₦airaland Forum

tpapi: tel us who u av shared urs with

wassade: Bad belle NL

ogoamaka99: Bro Kokoket007, so bro frosbel is doing well by posting for us articles from other web cites. frosbel is not the original author of this article but Angela More of 21st Century Reformation where he copied the article from.

lightheart: Are u one of the Jehovah Witness's kokolet?

prothelley: you dnt make money from it, yet you ask for donations when giving out ur magazines. In reminding the receiver 'though our magazines re without charge 'but' we encourage donations'. So why do you ask for money? Stop deceiving urself...............Mal 3:10 says it all.

BARRISTERS: @Myjoe

i still wonder why you quote bibles and think it will partly surport your appologetics only to leave you with plenty holes to fill,see below;



Act as free men, in what areas and why?
verses 5-9 explained the transformation from the old law to faith in christ, while the old law required circumcision to be called among the 'sons of God' christ sacrifice has opened the door to
12,the gentiles who were formerly required to circumcise before now were declared to have freedom from the requirements of old law.

and that is still the same thing that paul was also emphasizing below in your quote;



just as the isrealites of old celebrates 'new moon'and 'sabbath'etc....

1 Chronicles 23:31 1 Chronicles 23 1 Chronicles 23:30-32 and whenever burnt offerings were presented to the LORD[color=#000099] on Sabbaths and at New Moon festivals and at appointed feasts. They were to serve before the LORD regularly in the proper number and in the way prescribed for them.[/color]

your bible quote below does not even support your point;


you should have even given some thought into the directions given through paul earlier in the book of 1 corinthians 14:34-37



if you compare your statement with the other direction given through paul below;

1 Corinthians 14:34-37

34 [size=14pt]Let your[a] women keep silent in the churches, for they are not permitted to speak; but they are to be submissive[/size], as the law also says. [size=14pt]35 And if they want to learn something, let them ask their own husbands at home; for it is shameful for women to speak in church.
[/size]

[b]now, has paul burdened down the church members,isn'nt it? or even deprived the women of their right?
or maybe paul has assumed the 'centre brain' for women knowing fully well that 'he will instruct them not to allow theirself to be judged or determined by leaders including paul himself, is that not how you understood it?


can you see parallels with paul's case below;
34 Let your women keep silent in the churches, for they are not permitted to speak; but they are to be submissive[/size], as the law also says. [size=14pt]35 And if they want to learn something, let them ask their own husbands at home; for it is shameful for women to speak in church.

you would have asked same question from paul,questioning his authority,and accusing him of ''assuming the centre brain''brand.
not so?