₦airaland Forum

For those shouting Orji Kalu was already very rich before he became Governor, as proof that he didn't steal or can't steal; you guys should go sit down and look for something else to say.

So because a man is a millionaire, that means he cannot steal or won't steal; especially in this our Nigeria that we all know very well.

Then you should know that there are different levels of money or being rich. An ambitious rich man can probably steal more in government since hell be carrying about his reputation as an alibi.

Mogidi: Buhari is capable of communicating using Hausa only, be prepared to hear your C-in-C blabbing hausa if he wins.
The man should continue with his previous job of exporting magani burutashi.

Your hatred and intense criticism of Buhari has no logic other than you are a paid agent working for your pay to malign and assassinate the character of the General.

There is not a single shred of evidence against this man of being a terrorist, yet you keep repeating the same thing day in and day out.

If you doing good or bad, God knows will definitely give you the appropriate reward for the work of your hand.

true45: I also don't believe in hypocrisy, and you most definitely have the right to be angry.
But think about this for a sec:
Who report these news we post/share on these forum?
it definitely not a US,UK,Ghana or SA but our own news channel.
Believe me when I say that every average Nigerian that has internet enabled phones, can check their website for news or better still buy from the news stand. Besides they are comment section below every news were you can lash out your anger on the government anyhow you want Nd it feels better cuz only family member(Nigerians)are the ones that mostly visit and your voice maybe heard even by the people you angry at.
see you may have killed two birds with just your phone. unlike Nairaland that anybody can visit and course mayhem. And I can assure you few foreigners view these news site.
just Google Nigeria and see if nairaland won't pop up.

Let us use this great resources called nairaland to mainly promote,encourage and protect each other image to the outside world.
why we use internal means to let the government know we ain't blind and correct their Bleep up.

Remember you can't win a war if you already accept defeat. we all Nigerians in this forum very much contribute to either the growth or down fall of this nation peace.
#always think positive naija#

Pls, America is the greatest critic of itself. America has a high percentage of highly intelligent and cerebral population and they don't give their leaders any room at all for mediocrity and clueless ness.

Do you know the amount of criticism that Obama is suffering presently? The most damaging secrets about America are exposed by Americans. They keep their leaders on their toes.

Billyonaire: It is easy to believe USA and disbelieve our Presidency, after all we believe the Bible and Koran more than our native gods. After all, they have white skin and our President is black. When are we gonna learn of America's antics ? 6 months ago, US send arms to 'Moderate Syrian Opposition', now that same group is called ISIS. Before then Lybia rebels were funded, and that's where the arms come from.

Make we hear word jare.

This Presidency/Administration is corrupt beyond imagination and does not have the interest of Nigerians at heart. So its not that Nigerians trust US, but we know that our government may most probably be lying or distorting the truth in order to cover up for itself.

Actually, I fail to see any evidence that she's singing in a church... all I see is a picture of some woman at some window with some cross behind her.... doesn't the church, the woman, have a name?

rubbish

mikeansy: I can't believe that in the whole of North Central or North East APC can not find a northern christain who has had a distinguished career as a Lawyer, Banker, Businessman or Lecturer who can be Fashola VP?

APC political calculation on Buhari amounts to attempting to win a 2015 election with 1990 tactics! It will fail woefully!

People think Fashola being a Yoruba Muslim is a political liability? I say no it's an asset that can help your political calculus if well planned!

I tire for this person...... you are a die-hard supporter and fan of GEJ. Why help your opponent by helping them choose the best candidate. is it not better urge them to make the mistake of choosing Buhari so that the opponent can use his own hand to bury itself.

What is exactly is a your fixation with Buhari sef? I don't understand. it's like anybody can be President, anybody but not Buhari.

mikeansy: The best Christmas gift for PDP is candidate Buhari!

I hope APC make good on this promise and nominate him again!

He has failed 3 times and will loose again by landslide!!!!!!

I am reluctant about Buhari emergence because quality opposition and alternative benefits Nigeria and our politics!

But if Buhari is the best APC has then I say bring it on! GEJ till 2019 will be a walk in the park!

You people have said this so many times and we have heard you, why don't you just leave us alone..... if he really is the best Christmas gift, and since we know you want GEJ to win by all means, then really, you should be championing that APC field Buhari so that they can lose gallantly to PDP.

But instead, you are doing the direct opposite... championing for APC to field Fashola. His your love for APC that great that you desire help them choose the best candidate to field against GEJ?

We know this is not the case.

It is so clear to people that are sincere in intention, that Buhari is the solution to Nigeria's problem. in a western country, the populace they will have snatched him up in a hurry.

The man is incorruptible because he has no use for the benefits of corruption. He is not interested in money, luxury cars, private jets, mansions (+things which even many christian leaders covert and cherish).

This is very clear from the kind of lifestyle he has lives for about 40 years (since his thirties) he has been in the corridors of power). Is he now that he's in his seventies that he will begin to covet them.

The elites hate and fear him because of it's indifference to material possession and wealth acquisition.

How do you make a man who is mire satisfied and contented with a simple lifestyle compromise; and has lived that kind of life since his youth despite being surrounded by uncountable opportunities and access to do so.

If Nigerians fail to elect this man, then there is nothing God can do for us. The best God can do is present with the people that can change Nigeria. If we reject them, then we are on our own. God will not come down from heaven to rule us.

mikeansy: Moshood Abiola defeated Tofa who himself was a northerner even in the North!

This was in the 90s!!!!!!

Do not underestimate the intelligence of Nigerian electorate!

Now I know why you want APC to field Fashola as President. You want APC to field Fashola as President because you want APC to gallantly lose to PDP.

The truth of the matter is: out of all the people available for APC, Buhari is the only one that can give PDP a run for it's money.

Personally I think it's worth the risk, a Buhari/Fashola ticket.

I know many people will try to use the Muslim/Muslim thing against APC; but why, some redeemed pastors are already saying APC wants to Islamise Nigeria, but if APC does its campaign well, and make people understand they we need people who can do the job, they will overcome this obstacle and I believe this duo will give PDP a run for their money.

mikeansy: You know a useless party when their best candidate is being seduced by everyone as the VP

Why not calling for him to run for President if you think he is very good?
There is something very tribalistic and nepotic about the call for Fashola to be the next VP rather than the next President!

The usual practice is a party picks a Presidential candidate, the Presidential candidate when chosen by his party then select his VP of choice.

But somehow Nigeria's so called progressives are either proposing:

Buhari/Fashola
Tambuwal/Fashola
Etc

Our progressives are not even progressive enough to consider the best man for the job!

You talk as if you know nothing about politics or the recent state of Nigerian polity at the moment: if APC field Fashola or any other Southerner as President for that matter, then they've already lost the election.

Fashola will not have any vote in the North as Presidential candidate.

Abdulsalam20: WHO ARE BOKO HARAM?!!
(1) Mr. John Alaku Akpavan, the
man arrested attempt to bomb
Radio House Abuja were christian.
(2) Lydia Joseph (the failed
bomber of St. John Catholic
Cathedral) of Bauchi State who
attempted to bomb a church on
September 12,2011.; was
christian.
(3) Augustine Effiong akwa ibon
indigene carry april 29th 2012
attack in connection with BUK
bomb attack.” Was christian.
(4) Emmanuel King arrested in
attempt to bomb the Redeemed
Christian Church of God (RCCG) in
Yenagoa, the Bayelsa State capital,
while camouflaged in Islamic
attire on December 28, 2011.
(5) Igbo traders that gunned
down a dozen fellow Igbo
businessmen of the same non-
Islamic faith inside the Christ
Apostolic Church, in Adamawa
State on Friday, January 6, 2012.
(6) Samson Mangai who was
arrested in Plateau state
attempting to bomb a church was
christian fellower.
(7) Madam Ruth, who attempted
to bomb the ECWA church,
Kalaring Kaltingo, in Gombe State
on 12 Mar 2012. She Was cristian
fellower.
( Case of the arrest of about
eight Christians in Bauchi in an
attempt to blast the COCIN church
on Sunday, February 26, 2012.
(9) Case of the Christian bomber
lynched while escaping after
blasting the COCIN Church of Jos
on Sunday, February 26, 2012.
(10) Mr Alex Danladi involved in
COCIN HQ bombing was lynched
by worshipers. He was a church
member disguised in military
uniform.
(11) jonathan Gyanet, police
officer was arrested attempt to
bomb ERCC church in
Akwanga nasarawa state on Apri
20 2014. Was christian.
(12) The pastor's case in Osun state still fresh in our mind# fact!
CAN WE STILL CALL IT MUSLIMS'
AGENDA?

you don't get it, firstly, there is no evidence that these people you name are Christians. You are just being presumptuous. How do we know for example that there are now Pagans, Buddhists, Enkankar, etc.

We know Muslim terrorists because they kill in the name of Allah and the Prophet Mohammed. They declare it for the world to hear. Infact, they take great care that you know who they are and in whose name they are killing.

Have you ever seen Christians killing in the name of Jesus Christ. In fact have you ever seen any other religion in these modern times killing and bombing in the name of their god?

The answer is no. It is only when Muslims should admit they have a big problem that they can start dealing with the problems within themselves.

Let's forget about history or what is written. Let's face the reality on ground today.

Are Christians or is Christianity a problem in any part of the world today. No there are not. They are peaceful and live peacefully with people of all religions, race or country. Abuse Jesus all you want, burn a thousand bibles, and all they will do is pray for you.

Is Islam a problem to the world today. Yes. Somebody in Paris in a European country draw a cartoon about Muhammed and innocent Christians and people die all over the world. Churches are burnt.

Muslims are busy bombing people all over the world in the name of Allah and the prophet. Have you heard any Christians bombing anyone.

I know, the usual argument, those guys are not Muslims. Okay agreed, they ate fake Muslims.

My question to you is: Why are the fake adherents of Christianity or any other religion for that matter bombing people in the name of the God of that religion.

It's only Muslims or Islam that you find doing this. No other religion in the world does this.

Like a quote that is now famous said: True, not all Muslims are terrorists, but all terrorists are Muslims.

pstmcm: I strongly believe that those who critisize this man don't know him cos my former pastor told me that they said he is occultist,but I've come to discover that he is in a dimension of God's power that most men of God know nothing about

The man is a fraud and messenger of Satan. Say what you like, or even hand your life over to him on a platter of gold....na u know.....

......but if also on the lowdown, and you just too just dey chop your own, that one go still better....

.....but if you truly believe that you've met one Messiah, then I'm truly sorry for you.

Say what you like, the fact is clear: the corrupt political and business elite are afraid of a Buhari Presidency.

Ikengawo: but the rest of the generals and presidents know they're corrupt and don't pretend otherwise. It's only Buhari that lives the same life style as IBB and Obasanjo that will tell you he's not corrupt. How much was he 'making' as 'president' and 'general' that he has been living the life of a billionaire and politically battling other billionaires like IBB, Atiku, and Obansanjo for 3 decades? today he's in Lagos, tomorrow he's in Kano, the next day he's in South Africa, then Saudi Arabia. He moves around Abuja in Stella Oduah style bulletproof cars and has enough money to start not 1 but 2 entire political parties, and hasn't run out yet.

This is lame. So so stupid.

Why all this lies? The world knows Buhari does not live the life of a billionaire so you can spin all your lies for gullible Nairalanders but the real world knows the truth.

Is it the Buhari whose I'll daughter died in an ordinary common Nigerian hospital that is living the life of billionaire.

The question is so stupid. Buhari is charismatic figure. There are many important people who believe in him and will support his presidential ambitions.

Why the so much desperation to tarnish the man's image.

And by the way, why are you and the OP disturbing us? If you think Buhari is corrupt, the burden to prove it should be on you.

If you can't prove that he is corrupt with citing of his glaring corrupt deeds, pls do us all a favour and shut up.

On the other hand, it's a small thing to prove that GEJ, IBB, Bode George, Atiku, and countless others are corrupt.
Why is Buhari's own any different?

Does the PDP Presidency love Buhari so much that the EFCC and never even made an attempt to interrogate him even once talk less of arresting him.

So if EFFC upon all the shouts of mischievous people like you cannot even find something to interrogate Buahri about, why should we listen whatever you and your likes have to say.

sfive: Vin no 1FMCU03165KA07418 .its 2005 not 2004

Then why not change the Title of your thread to reflect 2005. It definitely a 2005 because of the gearbox that is in between the seats.

In case you don't know how: hit the "modify" button and then make the necessary changes and hit the SUBMIT button.

These African leaders are crazy. Have they no sense of gravity or appropriateness? Can't they respond to issues with the eight amount of response?

Is gay act worse than arm robbery, murder, corruption and looting of national treasury? Why should give that life imprisonment? It is so crazy that it does not make any sense.

A one or two year jail term is appropriate. Others like having gay sex with an underage, a cripple or a person drugged should be treated as criminal cases of rape and child abuse.

of this is true then there is great need to make this PUBLIC INFORMATION.

How CME Lai Mohammed has not come about this. Maybe someone should send these information to APC website or mail so they can investigate the matter.

the former has not said any sensible thing. What is the new face of terrorism that was exposed.

concerning Modus Sheriff, the general agreement even amongst the people of Born is that he is sponsorer of Bokoharm.
But obviously he has fallen out with Boko-Haram because Boko-Haram has gone out of control, exceeding the mandate they had for it. so many people sponsoring Boko-Haram had ceased the funding to the monster they created. but guess what, the monster has grown and can now survive without their funds. It has new international friends that are up to the task.

that's why Boko-Haram attacked sine of Hus family as revenge.

why are sweating this? people shouldn't waste their time because the OP is DEFINITELY LIEING.

Aside from the fact that hardly can it happen that girlfriend will be demanding that a sister vacates front seat and go to the back for her to seat down, the OP also gave himself out the when he mentioned later on the thread that is girlfriend visits their house regularly and that has sister and girlfriend relates well.

The whole thing is just so absurd. It's a wife that can be concerned about sitting in the front seat, and that is even if it becomes a regular thing for her husband to have sister seat at the front and his wife at the same back.

Even Hardly will any wife make trouble over an occasional occurrence especially if she's in good rapport with the said sister.

is this not the Pastor who was accuses of telling an 18 year old boy to get the feaces from a strangled girl.....

also, is he not the man that said something like "God is a game; if you know how to play, you will prosper"

the man is not called of GOD

September 10 , 2014 ↔ no comments
Guest Writer Nonie Darwish
Writes An ISIS Speech for
Obama
Nonie Darwish

(Author’s note: The speech below was
written by me for Obama for one of his
upcoming addresses on ISIS. Hopefully he
will use it, because it is what America needs
to hear from our president today. Such a
speech is what the Muslim world needs to
hear instead of what it heard from Obama six
years ago in Cairo.)

http://www.politichicks.tv/column/guest-writer-nonie-darwish-writes-isis-speech-obama/

available

coogar: your writing argument makes no sense, young man!



so why are you arguing if you know all these things?



she will make a claim & the court would decide how much she's entitled to. if she was without kids, then she can make a clean break - ask for a certain amount of money in settlement once and for all but that isn't the case - kids are very involved!



your bush mentality has reared it's ugly head again. the divorce case is in the UK, not the US. in case you have no idea about world geography, the 2 countries are worlds apart. there's a universe of difference between the divorce laws in the UK & that of the US.



i should be asking you that question - why are you such a semi-illiterate? we are talking UK, you are bringing the USA into it.....what's the correlation?

You are just an obstinate idi.ot without any manners. I'm not answering you after this. Thank God you said she'll make her claim and not that the judge will make her claim for her.

Someone like you casting aspersion at Pastor Chris will be much worse than in a position of leadership. You will always find a way to justify yourself by twisting things.

What you have said in essence is this: Whenever a woman divorces a rich man in UK, whether the wife wants to or not, that even against her wish, the Judge will and always awards the woman fifty percent of the man's money and assets. WHAT KIND OF LIE IS THAT?

If that's the case why do some women even bother with expensive high profile lawyers to divorce their husbands? They should just look for any young man or woman who is already practising law. Abi now, since the end of the matter is already set in stone.

Like u said, write what you like, not answering you again. Your type never admit if they made a mistake or if they are wrong; must always prove themselves right.

Then what is it with the cursing?

Must you curse to make tour point?

coogar: stop using hypothetical terms like IF in a debate. jeeez, if your aunty had testiclës, she would have been your uncle. if means shyte - talk about reality.

Then can't you read. There are terms like alimony, child support. There is nothing which stops the court from making sure the children are catered for.



and i am telling you because young children are involved, she cannot speak for them. this is the UK, the government speaks for the kids. i am sure child protection agencies would work out the lifestyle of those children before the marriage break/up & apply the maintenance fee that would be commensurate. that's how the law works here. pastor anita cannot decide that - the law doesn't even trust her enough to know the best for her kids.

go & read more about UK's ancillary relief & put your village sense outside the door when trading words to me.



if the kids are under-18, the child support & maintenance fees get wired to the wife. it is because children are involved that st there's a half & half divorce policy in the first place. don't colour the argument with your after-thought sentiments or stop replying if you don't have a clue.

Please my writing argument are very clear, you only wish to twist them the way you like.

Of course the judge can and will award child support and maintenance. And of course if they husband has deep pockets, the amount of money awarded for those things will be high.

And it can be done without the wife collecting 50 percent of the husband net worth if SHE DOESN'T WANT IT. That's what we are trying to say and you just keep on repeating the same thing.

There are divorce cases in America which are not fought over in court because the wife and her lawyers are more than satisfied with the generous offer of the husband which caters both the wife and the children. Meanwhile some women are greedy and in fact that's their reason for marrying the man, to divorce him take half of his money.


Lord, why are people like this.

coogar: that's exactly what you said - you said she doesn't want more than 10% as if you are related to her. it's a divorce, not a love feast!



stop painting insane scenarios - there's nothing like such absurd reason. show us any precedence where this your absurd reason has happened before......this is not your usual family meeting in your village.



how is the children another matter in this particular case? is pastor anita barren? she doesn't have kids? are those kids not entitled to the lives they were once used to? until you stop using your village lens to view the world before you, i would continue to whip you into shape.

it's not about unreasonableness - it's your intransigence to take lessons from someone that knows better. pastor anita can never qualify for legal aid. she has a well-known profession - pastoring! so who's going to pick up her bill? the taxpayers?




she's not the one that will insist on whatever percentage - the judge would decide that after looking at the merits of the case. it's the divorce of a multi-millionaire pastor & his wife that also involves children.

if you think a UK judge would award anything less than 50% then the money spent on your education has been a waste - investing it in cocoa production would have been more rewarding.

Why are you lying like this? It's very clear from my writings I'm saying IF IF IF that's what she wants. How can I say that's what she wants? Do her know her mind? Am I confidant. Please stop lying just to win an argument It's plain for anyone to see in my writeup that I never said that.

Then can't you read. There are terms like alimony, child support. There is nothing which stops the court from making sure the children are catered for.

If for instance a wife wants to divorce her husband who is rich and worth 100 million dollars. And the husband through his lawyers offer the wife 10 million dollars. If she's not there greedy type she can say, ten millions dollars is a lot of money.
That's enough for me. In fact its more than I need for a lifetime and she accepts it. Are you saying the judge or lawyer will say it's a lie, no you can't do that. You must collect 50 million dollars. That is just ridiculous; and you're insisting on it.

And do you know most times, alimony/child support are worked out apart from what the wife receives.

Stop your cursing and obstinate unreasonableness.

coogar: stop embarrassing yourself on a public forum. how is pastor anita different from the millions of women that have taken what they are fully-entitled to take? you make it sound like she would be breaking the law if she does - it's her rights to take.

UK law recognises she must have been used to a particular lifestyle & her divorce should not rob her of that lifestyle....she would get handsomely rewarded whether she wants it or not especially when children are involved.



the lawyers will charge according to the size of whom the divorce petition is against. a cursory glance on the internet would tell any lawyer who pastor chris is - she would be lucky to pay less than £2,000 per hour to any law practitioner representing her. it's going to be a complex case as there are too many things involved.



which law firm does not want money? even if she insists she doesn't want it, can she speak for the children? you need to brush up on family law before misinforming the public. it's the court that would protect the children, not pastor anita's sentiments & emotions.

I don't know why people like to twist things. Did I say it's not her right? Did I say she's different from other women?

But of some ABSURD reason she says she doesn't want anything for herself, that's the way it will be. Stop making it seem like she does not have a CHOICE in the matter.

The children is another matter all the together. You making sound like any woman that divorces in UK or US is under compulsion to take her husband for half of what's he's got. IT'S SIMPLY NOT TRUE. But your unreasonableness won't let accept this simple thing just for the sake of winning argument.

The interest of the children can be well taken care of without her insisting of 50 percent if she doesn't want to. I'm not a lawyer but I believe that's what stuff like alimony and child support are for. The court can of course do their duty on this.

coogar: your propensity to stretch the borders of daftness is peerless. you are the one chatting balderdash - how am i even sure you have been within the 4 walls of a school?



isn't that a different case entirely. it's all about who is more well-off. in cases of poor people, there's legal aid in the UK that will pick the cost. pastor anita is well-known - she can never qualify for legal aid & her being a famous woman means the case would be high profile.



how would she pay the law firm when lawyers charge according to the size of their client's pocket size? divorce process takes about 6 months in the UK - that is if both parties mutually agree to end things amicably & some lawyers charge as high as £500 per hour.



this got nothing to do with her - fees must be paid.

None of what you've said is equal to: your Law firm can dictate to you the percentage you must claim from your husband. The law is there and it allows any woman to claim up to 50 percent if she so wish. Stop making it seem as if its a requirement in divorce cases. It just so happens most women will definitely take advantage of the law. Who settle for less when you can get more.

Actually lawyers charge firstly according to their reputation although the size of the clients pocket maybe a factor.

But the first factor is their legal reputation. If you go to a first class or high profile lawyer, like a SAN, you'll get charged SAN fees. There is a lawyer for everyone.

If for instance, Pastor Anita says to herself, I want to prove a point that this is not about money, I don't want anything, she'll definitely be able to get a lawyer for herself that she can pay for the service. If she doesn't want anything, why would she needs a high profile lawyer. The lawyer is simply going to court for a separation and no other demand. infact, such a case would be fast.

I don't know why people like to insist on what is not.

Intact, do you know that if both husband and wife have no demand of each other and both side are in agreement, all they need to do is to both sign divorce papers. The rest will just be formalty that will be handled by their lawyers.

They may only have to appear in court so that the judge can physically see them and confirm that this is indeed their wish. That is for record purpose. So that no one will be able to claim something else later.

coogar: how would they get paid if she wants 10%. why would the state award her 10% because that's what she wants? you think this is a family meeting in agbor? she would get 50%, her lawyers would get a commission from her reward(between 5-10%)

she can decide to give it back to him after getting paid. the law wouldn't act otherwise because she wants it so. if she's not ready for divorce, what's she doing in the court in the first place?

Please stop spewing nonsense. No law firm can't dictate to you how much you must claim from your husband against your wish.

Aren't women that divorce in UK whose husband are worth nothing and are even a liability to them. The lawyers gets paid their fees; where will the commission come from.

If a woman likes, she can say she's divorcing and wants nothing. As long as she's able to afford the fees of the law firm she went to, that's the end of the matter.

Yes, in divorce high net worth husbands, lawyers do defer fees and say they'll get so and so commission of whatever amount they are able to help her obtain from her husband. But this only happens by mutual agreement and its not a must. She can well say she wants nothing and will pay them their legal charges for service rendered.

You're wrong.

coogar: oh that?
they are no longer together - they have been unable to resolve their issues so it's only right he comes out with the truth that the woman was never spiritually chosen by God before someone like you decides to take spiritual matters to her.

it's only a disclaimer as far as pastor chris is concerned - it's not to insult her.



this is the UK, my friend.
every woman gets half - it doesn't matter where you hail from or whose ox would be gored. wives of russian billionaires have brought their divorce cases to the UK & they all got handsomely rewarded. the only reason any woman would take a divorce case to the UK(especially) is for the humongous reward - nothing else!

you can quote me on this anywhere.




this is not about what she would be demanding - it's about what she would get. her reward is directly proportional to the commission her barristers would get - so do the math!

thank God you said "wives of russian billionaires have brought their divorce cases to the UK & they all got handsomely rewarded".

She is not bringing her divorce from somewhere to the UK. UK is her home and she has lived with her two daughters for the past sixteen years. So where else will she file it. You really don't have point here.

She can either file in Nigeria or UK. Why should she come and sit down in Nigeria and leave her daughters.

Then her lawyers can't force her in what she demands or choose to demand. If she says she wants only ten percent if his worth, there is nothing she can do about that. She can even halfway through the divorce says she's not divorcing again that she has decided she still wants to stay with her husband.

So please stop implying things that are wrong. As long the lawyers are paid their fees, that is it.

Then the UK court can only exercise control over the Pastor Chris assets and money that is inside their system. They can't do anything about his worth in Nigeria.

Eruditor: She wants to be taken care of?

I wish I can tell you about monies that she has given to help many women and children around the world. You would faint I tell you.

I never said she is not generous. That also doesn't mean she will not see to her financial need. Or is she going to be living on water after she leave the Ministry? She has not done any secular work since she married Chris. is it now that she wants to start.

Please stop twisting everything. She will want to be taken care of. She's a woman used to a certain standard if living.