JuicyGee's Posts
Nairaland Forum › JuicyGee's Profile › JuicyGee's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 15 pages)
Suicide or murder |
Suicide or murder
|
Am about to do a name change in court, but i want to know if i'll be able to change it also in school? Being that i'm already registered with different name. Has anyone done it before? |
Godbaby1: I just pictured You in my minds eyes running 4-40.. So funny.. ![]() I couldn't help but laugh |
titosantana:we are not complaining ![]() |
fortunechy:lol.. Not me, i like them slim, just like phyno |
titosantana:he is ok |
ZKOSOSO:Why na, why bring in muslims to this matter. If truly u're a true christian, you shouldn't make other religions look bad in other to exalt christianity. Instead you should Show them the right way and not condemn. You have no right to condemn or Judge, only God does that. |
PerfectlyPerfect: |
Abukc:See your big teeth ![]() |
Is this the same bread seller |
martineverest:Which one is nigeria part of? Just curious tho ![]() |
Why y'all making it sound like short girls are different kinda species.. Lol.. I have short cousins and they don't have anger ish, they're just like every other girl |
DashMeYansh:Ok o.. So you have enough stashed up in the bank to rock solo. Rock solo come my side nau ![]() |
DashMeYansh:How are you sure you won't get a job. Why are you pessimistic ![]() |
Replying the second question. How did different races come from one man. Now Share with me this write-up and also looking at it in the light of the bible. Skin shade is governed by multiple genes and is quite complex, but for the sake of simplicity, assume for a moment that there are only two. Genes come in pairs of pairs. During reproduction, half of the genes passed on to the offspring come from each parent. For this discussion, let’s assign the letters “A” and “B” to the genes that code for large amounts of melanin—the brown-colored pigment in everyone’s skin. We’ll also use the letters “a” and “b” to designate the genes for small amounts of melanin. In very dark-skinned people groups, individuals carry AABB genes and only produce dark-skinned offspring. In very light-skinned people groups, individuals carry aabb genes and only produce light-skinned offspring. If a male and female from each group mate and produce a child, the combination of their AABB and aabb genes would give rise to a child who carries the AaBb genes for melanin and would be “middle brown” in skin shade. Now, if two people carrying the AaBb genes got married and reproduced, their children could have a wide rage of skin colors. If Adam and Eve were both middle brown (AaBb), they would have produced children with a wide range of tones. Suddenly, all of us being one race doesn’t seem so complicated. [b] Okay, so that explains the different skin tones, but how did different people groups come to be divided as they are now? Again, we can find the answer in the Bible. Division In Genesis 11, our ancestors refused to obey God’s command to spread out and fill the earth. Instead, they started building a monument to their insolence—you probably know it as the Tower of Babel. God judged our ancestor’s disobedience by imposing different languages on them by their family groups. This language confusion forced them to scatter over the earth as God intended. Eventually they congregated with others who shared a common language, and instantaneous barriers were set up in the gene pool. Not only would people tend not to marry someone they couldn’t understand, but entire groups that spoke the same language would have difficulty relating to and trusting those they did not understand. These people groups then moved away or were forced away from each other into different parts of the world. The dispersion at Babel broke the large interbreeding group of humanity into smaller groups with less genetic variability. Each group had different mixes of genes for various physical features. All sorts of factors modified the frequency of certain combinations of genes, causing a tendency for specific characteristics to dominate. In other words, kids and grandkids shared the same basic genes their ancestors took with them from Babel. Breaking It Down So, what’s the bottom line? The Bible tells us, and genetics confirms that we’re all descendants of Adam and Eve. No matter the color of our skin, we’re one race . . . but this also means we are all sinners, like our first parents, and all in need of the gospel in Jesus Christ. [/b] |
K9blunt:If he doesn't believe in God, how then can he believe in the bible? I asked that for clarity and to understand where he was coming from. Apparently you guys don't believe in God. The problem with atheist/science is that it uses empirical, testable and demonstrable protocols to prove or disprove the existence things. God cannot be proved in this way, cos He is not of this world, God is a supernatural being beyond human comprehension. Lets take thought for example, a thought has never been seen, much less fully understood. But we all know thoughts are real and exists. So, the absence of something observable doesnt mean it doesnt exists. With that said. Adam and Eve surely had given birth to more children than just Cain and Abel at the time Abel was killed. The fact that cain was scared for his own life after he killed Abel indicates that they were many children and perhaps even grandchildren of Adam and Eve already living at that time. Cain's wife was a daughter or granddaughter of Adam and Eve. |
nobilis:@Niflheim @nobilis Before i answer your question, Do you believe in God? |
Were there cavemen or prehistoric men? The Bible does not use the term “caveman” or “Neanderthals,” and according to the Bible there is no such thing as “prehistoric” man. The term “prehistoric” means “belonging to the era before recorded history.” It presupposes that the biblical account is merely a fabrication, because the book of Genesis records events which precede the creation of man (namely, the first five days of creation—man was created on the sixth day). The Bible is clear that Adam and Eve were perfect humans from the time of their creation and did not evolve from lower life forms. With that said, the Bible does describe a period of traumatic upheaval upon the earth—the flood ( Genesis 6-9), during which time civilization was utterly destroyed except for eight people. Humanity was forced to start over. It is in this historical context that some scholars believe men lived in caves and made use of stone tools. These men were not primitive; they were simply destitute. And they certainly were not half ape. The fossil evidence is quite clear: cavemen were human—men who lived in caves. There are some fossilized ape remains which Darwinian paleo-anthropologists interpret as being some sort of transition between ape and men. Most people seem to think of these interpretations when they imagine cavemen. They picture furry half-men, half-ape creatures crouched in a cave next to a fire, drawing on the walls with their newly developed stone tools. This is a common misconception. And as far as Darwinian paleo-anthropology goes, we should keep in mind that these interpretations reflect a peculiar worldview and are not the result of the evidence. In fact, not only is there major opposition to these interpretations within the academic community, the Darwinists themselves do not entirely agree with each other on the details. Unfortunately, the popular mainstream view promotes this idea that man and ape both evolved from the same ancestor, but this is certainly not the only plausible interpretation of the available evidence. In fact, the evidence in favor of this particular interpretation is lacking. When God created Adam and Eve, they were fully developed human beings, capable of communication, society, and development ( Genesis 2:19-25; 3:1-20; 4:1-12). It is almost entertaining to consider the lengths evolutionary scientists go to prove the existence of prehistoric cavemen. They find a misshapen tooth in a cave and from that create a misshapen human being who lived in a cave, hunched over like an ape. There is no way that science can prove the existence of cavemen by a fossil. Evolutionary scientists simply have a theory, and then they force the evidence to fit the theory. Adam and Eve were the first human beings ever created and were fully-formed, intelligent, and upright. |
[b] Evolutionary scientists mock creation and/or intelligent design as unscientific and not worthy of scientific examination. In order for something to be considered a “science,” they argue, it must be able to be observed and tested; it must be “naturalistic.” Creation is by definition “supernatural.” God and the supernatural cannot be observed or tested (so the argument goes); therefore, creation and/or intelligent design cannot be considered science. Of course, neither can evolution be observed or tested, but that does not seem to be an issue with evolutionists. As a result, all data is filtered through the preconceived, presupposed, and pre-accepted theory of evolution, without alternate explanations being considered. However, the origin of the universe and the origin of life cannot be tested or observed. Both creation and evolution are faith-based systems in regards to origins. Neither can be tested because we cannot go back billions (or thousands) of years to observe the origin of the universe or of life in the universe. Evolutionary scientists reject creation on grounds that would logically force them to also reject evolution as a scientific explanation of origins. Evolution, at least in regard to origins, does not fit the definition of “science” any more than creation does. Evolution is supposedly the only explanation of origins that can be tested; therefore, it is the only theory of origins that can be considered “scientific.” This is foolishness! Scientists who advocate evolution are rejecting a plausible theory of origins without even honestly examining its merits, because it does not fit their illogically narrow definition of “science.” If creation is true, then there is a Creator to whom we are accountable. Evolution is an enabler for atheism. Evolution gives atheists a basis for explaining how life exists apart from a Creator God. Evolution denies the need for a God to be involved in the universe. Evolution is the “creation theory” for the religion of atheism. According to the Bible, the choice is clear. We can believe the Word of our omnipotent and omniscient God, or we can believe the illogically biased, “scientific” explanations of fools. Culled from gotquestions.com [/b] |
[b] It is not the purpose of this answer to present a scientific argument in the creation vs. evolution debate. For scientific arguments for creation and/or against evolution, we highly recommend Answers in Genesis and the Institute for Creation Research. The purpose of this article is to explain why, according to the Bible, the creation vs. evolution debate even exists. Romans 1:25 declares, “They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.” A key factor in the creation vs. evolution debate is that the majority of scientists who believe in evolution are also atheists or agnostics. There are some who hold to some form of theistic evolution and others who take a deistic view of God (God exists but is not involved in the world, and everything proceeds along a natural course). There are some who genuinely and honestly look at the data and arrive at the conclusion that evolution better fits with the data. However, these represent an insignificant percentage of the scientists who advocate evolution. The vast majority of evolutionary scientists hold that life evolved entirely without any intervention of a higher being. Evolution is by definition a naturalistic science. For atheism to be true, there must be an alternate explanation—other than a Creator—for how the universe and life came into existence. Although belief in some form of evolution predated Charles Darwin, he was the first to develop a plausible model for the process of evolution—natural selection. Darwin once identified himself as a Christian but as a result of some tragedies that took place in his life, he later renounced the Christian faith and the existence of God. Evolution was invented by an atheist. Darwin's goal was not to disprove God's existence, but that is one of the end results of the theory of evolution. Evolution is an enabler of atheism. Evolutionary scientists likely would not admit that their goal is to give an alternate explanation of the origins of life, and thereby to give a foundation for atheism, but according to the Bible, that is exactly why the theory of evolution exists. The Bible tells us, “The fool says in his heart, 'There is no God'” ( Psalm 14:1; 53:1). The Bible also proclaims that people are without excuse for not believing in a Creator God. “For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities—His eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse” ( Romans 1:20). According to the Bible, anyone who denies the existence of God is a fool. Why, then, are so many people, including some Christians, willing to accept that evolutionary scientists are unbiased interpreters of scientific data? According to the Bible, they are all fools! Foolishness does not imply a lack of intelligence. Most evolutionary scientists are brilliant intellectually. Foolishness indicates an inability to properly apply knowledge. Proverbs 1:7tells us, “The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge, but fools despise wisdom and discipline.” [/b] |
iwuemma:Thank you very much!!! One thing i keep saying; Human need is unlimited. You cant please everyone.. There's always a complainer somewhere |
Maxi112:Lolz.. Its like you have BSc in toasting a lady.. Hehe.. Too bad, the guy no sharp |
Maxi112:He had failed test number 1, there was no need to continue any convo.. I just hurriedly left before he could say anything.. I no do bad nau ![]() |
Maxi112:Lol.. So true.. One guy at the bank was like 'can you help me with your pen?' i told him i was already leaving the bank, and he said 'oh! Dnt worry, I have my pen here' ( showing me his pen ) |
247notire:I was just talking with my cousin who's in the US, she said i could become a textbroker i.e get paid to write articles for people.. Dnt kw if thats relevant here, and that i could also so do online selling, i think this is better and not time consuming |
247notire: Drabeey:That's the thing.. If only Nigeria had provisions for hourly or weekend jobs or an environment where it would be easier for students to be independent.. I was laying on my bed and i wasn't contented, i just want more out of life... I want to be able to do something in other to earn an income to help people who are in dear need. I just want to do something!! But being in skul is a barrier |
247notire:The good way is always ths best ![]() |
Drabeey:I'm in Unical.. I'm the reading type o and willing to take a loan but i'm not ready to go into any large scale business yet, atleast not this year. This year is pretty intense for me.. I'll holla you tho |
Burger01:I tell you! That's why He is God |



