₦airaland Forum

TheGift:
➜Even you are laughing at what you said.

My smirk is instead directed at the fact that you, who have no realization of the fact that the man is a liar/a politician who speaks what his crowd of supporters— those who elected him— desire of him.

TheGift:
➜Reality renders what nonsensical?

Everything he said!

Truthseeker10:
➜😂😂You mean that you and the isrealites in the bible are not religious?

You would need to specifically point to the period where they become religious. So, where?

Agbegbaorogboye:
➜How's it a lie

What part of his claim is not a lie?

Double0h7:
I swear Nigerian women were enjoying in Nigeria! Out here in the west, I've never seen or spoken to any woman (other than sugar babies and the like) who have experienced what she is talking about 😂.
We've been programmed to reject such offers out of sheer shame! Offer to pay for my groceries, what do I look like a charity case!?! I've been programmed to take offence to such offers from complete strangers.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Agbegbaorogboye:
➜What specific lies did he tell. It's sweeping to say a politician is a liar. A priest is not a liar anyway

Let's start with this current lie, which I made clear is a nonsensical claim.

Chienex24:
➜Exactly what I did, and will do so again.... Now RIP

I am glad you at least admitted to worshipping a human being, though.

SmartyPants:
1. All creations of the 20th century as I said. At a loss as to what your point here is.
2. Baby mama and baby daddy relationships are not stable, so no, they don't qualify as marriage. Can you kindly clarify what your point is here?
3. Marriage existed before the coming of Jesus and across all regions of the world. This is empirical regularity that points to a law of nature. It's also really just common sense.
4. No one said families don't exist outside marriage certificates. Why not stick to the actual debate?

1. Surrogacy and adoption have existed long before.

2. Since when did stability or marriage define family?

3. Family is what we are on, and it exists even where there is no marriage.

4. Your scammer-in-the-lord there claimed family is founded upon what he referred to as a stable union between man and woman. That is a bloody lie!

TheGift:
➜What is nonsense? What makes it nonsense?

Reality renders it nonsensical!

Obiedun:
➜Of course. Must you now insult people and their religion?

I insulted no one as I simply stated the facts as they present themselves! Is a lie no longer a lie because it is spoken behind a particular religious flag?

Agbegbaorogboye:
➜The pope is a priest before being a politician He's pontificating as part of his priestly duties He's also making a policy statement as part of his functions as head of state. Which of the two do you have a problem with

A politician is a liar, whether he be a priest first, second, or third. Your Pope is a liar, and his international lies are bound to impact me here.

Obiedun:
➜That is blasphemy! How dare you?

Your god is not my god, abeg! 🤣🤣🤣🤣

jaxxy:
➜The bible says u are a god too. Do u know that?

That book says absolutely nothing of what you claim.

Agbegbaorogboye:
➜How does the pope's truthful teaching directly affect your existence wherever you live today

The pope is a politician, and so this other brazen lie of his is bound to influence or impact politics even in my locale.

Chienex24:
➜Yes we admit it!! In fact, we worship him above all, deal with it!!

I just want you all to admit it rather than hide yourselves behind the mentions of another deity as though you risk punishment if you were to declare the truth.

Agbegbaorogboye:
➜Are you gay

How does my sexuality directly impact your existence wherever you live today?

SmartyPants:
➜Well, sorry but that is demonstrable nonsense. Families in nature come about when a man impregnates a woman. Any other family structure is secondary, therefore, and cannot always have existed. The only family structure that has always existed is the heterogenous family.
➜ Perhaps you meant to say homosexual relationships have always existed, but homosexual marriages and families are largely a creation of the 20th century, with very few exceptions whatsoever.
➜ But all of this is you missing the point. The question is not what shapes and sizes families may come in, but what shapes and sizes are good for families. Science is clear on the success rates of children raised in stable families with a dad present. Science is also clear on the importance of having a mother for young children.
➜ Seems clear and rather common-sensical if you just dial it down to logic as simple as the fact that diversity improves any organisation. Why would marriage be different?

1. Yet many of you here and some of your own children were test tube babies/IVF, or Surrogate issues. Nonsense!

2. Are all relationships today — baby mama and baby daddy included — this marriage relationship you speak of? Again, Nonsense!

3. Again, families come in all shapes, sizes, and configurations. You may prefer to delude yourself with these delusional ideas poured out of the mouths of your gods of men, but the reality of things remains and will continue to, as they have always been.

4. Families exist, marriage or not. Your fixation on your marriage certificates only reveals the level of delusion you continue to hold to, even with all of the information right before your eyes.

malvisguy212:
➜do you support the union?

Do they require my support?

Ebubu:
➜You like gays?

Interesting question! Do I first need to like Boko Haram before I can admit they exist and accept this fact?

Anyways, I don't hate people who are gay, nor do I have a personal grudge against those who are gay. I also have no reason to hate them for existing.

SmartyPants:
➜Which part of what he said is supposedly nonsense?
➜ Can a family be built on any human construct more stable than that of a stable husband and wife?

Everything he said!

Families come in all shapes and sizes in the world we live in. Always have and always will!

Glimpsetv:
Summary: A Nigerian lady took to social media to lament the decline in how men treat women today. [b]She recalled how, years ago, men would offer to pay for meals, help women shop, carry their baskets, and even offer free rides. [/b]She expressed disappointment that such acts of kindness have become rare, reflecting on how much things have changed over the past decade.

Hopefully, this means the men are finally growing up, but I seriously doubt it!

Truthseeker10:
➜How does the Bible define religion. Kobo are you religious? Yes or no?

Ah! You are not aware that YHWH and Jesus Christ were vehemently against the religious establishment that came to exist in the land of Israel(and Judah)?

Truthseeker10:
➜What do you think kobo....is Oxford wrong?

You brought the Oxford definitions here. But the OP instead asserted the Bible as the context of the discussion. So, should we abandon the Bible's meanings to assert Oxford instead?

Truthseeker10:
What do you think kobo?

Again, if we are to follow those definitions literally, particularly the 3rd definition there, we would, every one of us, be considered religious beings, wouldn't we? So, is that where you are driving at with this?

Truthseeker10:
➜What do you think kobo in respect to the definition below?

If we are to follow those definitions literally, particularly the 3rd definition there, we would, every one of us, be considered religious beings, wouldn't we? So, is that where you are driving at with this?

Truthseeker10:
➜ kobo do you believe that the Almighty God of the bible exists? Yes or no? The implication of answering the question above is to determine whether you are religious. If your answer is yes, it means you are religious.

Interesting! So, if I said I believe in Santa Claus or Baba Yaga, you would determine that to mean that I am a religious being, then, right?

SonofIssachar:
➜“When an unclean spirit goes out of a man, he goes through dry places, seeking rest, and finds none.” – Matthew 12:43
The spirit is the entity that animates the body and supplies it the energy to live. Spirit gives life (read John 6:63 and 2 Corinthians 3:6). Blood is the tangible representation of the spirit. That is why the Bible says ‘the life of every creature is in its blood’ (Leviticus 17:11, 14). Once a creature is drained of blood, the spirit departs from such being and he/she/it becomes a lifeless body.
However, even while the spirit is emblemised by blood, it is nonetheless an invisible entity. It takes more than the physical eyes to see a spirit. It is not a tangible thing, and it can do little on its own except through a physical form. That explains why the spirit is accommodated in a body, through which it lives and operates.

Religion don blaskata people brain finish...

Truthseeker10:
➜kobo do you believe that the Almighty God of the bible exists? Yes or no?

⚉ If you admit that such a requirement does not exist, then why does it matter whether I believe or not?
⚉ Of what value is that information to you or this discussion?

Truthseeker10:
➜kobo you don't believe that the Almighty God of the bible exists?

Do I need to first believe in this Almighty God of the Bible before I can assert the facts recorded regarding Him in the book written by the Israelites about their God?

Truthseeker10:
➜kobo are you saying that you don't believe in the existence of a supernatural being?

There are over 4000 different deities out there.
⚉ Which one of them— the ones considered supernatural beings —should I believe in the existence of?
⚉ And what particular value or worth would that belief be to this discussion here?

rentgyd2000s:
➜The Pope is infallible, ex cathedral.

So, you admit then that he is in fact a god worshipped by his followers?