah ah. Stillmatic you still dey around. O ga oh. Lol