₦airaland Forum

RealityKings1:
➜This was my actual post Where did I labeled as "wrong"?

What part of your post there is not equally dumping it all on the woman?

RealityKings1:
➜I wonder why you chose to label the man incompetent. Men struggle to build themselves and make their lives comfortable.
➜How is that lazy or incompetent?

1. Ah! It is OK to label the woman as being wrong but not OK to admit that the man's failure at achieving his dream of wealth is instead largely due to his own incompetence and/or laziness.

2. What else could it be?

RealityKings1:
➜But you can't know her truely until after marriage

Ah, I see, so incompetent and/or lazy men use their wives as scapegoats for when their failures become all too obvious. They claim the woman they married is the wrong woman to hide their own failings, right?

RealityKings1:
OK ma, what would you like me to explain?

My questions were made clear.

Omalicious1:
➜I just uncovered what was being hidden in the video you sent in one sentence. Don't you understand?

Are you sure you are OK at all? Hidden where exactly?

ibechris:
If u think it is a lie,marry one useless woman and see.

Nonsense!🙄🙄🙄
➜Are you suggesting wealth cannot exist outside of marriage altogether?
➜And this right woman? how do you define this?
➜In the case that the man is lazy and/or incompetent is the woman to blame for his inability to achieve wealth as well?

RealityKings1:
1. Why can't he? Abeg, Say no to Geh
2. But I have explained to you with more thn 2 quotes up there

You did no such thing!

Omalicious1:
➜Accountability is a woman's kryptonite

I don't know what you are rambling about now.

Omalicious1:
➜A 1964 discussion, right?

Nope!

RealityKings1:
➜I watched 5 minutes of the video ma. I wonder why the guy got his fingers painted like a woman, that aside they were discussing about men and women relationships.
➜The entire context in the video has nothing to do with the content of this thread. Or maybe I missed something

Why can't he?

2. Because this thread is going nowhere given you have yet to explain the reason for creating it. And you have yet to explain what you mean at all.

Omalicious1:
➜Tell me about the video you sent

I think it is particularly directed at those who think the problems in relationships are to blame on the females or that women are now wicked and manipulative.

RealityKings1:
I have explained the best way I can For the time being

You did nothing of the such. 😩😩😩😩

ABeg go watch video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nybZKZ6DUC8?si=O6GE6KmMybEqlA2v

Omalicious1:
Not baseless.

It is baseless if you are not able to provide evidence or at least data to back up your claim. 😏😏😏

Omalicious1:
➜I'm just stating the facts that women don't love unconditionally

You mean baseless facts, right? 😏😏😏😏

RealityKings1:
➜Five loaves of bread could multiply to feed many.. The probability of such happening is inexhaustible

How? Explain!

RealityKings1:
➜ What I mean is the probability of Christ's bread and fish multiplication happening is possible

Let me bite... is possible how?

Omalicious1:
➜80% percent of divorce are initiated by who?
➜ Out of the 80%, in many of those cases, the men aren't guilty? Should we start mentioning names

Where?

2. What are you on about?

By the way, I found this interesting video that I think Nigerians particularly the men can equally benefit from.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nybZKZ6DUC8?si=O6GE6KmMybEqlA2v

bingbagbo:
➜Pray for understanding

You mean your understanding informs you that the content of the book — the message recorded by the author — is wrong?

SuperOnyi:
➜ I can't wait to expose you in front of your husband. If he's kind enough to relocate with a demon like you, I wonder if he's really a monster like you paint him.

You must be a bosom friend of the man whose wife took her kids and their passports from him at the airport right before handing him divorce papers. The man initially had us believing he was responsible for the wife moving aboard. Only for us to learn much later that the man had been unemployed for a long time, and the wife was the sole breadwinner for many years before she finally left Nigeria. 😂😂😂😂😂😂

boysco:
➜If rent is ₦200K, how do I save up to build my own house, feed my family, and send my kids to school? — Nigerian police officer

Stories!

jaxxy:
➜I think I've been pretty clear on what I meant so why are u going in circles?
Friends with benefits is made clear.
A relationship is not sane as friends with benefits and should have more expectations. if u have a relationship with someone who's broke there is a higher probability to not know them for who they are cos they have a lack that u might be meeting for them in that relationship which changes the original intentions or expectations of the relationship. So u have to be aware of their real intentions and character.
This plays out in all relationships mind u but where there is a sharp imbalance not only in being broke but also power imbalance, leverage imbalance u have to watch out. That's my point.

But I am not the one still arguing, you are, and in circles at that. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

delkuf:
guy I know you before. Na your way. I won't reply again bye

Religion is a bitch that never gets you anywhere better than you were with it. isn't that so?🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Ilekokonit:
➜Even though marriage is good, but there is nothing stopping me abandoning a stubborn wife to be at the altar right in the marriage day if she or her family begin stress me and even after marriage if you begin stress me, I go abandon you and our your children for the house. I have only one life to live.

It is always better not to enter into marriage at all than to enter only to then play the victim after being caught committing a criminal offense.

Spousal/Marriage abandonment is a criminal offense. You are instead required by law to file a divorce in case you are done with a marriage union. Also, if the children are yours, you are required by law to provide for their support. Society should not have to bear the burden of even your sudden change of mind.

jaxxy:
➜Seems u like arguing. I agreed we all go for what benefits us and we don't all do it deceptively meaning hiding sinister or other motives.
And when I said people come for beneficial reasons and give back nothing, I wasn't referring to sexual transactional relationship cos that is made plain for u to judge even tho they mask it as a relationship... My point was while in such relationship don't see it as what it is not, understanding they are there strictly fir benefits. There is nothing beyond those benefits and there may ne no single loyalty or even worse sinister motives.
If u now take such a relationship as a dependable one u are only shortchanged or decieved urself. There are relationship where the relationships go beyond the superficial and hidden motives.

Let me guess, you don't like arguing even though clearly your forte seems to be arguing in circles. 🙄🙄🙄🙄

delkuf:
you tell me the difference now. Stop going round and round. Simply tell me the difference between faith and beliefs.

If you don't first understand salvation in the context of the book you quote from, how can you understand faith or belief in the context of that same book?

bingbagbo:
➜Man will account for his deeds one day
All our deeds are being recorded
There surely will come a day of judgment
Repent and believe In The Lord Jesus
He is The Only Surety❤️
Your "abeg" will not be heard that day
Your opportunity is Now

Daniel 12:1-2
[1] “At that time Michael shall stand up, The great prince who stands watch over the sons of your people; And there shall be a time of trouble, Such as never was since there was a nation, Even to that time. And at that time your people shall be delivered, Every one who is found written in the book.
[2] And many of those who sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, Some to everlasting life, Some to shame and everlasting contempt.

Micheal is, in the context of the visions seen by Daniel, described as a chief prince of Israel, and the expression "your people" points to the people of Israel. Hence the book in question is a book that contains the names of the people of Isreal whose names are written in it.

Yes, the day will likely come for the people of Israel — the bloodline of Jacob—, however, what day is to come for the people of Nigeria?

delkuf:
➜you were laughing that I don't know the difference between faith and beliefs. So let us stick to that. What is the difference between faith and beliefs

You don't understand the difference between this faith and belief but you are here adamant that you have salvation figured out, huh? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

HardBishop:
➜Then marriage should not be permitted in Nigeria...since it's a game of betrayal. The sores should be opened for everyone to explore outside the continental shore of Nigeria to other countries.

Marriage is not a game of betrayal. It is not to blame for the manipulative behavior of individuals who attempt to use marriage in that manner. Rather, the level of social and emotional intelligence among individuals who engage in the union is primarily at fault. Also, You can't bar people from engaging in activities that you deem foolish — marrying when the red flags are all over the place for all to see—simply because you realize it as such. People need to be allowed to make these choices for themselves.

Omalicious1:
➜Not all the men abused their spouse. Some women also are serial manipulators and selfish

Interesting shift from your initial comment!

In the same way, you now realize that not all men love, you at least admit that equally not all women love? In the same way, men are capable of serial manipulation, so also you are bound to find women who are serial manipulators. Then why the initial generalization? Why be biased in your assessment of these things if you are indeed aware of these truths?

delkuf:
tell me the difference. I dont know

A more pressing question is how you came to conclude that the man on the cross was saved.

Jesus Christ of Israel did not employ the term saved or any of its synonyms in the context of that conversation on the cross with the thief hanging there beside him. Jesus Christ of Israel also did not allude to the man having any special benefits bestowed on that man beyond what Jesus Christ of Israel proclaimed would take place that very same day to the man and His person. Before that conversation on the cross, we learned from Jesus Christ of Israel that when the day when He would be handed to the foreigners came around He would be found in the grave — He would die that day. Jesus Christ of Israel also insisted that He would be in the grave for 2 days after that — 3 days in the grave. It should then follow that when Jesus Christ of Israel announced to the man on the cross that he— the thief— would be with Him— Jesus Christ of Israel— in a place referred to as Paradise that same day what Jesus Christ of Israel meant was that the man would, along with Jesus Christ, die that same day.

---

NB: in Paradise seems to have been used by Jesus Christ of Israel as a sort of euphemism as an indirect expression representing "the grave" or "death".

---

Now back to the question which is where do you get this notion, from what Jesus Christ of Israel in fact said to the man that Jesus Christ of Israel instead meant that the thief was saved?

Lordbinsmar:
➜E better to carry woman come from Nigeria ooo. Naa the one wey meet here self be wahala.

...

Ebubu:
➜do you think I'll read all that trash you old man?

Even with all that is right in front of your faces, the choice remains whether to carry a woman from Naija or not to carry a woman from Naija? Kai! Nigerians never seem to learn! 😂😂😂😂😂😂

Omalicious1:
➜Men aren't loved...they just being manipulated...a few know, majority don't. And the circle repeats

Do these men love? Do you assault and abuse someone you love? Do you treat like property someone you love? Read all those stories up there and you will see that those men equally didn't love those women in their lives. How can you expect to sow apples and reap tangerines?